1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -verify %s
3 // libstdc++ 4.6.x contains a bug where it defines std::__atomic[0,1,2] as a
4 // non-inline namespace, then selects one of those namespaces and reopens it
5 // as inline, as a strange way of providing something like a using-directive.
6 // Clang has an egregious hack to work around the problem, by allowing a
7 // namespace to be converted from non-inline to inline in this one specific
10 // the last 4.6 release was 2013, so the hack is removed. This checks __atomic
14 #pragma clang system_header
17 namespace __atomic0
{ // expected-note {{previous definition}}
19 } // namespace __atomic0
22 } // namespace __atomic1
24 inline namespace __atomic0
{} // expected-error {{cannot be reopened as inline}}
30 #include "libstdcxx_atomic_ns_hack.cpp"
32 std::foobar fb
; // expected-error {{no type named 'foobar' in namespace}}