| commit | 8f34cea85b340d1057d9251e38d6b000898c659f | |
| author | Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> | |
| Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:12:32 +0000 (28 21:12 +0100) | ||
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | |
| Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:21:24 +0000 (8 10:21 -0800) | ||
| tree | a82bb27ef491c8319e1d22346e33692bad391419 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | ffb83b9e7d0e935ccc665ed09f2f7273828c9cfb | commitdiff |
tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier
commit 4175f3e31cc7157669aa66d46dc79de6ae0126ce upstream.
Original discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/23217/focus=23248
or
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=125553790714133&w=2
The tty_port code inherited a bug common to various drivers it was based
upon. If the tty is opened O_NONBLOCK we do not wait for the carrier to be
raised but we must still raise our modem lines if appropriate.
(There is a second question here about whether we should do so if CLOCAL is
set but that can wait)
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Tested-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 4175f3e31cc7157669aa66d46dc79de6ae0126ce upstream.
Original discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/23217/focus=23248
or
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=125553790714133&w=2
The tty_port code inherited a bug common to various drivers it was based
upon. If the tty is opened O_NONBLOCK we do not wait for the carrier to be
raised but we must still raise our modem lines if appropriate.
(There is a second question here about whether we should do so if CLOCAL is
set but that can wait)
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Tested-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
| drivers/char/tty_port.c | diffblobblamehistory |