1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
3 template <typename T
, typename U
= void*>
6 id
= _Generic(T(), // expected-error {{controlling expression type 'char' not compatible with any generic association type}}
7 int: 1, // expected-note {{compatible type 'int' specified here}}
9 U
: 3) // expected-error {{type 'int' in generic association compatible with previously specified type 'int'}}
13 static_assert(A
<int>::id
== 1, "fail");
14 static_assert(A
<float>::id
== 2, "fail");
15 static_assert(A
<double, double>::id
== 3, "fail");
17 A
<char> a1
; // expected-note {{in instantiation of template class 'A<char>' requested here}}
18 A
<short, int> a2
; // expected-note {{in instantiation of template class 'A<short, int>' requested here}}
20 template <typename T
, typename U
>
24 int: 1, // expected-note {{compatible type 'int' specified here}}
25 int: 2, // expected-error {{type 'int' in generic association compatible with previously specified type 'int'}}
30 template <unsigned Arg
, unsigned... Args
> struct Or
{
31 enum { result
= Arg
| Or
<Args
...>::result
};
34 template <unsigned Arg
> struct Or
<Arg
> {
35 enum { result
= Arg
};
38 template <class... Args
> struct TypeMask
{
40 result
= Or
<_Generic(Args(), int: 1, long: 2, short: 4, float: 8)...>::result
44 static_assert(TypeMask
<int, long, short>::result
== 7, "fail");
45 static_assert(TypeMask
<float, short>::result
== 12, "fail");
46 static_assert(TypeMask
<int, float, float>::result
== 9, "fail");
53 void unreachable_associations(const int i
, const Test t
) {
54 // FIXME: it's not clear to me whether we intended to deviate from the C
55 // semantics in terms of how qualifiers are handled, so this documents the
56 // existing behavior but perhaps not the desired behavior.
59 const int : 1, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'const int' will never be selected because it is qualified}}
60 volatile int : 2, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'volatile int' will never be selected because it is qualified}}
61 int[12] : 3, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'int[12]' will never be selected because it is of array type}}
64 ) == 4, "we had better pick int, not const int!");
68 const Test
: 2, // Ok in C++, warned in C
70 ) == 2, "we had better pick const Test, not Test!"); // C++-specific result
74 struct S
{ // expected-note {{declared here}}
78 void func(struct S s
) {
79 // We would previously reject this because the parser thought 'struct S :'
80 // was the start of a definition (with a base class specifier); it's not, it
81 // is an elaborated type specifier followed by the association's value and
82 // it should work the same as in C.
83 (void)_Generic(s
, struct S
: 1);
85 // The rest of these cases test that we still produce a reasonable diagnostic
86 // when referencing an unknown type or trying to define a type in other ways.
87 (void)_Generic(s
, struct T
: 1); // expected-error {{type 'struct T' in generic association incomplete}}
88 (void)_Generic(s
, struct U
{ int a
; } : 1); // expected-error {{'U' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
89 (void)_Generic(s
, struct V
: S
); // expected-error {{'S' does not refer to a value}}
90 (void)_Generic(s
, struct W
: S
{ int b
; } : 1); // expected-error {{expected '(' for function-style cast or type construction}}
92 } // namespace GH55562