From f664f1f9b77d6c64f3cee1875dcb4faba0da6dd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morton Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:37:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] revert "ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()" Evgeniy said: I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch? NetBSD and FreeBSD do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag, only Solaris does check like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK. That's why parentheses was like that. At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck, but NetBSD's fsck says that's all ok. I suggest revert this patch. Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov Cc: Satyam Sharma Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ufs/super.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c index 584cf12cc4..c78c04fd99 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/super.c +++ b/fs/ufs/super.c @@ -933,20 +933,19 @@ magic_found: goto again; } - /* Set sbi->s_flags here, used by ufs_get_fs_state() below */ - sbi->s_flags = flags; + sbi->s_flags = flags;/*after that line some functions use s_flags*/ ufs_print_super_stuff(sb, usb1, usb2, usb3); /* * Check, if file system was correctly unmounted. * If not, make it read only. */ - if ((((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) || - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) || - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN) || - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS) || - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86)) && - (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time)))) { + if (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) || + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) || + (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN || + (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS || + (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86) && + (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time))))) { switch(usb1->fs_clean) { case UFS_FSCLEAN: UFSD("fs is clean\n"); -- 2.11.4.GIT