| commit | 6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e | |
| author | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | |
| Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:48:21 +0000 (23 09:48 -0700) | ||
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | |
| Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:17:02 +0000 (29 20:17 +0200) | ||
| tree | f4a5c584983c110e0b2ddc9e3b51c25e11801353 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | ded56184a562b925a588b6e78688e2e60757b425 | commitdiff |
btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>