| commit | 51953d5bc43e468f24cc573a45cde1d32af129b8 | |
| author | Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com> | |
| Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:24:16 +0000 (5 08:24 +0000) | ||
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | |
| Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:10:45 +0000 (7 01:10 -0700) | ||
| tree | e275eb5019dc07bdea3ac61b6198c5c410c49e41 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | d73d3a8cb4723e161589864741d8528d70b350eb | commitdiff |
Use sk_mark for IPv6 routing lookups
Atis Elsts wrote:
> Not sure if there is need to fill the mark from skb in tunnel xmit functions. In any case, it's not done for GRE or IPIP tunnels at the moment.
Ok, I'll just drop that part, I'm not sure what should be done in this case.
> Also, in this patch you are doing that for SIT (v6-in-v4) tunnels only, and not doing it for v4-in-v6 or v6-in-v6 tunnels. Any reason for that?
I just sent that patch out too quickly, here's a better one with the updates.
Add support for IPv6 route lookups using sk_mark.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Atis Elsts wrote:
> Not sure if there is need to fill the mark from skb in tunnel xmit functions. In any case, it's not done for GRE or IPIP tunnels at the moment.
Ok, I'll just drop that part, I'm not sure what should be done in this case.
> Also, in this patch you are doing that for SIT (v6-in-v4) tunnels only, and not doing it for v4-in-v6 or v6-in-v6 tunnels. Any reason for that?
I just sent that patch out too quickly, here's a better one with the updates.
Add support for IPv6 route lookups using sk_mark.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>