1 # Contributing to Cabal
3 Building Cabal for hacking
4 --------------------------
6 If you use the `cabal` executable from the latest version of the
7 [cabal-install](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/cabal-install) package
8 published on Hackage, it is sufficient to run:
14 If you have trouble building the testsuite for this initial build, try building
15 with the release project that excludes this testsuite:
18 $ cabal build cabal --project-file=cabal.release.project
22 > The default `cabal.project` is picked up implicitly as if the
23 > `--project-file=cabal.project` explicit option had been given.
25 For developing, we recommend using the locally built version of `cabal`, the
26 executable, if only because one of the released versions available may be
27 lacking a fix. This can be installed:
30 $ cabal install cabal-install:exe:cabal --overwrite-policy=always
33 It can be run without first installing it with `cabal run cabal --` followed by
34 its own arguments, as shown here for `build --help`:
37 $ cabal run cabal -- build --help
41 > If you're using Nix, you might find it convenient to work within a shell that has the following `Cabal` development dependencies:
43 > $ nix-shell -p cabal-install ghc ghcid pkg-config zlib.dev # incomplete
45 > One dependency that we left out in the above command is `haskellPackages.fourmolu_0_12_0_0` which would need to be installed manually.
46 > A Nix flake developer shell with these dependencies is also available, supported solely by the community, through the command `nix develop github:yvan-sraka/cabal.nix`.
48 The location of your build products will vary depending on which version of
49 cabal-install you use to build; see the documentation section
50 [Where are my build products?](http://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/latest/nix-local-build.html#where-are-my-build-products)
51 to find the binary (or just run `find -type f -executable -name cabal`).
53 Here are some other useful variations on the commands:
56 $ cabal build Cabal # build library only
57 $ cabal build Cabal-tests:unit-tests # build Cabal's unit test suite
58 $ cabal build cabal-tests # etc...
64 **Using GitHub Actions.**
65 If you are not in a hurry, the most convenient way to run tests on Cabal
66 is to make a branch on GitHub and then open a pull request; our
67 continuous integration service on GitHub Actions builds and
68 tests your code. Title your PR with WIP so we know that it does not need
71 Some tips for using GitHub Actions effectively:
73 * GitHub Actions builds take a long time. Use them when you are pretty
74 sure everything is OK; otherwise, try to run relevant tests locally
77 * If you are only changing documentation in the `docs/` subdirectory,
78 or if you change `README.md` or `CONTRIBUTING.md`, then we only run a
79 small subset of the CI jobs. You can therefore open small PRs with
80 improvements to the documentation without feeling guilty about wasted
83 * Watch over your jobs on the [GitHub Actions website](http://github.org/haskell/cabal/actions).
84 If you know a build of yours is going to fail (because one job has
85 already failed), be nice to others and cancel the rest of the jobs,
86 so that other commits on the build queue can be processed.
88 **How to debug a failing CI test.**
89 One of the annoying things about running tests on CI is when they
90 fail, there is often no easy way to further troubleshoot the broken
91 build. Here are some guidelines for debugging continuous integration
94 1. Can you tell what the problem is by looking at the logs? The
95 `cabal-testsuite` tests run with `-v` logging by default, which
96 is dumped to the log upon failure; you may be able to figure out
97 what the problem is directly this way.
99 2. Can you reproduce the problem by running the test locally?
100 See the next section for how to run the various test suites
101 on your local machine.
103 3. Is the test failing only for a specific version of GHC, or
104 a specific operating system? If so, try reproducing the
105 problem on the specific configuration.
107 4. Is the test failing on a GitHub Actions per-GHC build.
108 In this case, if you click on "Branch", you can get access to
109 the precise binaries that were built by GitHub Actions that are being
110 tested. If you have an Ubuntu system, you can download
111 the binaries and run them directly.
113 If none of these let you reproduce, there might be some race condition
114 or continuous integration breakage; please file a bug.
116 **Running tests locally.**
117 To run tests locally with `cabal`, you will need to know the
118 name of the test suite you want. Cabal and cabal-install have
119 several. Also, you'll want to read [Where are my build products?](http://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/latest/nix-local-build.html#where-are-my-build-products)
121 The most important test suite is `cabal-testsuite`: most user-visible
122 changes to Cabal should come with a test in this framework. See
123 [cabal-testsuite/README.md](cabal-testsuite/README.md) for more
124 information about how to run tests and write new ones. Quick
125 start: use `cabal-tests` to run `Cabal` tests, and `cabal-tests
126 --with-cabal=/path/to/cabal` to run `cabal-install` tests
127 (don't forget `--with-cabal`! Your cabal-install tests won't
130 There are also other test suites:
132 * `Cabal-tests:unit-tests` are small, quick-running unit tests
133 on small pieces of functionality in Cabal. If you are working
134 on some utility functions in the Cabal library you should run this
137 * `cabal-install:unit-tests` are small, quick-running unit tests on
138 small pieces of functionality in cabal-install. If you are working
139 on some utility functions in cabal-install you should run this test
142 * `cabal-install:long-tests` are QuickCheck tests on
143 cabal-install's dependency solver, VCS, and file monitoring code.
144 If you are working on the solver you should run this test suite.
146 * `cabal-install:integration-tests2` are integration tests on some
147 top-level API functions inside the `cabal-install` source code.
149 For these test executables, `-p` which applies a regex filter to the test
150 names. When running `cabal-install` test suites, one need only use `cabal test` or
151 `cabal run <test-target>` in order to test locally.
156 Manual Quality Assurance (QA) is performed to ensure that the changes impacting
157 the command-line interface, whether adding or modifying a behaviour,
158 are tested before being released. This allows us to catch UX regressions and put
159 a human perspective into testing.
161 Contributions that touch `cabal-install` are expected to include notes for the QA team.
162 They are a description of an expected result upon calling `cabal-install` with certain parameters,
163 and should be written in the body of the ticket or PR under their own heading, like this:
169 > Calling `cabal haddock-project` should produce documentation for the whole cabal project with the following defaults enabled:
170 > * Documentation lives in ./haddocks
171 > * The file `./haddocks/index.html` should exist
173 Manual QA is not expected to find every possible bug, but to really challenge the assumptions of the contributor, and to verify that their own testing
174 of their patch is not influenced by their setup or implicit knowledge of the system.
180 We use automated formatting with Fourmolu to enforce a unified style across the code bases. It is checked in the CI process.
181 After installing Fourmolu 0.12, there are some makefile targets to help formatting
185 * `make style` - Format the `Cabal`, `Cabal-syntax` and `cabal-install` directories.
186 * `make style-modified` - Format files modified in the current tree.
187 * `make style-commit COMMIT=<ref>` - Format files modified between HEAD and the given reference.
189 Whitespace Conventions
190 ----------------------
192 We use automated whitespace convention checking. Violations can be fixed by
193 running [fix-whitespace](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/fix-whitespace). If
194 you push a fix of a whitespace violation, please do so in a _separate commit_.
199 * Format your commit messages [in the standard way](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/#seven-rules).
201 * A lot of Cabal does not have top-level comments. We are trying to
202 fix this. If you add new top-level definitions, please Haddock them;
203 and if you spend some time understanding what a function does, help
204 us out and add a comment. We'll try to remind you during code review.
206 * If you do something tricky or non-obvious, add a comment.
208 * For local imports (Cabal module importing Cabal module), import lists
209 are NOT required (although you may use them at your discretion.) For
210 third-party and standard library imports, please use either qualified imports
211 or explicit import lists.
213 * You can use basically any GHC extension supported by a GHC in our
214 support window, except Template Haskell, which would cause
215 bootstrapping problems in the GHC compilation process.
217 * Our GHC support window is five years for the Cabal library and three
218 years for cabal-install: that is, the Cabal library must be
219 buildable out-of-the-box with the dependencies that shipped with GHC
220 for at least five years. GitHub Actions checks this, so most
221 developers submit a PR to see if their code works on all these
222 versions of GHC. `cabal-install` must also be buildable on all
223 supported GHCs, although it does not have to be buildable
224 out-of-the-box. Instead, the `cabal-install/bootstrap.sh` script
225 must be able to download and install all of the dependencies (this
226 is also checked by CI). Also, self-upgrade to the latest version
227 (i.e. `cabal install cabal-install`) must work with all versions of
228 `cabal-install` released during the last three years.
230 * `Cabal` has its own Prelude, in `Distribution.Compat.Prelude`,
231 that provides a compatibility layer and exports some commonly
232 used additional functions. Use it in all new modules.
234 * As far as possible, please do not use CPP. If you must use it,
235 try to put it in a `Compat` module, and minimize the amount of code
236 that is enclosed by CPP. For example, prefer:
239 #ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS
248 #ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS
257 GitHub Ticket Conventions
260 Each major `Cabal`/`cabal-install` release (e.g. 3.4, 3.6, etc.) has a
261 corresponding GitHub Project and milestone. A ticket is included in a release's
262 project if the release managers are tentatively planning on including a fix for
263 the ticket in the release, i.e. if they are actively seeking someone to work on
266 By contrast, a ticket is milestoned to a given release if we are open to
267 accepting a fix in that release, i.e. we would very much appreciate someone
268 working on it, but are not committing to actively sourcing someone to work on
271 GitHub Pull Request Conventions
274 Every (non-backport) pull request has to go through a review and get 2
275 approvals. After this is done, the author of the pull request is expected to add
276 any final touches they deem important and put the `merge me` label on the pull
277 request. If the author lacks permissions to apply labels, they are welcome to
278 explicitly signal the merge intent on the discussion thread of the pull request,
279 at which point others (e.g., reviewers) apply the label. Merge buttons are
280 reserved for exceptional situations, e.g., CI fixes being iterated on or
281 backports/patches that need to be expedited for a release.
283 Currently there is a 2 day buffer for potential extra feedback between the last
284 update of a pull request (e.g. a commit, a rebase, an addition of the `merge me`
285 label) and the moment the Mergify bot picks up the pull request for a merge.
287 If your pull request consists of several commits, consider using `squash+merge
288 me` instead of `merge me`: the Mergify bot will squash all the commits into one
289 and concatenate the commit messages of the commits before merging.
291 There is also a `merge+no rebase` label. Use this very sparingly, as not rebasing
292 severely complicates Git history. It is intended for special circumstances, as when
293 the PR branch cannot or should not be modified. If you have any questions about it,
296 ### Pull Requests & Issues
298 A pull request *fixes* a problem that is *described* in an issue. Make sure to
299 file an issue before opening a pull request. In the issue you can illustrate
300 your proposed design, UX considerations, tradeoffs etc. and work them out with
301 other contributors. The PR itself is for implementation.
303 If a PR becomes out of sync with its issue, go back to the issue, update
304 it, and continue the conversation there. Telltale signs of Issue/PR diverging
305 are, for example: the PR growing bigger in scope; lengthy discussions
306 about things that are *not* implementation choices; a change in design.
308 If your PR is trivial you can omit this process (but explain in the PR why you
309 think it does not warrant an issue). Feel free to open a new issue (or new
310 issues) when appropriate.
316 Anything that changes `cabal-install:exe:cabal` or changes exports from library
317 modules or changes behaviour of functions exported from packages published to
318 hackage is a <a id="user-visible-change">user-visible change</a>. Raising the
319 lower bound on `base` is most definitely a user-visible change because it
320 excludes versions of GHC from being able to build these packages.
322 When opening a pull request with a user-visible change, you should write one
323 changelog entry (or more in case of multiple independent changes) — the
324 information will end up in our release notes.
326 Changelogs for the next release are stored in the `changelog.d` directory.
327 The files follow a simple key-value format similar to the one for `.cabal` files.
328 Free-form text fields (`synopsis` and `description`) allow Markdown markup — please,
329 use markup to make our release notes more readable.
334 synopsis: Add feature xyz
335 packages: cabal-install
338 significance: significant
348 Only the `synopsis` and `prs` fields are required, but you should also set the others where applicable.
350 | Field | Description |
351 | ----- | ----------- |
352 | `synopsis` | Brief description of the change. Often just the pr title. |
353 | `description` | Longer description, with a list of sub-changes. Not needed for small/atomic changes. |
354 | `packages` | Packages affected by the change (`cabal-install`, `Cabal`...). Omit if it's an overarching or non-package change. |
355 | `prs` | Space-separated hash-prefixed pull request numbers containing the change (usually just one). |
356 | `issues` | Space-separated hash-prefixed issue numbers that the change fixes/closes/affects. |
357 | `significance` | Set to `significant` if the change is significant, that is if it warrants being put near the top of the changelog. |
359 You can find a large number of real-world examples of changelog files
360 [here](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/tree/bc83de27569fda22dbe1e10be1a921bebf4d3430/changelog.d).
362 At release time, the entries will be merged with
363 [this tool](https://github.com/fgaz/changelog-d).
365 In addition, if you're changing the `.cabal` file format specification you should
366 add an entry in `doc/file-format-changelog.rst`.
371 There are a few main venues of communication:
373 * Most developers subscribe to receive messages from [all issues](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues); issues can be used to [open discussion](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+custom+label%3A%22type%3A+discussion%22). If you know someone who should hear about a message, CC them explicitly using the @username GitHub syntax.
375 * For more organizational concerns, the [mailing
376 list](http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel) is used.
378 * Many developers idle on `#hackage` on [`irc.libera.chat`](https://libera.chat). The `#ghc` channel is also a decently good bet.
379 * You can join the channel using a web client, even anonymously: https://web.libera.chat/#hackage
380 * Alternatively you can join it using [matrix](https://matrix.org/): https://matrix.to/#/#hackage:libera.chat
385 Notes for how to make a release are at the
386 wiki page ["Making a release"](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/wiki/Making-a-release).
387 Currently, [@emilypi](https://github.com/emilypi), [@fgaz](https://github.com/fgaz) and [@Mikolaj](https://github.com/Mikolaj) have access to
388 `haskell.org/cabal`, and [@Mikolaj](https://github.com/Mikolaj) is the point of contact for getting
394 We make preview releases available to facilitate testing of development builds.
396 Artifacts can be found on the [`cabal-head` release page](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/releases/tag/cabal-head).
397 The Validate CI pipeline generates tarballs with a `cabal` executable. The executable gets uploaded to this release by the pipelines that run on `master`.
399 We currently make available builds for:
400 - Linux, dynamically linked (requiring `zlib`, `gmp`, `glibc`)
401 - Linux, statically linked
405 The statically linked Linux executables are built using Alpine.
406 To reproduce these locally, set up an Alpine build environment using GHCup,
407 and then build by calling `cabal build cabal-install --enable-executable-static`.
413 Auto-generated API documentation for the `master` branch of Cabal is automatically uploaded here: http://haskell.github.io/cabal-website/doc/html/Cabal/.
415 ## Issue triage [![Open Source Helpers](https://www.codetriage.com/haskell/cabal/badges/users.svg)](https://www.codetriage.com/haskell/cabal)
417 You can contribute by triaging issues which may include reproducing bug reports or asking for vital information, such as version numbers or reproduction instructions. If you would like to start triaging issues, one easy way to get started is to [subscribe to cabal on CodeTriage](https://www.codetriage.com/haskell/cabal).
422 We are reactive rather than proactive with revising bounds on our dependencies
423 for code already released on Hackage. If you would benefit from a version bump,
424 please, open a ticket and get familiar with
425 [our revision policy](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/9531#issuecomment-1866930240).
427 The burden of proof that the bump is harmless remains with you, but we have a CI
428 setup to show that our main pipeline ("Validate") is fine with the bump. To use
429 it, someone with enough permissions needs to go on the
430 [Validate workflow page](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/actions/workflows/validate.yml)
431 and dispatch it manually by clicking "Run workflow".
433 Running workflow manually as discussed above allows you to supply two inputs:
438 Going via an example, imagine that Cabal only allows `tar` or version less then
439 or equal to 0.6, and you want to bump it to 0.6. Then, to show that Validate
440 succeeds with `tar` 0.6, you should input
442 - `tar` to the "allow-newer line"
443 - `tar ==0.6` to the "constraints line"
445 Hopefully, running the Validate pipeline with these inputs succeeds and you
446 supply the link to the run in the ticket about bumping the bound and making a revision.
448 If interested in technical details, refer to the parts of `validate.yml` that
449 mention `hackage-revisions`.