BuildBot fix, compiler complains about array decay to pointer
[llvm-core.git] / unittests / Analysis / BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp
blob529af5c068da933845b3cb8e5bb65844f1f8e4f2
1 //===- BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp - BranchProbabilityInfo unit tests ---===//
2 //
3 // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4 //
5 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
7 //
8 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
10 #include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
11 #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
12 #include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
13 #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
14 #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
15 #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
16 #include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
17 #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
18 #include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
19 #include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
20 #include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"
21 #include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
22 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
23 #include "gtest/gtest.h"
25 namespace llvm {
26 namespace {
28 struct BranchProbabilityInfoTest : public testing::Test {
29 std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI;
30 std::unique_ptr<DominatorTree> DT;
31 std::unique_ptr<LoopInfo> LI;
32 LLVMContext C;
34 BranchProbabilityInfo &buildBPI(Function &F) {
35 DT.reset(new DominatorTree(F));
36 LI.reset(new LoopInfo(*DT));
37 BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, *LI));
38 return *BPI;
41 std::unique_ptr<Module> makeLLVMModule() {
42 const char *ModuleString = "define void @f() { exit: ret void }\n";
43 SMDiagnostic Err;
44 return parseAssemblyString(ModuleString, Err, C);
48 TEST_F(BranchProbabilityInfoTest, StressUnreachableHeuristic) {
49 auto M = makeLLVMModule();
50 Function *F = M->getFunction("f");
52 // define void @f() {
53 // entry:
54 // switch i32 undef, label %exit, [
55 // i32 0, label %preexit
56 // ... ;;< Add lots of cases to stress the heuristic.
57 // ]
58 // preexit:
59 // unreachable
60 // exit:
61 // ret void
62 // }
64 auto *ExitBB = &F->back();
65 auto *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(C, "entry", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
67 auto *PreExitBB =
68 BasicBlock::Create(C, "preexit", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB);
69 new UnreachableInst(C, PreExitBB);
71 unsigned NumCases = 4096;
72 auto *I32 = IntegerType::get(C, 32);
73 auto *Undef = UndefValue::get(I32);
74 auto *Switch = SwitchInst::Create(Undef, ExitBB, NumCases, EntryBB);
75 for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumCases; ++I)
76 Switch->addCase(ConstantInt::get(I32, I), PreExitBB);
78 BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = buildBPI(*F);
80 // FIXME: This doesn't seem optimal. Since all of the cases handled by the
81 // switch have the *same* destination block ("preexit"), shouldn't it be the
82 // hot one? I'd expect the results to be reversed here...
83 EXPECT_FALSE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, PreExitBB));
84 EXPECT_TRUE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, ExitBB));
87 } // end anonymous namespace
88 } // end namespace llvm