2 * Budget Fair Queueing (BFQ) I/O scheduler.
4 * Based on ideas and code from CFQ:
5 * Copyright (C) 2003 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
7 * Copyright (C) 2008 Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>
8 * Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
10 * Copyright (C) 2010 Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
11 * Arianna Avanzini <avanzini@google.com>
13 * Copyright (C) 2017 Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
15 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
16 * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
17 * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
18 * License, or (at your option) any later version.
20 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
21 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
22 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
23 * General Public License for more details.
25 * BFQ is a proportional-share I/O scheduler, with some extra
26 * low-latency capabilities. BFQ also supports full hierarchical
27 * scheduling through cgroups. Next paragraphs provide an introduction
28 * on BFQ inner workings. Details on BFQ benefits, usage and
29 * limitations can be found in Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt.
31 * BFQ is a proportional-share storage-I/O scheduling algorithm based
32 * on the slice-by-slice service scheme of CFQ. But BFQ assigns
33 * budgets, measured in number of sectors, to processes instead of
34 * time slices. The device is not granted to the in-service process
35 * for a given time slice, but until it has exhausted its assigned
36 * budget. This change from the time to the service domain enables BFQ
37 * to distribute the device throughput among processes as desired,
38 * without any distortion due to throughput fluctuations, or to device
39 * internal queueing. BFQ uses an ad hoc internal scheduler, called
40 * B-WF2Q+, to schedule processes according to their budgets. More
41 * precisely, BFQ schedules queues associated with processes. Each
42 * process/queue is assigned a user-configurable weight, and B-WF2Q+
43 * guarantees that each queue receives a fraction of the throughput
44 * proportional to its weight. Thanks to the accurate policy of
45 * B-WF2Q+, BFQ can afford to assign high budgets to I/O-bound
46 * processes issuing sequential requests (to boost the throughput),
47 * and yet guarantee a low latency to interactive and soft real-time
50 * In particular, to provide these low-latency guarantees, BFQ
51 * explicitly privileges the I/O of two classes of time-sensitive
52 * applications: interactive and soft real-time. This feature enables
53 * BFQ to provide applications in these classes with a very low
54 * latency. Finally, BFQ also features additional heuristics for
55 * preserving both a low latency and a high throughput on NCQ-capable,
56 * rotational or flash-based devices, and to get the job done quickly
57 * for applications consisting in many I/O-bound processes.
59 * NOTE: if the main or only goal, with a given device, is to achieve
60 * the maximum-possible throughput at all times, then do switch off
61 * all low-latency heuristics for that device, by setting low_latency
64 * BFQ is described in [1], where also a reference to the initial, more
65 * theoretical paper on BFQ can be found. The interested reader can find
66 * in the latter paper full details on the main algorithm, as well as
67 * formulas of the guarantees and formal proofs of all the properties.
68 * With respect to the version of BFQ presented in these papers, this
69 * implementation adds a few more heuristics, such as the one that
70 * guarantees a low latency to soft real-time applications, and a
71 * hierarchical extension based on H-WF2Q+.
73 * B-WF2Q+ is based on WF2Q+, which is described in [2], together with
74 * H-WF2Q+, while the augmented tree used here to implement B-WF2Q+
75 * with O(log N) complexity derives from the one introduced with EEVDF
78 * [1] P. Valente, A. Avanzini, "Evolution of the BFQ Storage I/O
79 * Scheduler", Proceedings of the First Workshop on Mobile System
80 * Technologies (MST-2015), May 2015.
81 * http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/mst-2015.pdf
83 * [2] Jon C.R. Bennett and H. Zhang, "Hierarchical Packet Fair Queueing
84 * Algorithms", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(5):675-689,
87 * http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/papers/TON-97-Oct.ps.gz
89 * [3] I. Stoica and H. Abdel-Wahab, "Earliest Eligible Virtual Deadline
90 * First: A Flexible and Accurate Mechanism for Proportional Share
91 * Resource Allocation", technical report.
93 * http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~istoica/papers/eevdf-tr-95.pdf
95 #include <linux/module.h>
96 #include <linux/slab.h>
97 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
98 #include <linux/cgroup.h>
99 #include <linux/elevator.h>
100 #include <linux/ktime.h>
101 #include <linux/rbtree.h>
102 #include <linux/ioprio.h>
103 #include <linux/sbitmap.h>
104 #include <linux/delay.h>
108 #include "blk-mq-tag.h"
109 #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
110 #include "bfq-iosched.h"
112 #define BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(name) \
113 void bfq_mark_bfqq_##name(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
115 __set_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
117 void bfq_clear_bfqq_##name(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
119 __clear_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
121 int bfq_bfqq_##name(const struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
123 return test_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
126 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(just_created
);
128 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(wait_request
);
129 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(non_blocking_wait_rq
);
130 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(fifo_expire
);
131 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(idle_window
);
133 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(IO_bound
);
134 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(in_large_burst
);
136 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(split_coop
);
137 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(softrt_update
);
138 #undef BFQ_BFQQ_FNS \
140 /* Expiration time of sync (0) and async (1) requests, in ns. */
141 static const u64 bfq_fifo_expire
[2] = { NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 4, NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 8 };
143 /* Maximum backwards seek (magic number lifted from CFQ), in KiB. */
144 static const int bfq_back_max
= 16 * 1024;
146 /* Penalty of a backwards seek, in number of sectors. */
147 static const int bfq_back_penalty
= 2;
149 /* Idling period duration, in ns. */
150 static u64 bfq_slice_idle
= NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 125;
152 /* Minimum number of assigned budgets for which stats are safe to compute. */
153 static const int bfq_stats_min_budgets
= 194;
155 /* Default maximum budget values, in sectors and number of requests. */
156 static const int bfq_default_max_budget
= 16 * 1024;
159 * Async to sync throughput distribution is controlled as follows:
160 * when an async request is served, the entity is charged the number
161 * of sectors of the request, multiplied by the factor below
163 static const int bfq_async_charge_factor
= 10;
165 /* Default timeout values, in jiffies, approximating CFQ defaults. */
166 const int bfq_timeout
= HZ
/ 8;
168 static struct kmem_cache
*bfq_pool
;
170 /* Below this threshold (in ns), we consider thinktime immediate. */
171 #define BFQ_MIN_TT (2 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
173 /* hw_tag detection: parallel requests threshold and min samples needed. */
174 #define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD 4
175 #define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES 32
177 #define BFQQ_SEEK_THR (sector_t)(8 * 100)
178 #define BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT (sector_t)(2 * 32)
179 #define BFQQ_CLOSE_THR (sector_t)(8 * 1024)
180 #define BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) (hweight32(bfqq->seek_history) > 32/8)
182 /* Min number of samples required to perform peak-rate update */
183 #define BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES 32
184 /* Min observation time interval required to perform a peak-rate update (ns) */
185 #define BFQ_RATE_MIN_INTERVAL (300*NSEC_PER_MSEC)
186 /* Target observation time interval for a peak-rate update (ns) */
187 #define BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL NSEC_PER_SEC
189 /* Shift used for peak rate fixed precision calculations. */
190 #define BFQ_RATE_SHIFT 16
193 * By default, BFQ computes the duration of the weight raising for
194 * interactive applications automatically, using the following formula:
195 * duration = (R / r) * T, where r is the peak rate of the device, and
196 * R and T are two reference parameters.
197 * In particular, R is the peak rate of the reference device (see below),
198 * and T is a reference time: given the systems that are likely to be
199 * installed on the reference device according to its speed class, T is
200 * about the maximum time needed, under BFQ and while reading two files in
201 * parallel, to load typical large applications on these systems.
202 * In practice, the slower/faster the device at hand is, the more/less it
203 * takes to load applications with respect to the reference device.
204 * Accordingly, the longer/shorter BFQ grants weight raising to interactive
207 * BFQ uses four different reference pairs (R, T), depending on:
208 * . whether the device is rotational or non-rotational;
209 * . whether the device is slow, such as old or portable HDDs, as well as
210 * SD cards, or fast, such as newer HDDs and SSDs.
212 * The device's speed class is dynamically (re)detected in
213 * bfq_update_peak_rate() every time the estimated peak rate is updated.
215 * In the following definitions, R_slow[0]/R_fast[0] and
216 * T_slow[0]/T_fast[0] are the reference values for a slow/fast
217 * rotational device, whereas R_slow[1]/R_fast[1] and
218 * T_slow[1]/T_fast[1] are the reference values for a slow/fast
219 * non-rotational device. Finally, device_speed_thresh are the
220 * thresholds used to switch between speed classes. The reference
221 * rates are not the actual peak rates of the devices used as a
222 * reference, but slightly lower values. The reason for using these
223 * slightly lower values is that the peak-rate estimator tends to
224 * yield slightly lower values than the actual peak rate (it can yield
225 * the actual peak rate only if there is only one process doing I/O,
226 * and the process does sequential I/O).
228 * Both the reference peak rates and the thresholds are measured in
229 * sectors/usec, left-shifted by BFQ_RATE_SHIFT.
231 static int R_slow
[2] = {1000, 10700};
232 static int R_fast
[2] = {14000, 33000};
234 * To improve readability, a conversion function is used to initialize the
235 * following arrays, which entails that they can be initialized only in a
238 static int T_slow
[2];
239 static int T_fast
[2];
240 static int device_speed_thresh
[2];
242 #define RQ_BIC(rq) ((struct bfq_io_cq *) (rq)->elv.priv[0])
243 #define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1])
245 struct bfq_queue
*bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool is_sync
)
247 return bic
->bfqq
[is_sync
];
250 void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, bool is_sync
)
252 bic
->bfqq
[is_sync
] = bfqq
;
255 struct bfq_data
*bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
257 return bic
->icq
.q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
261 * icq_to_bic - convert iocontext queue structure to bfq_io_cq.
262 * @icq: the iocontext queue.
264 static struct bfq_io_cq
*icq_to_bic(struct io_cq
*icq
)
266 /* bic->icq is the first member, %NULL will convert to %NULL */
267 return container_of(icq
, struct bfq_io_cq
, icq
);
271 * bfq_bic_lookup - search into @ioc a bic associated to @bfqd.
272 * @bfqd: the lookup key.
273 * @ioc: the io_context of the process doing I/O.
274 * @q: the request queue.
276 static struct bfq_io_cq
*bfq_bic_lookup(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
277 struct io_context
*ioc
,
278 struct request_queue
*q
)
282 struct bfq_io_cq
*icq
;
284 spin_lock_irqsave(q
->queue_lock
, flags
);
285 icq
= icq_to_bic(ioc_lookup_icq(ioc
, q
));
286 spin_unlock_irqrestore(q
->queue_lock
, flags
);
295 * Scheduler run of queue, if there are requests pending and no one in the
296 * driver that will restart queueing.
298 void bfq_schedule_dispatch(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
300 if (bfqd
->queued
!= 0) {
301 bfq_log(bfqd
, "schedule dispatch");
302 blk_mq_run_hw_queues(bfqd
->queue
, true);
306 #define bfq_class_idle(bfqq) ((bfqq)->ioprio_class == IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE)
307 #define bfq_class_rt(bfqq) ((bfqq)->ioprio_class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
309 #define bfq_sample_valid(samples) ((samples) > 80)
312 * Lifted from AS - choose which of rq1 and rq2 that is best served now.
313 * We choose the request that is closesr to the head right now. Distance
314 * behind the head is penalized and only allowed to a certain extent.
316 static struct request
*bfq_choose_req(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
321 sector_t s1
, s2
, d1
= 0, d2
= 0;
322 unsigned long back_max
;
323 #define BFQ_RQ1_WRAP 0x01 /* request 1 wraps */
324 #define BFQ_RQ2_WRAP 0x02 /* request 2 wraps */
325 unsigned int wrap
= 0; /* bit mask: requests behind the disk head? */
327 if (!rq1
|| rq1
== rq2
)
332 if (rq_is_sync(rq1
) && !rq_is_sync(rq2
))
334 else if (rq_is_sync(rq2
) && !rq_is_sync(rq1
))
336 if ((rq1
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
) && !(rq2
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
))
338 else if ((rq2
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
) && !(rq1
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
))
341 s1
= blk_rq_pos(rq1
);
342 s2
= blk_rq_pos(rq2
);
345 * By definition, 1KiB is 2 sectors.
347 back_max
= bfqd
->bfq_back_max
* 2;
350 * Strict one way elevator _except_ in the case where we allow
351 * short backward seeks which are biased as twice the cost of a
352 * similar forward seek.
356 else if (s1
+ back_max
>= last
)
357 d1
= (last
- s1
) * bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
;
359 wrap
|= BFQ_RQ1_WRAP
;
363 else if (s2
+ back_max
>= last
)
364 d2
= (last
- s2
) * bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
;
366 wrap
|= BFQ_RQ2_WRAP
;
368 /* Found required data */
371 * By doing switch() on the bit mask "wrap" we avoid having to
372 * check two variables for all permutations: --> faster!
375 case 0: /* common case for CFQ: rq1 and rq2 not wrapped */
390 case BFQ_RQ1_WRAP
|BFQ_RQ2_WRAP
: /* both rqs wrapped */
393 * Since both rqs are wrapped,
394 * start with the one that's further behind head
395 * (--> only *one* back seek required),
396 * since back seek takes more time than forward.
405 static struct bfq_queue
*
406 bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct rb_root
*root
,
407 sector_t sector
, struct rb_node
**ret_parent
,
408 struct rb_node
***rb_link
)
410 struct rb_node
**p
, *parent
;
411 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= NULL
;
419 bfqq
= rb_entry(parent
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
422 * Sort strictly based on sector. Smallest to the left,
423 * largest to the right.
425 if (sector
> blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
))
427 else if (sector
< blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
))
435 *ret_parent
= parent
;
439 bfq_log(bfqd
, "rq_pos_tree_lookup %llu: returning %d",
440 (unsigned long long)sector
,
441 bfqq
? bfqq
->pid
: 0);
446 void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
448 struct rb_node
**p
, *parent
;
449 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
451 if (bfqq
->pos_root
) {
452 rb_erase(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
453 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
456 if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
461 bfqq
->pos_root
= &bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(bfqq
)->rq_pos_tree
;
462 __bfqq
= bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(bfqd
, bfqq
->pos_root
,
463 blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
), &parent
, &p
);
465 rb_link_node(&bfqq
->pos_node
, parent
, p
);
466 rb_insert_color(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
468 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
472 * Tell whether there are active queues or groups with differentiated weights.
474 static bool bfq_differentiated_weights(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
477 * For weights to differ, at least one of the trees must contain
478 * at least two nodes.
480 return (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
) &&
481 (bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_left
||
482 bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_right
)
483 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
485 (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd
->group_weights_tree
) &&
486 (bfqd
->group_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_left
||
487 bfqd
->group_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_right
)
493 * The following function returns true if every queue must receive the
494 * same share of the throughput (this condition is used when deciding
495 * whether idling may be disabled, see the comments in the function
496 * bfq_bfqq_may_idle()).
498 * Such a scenario occurs when:
499 * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
500 * 2) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
502 * 3) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
503 * number of children.
505 * Unfortunately, keeping the necessary state for evaluating exactly the
506 * above symmetry conditions would be quite complex and time-consuming.
507 * Therefore this function evaluates, instead, the following stronger
508 * sub-conditions, for which it is much easier to maintain the needed
510 * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
511 * 2) all active groups have the same weight,
512 * 3) all active groups have at most one active child each.
513 * In particular, the last two conditions are always true if hierarchical
514 * support and the cgroups interface are not enabled, thus no state needs
515 * to be maintained in this case.
517 static bool bfq_symmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
519 return !bfq_differentiated_weights(bfqd
);
523 * If the weight-counter tree passed as input contains no counter for
524 * the weight of the input entity, then add that counter; otherwise just
525 * increment the existing counter.
527 * Note that weight-counter trees contain few nodes in mostly symmetric
528 * scenarios. For example, if all queues have the same weight, then the
529 * weight-counter tree for the queues may contain at most one node.
530 * This holds even if low_latency is on, because weight-raised queues
531 * are not inserted in the tree.
532 * In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed
535 void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_entity
*entity
,
536 struct rb_root
*root
)
538 struct rb_node
**new = &(root
->rb_node
), *parent
= NULL
;
541 * Do not insert if the entity is already associated with a
542 * counter, which happens if:
543 * 1) the entity is associated with a queue,
544 * 2) a request arrival has caused the queue to become both
545 * non-weight-raised, and hence change its weight, and
546 * backlogged; in this respect, each of the two events
547 * causes an invocation of this function,
548 * 3) this is the invocation of this function caused by the
549 * second event. This second invocation is actually useless,
550 * and we handle this fact by exiting immediately. More
551 * efficient or clearer solutions might possibly be adopted.
553 if (entity
->weight_counter
)
557 struct bfq_weight_counter
*__counter
= container_of(*new,
558 struct bfq_weight_counter
,
562 if (entity
->weight
== __counter
->weight
) {
563 entity
->weight_counter
= __counter
;
566 if (entity
->weight
< __counter
->weight
)
567 new = &((*new)->rb_left
);
569 new = &((*new)->rb_right
);
572 entity
->weight_counter
= kzalloc(sizeof(struct bfq_weight_counter
),
576 * In the unlucky event of an allocation failure, we just
577 * exit. This will cause the weight of entity to not be
578 * considered in bfq_differentiated_weights, which, in its
579 * turn, causes the scenario to be deemed wrongly symmetric in
580 * case entity's weight would have been the only weight making
581 * the scenario asymmetric. On the bright side, no unbalance
582 * will however occur when entity becomes inactive again (the
583 * invocation of this function is triggered by an activation
584 * of entity). In fact, bfq_weights_tree_remove does nothing
585 * if !entity->weight_counter.
587 if (unlikely(!entity
->weight_counter
))
590 entity
->weight_counter
->weight
= entity
->weight
;
591 rb_link_node(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, parent
, new);
592 rb_insert_color(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, root
);
595 entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
++;
599 * Decrement the weight counter associated with the entity, and, if the
600 * counter reaches 0, remove the counter from the tree.
601 * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for considerations
604 void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_entity
*entity
,
605 struct rb_root
*root
)
607 if (!entity
->weight_counter
)
610 entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
--;
611 if (entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
> 0)
612 goto reset_entity_pointer
;
614 rb_erase(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, root
);
615 kfree(entity
->weight_counter
);
617 reset_entity_pointer
:
618 entity
->weight_counter
= NULL
;
622 * Return expired entry, or NULL to just start from scratch in rbtree.
624 static struct request
*bfq_check_fifo(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
625 struct request
*last
)
629 if (bfq_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
))
632 bfq_mark_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
);
634 rq
= rq_entry_fifo(bfqq
->fifo
.next
);
636 if (rq
== last
|| ktime_get_ns() < rq
->fifo_time
)
639 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "check_fifo: returned %p", rq
);
643 static struct request
*bfq_find_next_rq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
644 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
645 struct request
*last
)
647 struct rb_node
*rbnext
= rb_next(&last
->rb_node
);
648 struct rb_node
*rbprev
= rb_prev(&last
->rb_node
);
649 struct request
*next
, *prev
= NULL
;
651 /* Follow expired path, else get first next available. */
652 next
= bfq_check_fifo(bfqq
, last
);
657 prev
= rb_entry_rq(rbprev
);
660 next
= rb_entry_rq(rbnext
);
662 rbnext
= rb_first(&bfqq
->sort_list
);
663 if (rbnext
&& rbnext
!= &last
->rb_node
)
664 next
= rb_entry_rq(rbnext
);
667 return bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, next
, prev
, blk_rq_pos(last
));
670 /* see the definition of bfq_async_charge_factor for details */
671 static unsigned long bfq_serv_to_charge(struct request
*rq
,
672 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
674 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1)
675 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
678 * If there are no weight-raised queues, then amplify service
679 * by just the async charge factor; otherwise amplify service
680 * by twice the async charge factor, to further reduce latency
681 * for weight-raised queues.
683 if (bfqq
->bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
== 0)
684 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
) * bfq_async_charge_factor
;
686 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
) * 2 * bfq_async_charge_factor
;
690 * bfq_updated_next_req - update the queue after a new next_rq selection.
691 * @bfqd: the device data the queue belongs to.
692 * @bfqq: the queue to update.
694 * If the first request of a queue changes we make sure that the queue
695 * has enough budget to serve at least its first request (if the
696 * request has grown). We do this because if the queue has not enough
697 * budget for its first request, it has to go through two dispatch
698 * rounds to actually get it dispatched.
700 static void bfq_updated_next_req(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
701 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
703 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
704 struct request
*next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
705 unsigned long new_budget
;
710 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
)
712 * In order not to break guarantees, budgets cannot be
713 * changed after an entity has been selected.
717 new_budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
718 bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
));
719 if (entity
->budget
!= new_budget
) {
720 entity
->budget
= new_budget
;
721 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "updated next rq: new budget %lu",
723 bfq_requeue_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
728 bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
729 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool bfq_already_existing
)
731 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
732 bool busy
= bfq_already_existing
&& bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
);
734 if (bic
->saved_idle_window
)
735 bfq_mark_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
737 bfq_clear_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
739 if (bic
->saved_IO_bound
)
740 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
742 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
744 bfqq
->ttime
= bic
->saved_ttime
;
745 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bic
->saved_wr_coeff
;
746 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bic
->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
747 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= bic
->saved_last_wr_start_finish
;
748 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bic
->saved_wr_cur_max_time
;
750 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 && (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
) ||
751 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
752 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
))) {
753 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
,
754 "resume state: switching off wr");
759 /* make sure weight will be updated, however we got here */
760 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
765 if (old_wr_coeff
== 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1)
766 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
767 else if (old_wr_coeff
> 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
768 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
771 static int bfqq_process_refs(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
773 return bfqq
->ref
- bfqq
->allocated
- bfqq
->entity
.on_st
;
776 /* Empty burst list and add just bfqq (see comments on bfq_handle_burst) */
777 static void bfq_reset_burst_list(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
779 struct bfq_queue
*item
;
780 struct hlist_node
*n
;
782 hlist_for_each_entry_safe(item
, n
, &bfqd
->burst_list
, burst_list_node
)
783 hlist_del_init(&item
->burst_list_node
);
784 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
, &bfqd
->burst_list
);
785 bfqd
->burst_size
= 1;
786 bfqd
->burst_parent_entity
= bfqq
->entity
.parent
;
789 /* Add bfqq to the list of queues in current burst (see bfq_handle_burst) */
790 static void bfq_add_to_burst(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
792 /* Increment burst size to take into account also bfqq */
795 if (bfqd
->burst_size
== bfqd
->bfq_large_burst_thresh
) {
796 struct bfq_queue
*pos
, *bfqq_item
;
797 struct hlist_node
*n
;
800 * Enough queues have been activated shortly after each
801 * other to consider this burst as large.
803 bfqd
->large_burst
= true;
806 * We can now mark all queues in the burst list as
807 * belonging to a large burst.
809 hlist_for_each_entry(bfqq_item
, &bfqd
->burst_list
,
811 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq_item
);
812 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
815 * From now on, and until the current burst finishes, any
816 * new queue being activated shortly after the last queue
817 * was inserted in the burst can be immediately marked as
818 * belonging to a large burst. So the burst list is not
819 * needed any more. Remove it.
821 hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pos
, n
, &bfqd
->burst_list
,
823 hlist_del_init(&pos
->burst_list_node
);
825 * Burst not yet large: add bfqq to the burst list. Do
826 * not increment the ref counter for bfqq, because bfqq
827 * is removed from the burst list before freeing bfqq
830 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
, &bfqd
->burst_list
);
834 * If many queues belonging to the same group happen to be created
835 * shortly after each other, then the processes associated with these
836 * queues have typically a common goal. In particular, bursts of queue
837 * creations are usually caused by services or applications that spawn
838 * many parallel threads/processes. Examples are systemd during boot,
839 * or git grep. To help these processes get their job done as soon as
840 * possible, it is usually better to not grant either weight-raising
841 * or device idling to their queues.
843 * In this comment we describe, firstly, the reasons why this fact
844 * holds, and, secondly, the next function, which implements the main
845 * steps needed to properly mark these queues so that they can then be
846 * treated in a different way.
848 * The above services or applications benefit mostly from a high
849 * throughput: the quicker the requests of the activated queues are
850 * cumulatively served, the sooner the target job of these queues gets
851 * completed. As a consequence, weight-raising any of these queues,
852 * which also implies idling the device for it, is almost always
853 * counterproductive. In most cases it just lowers throughput.
855 * On the other hand, a burst of queue creations may be caused also by
856 * the start of an application that does not consist of a lot of
857 * parallel I/O-bound threads. In fact, with a complex application,
858 * several short processes may need to be executed to start-up the
859 * application. In this respect, to start an application as quickly as
860 * possible, the best thing to do is in any case to privilege the I/O
861 * related to the application with respect to all other
862 * I/O. Therefore, the best strategy to start as quickly as possible
863 * an application that causes a burst of queue creations is to
864 * weight-raise all the queues created during the burst. This is the
865 * exact opposite of the best strategy for the other type of bursts.
867 * In the end, to take the best action for each of the two cases, the
868 * two types of bursts need to be distinguished. Fortunately, this
869 * seems relatively easy, by looking at the sizes of the bursts. In
870 * particular, we found a threshold such that only bursts with a
871 * larger size than that threshold are apparently caused by
872 * services or commands such as systemd or git grep. For brevity,
873 * hereafter we call just 'large' these bursts. BFQ *does not*
874 * weight-raise queues whose creation occurs in a large burst. In
875 * addition, for each of these queues BFQ performs or does not perform
876 * idling depending on which choice boosts the throughput more. The
877 * exact choice depends on the device and request pattern at
880 * Unfortunately, false positives may occur while an interactive task
881 * is starting (e.g., an application is being started). The
882 * consequence is that the queues associated with the task do not
883 * enjoy weight raising as expected. Fortunately these false positives
884 * are very rare. They typically occur if some service happens to
885 * start doing I/O exactly when the interactive task starts.
887 * Turning back to the next function, it implements all the steps
888 * needed to detect the occurrence of a large burst and to properly
889 * mark all the queues belonging to it (so that they can then be
890 * treated in a different way). This goal is achieved by maintaining a
891 * "burst list" that holds, temporarily, the queues that belong to the
892 * burst in progress. The list is then used to mark these queues as
893 * belonging to a large burst if the burst does become large. The main
894 * steps are the following.
896 * . when the very first queue is created, the queue is inserted into the
897 * list (as it could be the first queue in a possible burst)
899 * . if the current burst has not yet become large, and a queue Q that does
900 * not yet belong to the burst is activated shortly after the last time
901 * at which a new queue entered the burst list, then the function appends
902 * Q to the burst list
904 * . if, as a consequence of the previous step, the burst size reaches
905 * the large-burst threshold, then
907 * . all the queues in the burst list are marked as belonging to a
910 * . the burst list is deleted; in fact, the burst list already served
911 * its purpose (keeping temporarily track of the queues in a burst,
912 * so as to be able to mark them as belonging to a large burst in the
913 * previous sub-step), and now is not needed any more
915 * . the device enters a large-burst mode
917 * . if a queue Q that does not belong to the burst is created while
918 * the device is in large-burst mode and shortly after the last time
919 * at which a queue either entered the burst list or was marked as
920 * belonging to the current large burst, then Q is immediately marked
921 * as belonging to a large burst.
923 * . if a queue Q that does not belong to the burst is created a while
924 * later, i.e., not shortly after, than the last time at which a queue
925 * either entered the burst list or was marked as belonging to the
926 * current large burst, then the current burst is deemed as finished and:
928 * . the large-burst mode is reset if set
930 * . the burst list is emptied
932 * . Q is inserted in the burst list, as Q may be the first queue
933 * in a possible new burst (then the burst list contains just Q
936 static void bfq_handle_burst(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
939 * If bfqq is already in the burst list or is part of a large
940 * burst, or finally has just been split, then there is
941 * nothing else to do.
943 if (!hlist_unhashed(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
) ||
944 bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
) ||
945 time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
946 msecs_to_jiffies(10)))
950 * If bfqq's creation happens late enough, or bfqq belongs to
951 * a different group than the burst group, then the current
952 * burst is finished, and related data structures must be
955 * In this respect, consider the special case where bfqq is
956 * the very first queue created after BFQ is selected for this
957 * device. In this case, last_ins_in_burst and
958 * burst_parent_entity are not yet significant when we get
959 * here. But it is easy to verify that, whether or not the
960 * following condition is true, bfqq will end up being
961 * inserted into the burst list. In particular the list will
962 * happen to contain only bfqq. And this is exactly what has
963 * to happen, as bfqq may be the first queue of the first
966 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqd
->last_ins_in_burst
+
967 bfqd
->bfq_burst_interval
) ||
968 bfqq
->entity
.parent
!= bfqd
->burst_parent_entity
) {
969 bfqd
->large_burst
= false;
970 bfq_reset_burst_list(bfqd
, bfqq
);
975 * If we get here, then bfqq is being activated shortly after the
976 * last queue. So, if the current burst is also large, we can mark
977 * bfqq as belonging to this large burst immediately.
979 if (bfqd
->large_burst
) {
980 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
985 * If we get here, then a large-burst state has not yet been
986 * reached, but bfqq is being activated shortly after the last
987 * queue. Then we add bfqq to the burst.
989 bfq_add_to_burst(bfqd
, bfqq
);
992 * At this point, bfqq either has been added to the current
993 * burst or has caused the current burst to terminate and a
994 * possible new burst to start. In particular, in the second
995 * case, bfqq has become the first queue in the possible new
996 * burst. In both cases last_ins_in_burst needs to be moved
999 bfqd
->last_ins_in_burst
= jiffies
;
1002 static int bfq_bfqq_budget_left(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1004 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
1006 return entity
->budget
- entity
->service
;
1010 * If enough samples have been computed, return the current max budget
1011 * stored in bfqd, which is dynamically updated according to the
1012 * estimated disk peak rate; otherwise return the default max budget
1014 static int bfq_max_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1016 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
< bfq_stats_min_budgets
)
1017 return bfq_default_max_budget
;
1019 return bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
;
1023 * Return min budget, which is a fraction of the current or default
1024 * max budget (trying with 1/32)
1026 static int bfq_min_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1028 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
< bfq_stats_min_budgets
)
1029 return bfq_default_max_budget
/ 32;
1031 return bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
/ 32;
1035 * The next function, invoked after the input queue bfqq switches from
1036 * idle to busy, updates the budget of bfqq. The function also tells
1037 * whether the in-service queue should be expired, by returning
1038 * true. The purpose of expiring the in-service queue is to give bfqq
1039 * the chance to possibly preempt the in-service queue, and the reason
1040 * for preempting the in-service queue is to achieve one of the two
1043 * 1. Guarantee to bfqq its reserved bandwidth even if bfqq has
1044 * expired because it has remained idle. In particular, bfqq may have
1045 * expired for one of the following two reasons:
1047 * - BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS bfqq did not enjoy any device idling
1048 * and did not make it to issue a new request before its last
1049 * request was served;
1051 * - BFQQE_TOO_IDLE bfqq did enjoy device idling, but did not issue
1052 * a new request before the expiration of the idling-time.
1054 * Even if bfqq has expired for one of the above reasons, the process
1055 * associated with the queue may be however issuing requests greedily,
1056 * and thus be sensitive to the bandwidth it receives (bfqq may have
1057 * remained idle for other reasons: CPU high load, bfqq not enjoying
1058 * idling, I/O throttling somewhere in the path from the process to
1059 * the I/O scheduler, ...). But if, after every expiration for one of
1060 * the above two reasons, bfqq has to wait for the service of at least
1061 * one full budget of another queue before being served again, then
1062 * bfqq is likely to get a much lower bandwidth or resource time than
1063 * its reserved ones. To address this issue, two countermeasures need
1066 * First, the budget and the timestamps of bfqq need to be updated in
1067 * a special way on bfqq reactivation: they need to be updated as if
1068 * bfqq did not remain idle and did not expire. In fact, if they are
1069 * computed as if bfqq expired and remained idle until reactivation,
1070 * then the process associated with bfqq is treated as if, instead of
1071 * being greedy, it stopped issuing requests when bfqq remained idle,
1072 * and restarts issuing requests only on this reactivation. In other
1073 * words, the scheduler does not help the process recover the "service
1074 * hole" between bfqq expiration and reactivation. As a consequence,
1075 * the process receives a lower bandwidth than its reserved one. In
1076 * contrast, to recover this hole, the budget must be updated as if
1077 * bfqq was not expired at all before this reactivation, i.e., it must
1078 * be set to the value of the remaining budget when bfqq was
1079 * expired. Along the same line, timestamps need to be assigned the
1080 * value they had the last time bfqq was selected for service, i.e.,
1081 * before last expiration. Thus timestamps need to be back-shifted
1082 * with respect to their normal computation (see [1] for more details
1083 * on this tricky aspect).
1085 * Secondly, to allow the process to recover the hole, the in-service
1086 * queue must be expired too, to give bfqq the chance to preempt it
1087 * immediately. In fact, if bfqq has to wait for a full budget of the
1088 * in-service queue to be completed, then it may become impossible to
1089 * let the process recover the hole, even if the back-shifted
1090 * timestamps of bfqq are lower than those of the in-service queue. If
1091 * this happens for most or all of the holes, then the process may not
1092 * receive its reserved bandwidth. In this respect, it is worth noting
1093 * that, being the service of outstanding requests unpreemptible, a
1094 * little fraction of the holes may however be unrecoverable, thereby
1095 * causing a little loss of bandwidth.
1097 * The last important point is detecting whether bfqq does need this
1098 * bandwidth recovery. In this respect, the next function deems the
1099 * process associated with bfqq greedy, and thus allows it to recover
1100 * the hole, if: 1) the process is waiting for the arrival of a new
1101 * request (which implies that bfqq expired for one of the above two
1102 * reasons), and 2) such a request has arrived soon. The first
1103 * condition is controlled through the flag non_blocking_wait_rq,
1104 * while the second through the flag arrived_in_time. If both
1105 * conditions hold, then the function computes the budget in the
1106 * above-described special way, and signals that the in-service queue
1107 * should be expired. Timestamp back-shifting is done later in
1108 * __bfq_activate_entity.
1110 * 2. Reduce latency. Even if timestamps are not backshifted to let
1111 * the process associated with bfqq recover a service hole, bfqq may
1112 * however happen to have, after being (re)activated, a lower finish
1113 * timestamp than the in-service queue. That is, the next budget of
1114 * bfqq may have to be completed before the one of the in-service
1115 * queue. If this is the case, then preempting the in-service queue
1116 * allows this goal to be achieved, apart from the unpreemptible,
1117 * outstanding requests mentioned above.
1119 * Unfortunately, regardless of which of the above two goals one wants
1120 * to achieve, service trees need first to be updated to know whether
1121 * the in-service queue must be preempted. To have service trees
1122 * correctly updated, the in-service queue must be expired and
1123 * rescheduled, and bfqq must be scheduled too. This is one of the
1124 * most costly operations (in future versions, the scheduling
1125 * mechanism may be re-designed in such a way to make it possible to
1126 * know whether preemption is needed without needing to update service
1127 * trees). In addition, queue preemptions almost always cause random
1128 * I/O, and thus loss of throughput. Because of these facts, the next
1129 * function adopts the following simple scheme to avoid both costly
1130 * operations and too frequent preemptions: it requests the expiration
1131 * of the in-service queue (unconditionally) only for queues that need
1132 * to recover a hole, or that either are weight-raised or deserve to
1135 static bool bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1136 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1137 bool arrived_in_time
,
1138 bool wr_or_deserves_wr
)
1140 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
1142 if (bfq_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
) && arrived_in_time
) {
1144 * We do not clear the flag non_blocking_wait_rq here, as
1145 * the latter is used in bfq_activate_bfqq to signal
1146 * that timestamps need to be back-shifted (and is
1147 * cleared right after).
1151 * In next assignment we rely on that either
1152 * entity->service or entity->budget are not updated
1153 * on expiration if bfqq is empty (see
1154 * __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget). Thus both quantities
1155 * remain unchanged after such an expiration, and the
1156 * following statement therefore assigns to
1157 * entity->budget the remaining budget on such an
1158 * expiration. For clarity, entity->service is not
1159 * updated on expiration in any case, and, in normal
1160 * operation, is reset only when bfqq is selected for
1161 * service (see bfq_get_next_queue).
1163 entity
->budget
= min_t(unsigned long,
1164 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
),
1170 entity
->budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
1171 bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq
->next_rq
, bfqq
));
1172 bfq_clear_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
);
1173 return wr_or_deserves_wr
;
1176 static unsigned int bfq_wr_duration(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1180 if (bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
> 0)
1181 return bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
;
1183 dur
= bfqd
->RT_prod
;
1184 do_div(dur
, bfqd
->peak_rate
);
1187 * Limit duration between 3 and 13 seconds. Tests show that
1188 * higher values than 13 seconds often yield the opposite of
1189 * the desired result, i.e., worsen responsiveness by letting
1190 * non-interactive and non-soft-real-time applications
1191 * preserve weight raising for a too long time interval.
1193 * On the other end, lower values than 3 seconds make it
1194 * difficult for most interactive tasks to complete their jobs
1195 * before weight-raising finishes.
1197 if (dur
> msecs_to_jiffies(13000))
1198 dur
= msecs_to_jiffies(13000);
1199 else if (dur
< msecs_to_jiffies(3000))
1200 dur
= msecs_to_jiffies(3000);
1205 static void bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1206 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1207 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
,
1208 bool wr_or_deserves_wr
,
1213 if (old_wr_coeff
== 1 && wr_or_deserves_wr
) {
1214 /* start a weight-raising period */
1216 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1217 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1219 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= jiffies
;
1220 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
*
1221 BFQ_SOFTRT_WEIGHT_FACTOR
;
1222 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
=
1223 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
;
1227 * If needed, further reduce budget to make sure it is
1228 * close to bfqq's backlog, so as to reduce the
1229 * scheduling-error component due to a too large
1230 * budget. Do not care about throughput consequences,
1231 * but only about latency. Finally, do not assign a
1232 * too small budget either, to avoid increasing
1233 * latency by causing too frequent expirations.
1235 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= min_t(unsigned long,
1236 bfqq
->entity
.budget
,
1237 2 * bfq_min_budget(bfqd
));
1238 } else if (old_wr_coeff
> 1) {
1239 if (interactive
) { /* update wr coeff and duration */
1240 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1241 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1242 } else if (in_burst
)
1246 * The application is now or still meeting the
1247 * requirements for being deemed soft rt. We
1248 * can then correctly and safely (re)charge
1249 * the weight-raising duration for the
1250 * application with the weight-raising
1251 * duration for soft rt applications.
1253 * In particular, doing this recharge now, i.e.,
1254 * before the weight-raising period for the
1255 * application finishes, reduces the probability
1256 * of the following negative scenario:
1257 * 1) the weight of a soft rt application is
1258 * raised at startup (as for any newly
1259 * created application),
1260 * 2) since the application is not interactive,
1261 * at a certain time weight-raising is
1262 * stopped for the application,
1263 * 3) at that time the application happens to
1264 * still have pending requests, and hence
1265 * is destined to not have a chance to be
1266 * deemed soft rt before these requests are
1267 * completed (see the comments to the
1268 * function bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()
1269 * for details on soft rt detection),
1270 * 4) these pending requests experience a high
1271 * latency because the application is not
1272 * weight-raised while they are pending.
1274 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
!=
1275 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
) {
1276 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
=
1277 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
1279 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
=
1280 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
;
1281 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
*
1282 BFQ_SOFTRT_WEIGHT_FACTOR
;
1284 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1289 static bool bfq_bfqq_idle_for_long_time(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1290 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1292 return bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 &&
1293 time_is_before_jiffies(
1294 bfqq
->budget_timeout
+
1295 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
);
1298 static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1299 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1304 bool soft_rt
, in_burst
, wr_or_deserves_wr
,
1305 bfqq_wants_to_preempt
,
1306 idle_for_long_time
= bfq_bfqq_idle_for_long_time(bfqd
, bfqq
),
1308 * See the comments on
1309 * bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation for
1310 * details on the usage of the next variable.
1312 arrived_in_time
= ktime_get_ns() <=
1313 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
+
1314 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
* 3;
1316 bfqg_stats_update_io_add(bfqq_group(RQ_BFQQ(rq
)), bfqq
, rq
->cmd_flags
);
1319 * bfqq deserves to be weight-raised if:
1321 * - it does not belong to a large burst,
1322 * - it has been idle for enough time or is soft real-time,
1323 * - is linked to a bfq_io_cq (it is not shared in any sense).
1325 in_burst
= bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
1326 soft_rt
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
> 0 &&
1328 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
);
1329 *interactive
= !in_burst
&& idle_for_long_time
;
1330 wr_or_deserves_wr
= bfqd
->low_latency
&&
1331 (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 ||
1332 (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) &&
1333 bfqq
->bic
&& (*interactive
|| soft_rt
)));
1336 * Using the last flag, update budget and check whether bfqq
1337 * may want to preempt the in-service queue.
1339 bfqq_wants_to_preempt
=
1340 bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation(bfqd
, bfqq
,
1345 * If bfqq happened to be activated in a burst, but has been
1346 * idle for much more than an interactive queue, then we
1347 * assume that, in the overall I/O initiated in the burst, the
1348 * I/O associated with bfqq is finished. So bfqq does not need
1349 * to be treated as a queue belonging to a burst
1350 * anymore. Accordingly, we reset bfqq's in_large_burst flag
1351 * if set, and remove bfqq from the burst list if it's
1352 * there. We do not decrement burst_size, because the fact
1353 * that bfqq does not need to belong to the burst list any
1354 * more does not invalidate the fact that bfqq was created in
1357 if (likely(!bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
)) &&
1358 idle_for_long_time
&&
1359 time_is_before_jiffies(
1360 bfqq
->budget_timeout
+
1361 msecs_to_jiffies(10000))) {
1362 hlist_del_init(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
1363 bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
1366 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
1369 if (!bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
)) {
1370 if (arrived_in_time
) {
1371 bfqq
->requests_within_timer
++;
1372 if (bfqq
->requests_within_timer
>=
1373 bfqd
->bfq_requests_within_timer
)
1374 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
1376 bfqq
->requests_within_timer
= 0;
1379 if (bfqd
->low_latency
) {
1380 if (unlikely(time_is_after_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
)))
1383 jiffies
- bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
- 1;
1385 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
1386 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
)) {
1387 bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival(bfqd
, bfqq
,
1394 if (old_wr_coeff
!= bfqq
->wr_coeff
)
1395 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1399 bfqq
->last_idle_bklogged
= jiffies
;
1400 bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
= 0;
1401 bfq_clear_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
);
1403 bfq_add_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1406 * Expire in-service queue only if preemption may be needed
1407 * for guarantees. In this respect, the function
1408 * next_queue_may_preempt just checks a simple, necessary
1409 * condition, and not a sufficient condition based on
1410 * timestamps. In fact, for the latter condition to be
1411 * evaluated, timestamps would need first to be updated, and
1412 * this operation is quite costly (see the comments on the
1413 * function bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation).
1415 if (bfqd
->in_service_queue
&& bfqq_wants_to_preempt
&&
1416 bfqd
->in_service_queue
->wr_coeff
< bfqq
->wr_coeff
&&
1417 next_queue_may_preempt(bfqd
))
1418 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqd
->in_service_queue
,
1419 false, BFQQE_PREEMPTED
);
1422 static void bfq_add_request(struct request
*rq
)
1424 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
1425 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1426 struct request
*next_rq
, *prev
;
1427 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
1428 bool interactive
= false;
1430 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "add_request %d", rq_is_sync(rq
));
1431 bfqq
->queued
[rq_is_sync(rq
)]++;
1434 elv_rb_add(&bfqq
->sort_list
, rq
);
1437 * Check if this request is a better next-serve candidate.
1439 prev
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
1440 next_rq
= bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, bfqq
->next_rq
, rq
, bfqd
->last_position
);
1441 bfqq
->next_rq
= next_rq
;
1444 * Adjust priority tree position, if next_rq changes.
1446 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
)
1447 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1449 if (!bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
)) /* switching to busy ... */
1450 bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(bfqd
, bfqq
, old_wr_coeff
,
1453 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& old_wr_coeff
== 1 && !rq_is_sync(rq
) &&
1454 time_is_before_jiffies(
1455 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
1456 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_inter_arr_async
)) {
1457 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1458 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1460 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
1461 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1463 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
)
1464 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1468 * Assign jiffies to last_wr_start_finish in the following
1471 * . if bfqq is not going to be weight-raised, because, for
1472 * non weight-raised queues, last_wr_start_finish stores the
1473 * arrival time of the last request; as of now, this piece
1474 * of information is used only for deciding whether to
1475 * weight-raise async queues
1477 * . if bfqq is not weight-raised, because, if bfqq is now
1478 * switching to weight-raised, then last_wr_start_finish
1479 * stores the time when weight-raising starts
1481 * . if bfqq is interactive, because, regardless of whether
1482 * bfqq is currently weight-raised, the weight-raising
1483 * period must start or restart (this case is considered
1484 * separately because it is not detected by the above
1485 * conditions, if bfqq is already weight-raised)
1487 * last_wr_start_finish has to be updated also if bfqq is soft
1488 * real-time, because the weight-raising period is constantly
1489 * restarted on idle-to-busy transitions for these queues, but
1490 * this is already done in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch if
1493 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&&
1494 (old_wr_coeff
== 1 || bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 || interactive
))
1495 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1498 static struct request
*bfq_find_rq_fmerge(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1500 struct request_queue
*q
)
1502 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->bio_bfqq
;
1506 return elv_rb_find(&bfqq
->sort_list
, bio_end_sector(bio
));
1511 static sector_t
get_sdist(sector_t last_pos
, struct request
*rq
)
1514 return abs(blk_rq_pos(rq
) - last_pos
);
1519 #if 0 /* Still not clear if we can do without next two functions */
1520 static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
1522 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1524 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
++;
1527 static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
1529 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1531 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
--;
1535 static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue
*q
,
1538 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
1539 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1540 const int sync
= rq_is_sync(rq
);
1542 if (bfqq
->next_rq
== rq
) {
1543 bfqq
->next_rq
= bfq_find_next_rq(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
1544 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1547 if (rq
->queuelist
.prev
!= &rq
->queuelist
)
1548 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
1549 bfqq
->queued
[sync
]--;
1551 elv_rb_del(&bfqq
->sort_list
, rq
);
1553 elv_rqhash_del(q
, rq
);
1554 if (q
->last_merge
== rq
)
1555 q
->last_merge
= NULL
;
1557 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
1558 bfqq
->next_rq
= NULL
;
1560 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
) && bfqq
!= bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
1561 bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
, false);
1563 * bfqq emptied. In normal operation, when
1564 * bfqq is empty, bfqq->entity.service and
1565 * bfqq->entity.budget must contain,
1566 * respectively, the service received and the
1567 * budget used last time bfqq emptied. These
1568 * facts do not hold in this case, as at least
1569 * this last removal occurred while bfqq is
1570 * not in service. To avoid inconsistencies,
1571 * reset both bfqq->entity.service and
1572 * bfqq->entity.budget, if bfqq has still a
1573 * process that may issue I/O requests to it.
1575 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= bfqq
->entity
.service
= 0;
1579 * Remove queue from request-position tree as it is empty.
1581 if (bfqq
->pos_root
) {
1582 rb_erase(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
1583 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
1587 if (rq
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
)
1588 bfqq
->meta_pending
--;
1590 bfqg_stats_update_io_remove(bfqq_group(bfqq
), rq
->cmd_flags
);
1593 static bool bfq_bio_merge(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
, struct bio
*bio
)
1595 struct request_queue
*q
= hctx
->queue
;
1596 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1597 struct request
*free
= NULL
;
1599 * bfq_bic_lookup grabs the queue_lock: invoke it now and
1600 * store its return value for later use, to avoid nesting
1601 * queue_lock inside the bfqd->lock. We assume that the bic
1602 * returned by bfq_bic_lookup does not go away before
1603 * bfqd->lock is taken.
1605 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= bfq_bic_lookup(bfqd
, current
->io_context
, q
);
1608 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1611 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, op_is_sync(bio
->bi_opf
));
1613 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= NULL
;
1614 bfqd
->bio_bic
= bic
;
1616 ret
= blk_mq_sched_try_merge(q
, bio
, &free
);
1619 blk_mq_free_request(free
);
1620 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1625 static int bfq_request_merge(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
**req
,
1628 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1629 struct request
*__rq
;
1631 __rq
= bfq_find_rq_fmerge(bfqd
, bio
, q
);
1632 if (__rq
&& elv_bio_merge_ok(__rq
, bio
)) {
1634 return ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE
;
1637 return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE
;
1640 static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*req
,
1641 enum elv_merge type
)
1643 if (type
== ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE
&&
1644 rb_prev(&req
->rb_node
) &&
1646 blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req
->rb_node
),
1647 struct request
, rb_node
))) {
1648 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(req
);
1649 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1650 struct request
*prev
, *next_rq
;
1652 /* Reposition request in its sort_list */
1653 elv_rb_del(&bfqq
->sort_list
, req
);
1654 elv_rb_add(&bfqq
->sort_list
, req
);
1656 /* Choose next request to be served for bfqq */
1657 prev
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
1658 next_rq
= bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, bfqq
->next_rq
, req
,
1659 bfqd
->last_position
);
1660 bfqq
->next_rq
= next_rq
;
1662 * If next_rq changes, update both the queue's budget to
1663 * fit the new request and the queue's position in its
1666 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
) {
1667 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1668 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1673 static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
,
1674 struct request
*next
)
1676 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
), *next_bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(next
);
1678 if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&rq
->rb_node
))
1680 spin_lock_irq(&bfqq
->bfqd
->lock
);
1683 * If next and rq belong to the same bfq_queue and next is older
1684 * than rq, then reposition rq in the fifo (by substituting next
1685 * with rq). Otherwise, if next and rq belong to different
1686 * bfq_queues, never reposition rq: in fact, we would have to
1687 * reposition it with respect to next's position in its own fifo,
1688 * which would most certainly be too expensive with respect to
1691 if (bfqq
== next_bfqq
&&
1692 !list_empty(&rq
->queuelist
) && !list_empty(&next
->queuelist
) &&
1693 next
->fifo_time
< rq
->fifo_time
) {
1694 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
1695 list_replace_init(&next
->queuelist
, &rq
->queuelist
);
1696 rq
->fifo_time
= next
->fifo_time
;
1699 if (bfqq
->next_rq
== next
)
1702 bfq_remove_request(q
, next
);
1704 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqq
->bfqd
->lock
);
1706 bfqg_stats_update_io_merged(bfqq_group(bfqq
), next
->cmd_flags
);
1709 /* Must be called with bfqq != NULL */
1710 static void bfq_bfqq_end_wr(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1712 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
))
1713 bfqq
->bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
1715 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= 0;
1716 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1718 * Trigger a weight change on the next invocation of
1719 * __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio.
1721 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1724 void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1725 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
)
1729 for (i
= 0; i
< 2; i
++)
1730 for (j
= 0; j
< IOPRIO_BE_NR
; j
++)
1731 if (bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
])
1732 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
]);
1733 if (bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
)
1734 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
);
1737 static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1739 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
1741 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1743 list_for_each_entry(bfqq
, &bfqd
->active_list
, bfqq_list
)
1744 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
1745 list_for_each_entry(bfqq
, &bfqd
->idle_list
, bfqq_list
)
1746 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
1747 bfq_end_wr_async(bfqd
);
1749 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1752 static sector_t
bfq_io_struct_pos(void *io_struct
, bool request
)
1755 return blk_rq_pos(io_struct
);
1757 return ((struct bio
*)io_struct
)->bi_iter
.bi_sector
;
1760 static int bfq_rq_close_to_sector(void *io_struct
, bool request
,
1763 return abs(bfq_io_struct_pos(io_struct
, request
) - sector
) <=
1767 static struct bfq_queue
*bfqq_find_close(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1768 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1771 struct rb_root
*root
= &bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(bfqq
)->rq_pos_tree
;
1772 struct rb_node
*parent
, *node
;
1773 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
1775 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root
))
1779 * First, if we find a request starting at the end of the last
1780 * request, choose it.
1782 __bfqq
= bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(bfqd
, root
, sector
, &parent
, NULL
);
1787 * If the exact sector wasn't found, the parent of the NULL leaf
1788 * will contain the closest sector (rq_pos_tree sorted by
1789 * next_request position).
1791 __bfqq
= rb_entry(parent
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
1792 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(__bfqq
->next_rq
, true, sector
))
1795 if (blk_rq_pos(__bfqq
->next_rq
) < sector
)
1796 node
= rb_next(&__bfqq
->pos_node
);
1798 node
= rb_prev(&__bfqq
->pos_node
);
1802 __bfqq
= rb_entry(node
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
1803 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(__bfqq
->next_rq
, true, sector
))
1809 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_find_close_cooperator(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1810 struct bfq_queue
*cur_bfqq
,
1813 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
1816 * We shall notice if some of the queues are cooperating,
1817 * e.g., working closely on the same area of the device. In
1818 * that case, we can group them together and: 1) don't waste
1819 * time idling, and 2) serve the union of their requests in
1820 * the best possible order for throughput.
1822 bfqq
= bfqq_find_close(bfqd
, cur_bfqq
, sector
);
1823 if (!bfqq
|| bfqq
== cur_bfqq
)
1829 static struct bfq_queue
*
1830 bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
1832 int process_refs
, new_process_refs
;
1833 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
1836 * If there are no process references on the new_bfqq, then it is
1837 * unsafe to follow the ->new_bfqq chain as other bfqq's in the chain
1838 * may have dropped their last reference (not just their last process
1841 if (!bfqq_process_refs(new_bfqq
))
1844 /* Avoid a circular list and skip interim queue merges. */
1845 while ((__bfqq
= new_bfqq
->new_bfqq
)) {
1851 process_refs
= bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
);
1852 new_process_refs
= bfqq_process_refs(new_bfqq
);
1854 * If the process for the bfqq has gone away, there is no
1855 * sense in merging the queues.
1857 if (process_refs
== 0 || new_process_refs
== 0)
1860 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "scheduling merge with queue %d",
1864 * Merging is just a redirection: the requests of the process
1865 * owning one of the two queues are redirected to the other queue.
1866 * The latter queue, in its turn, is set as shared if this is the
1867 * first time that the requests of some process are redirected to
1870 * We redirect bfqq to new_bfqq and not the opposite, because
1871 * we are in the context of the process owning bfqq, thus we
1872 * have the io_cq of this process. So we can immediately
1873 * configure this io_cq to redirect the requests of the
1874 * process to new_bfqq. In contrast, the io_cq of new_bfqq is
1875 * not available any more (new_bfqq->bic == NULL).
1877 * Anyway, even in case new_bfqq coincides with the in-service
1878 * queue, redirecting requests the in-service queue is the
1879 * best option, as we feed the in-service queue with new
1880 * requests close to the last request served and, by doing so,
1881 * are likely to increase the throughput.
1883 bfqq
->new_bfqq
= new_bfqq
;
1884 new_bfqq
->ref
+= process_refs
;
1888 static bool bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1889 struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
1891 if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq
) || bfq_class_idle(new_bfqq
) ||
1892 (bfqq
->ioprio_class
!= new_bfqq
->ioprio_class
))
1896 * If either of the queues has already been detected as seeky,
1897 * then merging it with the other queue is unlikely to lead to
1900 if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) || BFQQ_SEEKY(new_bfqq
))
1904 * Interleaved I/O is known to be done by (some) applications
1905 * only for reads, so it does not make sense to merge async
1908 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || !bfq_bfqq_sync(new_bfqq
))
1915 * If this function returns true, then bfqq cannot be merged. The idea
1916 * is that true cooperation happens very early after processes start
1917 * to do I/O. Usually, late cooperations are just accidental false
1918 * positives. In case bfqq is weight-raised, such false positives
1919 * would evidently degrade latency guarantees for bfqq.
1921 static bool wr_from_too_long(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1923 return bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 &&
1924 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
1925 msecs_to_jiffies(100));
1929 * Attempt to schedule a merge of bfqq with the currently in-service
1930 * queue or with a close queue among the scheduled queues. Return
1931 * NULL if no merge was scheduled, a pointer to the shared bfq_queue
1932 * structure otherwise.
1934 * The OOM queue is not allowed to participate to cooperation: in fact, since
1935 * the requests temporarily redirected to the OOM queue could be redirected
1936 * again to dedicated queues at any time, the state needed to correctly
1937 * handle merging with the OOM queue would be quite complex and expensive
1938 * to maintain. Besides, in such a critical condition as an out of memory,
1939 * the benefits of queue merging may be little relevant, or even negligible.
1941 * Weight-raised queues can be merged only if their weight-raising
1942 * period has just started. In fact cooperating processes are usually
1943 * started together. Thus, with this filter we avoid false positives
1944 * that would jeopardize low-latency guarantees.
1946 * WARNING: queue merging may impair fairness among non-weight raised
1947 * queues, for at least two reasons: 1) the original weight of a
1948 * merged queue may change during the merged state, 2) even being the
1949 * weight the same, a merged queue may be bloated with many more
1950 * requests than the ones produced by its originally-associated
1953 static struct bfq_queue
*
1954 bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1955 void *io_struct
, bool request
)
1957 struct bfq_queue
*in_service_bfqq
, *new_bfqq
;
1960 return bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
1963 wr_from_too_long(bfqq
) ||
1964 unlikely(bfqq
== &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
1967 /* If there is only one backlogged queue, don't search. */
1968 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
== 1)
1971 in_service_bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
1973 if (!in_service_bfqq
|| in_service_bfqq
== bfqq
1974 || wr_from_too_long(in_service_bfqq
) ||
1975 unlikely(in_service_bfqq
== &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
1976 goto check_scheduled
;
1978 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(io_struct
, request
, bfqd
->last_position
) &&
1979 bfqq
->entity
.parent
== in_service_bfqq
->entity
.parent
&&
1980 bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(bfqq
, in_service_bfqq
)) {
1981 new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_merge(bfqq
, in_service_bfqq
);
1986 * Check whether there is a cooperator among currently scheduled
1987 * queues. The only thing we need is that the bio/request is not
1988 * NULL, as we need it to establish whether a cooperator exists.
1991 new_bfqq
= bfq_find_close_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
,
1992 bfq_io_struct_pos(io_struct
, request
));
1994 if (new_bfqq
&& !wr_from_too_long(new_bfqq
) &&
1995 likely(new_bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
) &&
1996 bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(bfqq
, new_bfqq
))
1997 return bfq_setup_merge(bfqq
, new_bfqq
);
2002 static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2004 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= bfqq
->bic
;
2007 * If !bfqq->bic, the queue is already shared or its requests
2008 * have already been redirected to a shared queue; both idle window
2009 * and weight raising state have already been saved. Do nothing.
2014 bic
->saved_ttime
= bfqq
->ttime
;
2015 bic
->saved_idle_window
= bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
2016 bic
->saved_IO_bound
= bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
2017 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
= bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
2018 bic
->was_in_burst_list
= !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
2019 bic
->saved_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
2020 bic
->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
2021 bic
->saved_last_wr_start_finish
= bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
2022 bic
->saved_wr_cur_max_time
= bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
;
2026 bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
,
2027 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
2029 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "merging with queue %lu",
2030 (unsigned long)new_bfqq
->pid
);
2031 /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */
2032 bfq_bfqq_save_state(bfqq
);
2033 bfq_bfqq_save_state(new_bfqq
);
2034 if (bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
))
2035 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(new_bfqq
);
2036 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
2039 * If bfqq is weight-raised, then let new_bfqq inherit
2040 * weight-raising. To reduce false positives, neglect the case
2041 * where bfqq has just been created, but has not yet made it
2042 * to be weight-raised (which may happen because EQM may merge
2043 * bfqq even before bfq_add_request is executed for the first
2044 * time for bfqq). Handling this case would however be very
2045 * easy, thanks to the flag just_created.
2047 if (new_bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) {
2048 new_bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
2049 new_bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
;
2050 new_bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
2051 new_bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
=
2052 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
2053 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(new_bfqq
))
2054 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
2055 new_bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
2058 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) { /* bfqq has given its wr to new_bfqq */
2060 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
2061 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
))
2062 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
2065 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, new_bfqq
, "merge_bfqqs: wr_busy %d",
2066 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
);
2069 * Merge queues (that is, let bic redirect its requests to new_bfqq)
2071 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, new_bfqq
, 1);
2072 bfq_mark_bfqq_coop(new_bfqq
);
2074 * new_bfqq now belongs to at least two bics (it is a shared queue):
2075 * set new_bfqq->bic to NULL. bfqq either:
2076 * - does not belong to any bic any more, and hence bfqq->bic must
2077 * be set to NULL, or
2078 * - is a queue whose owning bics have already been redirected to a
2079 * different queue, hence the queue is destined to not belong to
2080 * any bic soon and bfqq->bic is already NULL (therefore the next
2081 * assignment causes no harm).
2083 new_bfqq
->bic
= NULL
;
2085 /* release process reference to bfqq */
2086 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
2089 static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
,
2092 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
2093 bool is_sync
= op_is_sync(bio
->bi_opf
);
2094 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->bio_bfqq
, *new_bfqq
;
2097 * Disallow merge of a sync bio into an async request.
2099 if (is_sync
&& !rq_is_sync(rq
))
2103 * Lookup the bfqq that this bio will be queued with. Allow
2104 * merge only if rq is queued there.
2110 * We take advantage of this function to perform an early merge
2111 * of the queues of possible cooperating processes.
2113 new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
, bio
, false);
2116 * bic still points to bfqq, then it has not yet been
2117 * redirected to some other bfq_queue, and a queue
2118 * merge beween bfqq and new_bfqq can be safely
2119 * fulfillled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq
2120 * and bfqq can be put.
2122 bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd
, bfqd
->bio_bic
, bfqq
,
2125 * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue,
2126 * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be
2132 * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as
2133 * bfqd->bio_bic now points to new_bfqq, and
2134 * this function may be invoked again (and then may
2135 * use again bqfd->bio_bfqq).
2137 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= bfqq
;
2140 return bfqq
== RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
2144 * Set the maximum time for the in-service queue to consume its
2145 * budget. This prevents seeky processes from lowering the throughput.
2146 * In practice, a time-slice service scheme is used with seeky
2149 static void bfq_set_budget_timeout(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2150 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2152 unsigned int timeout_coeff
;
2154 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
== bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
)
2157 timeout_coeff
= bfqq
->entity
.weight
/ bfqq
->entity
.orig_weight
;
2159 bfqd
->last_budget_start
= ktime_get();
2161 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
+
2162 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
* timeout_coeff
;
2165 static void __bfq_set_in_service_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2166 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2169 bfqg_stats_update_avg_queue_size(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
2170 bfq_clear_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
);
2172 bfqd
->budgets_assigned
= (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
* 7 + 256) / 8;
2174 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
) &&
2175 bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 &&
2176 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
== bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
&&
2177 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->budget_timeout
)) {
2179 * For soft real-time queues, move the start
2180 * of the weight-raising period forward by the
2181 * time the queue has not received any
2182 * service. Otherwise, a relatively long
2183 * service delay is likely to cause the
2184 * weight-raising period of the queue to end,
2185 * because of the short duration of the
2186 * weight-raising period of a soft real-time
2187 * queue. It is worth noting that this move
2188 * is not so dangerous for the other queues,
2189 * because soft real-time queues are not
2192 * To not add a further variable, we use the
2193 * overloaded field budget_timeout to
2194 * determine for how long the queue has not
2195 * received service, i.e., how much time has
2196 * elapsed since the queue expired. However,
2197 * this is a little imprecise, because
2198 * budget_timeout is set to jiffies if bfqq
2199 * not only expires, but also remains with no
2202 if (time_after(bfqq
->budget_timeout
,
2203 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
))
2204 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+=
2205 jiffies
- bfqq
->budget_timeout
;
2207 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
2210 bfq_set_budget_timeout(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2211 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
2212 "set_in_service_queue, cur-budget = %d",
2213 bfqq
->entity
.budget
);
2216 bfqd
->in_service_queue
= bfqq
;
2220 * Get and set a new queue for service.
2222 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_set_in_service_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2224 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfq_get_next_queue(bfqd
);
2226 __bfq_set_in_service_queue(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2230 static void bfq_arm_slice_timer(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2232 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
2235 bfq_mark_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
2238 * We don't want to idle for seeks, but we do want to allow
2239 * fair distribution of slice time for a process doing back-to-back
2240 * seeks. So allow a little bit of time for him to submit a new rq.
2242 sl
= bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
;
2244 * Unless the queue is being weight-raised or the scenario is
2245 * asymmetric, grant only minimum idle time if the queue
2246 * is seeky. A long idling is preserved for a weight-raised
2247 * queue, or, more in general, in an asymmetric scenario,
2248 * because a long idling is needed for guaranteeing to a queue
2249 * its reserved share of the throughput (in particular, it is
2250 * needed if the queue has a higher weight than some other
2253 if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 &&
2254 bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd
))
2255 sl
= min_t(u64
, sl
, BFQ_MIN_TT
);
2257 bfqd
->last_idling_start
= ktime_get();
2258 hrtimer_start(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
, ns_to_ktime(sl
),
2260 bfqg_stats_set_start_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
2264 * In autotuning mode, max_budget is dynamically recomputed as the
2265 * amount of sectors transferred in timeout at the estimated peak
2266 * rate. This enables BFQ to utilize a full timeslice with a full
2267 * budget, even if the in-service queue is served at peak rate. And
2268 * this maximises throughput with sequential workloads.
2270 static unsigned long bfq_calc_max_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2272 return (u64
)bfqd
->peak_rate
* USEC_PER_MSEC
*
2273 jiffies_to_msecs(bfqd
->bfq_timeout
)>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
;
2277 * Update parameters related to throughput and responsiveness, as a
2278 * function of the estimated peak rate. See comments on
2279 * bfq_calc_max_budget(), and on T_slow and T_fast arrays.
2281 static void update_thr_responsiveness_params(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2283 int dev_type
= blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
);
2285 if (bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
== 0)
2286 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
=
2287 bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
2289 if (bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
&&
2290 bfqd
->peak_rate
< device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
]) {
2291 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_SLOW
;
2292 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_slow
[dev_type
] *
2294 } else if (bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_SLOW
&&
2295 bfqd
->peak_rate
> device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
]) {
2296 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_FAST
;
2297 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_fast
[dev_type
] *
2302 "dev_type %s dev_speed_class = %s (%llu sects/sec), thresh %llu setcs/sec",
2303 dev_type
== 0 ? "ROT" : "NONROT",
2304 bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
? "FAST" : "SLOW",
2305 bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
?
2306 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)R_fast
[dev_type
])>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
:
2307 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)R_slow
[dev_type
])>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
,
2308 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
])>>
2312 static void bfq_reset_rate_computation(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2315 if (rq
!= NULL
) { /* new rq dispatch now, reset accordingly */
2316 bfqd
->last_dispatch
= bfqd
->first_dispatch
= ktime_get_ns();
2317 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
= 1;
2318 bfqd
->sequential_samples
= 0;
2319 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
= bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
=
2321 } else /* no new rq dispatched, just reset the number of samples */
2322 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
= 0; /* full re-init on next disp. */
2325 "reset_rate_computation at end, sample %u/%u tot_sects %llu",
2326 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
, bfqd
->sequential_samples
,
2327 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
);
2330 static void bfq_update_rate_reset(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
2332 u32 rate
, weight
, divisor
;
2335 * For the convergence property to hold (see comments on
2336 * bfq_update_peak_rate()) and for the assessment to be
2337 * reliable, a minimum number of samples must be present, and
2338 * a minimum amount of time must have elapsed. If not so, do
2339 * not compute new rate. Just reset parameters, to get ready
2340 * for a new evaluation attempt.
2342 if (bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
< BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES
||
2343 bfqd
->delta_from_first
< BFQ_RATE_MIN_INTERVAL
)
2344 goto reset_computation
;
2347 * If a new request completion has occurred after last
2348 * dispatch, then, to approximate the rate at which requests
2349 * have been served by the device, it is more precise to
2350 * extend the observation interval to the last completion.
2352 bfqd
->delta_from_first
=
2353 max_t(u64
, bfqd
->delta_from_first
,
2354 bfqd
->last_completion
- bfqd
->first_dispatch
);
2357 * Rate computed in sects/usec, and not sects/nsec, for
2360 rate
= div64_ul(bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
,
2361 div_u64(bfqd
->delta_from_first
, NSEC_PER_USEC
));
2364 * Peak rate not updated if:
2365 * - the percentage of sequential dispatches is below 3/4 of the
2366 * total, and rate is below the current estimated peak rate
2367 * - rate is unreasonably high (> 20M sectors/sec)
2369 if ((bfqd
->sequential_samples
< (3 * bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
)>>2 &&
2370 rate
<= bfqd
->peak_rate
) ||
2371 rate
> 20<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
)
2372 goto reset_computation
;
2375 * We have to update the peak rate, at last! To this purpose,
2376 * we use a low-pass filter. We compute the smoothing constant
2377 * of the filter as a function of the 'weight' of the new
2380 * As can be seen in next formulas, we define this weight as a
2381 * quantity proportional to how sequential the workload is,
2382 * and to how long the observation time interval is.
2384 * The weight runs from 0 to 8. The maximum value of the
2385 * weight, 8, yields the minimum value for the smoothing
2386 * constant. At this minimum value for the smoothing constant,
2387 * the measured rate contributes for half of the next value of
2388 * the estimated peak rate.
2390 * So, the first step is to compute the weight as a function
2391 * of how sequential the workload is. Note that the weight
2392 * cannot reach 9, because bfqd->sequential_samples cannot
2393 * become equal to bfqd->peak_rate_samples, which, in its
2394 * turn, holds true because bfqd->sequential_samples is not
2395 * incremented for the first sample.
2397 weight
= (9 * bfqd
->sequential_samples
) / bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
;
2400 * Second step: further refine the weight as a function of the
2401 * duration of the observation interval.
2403 weight
= min_t(u32
, 8,
2404 div_u64(weight
* bfqd
->delta_from_first
,
2405 BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL
));
2408 * Divisor ranging from 10, for minimum weight, to 2, for
2411 divisor
= 10 - weight
;
2414 * Finally, update peak rate:
2416 * peak_rate = peak_rate * (divisor-1) / divisor + rate / divisor
2418 bfqd
->peak_rate
*= divisor
-1;
2419 bfqd
->peak_rate
/= divisor
;
2420 rate
/= divisor
; /* smoothing constant alpha = 1/divisor */
2422 bfqd
->peak_rate
+= rate
;
2423 update_thr_responsiveness_params(bfqd
);
2426 bfq_reset_rate_computation(bfqd
, rq
);
2430 * Update the read/write peak rate (the main quantity used for
2431 * auto-tuning, see update_thr_responsiveness_params()).
2433 * It is not trivial to estimate the peak rate (correctly): because of
2434 * the presence of sw and hw queues between the scheduler and the
2435 * device components that finally serve I/O requests, it is hard to
2436 * say exactly when a given dispatched request is served inside the
2437 * device, and for how long. As a consequence, it is hard to know
2438 * precisely at what rate a given set of requests is actually served
2441 * On the opposite end, the dispatch time of any request is trivially
2442 * available, and, from this piece of information, the "dispatch rate"
2443 * of requests can be immediately computed. So, the idea in the next
2444 * function is to use what is known, namely request dispatch times
2445 * (plus, when useful, request completion times), to estimate what is
2446 * unknown, namely in-device request service rate.
2448 * The main issue is that, because of the above facts, the rate at
2449 * which a certain set of requests is dispatched over a certain time
2450 * interval can vary greatly with respect to the rate at which the
2451 * same requests are then served. But, since the size of any
2452 * intermediate queue is limited, and the service scheme is lossless
2453 * (no request is silently dropped), the following obvious convergence
2454 * property holds: the number of requests dispatched MUST become
2455 * closer and closer to the number of requests completed as the
2456 * observation interval grows. This is the key property used in
2457 * the next function to estimate the peak service rate as a function
2458 * of the observed dispatch rate. The function assumes to be invoked
2459 * on every request dispatch.
2461 static void bfq_update_peak_rate(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
2463 u64 now_ns
= ktime_get_ns();
2465 if (bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
== 0) { /* first dispatch */
2466 bfq_log(bfqd
, "update_peak_rate: goto reset, samples %d",
2467 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
);
2468 bfq_reset_rate_computation(bfqd
, rq
);
2469 goto update_last_values
; /* will add one sample */
2473 * Device idle for very long: the observation interval lasting
2474 * up to this dispatch cannot be a valid observation interval
2475 * for computing a new peak rate (similarly to the late-
2476 * completion event in bfq_completed_request()). Go to
2477 * update_rate_and_reset to have the following three steps
2479 * - close the observation interval at the last (previous)
2480 * request dispatch or completion
2481 * - compute rate, if possible, for that observation interval
2482 * - start a new observation interval with this dispatch
2484 if (now_ns
- bfqd
->last_dispatch
> 100*NSEC_PER_MSEC
&&
2485 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
== 0)
2486 goto update_rate_and_reset
;
2488 /* Update sampling information */
2489 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
++;
2491 if ((bfqd
->rq_in_driver
> 0 ||
2492 now_ns
- bfqd
->last_completion
< BFQ_MIN_TT
)
2493 && get_sdist(bfqd
->last_position
, rq
) < BFQQ_SEEK_THR
)
2494 bfqd
->sequential_samples
++;
2496 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
+= blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2498 /* Reset max observed rq size every 32 dispatches */
2499 if (likely(bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
% 32))
2500 bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
=
2501 max_t(u32
, blk_rq_sectors(rq
), bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
);
2503 bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
= blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2505 bfqd
->delta_from_first
= now_ns
- bfqd
->first_dispatch
;
2507 /* Target observation interval not yet reached, go on sampling */
2508 if (bfqd
->delta_from_first
< BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL
)
2509 goto update_last_values
;
2511 update_rate_and_reset
:
2512 bfq_update_rate_reset(bfqd
, rq
);
2514 bfqd
->last_position
= blk_rq_pos(rq
) + blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2515 bfqd
->last_dispatch
= now_ns
;
2519 * Remove request from internal lists.
2521 static void bfq_dispatch_remove(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
2523 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
2526 * For consistency, the next instruction should have been
2527 * executed after removing the request from the queue and
2528 * dispatching it. We execute instead this instruction before
2529 * bfq_remove_request() (and hence introduce a temporary
2530 * inconsistency), for efficiency. In fact, should this
2531 * dispatch occur for a non in-service bfqq, this anticipated
2532 * increment prevents two counters related to bfqq->dispatched
2533 * from risking to be, first, uselessly decremented, and then
2534 * incremented again when the (new) value of bfqq->dispatched
2535 * happens to be taken into account.
2538 bfq_update_peak_rate(q
->elevator
->elevator_data
, rq
);
2540 bfq_remove_request(q
, rq
);
2543 static void __bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2546 * If this bfqq is shared between multiple processes, check
2547 * to make sure that those processes are still issuing I/Os
2548 * within the mean seek distance. If not, it may be time to
2549 * break the queues apart again.
2551 if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq
) && BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
))
2552 bfq_mark_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
);
2554 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
2555 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0)
2557 * Overloading budget_timeout field to store
2558 * the time at which the queue remains with no
2559 * backlog and no outstanding request; used by
2560 * the weight-raising mechanism.
2562 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
;
2564 bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
, true);
2566 bfq_requeue_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2568 * Resort priority tree of potential close cooperators.
2570 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2574 * All in-service entities must have been properly deactivated
2575 * or requeued before executing the next function, which
2576 * resets all in-service entites as no more in service.
2578 __bfq_bfqd_reset_in_service(bfqd
);
2582 * __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget - try to adapt the budget to the @bfqq behavior.
2583 * @bfqd: device data.
2584 * @bfqq: queue to update.
2585 * @reason: reason for expiration.
2587 * Handle the feedback on @bfqq budget at queue expiration.
2588 * See the body for detailed comments.
2590 static void __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2591 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2592 enum bfqq_expiration reason
)
2594 struct request
*next_rq
;
2595 int budget
, min_budget
;
2597 min_budget
= bfq_min_budget(bfqd
);
2599 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
2600 budget
= bfqq
->max_budget
;
2602 * Use a constant, low budget for weight-raised queues,
2603 * to help achieve a low latency. Keep it slightly higher
2604 * than the minimum possible budget, to cause a little
2605 * bit fewer expirations.
2607 budget
= 2 * min_budget
;
2609 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: last budg %d, budg left %d",
2610 bfqq
->entity
.budget
, bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
));
2611 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: last max_budg %d, min budg %d",
2612 budget
, bfq_min_budget(bfqd
));
2613 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: sync %d, seeky %d",
2614 bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
), BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqd
->in_service_queue
));
2616 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1) {
2619 * Caveat: in all the following cases we trade latency
2622 case BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
:
2624 * This is the only case where we may reduce
2625 * the budget: if there is no request of the
2626 * process still waiting for completion, then
2627 * we assume (tentatively) that the timer has
2628 * expired because the batch of requests of
2629 * the process could have been served with a
2630 * smaller budget. Hence, betting that
2631 * process will behave in the same way when it
2632 * becomes backlogged again, we reduce its
2633 * next budget. As long as we guess right,
2634 * this budget cut reduces the latency
2635 * experienced by the process.
2637 * However, if there are still outstanding
2638 * requests, then the process may have not yet
2639 * issued its next request just because it is
2640 * still waiting for the completion of some of
2641 * the still outstanding ones. So in this
2642 * subcase we do not reduce its budget, on the
2643 * contrary we increase it to possibly boost
2644 * the throughput, as discussed in the
2645 * comments to the BUDGET_TIMEOUT case.
2647 if (bfqq
->dispatched
> 0) /* still outstanding reqs */
2648 budget
= min(budget
* 2, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2650 if (budget
> 5 * min_budget
)
2651 budget
-= 4 * min_budget
;
2653 budget
= min_budget
;
2656 case BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
:
2658 * We double the budget here because it gives
2659 * the chance to boost the throughput if this
2660 * is not a seeky process (and has bumped into
2661 * this timeout because of, e.g., ZBR).
2663 budget
= min(budget
* 2, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2665 case BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
:
2667 * The process still has backlog, and did not
2668 * let either the budget timeout or the disk
2669 * idling timeout expire. Hence it is not
2670 * seeky, has a short thinktime and may be
2671 * happy with a higher budget too. So
2672 * definitely increase the budget of this good
2673 * candidate to boost the disk throughput.
2675 budget
= min(budget
* 4, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2677 case BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
:
2679 * For queues that expire for this reason, it
2680 * is particularly important to keep the
2681 * budget close to the actual service they
2682 * need. Doing so reduces the timestamp
2683 * misalignment problem described in the
2684 * comments in the body of
2685 * __bfq_activate_entity. In fact, suppose
2686 * that a queue systematically expires for
2687 * BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS and presents a
2688 * new request in time to enjoy timestamp
2689 * back-shifting. The larger the budget of the
2690 * queue is with respect to the service the
2691 * queue actually requests in each service
2692 * slot, the more times the queue can be
2693 * reactivated with the same virtual finish
2694 * time. It follows that, even if this finish
2695 * time is pushed to the system virtual time
2696 * to reduce the consequent timestamp
2697 * misalignment, the queue unjustly enjoys for
2698 * many re-activations a lower finish time
2699 * than all newly activated queues.
2701 * The service needed by bfqq is measured
2702 * quite precisely by bfqq->entity.service.
2703 * Since bfqq does not enjoy device idling,
2704 * bfqq->entity.service is equal to the number
2705 * of sectors that the process associated with
2706 * bfqq requested to read/write before waiting
2707 * for request completions, or blocking for
2710 budget
= max_t(int, bfqq
->entity
.service
, min_budget
);
2715 } else if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
)) {
2717 * Async queues get always the maximum possible
2718 * budget, as for them we do not care about latency
2719 * (in addition, their ability to dispatch is limited
2720 * by the charging factor).
2722 budget
= bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
;
2725 bfqq
->max_budget
= budget
;
2727 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
>= bfq_stats_min_budgets
&&
2728 !bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
)
2729 bfqq
->max_budget
= min(bfqq
->max_budget
, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2732 * If there is still backlog, then assign a new budget, making
2733 * sure that it is large enough for the next request. Since
2734 * the finish time of bfqq must be kept in sync with the
2735 * budget, be sure to call __bfq_bfqq_expire() *after* this
2738 * If there is no backlog, then no need to update the budget;
2739 * it will be updated on the arrival of a new request.
2741 next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
2743 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
2744 bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
));
2746 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "head sect: %u, new budget %d",
2747 next_rq
? blk_rq_sectors(next_rq
) : 0,
2748 bfqq
->entity
.budget
);
2752 * Return true if the process associated with bfqq is "slow". The slow
2753 * flag is used, in addition to the budget timeout, to reduce the
2754 * amount of service provided to seeky processes, and thus reduce
2755 * their chances to lower the throughput. More details in the comments
2756 * on the function bfq_bfqq_expire().
2758 * An important observation is in order: as discussed in the comments
2759 * on the function bfq_update_peak_rate(), with devices with internal
2760 * queues, it is hard if ever possible to know when and for how long
2761 * an I/O request is processed by the device (apart from the trivial
2762 * I/O pattern where a new request is dispatched only after the
2763 * previous one has been completed). This makes it hard to evaluate
2764 * the real rate at which the I/O requests of each bfq_queue are
2765 * served. In fact, for an I/O scheduler like BFQ, serving a
2766 * bfq_queue means just dispatching its requests during its service
2767 * slot (i.e., until the budget of the queue is exhausted, or the
2768 * queue remains idle, or, finally, a timeout fires). But, during the
2769 * service slot of a bfq_queue, around 100 ms at most, the device may
2770 * be even still processing requests of bfq_queues served in previous
2771 * service slots. On the opposite end, the requests of the in-service
2772 * bfq_queue may be completed after the service slot of the queue
2775 * Anyway, unless more sophisticated solutions are used
2776 * (where possible), the sum of the sizes of the requests dispatched
2777 * during the service slot of a bfq_queue is probably the only
2778 * approximation available for the service received by the bfq_queue
2779 * during its service slot. And this sum is the quantity used in this
2780 * function to evaluate the I/O speed of a process.
2782 static bool bfq_bfqq_is_slow(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2783 bool compensate
, enum bfqq_expiration reason
,
2784 unsigned long *delta_ms
)
2786 ktime_t delta_ktime
;
2788 bool slow
= BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
); /* if delta too short, use seekyness */
2790 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
))
2794 delta_ktime
= bfqd
->last_idling_start
;
2796 delta_ktime
= ktime_get();
2797 delta_ktime
= ktime_sub(delta_ktime
, bfqd
->last_budget_start
);
2798 delta_usecs
= ktime_to_us(delta_ktime
);
2800 /* don't use too short time intervals */
2801 if (delta_usecs
< 1000) {
2802 if (blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
))
2804 * give same worst-case guarantees as idling
2807 *delta_ms
= BFQ_MIN_TT
/ NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
2808 else /* charge at least one seek */
2809 *delta_ms
= bfq_slice_idle
/ NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
2814 *delta_ms
= delta_usecs
/ USEC_PER_MSEC
;
2817 * Use only long (> 20ms) intervals to filter out excessive
2818 * spikes in service rate estimation.
2820 if (delta_usecs
> 20000) {
2822 * Caveat for rotational devices: processes doing I/O
2823 * in the slower disk zones tend to be slow(er) even
2824 * if not seeky. In this respect, the estimated peak
2825 * rate is likely to be an average over the disk
2826 * surface. Accordingly, to not be too harsh with
2827 * unlucky processes, a process is deemed slow only if
2828 * its rate has been lower than half of the estimated
2831 slow
= bfqq
->entity
.service
< bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
/ 2;
2834 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "bfq_bfqq_is_slow: slow %d", slow
);
2840 * To be deemed as soft real-time, an application must meet two
2841 * requirements. First, the application must not require an average
2842 * bandwidth higher than the approximate bandwidth required to playback or
2843 * record a compressed high-definition video.
2844 * The next function is invoked on the completion of the last request of a
2845 * batch, to compute the next-start time instant, soft_rt_next_start, such
2846 * that, if the next request of the application does not arrive before
2847 * soft_rt_next_start, then the above requirement on the bandwidth is met.
2849 * The second requirement is that the request pattern of the application is
2850 * isochronous, i.e., that, after issuing a request or a batch of requests,
2851 * the application stops issuing new requests until all its pending requests
2852 * have been completed. After that, the application may issue a new batch,
2854 * For this reason the next function is invoked to compute
2855 * soft_rt_next_start only for applications that meet this requirement,
2856 * whereas soft_rt_next_start is set to infinity for applications that do
2859 * Unfortunately, even a greedy application may happen to behave in an
2860 * isochronous way if the CPU load is high. In fact, the application may
2861 * stop issuing requests while the CPUs are busy serving other processes,
2862 * then restart, then stop again for a while, and so on. In addition, if
2863 * the disk achieves a low enough throughput with the request pattern
2864 * issued by the application (e.g., because the request pattern is random
2865 * and/or the device is slow), then the application may meet the above
2866 * bandwidth requirement too. To prevent such a greedy application to be
2867 * deemed as soft real-time, a further rule is used in the computation of
2868 * soft_rt_next_start: soft_rt_next_start must be higher than the current
2869 * time plus the maximum time for which the arrival of a request is waited
2870 * for when a sync queue becomes idle, namely bfqd->bfq_slice_idle.
2871 * This filters out greedy applications, as the latter issue instead their
2872 * next request as soon as possible after the last one has been completed
2873 * (in contrast, when a batch of requests is completed, a soft real-time
2874 * application spends some time processing data).
2876 * Unfortunately, the last filter may easily generate false positives if
2877 * only bfqd->bfq_slice_idle is used as a reference time interval and one
2878 * or both the following cases occur:
2879 * 1) HZ is so low that the duration of a jiffy is comparable to or higher
2880 * than bfqd->bfq_slice_idle. This happens, e.g., on slow devices with
2882 * 2) jiffies, instead of increasing at a constant rate, may stop increasing
2883 * for a while, then suddenly 'jump' by several units to recover the lost
2884 * increments. This seems to happen, e.g., inside virtual machines.
2885 * To address this issue, we do not use as a reference time interval just
2886 * bfqd->bfq_slice_idle, but bfqd->bfq_slice_idle plus a few jiffies. In
2887 * particular we add the minimum number of jiffies for which the filter
2888 * seems to be quite precise also in embedded systems and KVM/QEMU virtual
2891 static unsigned long bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2892 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2894 return max(bfqq
->last_idle_bklogged
+
2895 HZ
* bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
/
2896 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
,
2897 jiffies
+ nsecs_to_jiffies(bfqq
->bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
) + 4);
2901 * Return the farthest future time instant according to jiffies
2904 static unsigned long bfq_greatest_from_now(void)
2906 return jiffies
+ MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET
;
2910 * Return the farthest past time instant according to jiffies
2913 static unsigned long bfq_smallest_from_now(void)
2915 return jiffies
- MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET
;
2919 * bfq_bfqq_expire - expire a queue.
2920 * @bfqd: device owning the queue.
2921 * @bfqq: the queue to expire.
2922 * @compensate: if true, compensate for the time spent idling.
2923 * @reason: the reason causing the expiration.
2925 * If the process associated with bfqq does slow I/O (e.g., because it
2926 * issues random requests), we charge bfqq with the time it has been
2927 * in service instead of the service it has received (see
2928 * bfq_bfqq_charge_time for details on how this goal is achieved). As
2929 * a consequence, bfqq will typically get higher timestamps upon
2930 * reactivation, and hence it will be rescheduled as if it had
2931 * received more service than what it has actually received. In the
2932 * end, bfqq receives less service in proportion to how slowly its
2933 * associated process consumes its budgets (and hence how seriously it
2934 * tends to lower the throughput). In addition, this time-charging
2935 * strategy guarantees time fairness among slow processes. In
2936 * contrast, if the process associated with bfqq is not slow, we
2937 * charge bfqq exactly with the service it has received.
2939 * Charging time to the first type of queues and the exact service to
2940 * the other has the effect of using the WF2Q+ policy to schedule the
2941 * former on a timeslice basis, without violating service domain
2942 * guarantees among the latter.
2944 void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2945 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2947 enum bfqq_expiration reason
)
2950 unsigned long delta
= 0;
2951 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
2955 * Check whether the process is slow (see bfq_bfqq_is_slow).
2957 slow
= bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd
, bfqq
, compensate
, reason
, &delta
);
2960 * Increase service_from_backlogged before next statement,
2961 * because the possible next invocation of
2962 * bfq_bfqq_charge_time would likely inflate
2963 * entity->service. In contrast, service_from_backlogged must
2964 * contain real service, to enable the soft real-time
2965 * heuristic to correctly compute the bandwidth consumed by
2968 bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
+= entity
->service
;
2971 * As above explained, charge slow (typically seeky) and
2972 * timed-out queues with the time and not the service
2973 * received, to favor sequential workloads.
2975 * Processes doing I/O in the slower disk zones will tend to
2976 * be slow(er) even if not seeky. Therefore, since the
2977 * estimated peak rate is actually an average over the disk
2978 * surface, these processes may timeout just for bad luck. To
2979 * avoid punishing them, do not charge time to processes that
2980 * succeeded in consuming at least 2/3 of their budget. This
2981 * allows BFQ to preserve enough elasticity to still perform
2982 * bandwidth, and not time, distribution with little unlucky
2983 * or quasi-sequential processes.
2985 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 &&
2987 (reason
== BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
&&
2988 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= entity
->budget
/ 3)))
2989 bfq_bfqq_charge_time(bfqd
, bfqq
, delta
);
2991 if (reason
== BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
&&
2992 entity
->service
<= 2 * entity
->budget
/ 10)
2993 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
2995 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
2996 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
2998 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
> 0 &&
2999 RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
3001 * If we get here, and there are no outstanding
3002 * requests, then the request pattern is isochronous
3003 * (see the comments on the function
3004 * bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()). Thus we can compute
3005 * soft_rt_next_start. If, instead, the queue still
3006 * has outstanding requests, then we have to wait for
3007 * the completion of all the outstanding requests to
3008 * discover whether the request pattern is actually
3011 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0)
3012 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
3013 bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3016 * The application is still waiting for the
3017 * completion of one or more requests:
3018 * prevent it from possibly being incorrectly
3019 * deemed as soft real-time by setting its
3020 * soft_rt_next_start to infinity. In fact,
3021 * without this assignment, the application
3022 * would be incorrectly deemed as soft
3024 * 1) it issued a new request before the
3025 * completion of all its in-flight
3027 * 2) at that time, its soft_rt_next_start
3028 * happened to be in the past.
3030 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
3031 bfq_greatest_from_now();
3033 * Schedule an update of soft_rt_next_start to when
3034 * the task may be discovered to be isochronous.
3036 bfq_mark_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
);
3040 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
3041 "expire (%d, slow %d, num_disp %d, idle_win %d)", reason
,
3042 slow
, bfqq
->dispatched
, bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
));
3045 * Increase, decrease or leave budget unchanged according to
3048 __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(bfqd
, bfqq
, reason
);
3050 __bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3052 /* mark bfqq as waiting a request only if a bic still points to it */
3053 if (ref
> 1 && !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
) &&
3054 reason
!= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
&&
3055 reason
!= BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
)
3056 bfq_mark_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
);
3060 * Budget timeout is not implemented through a dedicated timer, but
3061 * just checked on request arrivals and completions, as well as on
3062 * idle timer expirations.
3064 static bool bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3066 return time_is_before_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->budget_timeout
);
3070 * If we expire a queue that is actively waiting (i.e., with the
3071 * device idled) for the arrival of a new request, then we may incur
3072 * the timestamp misalignment problem described in the body of the
3073 * function __bfq_activate_entity. Hence we return true only if this
3074 * condition does not hold, or if the queue is slow enough to deserve
3075 * only to be kicked off for preserving a high throughput.
3077 static bool bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3079 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
,
3080 "may_budget_timeout: wait_request %d left %d timeout %d",
3081 bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
),
3082 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= bfqq
->entity
.budget
/ 3,
3083 bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
));
3085 return (!bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) ||
3086 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= bfqq
->entity
.budget
/ 3)
3088 bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
);
3092 * For a queue that becomes empty, device idling is allowed only if
3093 * this function returns true for the queue. As a consequence, since
3094 * device idling plays a critical role in both throughput boosting and
3095 * service guarantees, the return value of this function plays a
3096 * critical role in both these aspects as well.
3098 * In a nutshell, this function returns true only if idling is
3099 * beneficial for throughput or, even if detrimental for throughput,
3100 * idling is however necessary to preserve service guarantees (low
3101 * latency, desired throughput distribution, ...). In particular, on
3102 * NCQ-capable devices, this function tries to return false, so as to
3103 * help keep the drives' internal queues full, whenever this helps the
3104 * device boost the throughput without causing any service-guarantee
3107 * In more detail, the return value of this function is obtained by,
3108 * first, computing a number of boolean variables that take into
3109 * account throughput and service-guarantee issues, and, then,
3110 * combining these variables in a logical expression. Most of the
3111 * issues taken into account are not trivial. We discuss these issues
3112 * individually while introducing the variables.
3114 static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3116 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
3117 bool idling_boosts_thr
, idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
,
3118 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
,
3119 asymmetric_scenario
;
3121 if (bfqd
->strict_guarantees
)
3125 * The next variable takes into account the cases where idling
3126 * boosts the throughput.
3128 * The value of the variable is computed considering, first, that
3129 * idling is virtually always beneficial for the throughput if:
3130 * (a) the device is not NCQ-capable, or
3131 * (b) regardless of the presence of NCQ, the device is rotational
3132 * and the request pattern for bfqq is I/O-bound and sequential.
3134 * Secondly, and in contrast to the above item (b), idling an
3135 * NCQ-capable flash-based device would not boost the
3136 * throughput even with sequential I/O; rather it would lower
3137 * the throughput in proportion to how fast the device
3138 * is. Accordingly, the next variable is true if any of the
3139 * above conditions (a) and (b) is true, and, in particular,
3140 * happens to be false if bfqd is an NCQ-capable flash-based
3143 idling_boosts_thr
= !bfqd
->hw_tag
||
3144 (!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
) && bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
) &&
3145 bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
));
3148 * The value of the next variable,
3149 * idling_boosts_thr_without_issues, is equal to that of
3150 * idling_boosts_thr, unless a special case holds. In this
3151 * special case, described below, idling may cause problems to
3152 * weight-raised queues.
3154 * When the request pool is saturated (e.g., in the presence
3155 * of write hogs), if the processes associated with
3156 * non-weight-raised queues ask for requests at a lower rate,
3157 * then processes associated with weight-raised queues have a
3158 * higher probability to get a request from the pool
3159 * immediately (or at least soon) when they need one. Thus
3160 * they have a higher probability to actually get a fraction
3161 * of the device throughput proportional to their high
3162 * weight. This is especially true with NCQ-capable drives,
3163 * which enqueue several requests in advance, and further
3164 * reorder internally-queued requests.
3166 * For this reason, we force to false the value of
3167 * idling_boosts_thr_without_issues if there are weight-raised
3168 * busy queues. In this case, and if bfqq is not weight-raised,
3169 * this guarantees that the device is not idled for bfqq (if,
3170 * instead, bfqq is weight-raised, then idling will be
3171 * guaranteed by another variable, see below). Combined with
3172 * the timestamping rules of BFQ (see [1] for details), this
3173 * behavior causes bfqq, and hence any sync non-weight-raised
3174 * queue, to get a lower number of requests served, and thus
3175 * to ask for a lower number of requests from the request
3176 * pool, before the busy weight-raised queues get served
3177 * again. This often mitigates starvation problems in the
3178 * presence of heavy write workloads and NCQ, thereby
3179 * guaranteeing a higher application and system responsiveness
3180 * in these hostile scenarios.
3182 idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
= idling_boosts_thr
&&
3183 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
== 0;
3186 * There is then a case where idling must be performed not
3187 * for throughput concerns, but to preserve service
3190 * To introduce this case, we can note that allowing the drive
3191 * to enqueue more than one request at a time, and hence
3192 * delegating de facto final scheduling decisions to the
3193 * drive's internal scheduler, entails loss of control on the
3194 * actual request service order. In particular, the critical
3195 * situation is when requests from different processes happen
3196 * to be present, at the same time, in the internal queue(s)
3197 * of the drive. In such a situation, the drive, by deciding
3198 * the service order of the internally-queued requests, does
3199 * determine also the actual throughput distribution among
3200 * these processes. But the drive typically has no notion or
3201 * concern about per-process throughput distribution, and
3202 * makes its decisions only on a per-request basis. Therefore,
3203 * the service distribution enforced by the drive's internal
3204 * scheduler is likely to coincide with the desired
3205 * device-throughput distribution only in a completely
3206 * symmetric scenario where:
3207 * (i) each of these processes must get the same throughput as
3209 * (ii) all these processes have the same I/O pattern
3210 (either sequential or random).
3211 * In fact, in such a scenario, the drive will tend to treat
3212 * the requests of each of these processes in about the same
3213 * way as the requests of the others, and thus to provide
3214 * each of these processes with about the same throughput
3215 * (which is exactly the desired throughput distribution). In
3216 * contrast, in any asymmetric scenario, device idling is
3217 * certainly needed to guarantee that bfqq receives its
3218 * assigned fraction of the device throughput (see [1] for
3221 * We address this issue by controlling, actually, only the
3222 * symmetry sub-condition (i), i.e., provided that
3223 * sub-condition (i) holds, idling is not performed,
3224 * regardless of whether sub-condition (ii) holds. In other
3225 * words, only if sub-condition (i) holds, then idling is
3226 * allowed, and the device tends to be prevented from queueing
3227 * many requests, possibly of several processes. The reason
3228 * for not controlling also sub-condition (ii) is that we
3229 * exploit preemption to preserve guarantees in case of
3230 * symmetric scenarios, even if (ii) does not hold, as
3231 * explained in the next two paragraphs.
3233 * Even if a queue, say Q, is expired when it remains idle, Q
3234 * can still preempt the new in-service queue if the next
3235 * request of Q arrives soon (see the comments on
3236 * bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation). If all queues and
3237 * groups have the same weight, this form of preemption,
3238 * combined with the hole-recovery heuristic described in the
3239 * comments on function bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation,
3240 * are enough to preserve a correct bandwidth distribution in
3241 * the mid term, even without idling. In fact, even if not
3242 * idling allows the internal queues of the device to contain
3243 * many requests, and thus to reorder requests, we can rather
3244 * safely assume that the internal scheduler still preserves a
3245 * minimum of mid-term fairness. The motivation for using
3246 * preemption instead of idling is that, by not idling,
3247 * service guarantees are preserved without minimally
3248 * sacrificing throughput. In other words, both a high
3249 * throughput and its desired distribution are obtained.
3251 * More precisely, this preemption-based, idleless approach
3252 * provides fairness in terms of IOPS, and not sectors per
3253 * second. This can be seen with a simple example. Suppose
3254 * that there are two queues with the same weight, but that
3255 * the first queue receives requests of 8 sectors, while the
3256 * second queue receives requests of 1024 sectors. In
3257 * addition, suppose that each of the two queues contains at
3258 * most one request at a time, which implies that each queue
3259 * always remains idle after it is served. Finally, after
3260 * remaining idle, each queue receives very quickly a new
3261 * request. It follows that the two queues are served
3262 * alternatively, preempting each other if needed. This
3263 * implies that, although both queues have the same weight,
3264 * the queue with large requests receives a service that is
3265 * 1024/8 times as high as the service received by the other
3268 * On the other hand, device idling is performed, and thus
3269 * pure sector-domain guarantees are provided, for the
3270 * following queues, which are likely to need stronger
3271 * throughput guarantees: weight-raised queues, and queues
3272 * with a higher weight than other queues. When such queues
3273 * are active, sub-condition (i) is false, which triggers
3276 * According to the above considerations, the next variable is
3277 * true (only) if sub-condition (i) holds. To compute the
3278 * value of this variable, we not only use the return value of
3279 * the function bfq_symmetric_scenario(), but also check
3280 * whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because
3281 * bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also
3282 * weight-raised queues (see comments on
3283 * bfq_weights_tree_add()).
3285 * As a side note, it is worth considering that the above
3286 * device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the
3287 * following unlucky scenario: if idling is (correctly)
3288 * disabled in a time period during which all symmetry
3289 * sub-conditions hold, and hence the device is allowed to
3290 * enqueue many requests, but at some later point in time some
3291 * sub-condition stops to hold, then it may become impossible
3292 * to let requests be served in the desired order until all
3293 * the requests already queued in the device have been served.
3295 asymmetric_scenario
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 ||
3296 !bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd
);
3299 * Finally, there is a case where maximizing throughput is the
3300 * best choice even if it may cause unfairness toward
3301 * bfqq. Such a case is when bfqq became active in a burst of
3302 * queue activations. Queues that became active during a large
3303 * burst benefit only from throughput, as discussed in the
3304 * comments on bfq_handle_burst. Thus, if bfqq became active
3305 * in a burst and not idling the device maximizes throughput,
3306 * then the device must no be idled, because not idling the
3307 * device provides bfqq and all other queues in the burst with
3308 * maximum benefit. Combining this and the above case, we can
3309 * now establish when idling is actually needed to preserve
3310 * service guarantees.
3312 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
=
3313 asymmetric_scenario
&& !bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
3316 * We have now all the components we need to compute the return
3317 * value of the function, which is true only if both the following
3319 * 1) bfqq is sync, because idling make sense only for sync queues;
3320 * 2) idling either boosts the throughput (without issues), or
3321 * is necessary to preserve service guarantees.
3323 return bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) &&
3324 (idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
||
3325 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
);
3329 * If the in-service queue is empty but the function bfq_bfqq_may_idle
3330 * returns true, then:
3331 * 1) the queue must remain in service and cannot be expired, and
3332 * 2) the device must be idled to wait for the possible arrival of a new
3333 * request for the queue.
3334 * See the comments on the function bfq_bfqq_may_idle for the reasons
3335 * why performing device idling is the best choice to boost the throughput
3336 * and preserve service guarantees when bfq_bfqq_may_idle itself
3339 static bool bfq_bfqq_must_idle(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3341 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
3343 return RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
) && bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
!= 0 &&
3344 bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
);
3348 * Select a queue for service. If we have a current queue in service,
3349 * check whether to continue servicing it, or retrieve and set a new one.
3351 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
3353 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3354 struct request
*next_rq
;
3355 enum bfqq_expiration reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
;
3357 bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
3361 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: already in-service queue");
3363 if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq
) &&
3364 !bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) &&
3365 !bfq_bfqq_must_idle(bfqq
))
3370 * This loop is rarely executed more than once. Even when it
3371 * happens, it is much more convenient to re-execute this loop
3372 * than to return NULL and trigger a new dispatch to get a
3375 next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
3377 * If bfqq has requests queued and it has enough budget left to
3378 * serve them, keep the queue, otherwise expire it.
3381 if (bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
) >
3382 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
)) {
3384 * Expire the queue for budget exhaustion,
3385 * which makes sure that the next budget is
3386 * enough to serve the next request, even if
3387 * it comes from the fifo expired path.
3389 reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
;
3393 * The idle timer may be pending because we may
3394 * not disable disk idling even when a new request
3397 if (bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
)) {
3399 * If we get here: 1) at least a new request
3400 * has arrived but we have not disabled the
3401 * timer because the request was too small,
3402 * 2) then the block layer has unplugged
3403 * the device, causing the dispatch to be
3406 * Since the device is unplugged, now the
3407 * requests are probably large enough to
3408 * provide a reasonable throughput.
3409 * So we disable idling.
3411 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
3412 hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
3413 bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
3420 * No requests pending. However, if the in-service queue is idling
3421 * for a new request, or has requests waiting for a completion and
3422 * may idle after their completion, then keep it anyway.
3424 if (bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) ||
3425 (bfqq
->dispatched
!= 0 && bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
))) {
3430 reason
= BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
;
3432 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, reason
);
3434 bfqq
= bfq_set_in_service_queue(bfqd
);
3436 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: checking new queue");
3441 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: returned this queue");
3443 bfq_log(bfqd
, "select_queue: no queue returned");
3448 static void bfq_update_wr_data(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3450 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
3452 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) { /* queue is being weight-raised */
3453 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
3454 "raising period dur %u/%u msec, old coeff %u, w %d(%d)",
3455 jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies
- bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
),
3456 jiffies_to_msecs(bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
),
3458 bfqq
->entity
.weight
, bfqq
->entity
.orig_weight
);
3460 if (entity
->prio_changed
)
3461 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "WARN: pending prio change");
3464 * If the queue was activated in a burst, or too much
3465 * time has elapsed from the beginning of this
3466 * weight-raising period, then end weight raising.
3468 if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
))
3469 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
3470 else if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
3471 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
)) {
3472 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
!= bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
||
3473 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
+
3474 bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
)))
3475 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
3477 /* switch back to interactive wr */
3478 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
3479 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
3480 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
=
3481 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
3482 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
3487 * To improve latency (for this or other queues), immediately
3488 * update weight both if it must be raised and if it must be
3489 * lowered. Since, entity may be on some active tree here, and
3490 * might have a pending change of its ioprio class, invoke
3491 * next function with the last parameter unset (see the
3492 * comments on the function).
3494 if ((entity
->weight
> entity
->orig_weight
) != (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1))
3495 __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(bfq_entity_service_tree(entity
),
3500 * Dispatch next request from bfqq.
3502 static struct request
*bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3503 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3505 struct request
*rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
3506 unsigned long service_to_charge
;
3508 service_to_charge
= bfq_serv_to_charge(rq
, bfqq
);
3510 bfq_bfqq_served(bfqq
, service_to_charge
);
3512 bfq_dispatch_remove(bfqd
->queue
, rq
);
3515 * If weight raising has to terminate for bfqq, then next
3516 * function causes an immediate update of bfqq's weight,
3517 * without waiting for next activation. As a consequence, on
3518 * expiration, bfqq will be timestamped as if has never been
3519 * weight-raised during this service slot, even if it has
3520 * received part or even most of the service as a
3521 * weight-raised queue. This inflates bfqq's timestamps, which
3522 * is beneficial, as bfqq is then more willing to leave the
3523 * device immediately to possible other weight-raised queues.
3525 bfq_update_wr_data(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3528 * Expire bfqq, pretending that its budget expired, if bfqq
3529 * belongs to CLASS_IDLE and other queues are waiting for
3532 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
> 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
3538 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
);
3542 static bool bfq_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3544 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3547 * Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->busy_queues should cause at
3548 * most a call to dispatch for nothing
3550 return !list_empty_careful(&bfqd
->dispatch
) ||
3551 bfqd
->busy_queues
> 0;
3554 static struct request
*__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3556 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3557 struct request
*rq
= NULL
;
3558 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= NULL
;
3560 if (!list_empty(&bfqd
->dispatch
)) {
3561 rq
= list_first_entry(&bfqd
->dispatch
, struct request
,
3563 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
3569 * Increment counters here, because this
3570 * dispatch does not follow the standard
3571 * dispatch flow (where counters are
3576 goto inc_in_driver_start_rq
;
3580 * We exploit the put_rq_private hook to decrement
3581 * rq_in_driver, but put_rq_private will not be
3582 * invoked on this request. So, to avoid unbalance,
3583 * just start this request, without incrementing
3584 * rq_in_driver. As a negative consequence,
3585 * rq_in_driver is deceptively lower than it should be
3586 * while this request is in service. This may cause
3587 * bfq_schedule_dispatch to be invoked uselessly.
3589 * As for implementing an exact solution, the
3590 * put_request hook, if defined, is probably invoked
3591 * also on this request. So, by exploiting this hook,
3592 * we could 1) increment rq_in_driver here, and 2)
3593 * decrement it in put_request. Such a solution would
3594 * let the value of the counter be always accurate,
3595 * but it would entail using an extra interface
3596 * function. This cost seems higher than the benefit,
3597 * being the frequency of non-elevator-private
3598 * requests very low.
3603 bfq_log(bfqd
, "dispatch requests: %d busy queues", bfqd
->busy_queues
);
3605 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
== 0)
3609 * Force device to serve one request at a time if
3610 * strict_guarantees is true. Forcing this service scheme is
3611 * currently the ONLY way to guarantee that the request
3612 * service order enforced by the scheduler is respected by a
3613 * queueing device. Otherwise the device is free even to make
3614 * some unlucky request wait for as long as the device
3617 * Of course, serving one request at at time may cause loss of
3620 if (bfqd
->strict_guarantees
&& bfqd
->rq_in_driver
> 0)
3623 bfqq
= bfq_select_queue(bfqd
);
3627 rq
= bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3630 inc_in_driver_start_rq
:
3631 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
++;
3633 rq
->rq_flags
|= RQF_STARTED
;
3639 static struct request
*bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3641 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3644 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
3646 rq
= __bfq_dispatch_request(hctx
);
3647 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
3653 * Task holds one reference to the queue, dropped when task exits. Each rq
3654 * in-flight on this queue also holds a reference, dropped when rq is freed.
3656 * Scheduler lock must be held here. Recall not to use bfqq after calling
3657 * this function on it.
3659 void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3661 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
3662 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
= bfqq_group(bfqq
);
3666 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "put_queue: %p %d",
3673 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
))
3675 * The fact that this queue is being destroyed does not
3676 * invalidate the fact that this queue may have been
3677 * activated during the current burst. As a consequence,
3678 * although the queue does not exist anymore, and hence
3679 * needs to be removed from the burst list if there,
3680 * the burst size has not to be decremented.
3682 hlist_del_init(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
3684 kmem_cache_free(bfq_pool
, bfqq
);
3685 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
3686 bfqg_and_blkg_put(bfqg
);
3690 static void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3692 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
, *next
;
3695 * If this queue was scheduled to merge with another queue, be
3696 * sure to drop the reference taken on that queue (and others in
3697 * the merge chain). See bfq_setup_merge and bfq_merge_bfqqs.
3699 __bfqq
= bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
3703 next
= __bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
3704 bfq_put_queue(__bfqq
);
3709 static void bfq_exit_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3711 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
3712 __bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3713 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
3716 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "exit_bfqq: %p, %d", bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
3718 bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq
);
3720 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
); /* release process reference */
3723 static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool is_sync
)
3725 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, is_sync
);
3726 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
3729 bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
; /* NULL if scheduler already exited */
3732 unsigned long flags
;
3734 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
3735 bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3736 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, NULL
, is_sync
);
3737 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
3741 static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq
*icq
)
3743 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= icq_to_bic(icq
);
3745 bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic
, true);
3746 bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic
, false);
3750 * Update the entity prio values; note that the new values will not
3751 * be used until the next (re)activation.
3754 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
3756 struct task_struct
*tsk
= current
;
3758 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
3763 ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bic
->ioprio
);
3764 switch (ioprio_class
) {
3766 dev_err(bfqq
->bfqd
->queue
->backing_dev_info
->dev
,
3767 "bfq: bad prio class %d\n", ioprio_class
);
3768 case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
:
3770 * No prio set, inherit CPU scheduling settings.
3772 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= task_nice_ioprio(tsk
);
3773 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= task_nice_ioclass(tsk
);
3775 case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
:
3776 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3777 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
;
3779 case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
:
3780 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3781 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
;
3783 case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
:
3784 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
;
3785 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= 7;
3786 bfq_clear_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
3790 if (bfqq
->new_ioprio
>= IOPRIO_BE_NR
) {
3791 pr_crit("bfq_set_next_ioprio_data: new_ioprio %d\n",
3793 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_BE_NR
;
3796 bfqq
->entity
.new_weight
= bfq_ioprio_to_weight(bfqq
->new_ioprio
);
3797 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
3800 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3801 struct bio
*bio
, bool is_sync
,
3802 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
);
3804 static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bio
*bio
)
3806 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bic_to_bfqd(bic
);
3807 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3808 int ioprio
= bic
->icq
.ioc
->ioprio
;
3811 * This condition may trigger on a newly created bic, be sure to
3812 * drop the lock before returning.
3814 if (unlikely(!bfqd
) || likely(bic
->ioprio
== ioprio
))
3817 bic
->ioprio
= ioprio
;
3819 bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, false);
3821 /* release process reference on this queue */
3822 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
3823 bfqq
= bfq_get_queue(bfqd
, bio
, BLK_RW_ASYNC
, bic
);
3824 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
, false);
3827 bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, true);
3829 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(bfqq
, bic
);
3832 static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
3833 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, pid_t pid
, int is_sync
)
3835 RB_CLEAR_NODE(&bfqq
->entity
.rb_node
);
3836 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqq
->fifo
);
3837 INIT_HLIST_NODE(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
3843 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(bfqq
, bic
);
3846 if (!bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
3847 bfq_mark_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
3848 bfq_mark_bfqq_sync(bfqq
);
3849 bfq_mark_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
3851 bfq_clear_bfqq_sync(bfqq
);
3853 /* set end request to minus infinity from now */
3854 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
= ktime_get_ns() + 1;
3856 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
3860 /* Tentative initial value to trade off between thr and lat */
3861 bfqq
->max_budget
= (2 * bfq_max_budget(bfqd
)) / 3;
3862 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3865 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
3866 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3867 bfqq
->split_time
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3870 * Set to the value for which bfqq will not be deemed as
3871 * soft rt when it becomes backlogged.
3873 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
= bfq_greatest_from_now();
3875 /* first request is almost certainly seeky */
3876 bfqq
->seek_history
= 1;
3879 static struct bfq_queue
**bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3880 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
,
3881 int ioprio_class
, int ioprio
)
3883 switch (ioprio_class
) {
3884 case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
:
3885 return &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[0][ioprio
];
3886 case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
:
3887 ioprio
= IOPRIO_NORM
;
3889 case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
:
3890 return &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[1][ioprio
];
3891 case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
:
3892 return &bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
;
3898 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3899 struct bio
*bio
, bool is_sync
,
3900 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
3902 const int ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3903 const int ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bic
->ioprio
);
3904 struct bfq_queue
**async_bfqq
= NULL
;
3905 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3906 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
;
3910 bfqg
= bfq_find_set_group(bfqd
, bio_blkcg(bio
));
3912 bfqq
= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
;
3917 async_bfqq
= bfq_async_queue_prio(bfqd
, bfqg
, ioprio_class
,
3924 bfqq
= kmem_cache_alloc_node(bfq_pool
,
3925 GFP_NOWAIT
| __GFP_ZERO
| __GFP_NOWARN
,
3929 bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, bic
, current
->pid
,
3931 bfq_init_entity(&bfqq
->entity
, bfqg
);
3932 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "allocated");
3934 bfqq
= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
;
3935 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "using oom bfqq");
3940 * Pin the queue now that it's allocated, scheduler exit will
3945 * Extra group reference, w.r.t. sync
3946 * queue. This extra reference is removed
3947 * only if bfqq->bfqg disappears, to
3948 * guarantee that this queue is not freed
3949 * until its group goes away.
3951 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_queue, bfqq not in async: %p, %d",
3957 bfqq
->ref
++; /* get a process reference to this queue */
3958 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_queue, at end: %p, %d", bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
3963 static void bfq_update_io_thinktime(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3964 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3966 struct bfq_ttime
*ttime
= &bfqq
->ttime
;
3967 u64 elapsed
= ktime_get_ns() - bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
;
3969 elapsed
= min_t(u64
, elapsed
, 2ULL * bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
);
3971 ttime
->ttime_samples
= (7*bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_samples
+ 256) / 8;
3972 ttime
->ttime_total
= div_u64(7*ttime
->ttime_total
+ 256*elapsed
, 8);
3973 ttime
->ttime_mean
= div64_ul(ttime
->ttime_total
+ 128,
3974 ttime
->ttime_samples
);
3978 bfq_update_io_seektime(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
3981 bfqq
->seek_history
<<= 1;
3982 bfqq
->seek_history
|=
3983 get_sdist(bfqq
->last_request_pos
, rq
) > BFQQ_SEEK_THR
&&
3984 (!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
) ||
3985 blk_rq_sectors(rq
) < BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT
);
3989 * Disable idle window if the process thinks too long or seeks so much that
3990 * it doesn't matter.
3992 static void bfq_update_idle_window(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3993 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
3994 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
3998 /* Don't idle for async or idle io prio class. */
3999 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
4002 /* Idle window just restored, statistics are meaningless. */
4003 if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
4004 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
))
4007 enable_idle
= bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
4009 if (atomic_read(&bic
->icq
.ioc
->active_ref
) == 0 ||
4010 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
== 0 ||
4011 (bfqd
->hw_tag
&& BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) &&
4012 bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1))
4014 else if (bfq_sample_valid(bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_samples
)) {
4015 if (bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_mean
> bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
&&
4016 bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
4021 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "update_idle_window: enable_idle %d",
4025 bfq_mark_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
4027 bfq_clear_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
);
4031 * Called when a new fs request (rq) is added to bfqq. Check if there's
4032 * something we should do about it.
4034 static void bfq_rq_enqueued(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
4037 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= RQ_BIC(rq
);
4039 if (rq
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
)
4040 bfqq
->meta_pending
++;
4042 bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4043 bfq_update_io_seektime(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
4044 if (bfqq
->entity
.service
> bfq_max_budget(bfqd
) / 8 ||
4046 bfq_update_idle_window(bfqd
, bfqq
, bic
);
4048 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
4049 "rq_enqueued: idle_window=%d (seeky %d)",
4050 bfq_bfqq_idle_window(bfqq
), BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
));
4052 bfqq
->last_request_pos
= blk_rq_pos(rq
) + blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
4054 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
&& bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
)) {
4055 bool small_req
= bfqq
->queued
[rq_is_sync(rq
)] == 1 &&
4056 blk_rq_sectors(rq
) < 32;
4057 bool budget_timeout
= bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
);
4060 * There is just this request queued: if the request
4061 * is small and the queue is not to be expired, then
4064 * In this way, if the device is being idled to wait
4065 * for a new request from the in-service queue, we
4066 * avoid unplugging the device and committing the
4067 * device to serve just a small request. On the
4068 * contrary, we wait for the block layer to decide
4069 * when to unplug the device: hopefully, new requests
4070 * will be merged to this one quickly, then the device
4071 * will be unplugged and larger requests will be
4074 if (small_req
&& !budget_timeout
)
4078 * A large enough request arrived, or the queue is to
4079 * be expired: in both cases disk idling is to be
4080 * stopped, so clear wait_request flag and reset
4083 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
4084 hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4085 bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
4088 * The queue is not empty, because a new request just
4089 * arrived. Hence we can safely expire the queue, in
4090 * case of budget timeout, without risking that the
4091 * timestamps of the queue are not updated correctly.
4092 * See [1] for more details.
4095 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4096 BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
);
4100 static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
4102 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
),
4103 *new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
, true);
4106 if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1) != bfqq
)
4107 new_bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1);
4109 * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq
4110 * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue.
4112 new_bfqq
->allocated
++;
4115 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
4117 * If the bic associated with the process
4118 * issuing this request still points to bfqq
4119 * (and thus has not been already redirected
4120 * to new_bfqq or even some other bfq_queue),
4121 * then complete the merge and redirect it to
4124 if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1) == bfqq
)
4125 bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd
, RQ_BIC(rq
),
4128 * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq,
4129 * release rq reference on bfqq
4131 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4132 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = new_bfqq
;
4136 bfq_add_request(rq
);
4138 rq
->fifo_time
= ktime_get_ns() + bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[rq_is_sync(rq
)];
4139 list_add_tail(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqq
->fifo
);
4141 bfq_rq_enqueued(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
4144 static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
, struct request
*rq
,
4147 struct request_queue
*q
= hctx
->queue
;
4148 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
4150 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4151 if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q
, rq
)) {
4152 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4156 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4158 blk_mq_sched_request_inserted(rq
);
4160 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4161 if (at_head
|| blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq
)) {
4163 list_add(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqd
->dispatch
);
4165 list_add_tail(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqd
->dispatch
);
4167 __bfq_insert_request(bfqd
, rq
);
4169 if (rq_mergeable(rq
)) {
4170 elv_rqhash_add(q
, rq
);
4176 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4179 static void bfq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
,
4180 struct list_head
*list
, bool at_head
)
4182 while (!list_empty(list
)) {
4185 rq
= list_first_entry(list
, struct request
, queuelist
);
4186 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
4187 bfq_insert_request(hctx
, rq
, at_head
);
4191 static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4193 bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
= max_t(int, bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
,
4194 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
);
4196 if (bfqd
->hw_tag
== 1)
4200 * This sample is valid if the number of outstanding requests
4201 * is large enough to allow a queueing behavior. Note that the
4202 * sum is not exact, as it's not taking into account deactivated
4205 if (bfqd
->rq_in_driver
+ bfqd
->queued
< BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD
)
4208 if (bfqd
->hw_tag_samples
++ < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES
)
4211 bfqd
->hw_tag
= bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
> BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD
;
4212 bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
= 0;
4213 bfqd
->hw_tag_samples
= 0;
4216 static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4221 bfq_update_hw_tag(bfqd
);
4223 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
--;
4226 if (!bfqq
->dispatched
&& !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
)) {
4228 * Set budget_timeout (which we overload to store the
4229 * time at which the queue remains with no backlog and
4230 * no outstanding request; used by the weight-raising
4233 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
;
4235 bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd
, &bfqq
->entity
,
4236 &bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
);
4239 now_ns
= ktime_get_ns();
4241 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
= now_ns
;
4244 * Using us instead of ns, to get a reasonable precision in
4245 * computing rate in next check.
4247 delta_us
= div_u64(now_ns
- bfqd
->last_completion
, NSEC_PER_USEC
);
4250 * If the request took rather long to complete, and, according
4251 * to the maximum request size recorded, this completion latency
4252 * implies that the request was certainly served at a very low
4253 * rate (less than 1M sectors/sec), then the whole observation
4254 * interval that lasts up to this time instant cannot be a
4255 * valid time interval for computing a new peak rate. Invoke
4256 * bfq_update_rate_reset to have the following three steps
4258 * - close the observation interval at the last (previous)
4259 * request dispatch or completion
4260 * - compute rate, if possible, for that observation interval
4261 * - reset to zero samples, which will trigger a proper
4262 * re-initialization of the observation interval on next
4265 if (delta_us
> BFQ_MIN_TT
/NSEC_PER_USEC
&&
4266 (bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
)/delta_us
<
4267 1UL<<(BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
- 10))
4268 bfq_update_rate_reset(bfqd
, NULL
);
4269 bfqd
->last_completion
= now_ns
;
4272 * If we are waiting to discover whether the request pattern
4273 * of the task associated with the queue is actually
4274 * isochronous, and both requisites for this condition to hold
4275 * are now satisfied, then compute soft_rt_next_start (see the
4276 * comments on the function bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()). We
4277 * schedule this delayed check when bfqq expires, if it still
4278 * has in-flight requests.
4280 if (bfq_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
) && bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 &&
4281 RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
))
4282 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
4283 bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4286 * If this is the in-service queue, check if it needs to be expired,
4287 * or if we want to idle in case it has no pending requests.
4289 if (bfqd
->in_service_queue
== bfqq
) {
4290 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 && bfq_bfqq_must_idle(bfqq
)) {
4291 bfq_arm_slice_timer(bfqd
);
4293 } else if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq
))
4294 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4295 BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
);
4296 else if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
) &&
4297 (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 ||
4298 !bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
)))
4299 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4300 BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
);
4303 if (!bfqd
->rq_in_driver
)
4304 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
4307 static void bfq_put_rq_priv_body(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4311 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4314 static void bfq_finish_request(struct request
*rq
)
4316 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
4317 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
4325 if (rq
->rq_flags
& RQF_STARTED
)
4326 bfqg_stats_update_completion(bfqq_group(bfqq
),
4327 rq_start_time_ns(rq
),
4328 rq_io_start_time_ns(rq
),
4331 if (likely(rq
->rq_flags
& RQF_STARTED
)) {
4332 unsigned long flags
;
4334 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4336 bfq_completed_request(bfqq
, bfqd
);
4337 bfq_put_rq_priv_body(bfqq
);
4339 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4342 * Request rq may be still/already in the scheduler,
4343 * in which case we need to remove it. And we cannot
4344 * defer such a check and removal, to avoid
4345 * inconsistencies in the time interval from the end
4346 * of this function to the start of the deferred work.
4347 * This situation seems to occur only in process
4348 * context, as a consequence of a merge. In the
4349 * current version of the code, this implies that the
4353 if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&rq
->rb_node
))
4354 bfq_remove_request(rq
->q
, rq
);
4355 bfq_put_rq_priv_body(bfqq
);
4358 rq
->elv
.priv
[0] = NULL
;
4359 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = NULL
;
4363 * Returns NULL if a new bfqq should be allocated, or the old bfqq if this
4364 * was the last process referring to that bfqq.
4366 static struct bfq_queue
*
4367 bfq_split_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4369 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "splitting queue");
4371 if (bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
) == 1) {
4372 bfqq
->pid
= current
->pid
;
4373 bfq_clear_bfqq_coop(bfqq
);
4374 bfq_clear_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
);
4378 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, NULL
, 1);
4380 bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq
);
4382 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4386 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
4387 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
,
4389 bool split
, bool is_sync
,
4392 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, is_sync
);
4394 if (likely(bfqq
&& bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
4401 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4402 bfqq
= bfq_get_queue(bfqd
, bio
, is_sync
, bic
);
4404 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
, is_sync
);
4405 if (split
&& is_sync
) {
4406 if ((bic
->was_in_burst_list
&& bfqd
->large_burst
) ||
4407 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
)
4408 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
4410 bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
4411 if (bic
->was_in_burst_list
)
4412 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
,
4415 bfqq
->split_time
= jiffies
;
4422 * Allocate bfq data structures associated with this request.
4424 static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request
*rq
, struct bio
*bio
)
4426 struct request_queue
*q
= rq
->q
;
4427 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
4428 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
;
4429 const int is_sync
= rq_is_sync(rq
);
4430 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
4431 bool new_queue
= false;
4432 bool bfqq_already_existing
= false, split
= false;
4436 bic
= icq_to_bic(rq
->elv
.icq
);
4438 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4440 bfq_check_ioprio_change(bic
, bio
);
4442 bfq_bic_update_cgroup(bic
, bio
);
4444 bfqq
= bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd
, bic
, bio
, false, is_sync
,
4447 if (likely(!new_queue
)) {
4448 /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */
4449 if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq
) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
)) {
4450 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "breaking apart bfqq");
4452 /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */
4453 if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
))
4454 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
= true;
4456 bfqq
= bfq_split_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
);
4460 bfqq
= bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd
, bic
, bio
,
4464 bfqq_already_existing
= true;
4470 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_request %p: bfqq %p, %d",
4471 rq
, bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
4473 rq
->elv
.priv
[0] = bic
;
4474 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = bfqq
;
4477 * If a bfq_queue has only one process reference, it is owned
4478 * by only this bic: we can then set bfqq->bic = bic. in
4479 * addition, if the queue has also just been split, we have to
4482 if (likely(bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
) && bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
) == 1) {
4486 * The queue has just been split from a shared
4487 * queue: restore the idle window and the
4488 * possible weight raising period.
4490 bfq_bfqq_resume_state(bfqq
, bfqd
, bic
,
4491 bfqq_already_existing
);
4495 if (unlikely(bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
)))
4496 bfq_handle_burst(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4498 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4501 static void bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4503 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
4504 enum bfqq_expiration reason
;
4505 unsigned long flags
;
4507 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4508 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
4510 if (bfqq
!= bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
4511 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4515 if (bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
))
4517 * Also here the queue can be safely expired
4518 * for budget timeout without wasting
4521 reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
;
4522 else if (bfqq
->queued
[0] == 0 && bfqq
->queued
[1] == 0)
4524 * The queue may not be empty upon timer expiration,
4525 * because we may not disable the timer when the
4526 * first request of the in-service queue arrives
4527 * during disk idling.
4529 reason
= BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
;
4531 goto schedule_dispatch
;
4533 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, true, reason
);
4536 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4537 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
4541 * Handler of the expiration of the timer running if the in-service queue
4542 * is idling inside its time slice.
4544 static enum hrtimer_restart
bfq_idle_slice_timer(struct hrtimer
*timer
)
4546 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= container_of(timer
, struct bfq_data
,
4548 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
4551 * Theoretical race here: the in-service queue can be NULL or
4552 * different from the queue that was idling if a new request
4553 * arrives for the current queue and there is a full dispatch
4554 * cycle that changes the in-service queue. This can hardly
4555 * happen, but in the worst case we just expire a queue too
4559 bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(bfqq
);
4561 return HRTIMER_NORESTART
;
4564 static void __bfq_put_async_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
4565 struct bfq_queue
**bfqq_ptr
)
4567 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= *bfqq_ptr
;
4569 bfq_log(bfqd
, "put_async_bfqq: %p", bfqq
);
4571 bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd
, bfqq
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4573 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "put_async_bfqq: putting %p, %d",
4575 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4581 * Release all the bfqg references to its async queues. If we are
4582 * deallocating the group these queues may still contain requests, so
4583 * we reparent them to the root cgroup (i.e., the only one that will
4584 * exist for sure until all the requests on a device are gone).
4586 void bfq_put_async_queues(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_group
*bfqg
)
4590 for (i
= 0; i
< 2; i
++)
4591 for (j
= 0; j
< IOPRIO_BE_NR
; j
++)
4592 __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
]);
4594 __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
);
4597 static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue
*e
)
4599 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4600 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, *n
;
4602 hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4604 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4605 list_for_each_entry_safe(bfqq
, n
, &bfqd
->idle_list
, bfqq_list
)
4606 bfq_deactivate_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, false);
4607 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4609 hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4611 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
4612 blkcg_deactivate_policy(bfqd
->queue
, &blkcg_policy_bfq
);
4614 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4615 bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4616 kfree(bfqd
->root_group
);
4617 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4623 static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group
*root_group
,
4624 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4628 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
4629 root_group
->entity
.parent
= NULL
;
4630 root_group
->my_entity
= NULL
;
4631 root_group
->bfqd
= bfqd
;
4633 root_group
->rq_pos_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4634 for (i
= 0; i
< BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES
; i
++)
4635 root_group
->sched_data
.service_tree
[i
] = BFQ_SERVICE_TREE_INIT
;
4636 root_group
->sched_data
.bfq_class_idle_last_service
= jiffies
;
4639 static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue
*q
, struct elevator_type
*e
)
4641 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
4642 struct elevator_queue
*eq
;
4644 eq
= elevator_alloc(q
, e
);
4648 bfqd
= kzalloc_node(sizeof(*bfqd
), GFP_KERNEL
, q
->node
);
4650 kobject_put(&eq
->kobj
);
4653 eq
->elevator_data
= bfqd
;
4655 spin_lock_irq(q
->queue_lock
);
4657 spin_unlock_irq(q
->queue_lock
);
4660 * Our fallback bfqq if bfq_find_alloc_queue() runs into OOM issues.
4661 * Grab a permanent reference to it, so that the normal code flow
4662 * will not attempt to free it.
4664 bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
, NULL
, 1, 0);
4665 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.ref
++;
4666 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio
= BFQ_DEFAULT_QUEUE_IOPRIO
;
4667 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
;
4668 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
.new_weight
=
4669 bfq_ioprio_to_weight(bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio
);
4671 /* oom_bfqq does not participate to bursts */
4672 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(&bfqd
->oom_bfqq
);
4675 * Trigger weight initialization, according to ioprio, at the
4676 * oom_bfqq's first activation. The oom_bfqq's ioprio and ioprio
4677 * class won't be changed any more.
4679 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
4683 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->dispatch
);
4685 hrtimer_init(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
, CLOCK_MONOTONIC
,
4687 bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
.function
= bfq_idle_slice_timer
;
4689 bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4690 bfqd
->group_weights_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4692 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->active_list
);
4693 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->idle_list
);
4694 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->burst_list
);
4698 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_default_max_budget
;
4700 bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0] = bfq_fifo_expire
[0];
4701 bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1] = bfq_fifo_expire
[1];
4702 bfqd
->bfq_back_max
= bfq_back_max
;
4703 bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
= bfq_back_penalty
;
4704 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
= bfq_slice_idle
;
4705 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
= bfq_timeout
;
4707 bfqd
->bfq_requests_within_timer
= 120;
4709 bfqd
->bfq_large_burst_thresh
= 8;
4710 bfqd
->bfq_burst_interval
= msecs_to_jiffies(180);
4712 bfqd
->low_latency
= true;
4715 * Trade-off between responsiveness and fairness.
4717 bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
= 30;
4718 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
= msecs_to_jiffies(300);
4719 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
= 0;
4720 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
= msecs_to_jiffies(2000);
4721 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_inter_arr_async
= msecs_to_jiffies(500);
4722 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
= 7000; /*
4723 * Approximate rate required
4724 * to playback or record a
4725 * high-definition compressed
4728 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
= 0;
4731 * Begin by assuming, optimistically, that the device is a
4732 * high-speed one, and that its peak rate is equal to 2/3 of
4733 * the highest reference rate.
4735 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)] *
4736 T_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)];
4737 bfqd
->peak_rate
= R_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)] * 2 / 3;
4738 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_FAST
;
4740 spin_lock_init(&bfqd
->lock
);
4743 * The invocation of the next bfq_create_group_hierarchy
4744 * function is the head of a chain of function calls
4745 * (bfq_create_group_hierarchy->blkcg_activate_policy->
4746 * blk_mq_freeze_queue) that may lead to the invocation of the
4747 * has_work hook function. For this reason,
4748 * bfq_create_group_hierarchy is invoked only after all
4749 * scheduler data has been initialized, apart from the fields
4750 * that can be initialized only after invoking
4751 * bfq_create_group_hierarchy. This, in particular, enables
4752 * has_work to correctly return false. Of course, to avoid
4753 * other inconsistencies, the blk-mq stack must then refrain
4754 * from invoking further scheduler hooks before this init
4755 * function is finished.
4757 bfqd
->root_group
= bfq_create_group_hierarchy(bfqd
, q
->node
);
4758 if (!bfqd
->root_group
)
4760 bfq_init_root_group(bfqd
->root_group
, bfqd
);
4761 bfq_init_entity(&bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4768 kobject_put(&eq
->kobj
);
4772 static void bfq_slab_kill(void)
4774 kmem_cache_destroy(bfq_pool
);
4777 static int __init
bfq_slab_setup(void)
4779 bfq_pool
= KMEM_CACHE(bfq_queue
, 0);
4785 static ssize_t
bfq_var_show(unsigned int var
, char *page
)
4787 return sprintf(page
, "%u\n", var
);
4790 static ssize_t
bfq_var_store(unsigned long *var
, const char *page
,
4793 unsigned long new_val
;
4794 int ret
= kstrtoul(page
, 10, &new_val
);
4802 #define SHOW_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __VAR, __CONV) \
4803 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, char *page) \
4805 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4806 u64 __data = __VAR; \
4808 __data = jiffies_to_msecs(__data); \
4809 else if (__CONV == 2) \
4810 __data = div_u64(__data, NSEC_PER_MSEC); \
4811 return bfq_var_show(__data, (page)); \
4813 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_sync_show
, bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1], 2);
4814 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_async_show
, bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0], 2);
4815 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_max_show
, bfqd
->bfq_back_max
, 0);
4816 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_penalty_show
, bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
, 0);
4817 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_show
, bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 2);
4818 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_max_budget_show
, bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
, 0);
4819 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_timeout_sync_show
, bfqd
->bfq_timeout
, 1);
4820 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_strict_guarantees_show
, bfqd
->strict_guarantees
, 0);
4821 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_low_latency_show
, bfqd
->low_latency
, 0);
4822 #undef SHOW_FUNCTION
4824 #define USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __VAR) \
4825 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, char *page) \
4827 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4828 u64 __data = __VAR; \
4829 __data = div_u64(__data, NSEC_PER_USEC); \
4830 return bfq_var_show(__data, (page)); \
4832 USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_us_show
, bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
);
4833 #undef USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION
4835 #define STORE_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __PTR, MIN, MAX, __CONV) \
4837 __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, const char *page, size_t count) \
4839 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4840 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data); \
4841 int ret = bfq_var_store(&__data, (page), count); \
4842 if (__data < (MIN)) \
4844 else if (__data > (MAX)) \
4847 *(__PTR) = msecs_to_jiffies(__data); \
4848 else if (__CONV == 2) \
4849 *(__PTR) = (u64)__data * NSEC_PER_MSEC; \
4851 *(__PTR) = __data; \
4854 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_sync_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1], 1,
4856 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_async_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0], 1,
4858 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_max_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_back_max
, 0, INT_MAX
, 0);
4859 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_penalty_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
, 1,
4861 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 0, INT_MAX
, 2);
4862 #undef STORE_FUNCTION
4864 #define USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __PTR, MIN, MAX) \
4865 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, const char *page, size_t count)\
4867 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4868 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data); \
4869 int ret = bfq_var_store(&__data, (page), count); \
4870 if (__data < (MIN)) \
4872 else if (__data > (MAX)) \
4874 *(__PTR) = (u64)__data * NSEC_PER_USEC; \
4877 USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_us_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 0,
4879 #undef USEC_STORE_FUNCTION
4881 static ssize_t
bfq_max_budget_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4882 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4884 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4885 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data
);
4886 int ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
), count
);
4889 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
4891 if (__data
> INT_MAX
)
4893 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= __data
;
4896 bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
= __data
;
4902 * Leaving this name to preserve name compatibility with cfq
4903 * parameters, but this timeout is used for both sync and async.
4905 static ssize_t
bfq_timeout_sync_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4906 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4908 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4909 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data
);
4910 int ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
), count
);
4914 else if (__data
> INT_MAX
)
4917 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
= msecs_to_jiffies(__data
);
4918 if (bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
== 0)
4919 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
4924 static ssize_t
bfq_strict_guarantees_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4925 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4927 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4928 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data
);
4929 int ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
), count
);
4933 if (!bfqd
->strict_guarantees
&& __data
== 1
4934 && bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
< 8 * NSEC_PER_MSEC
)
4935 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
= 8 * NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
4937 bfqd
->strict_guarantees
= __data
;
4942 static ssize_t
bfq_low_latency_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4943 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4945 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4946 unsigned long uninitialized_var(__data
);
4947 int ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
), count
);
4951 if (__data
== 0 && bfqd
->low_latency
!= 0)
4953 bfqd
->low_latency
= __data
;
4958 #define BFQ_ATTR(name) \
4959 __ATTR(name, 0644, bfq_##name##_show, bfq_##name##_store)
4961 static struct elv_fs_entry bfq_attrs
[] = {
4962 BFQ_ATTR(fifo_expire_sync
),
4963 BFQ_ATTR(fifo_expire_async
),
4964 BFQ_ATTR(back_seek_max
),
4965 BFQ_ATTR(back_seek_penalty
),
4966 BFQ_ATTR(slice_idle
),
4967 BFQ_ATTR(slice_idle_us
),
4968 BFQ_ATTR(max_budget
),
4969 BFQ_ATTR(timeout_sync
),
4970 BFQ_ATTR(strict_guarantees
),
4971 BFQ_ATTR(low_latency
),
4975 static struct elevator_type iosched_bfq_mq
= {
4977 .prepare_request
= bfq_prepare_request
,
4978 .finish_request
= bfq_finish_request
,
4979 .exit_icq
= bfq_exit_icq
,
4980 .insert_requests
= bfq_insert_requests
,
4981 .dispatch_request
= bfq_dispatch_request
,
4982 .next_request
= elv_rb_latter_request
,
4983 .former_request
= elv_rb_former_request
,
4984 .allow_merge
= bfq_allow_bio_merge
,
4985 .bio_merge
= bfq_bio_merge
,
4986 .request_merge
= bfq_request_merge
,
4987 .requests_merged
= bfq_requests_merged
,
4988 .request_merged
= bfq_request_merged
,
4989 .has_work
= bfq_has_work
,
4990 .init_sched
= bfq_init_queue
,
4991 .exit_sched
= bfq_exit_queue
,
4995 .icq_size
= sizeof(struct bfq_io_cq
),
4996 .icq_align
= __alignof__(struct bfq_io_cq
),
4997 .elevator_attrs
= bfq_attrs
,
4998 .elevator_name
= "bfq",
4999 .elevator_owner
= THIS_MODULE
,
5002 static int __init
bfq_init(void)
5006 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5007 ret
= blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5013 if (bfq_slab_setup())
5017 * Times to load large popular applications for the typical
5018 * systems installed on the reference devices (see the
5019 * comments before the definitions of the next two
5020 * arrays). Actually, we use slightly slower values, as the
5021 * estimated peak rate tends to be smaller than the actual
5022 * peak rate. The reason for this last fact is that estimates
5023 * are computed over much shorter time intervals than the long
5024 * intervals typically used for benchmarking. Why? First, to
5025 * adapt more quickly to variations. Second, because an I/O
5026 * scheduler cannot rely on a peak-rate-evaluation workload to
5027 * be run for a long time.
5029 T_slow
[0] = msecs_to_jiffies(3500); /* actually 4 sec */
5030 T_slow
[1] = msecs_to_jiffies(6000); /* actually 6.5 sec */
5031 T_fast
[0] = msecs_to_jiffies(7000); /* actually 8 sec */
5032 T_fast
[1] = msecs_to_jiffies(2500); /* actually 3 sec */
5035 * Thresholds that determine the switch between speed classes
5036 * (see the comments before the definition of the array
5037 * device_speed_thresh). These thresholds are biased towards
5038 * transitions to the fast class. This is safer than the
5039 * opposite bias. In fact, a wrong transition to the slow
5040 * class results in short weight-raising periods, because the
5041 * speed of the device then tends to be higher that the
5042 * reference peak rate. On the opposite end, a wrong
5043 * transition to the fast class tends to increase
5044 * weight-raising periods, because of the opposite reason.
5046 device_speed_thresh
[0] = (4 * R_slow
[0]) / 3;
5047 device_speed_thresh
[1] = (4 * R_slow
[1]) / 3;
5049 ret
= elv_register(&iosched_bfq_mq
);
5056 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5057 blkcg_policy_unregister(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5062 static void __exit
bfq_exit(void)
5064 elv_unregister(&iosched_bfq_mq
);
5065 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5066 blkcg_policy_unregister(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5071 module_init(bfq_init
);
5072 module_exit(bfq_exit
);
5074 MODULE_AUTHOR("Paolo Valente");
5075 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
5076 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MQ Budget Fair Queueing I/O Scheduler");