clang/test/Sema/typo-correction-ambiguity.c

   1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
   2
   3 // Check the following typo correction behavior in C:
   4 // - no typos are diagnosed when a call expression has ambiguous (multiple) corrections
   5
   6 int v_63;
   7
   8 void v_2_0(int v_452, int v_454) {}
   9
  10 int v_3_0(void) {
  11    for (int v_345 = 0 ; v_63;)
  12        v_2_0(v_195,  // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'v_195'}}
  13              v_231);  // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'v_231'}}
  14 }
  15
  16 // Test: no typo-correction diagnostics are emitted for ambiguous typos.
  17 struct a {
  18   int xxx;
  19 };
  20
  21 int g_107;
  22 int g_108;
  23 int g_109;
  24
  25 struct a g_999;
  26 struct a g_998;
  27 void PR50797(void) { (g_910.xxx = g_910.xxx); } //expected-error 2{{use of undeclared identifier 'g_910'}}