| commit | 683bb2761fbf123b24aed03a1c0d5d7556ec3018 | |
| author | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | |
| Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:49:01 +0000 (13 14:49 -0800) | ||
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | |
| Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:49:01 +0000 (13 14:49 -0800) | ||
| tree | f6bb7a039fa1bf9387f70dfef9bec5474178547c | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 87da149343c8c93f6984c0f4b9da7651709624f7 | commitdiff |
Revert "kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*()"
This reverts commit d92d2e6bd72b653f9811e0c9c46307c743b3fc58.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit d92d2e6bd72b653f9811e0c9c46307c743b3fc58.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| fs/kernfs/file.c | diffblobblamehistory |