| commit | aa075d3d5122a82a2012197ad0820565d1d62c52 | |
| author | Omri Kahalon <omrik@mellanox.com> | |
| Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:31:08 +0000 (24 16:31 +0200) | ||
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | |
| Wed, 8 May 2019 05:19:09 +0000 (8 07:19 +0200) | ||
| tree | 4a0bc64cf060e64b236712dcc20a659a048d8c33 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | c40fc01511db545805582751cd51eedaa1a9332b | commitdiff |
net/mlx5: E-Switch, Fix esw manager vport indication for more vport commands
[ Upstream commit eca4a928585ac08147e5cc8e2111ecbc6279ee31 ]
Traditionally, the PF (Physical Function) which resides on vport 0 was
the E-switch manager. Since the ECPF (Embedded CPU Physical Function),
which resides on vport 0xfffe, was introduced as the E-Switch manager,
the assumption that the E-switch manager is on vport 0 is incorrect.
Since the eswitch code already uses the actual vport value, all we
need is to always set other_vport=1.
Signed-off-by: Omri Kahalon <omrik@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit eca4a928585ac08147e5cc8e2111ecbc6279ee31 ]
Traditionally, the PF (Physical Function) which resides on vport 0 was
the E-switch manager. Since the ECPF (Embedded CPU Physical Function),
which resides on vport 0xfffe, was introduced as the E-Switch manager,
the assumption that the E-switch manager is on vport 0 is incorrect.
Since the eswitch code already uses the actual vport value, all we
need is to always set other_vport=1.
Signed-off-by: Omri Kahalon <omrik@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
| drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | diffblobblamehistory |