6 // Adam Milazzo's "my algorithm" for FOV. Adapted from the c# code at http://www.adammil.net/blog/v125_Roguelike_Vision_Algorithms.html
8 void do_fov(const ref Map map
, ref Lightmap lightmap
, uint x
, uint y
, int rangeLimit
, int lightLimit
) {
9 lightmap
.for_all((ref Lightpt x
) { x
.visible
= false; x
.visibility
= 0; x
.lit
= false; x
.light
= 0; });
11 lightmap
[y
, x
].visible
= true;
12 foreach (octant
; 0 .. 8) {
13 compute(map
, lightmap
, octant
, Point(x
, y
), rangeLimit
, lightLimit
, 1, Slope(1, 1), Slope(0, 1));
17 // represents the slope Y/X as a rational number
18 private struct Slope
{
21 bool greater(int y
, int x
) { return this.y
*x
> this.x
*y
; } // this > y/x
22 bool greater_or_equal(int y
, int x
) { return this.y
*x
>= this.x
*y
; } // this >= y/x
23 bool less(int y
, int x
) { return this.y
*x
< this.x
*y
; } // this < y/x
24 bool less_or_equal(int y
, int x
) { return this.y
*x
<= this.x
*y
; } // this <= y/x
27 private struct Point
{
32 private void compute(const ref Map map
, ref Lightmap lightmap
, int octant
, Point origin
, int rangeLimit
, int lightLimit
, int x
, Slope top
, Slope bottom
) {
33 // NOTE: the code duplication between blocks_light and set_visible is for performance. don't refactor the octant
34 // translation out unless you don't mind an 18% drop in speed
35 bool blocks_light(int x
, int y
, int octant
, Point origin
) {
36 int nx
= origin
.x
, ny
= origin
.y
;
38 case 0: nx
+= x
; ny
-= y
; break;
39 case 1: nx
+= y
; ny
-= x
; break;
40 case 2: nx
-= y
; ny
-= x
; break;
41 case 3: nx
-= x
; ny
-= y
; break;
42 case 4: nx
-= x
; ny
+= y
; break;
43 case 5: nx
-= y
; ny
+= x
; break;
44 case 6: nx
+= y
; ny
+= x
; break;
45 case 7: nx
+= x
; ny
+= y
; break;
48 return map
[ny
, nx
].blocks_light
;
51 pragma(inline
, true) void set_visible(int x
, int y
, int octant
, Point origin
) {
52 int nx
= origin
.x
, ny
= origin
.y
;
54 case 0: nx
+= x
; ny
-= y
; break;
55 case 1: nx
+= y
; ny
-= x
; break;
56 case 2: nx
-= y
; ny
-= x
; break;
57 case 3: nx
-= x
; ny
-= y
; break;
58 case 4: nx
-= x
; ny
+= y
; break;
59 case 5: nx
-= y
; ny
+= x
; break;
60 case 6: nx
+= y
; ny
+= x
; break;
61 case 7: nx
+= x
; ny
+= y
; break;
64 lightmap
[ny
, nx
].visible
= true;
65 float vis_sq
= dist_sq(nx
, ny
, origin
.x
, origin
.y
);
66 float f
= sqrt(rangeLimit
) / (vis_sq
);
67 lightmap
[ny
, nx
].visibility
= f
;
69 float light_sq
= dist_sq(nx
, ny
, origin
.x
, origin
.y
);
70 if (light_sq
<= lightLimit
) {
71 lightmap
[ny
, nx
].lit
= true;
72 float f2
= sqrt(lightLimit
) / light_sq
;
73 lightmap
[ny
, nx
].light
= f2
;
76 // this makes conentric squares. Probably faster
77 //lightmap[ny, nx].visibility = 1 - cast(float)max(abs(nx - origin.x), abs(ny - origin.y)) / 32.;
85 * throughout this function there are references to various parts of tiles. a tile's coordinates refer to its
86 * center, and the following diagram shows the parts of the tile and the vectors from the origin that pass through
87 * those parts. given a part of a tile with vector u, a vector v passes above it if v > u and below it if v < u
89 * a------b a top left: (y*2+1) / (x*2-1) i inner top left: (y*4+1) / (x*4-1)
90 * | /\ | b top right: (y*2+1) / (x*2+1) j inner top right: (y*4+1) / (x*4+1)
91 * |i/__\j| c bottom left: (y*2-1) / (x*2-1) k inner bottom left: (y*4-1) / (x*4-1)
92 *e|/| |\|f d bottom right: (y*2-1) / (x*2+1) m inner bottom right: (y*4-1) / (x*4+1)
93 * |\|__|/| e middle left: (y*2) / (x*2-1)
94 * |k\ /m| f middle right: (y*2) / (x*2+1) a-d are the corners of the tile
95 * | \/ | g top center: (y*2+1) / (x*2) e-h are the corners of the inner (wall) diamond
96 * c------d h bottom center: (y*2-1) / (x*2) i-m are the corners of the inner square (1/2 tile width)
99 for(; x
<= rangeLimit
; x
++) /* (x <= rangeLimit) == (rangeLimit < 0 || x <= rangeLimit) */ {
100 // compute the Y coordinates of the top and bottom of the sector. we maintain that top > bottom
103 // if top == ?/1 then it must be 1/1 because 0/1 < top <= 1/1. this is special-cased because top
104 // starts at 1/1 and remains 1/1 as long as it doesn't hit anything, so it's a common case
110 * get the tile that the top vector enters from the left. since our coordinates refer to the center of the
111 * tile, this is (x-0.5)*top+0.5, which can be computed as (x-0.5)*top+0.5 = (2(x+0.5)*top+1)/2 =
112 * ((2x+1)*top+1)/2. since top == a/b, this is ((2x+1)*a+b)/2b. if it enters a tile at one of the left
113 * corners, it will round up, so it'll enter from the bottom-left and never the top-left
115 // the Y coordinate of the tile entered from the left
116 topY
= ((x
*2-1) * top
.y
+ top
.x
) / (top
.x
*2);
117 /* now it's possible that the vector passes from the left side of the tile up into the tile above before
118 * exiting from the right side of this column. so we may need to increment topY
121 // if the tile blocks light (i.e. is a wall)...
122 if (blocks_light(x
, topY
, octant
, origin
)) {
123 /* if the tile entered from the left blocks light, whether it
124 * passes into the tile above depends on the shape of the wall tile
125 * as well as the angle of the vector. if the tile has does not
126 * have a beveled top-left corner, then it is blocked. the corner is
127 * beveled if the tiles above and to the left are not walls. we can
128 * ignore the tile to the left because if it was a wall tile, the
129 * top vector must have entered this tile from the bottom-left
130 * corner, in which case it can't possibly enter the tile above.
132 * otherwise, with a beveled top-left corner, the slope of the
133 * vector must be greater than or equal to the slope of the vector
134 * to the top center of the tile (x*2, topY*2+1) in order for it to
135 * miss the wall and pass into the tile above
137 if (top
.greater_or_equal(topY
*2+1, x
*2) && !blocks_light(x
, topY
+1, octant
, origin
)) {
141 // the tile doesn't block light
143 /* since this tile doesn't block light, there's nothing to stop it
144 * from passing into the tile above, and it does so if the vector is greater than the
145 * vector for the bottom-right corner of the tile above. however,
146 * there is one additional consideration. later code in this method
147 * assumes that if a tile blocks light then it must be visible, so
148 * if the tile above blocks light we have to make sure the light
149 * actually impacts the wall shape. now there are three cases:
151 * 1) the tile above is clear, in which case the vector must be
152 * above the bottom-right corner of the tile above,
154 * 2) the tile above blocks light and does not have a beveled
155 * bottom-right corner, in which case the vector must be above
156 * the bottom-right corner, and
158 * 3) the tile above blocks light and does have a beveled bottom-
159 * right corner, in which case the vector must be above the bottom
160 * center of the tile above (i.e. the corner of the beveled edge).
163 * now it's possible to merge 1 and 2 into a single check, and we
164 * get the following: if the tile above and to the right is a wall,
165 * then the vector must be above the bottom-right corner. otherwise,
166 * the vector must be above the bottom center. this works because if
167 * the tile above and to the right is a wall, then there are two
170 * 1) the tile above is also a wall, in which case we must check
171 * against the bottom-right corner, or
173 * 2) the tile above is not a wall, in which case the vector passes
174 * into it if it's above the bottom-right corner.
177 * so either way we use the bottom-right corner in that case. now,
178 * if the tile above and to the right is not a wall, then we again
181 * 1) the tile above is a wall with a beveled edge, in which case we
182 * must check against the bottom center, or
184 * 2) the tile above is not a wall, in which case it will only be
185 * visible if light passes through the inner square, and the
186 * inner square is guaranteed to be no larger than a wall
187 * diamond, so if it wouldn't pass through a wall diamond then it
188 * can't be visible, so there's no point in incrementing topY
189 * even if light passes through the corner of the tile above. so
190 * we might as well use the bottom center for both cases.
192 int ax
= x
*2; // center
194 // use bottom-right if the tile above and right is a wall
195 if (blocks_light(x
+1, topY
+1, octant
, origin
)) {
199 if (top
.greater(topY
*2+1, ax
)) {
206 // if bottom == 0/?, then it's hitting the tile at Y=0 dead center. this is special-cased because
207 // bottom.y starts at zero and remains zero as long as it doesn't hit anything, so it's common
213 // the tile that the bottom vector enters from the left
214 bottomY
= ((x
*2-1) * bottom
.y
+ bottom
.x
) / (bottom
.x
*2);
217 * code below assumes that if a tile is a wall then it's visible, so if the tile contains a wall we have to
218 * ensure that the bottom vector actually hits the wall shape. it misses the wall shape if the top-left corner
219 * is beveled and bottom >= (bottomY*2+1)/(x*2). finally, the top-left corner is beveled if the tiles to the
220 * left and above are clear. we can assume the tile to the left is clear because otherwise the bottom vector
221 * would be greater, so we only have to check above
223 if (bottom
.greater_or_equal(bottomY
*2+1, x
*2) &&
224 blocks_light(x
, bottomY
, octant
, origin
) &&
225 !blocks_light(x
, bottomY
+1, octant
, origin
)) {
230 // go through the tiles in the column now that we know which ones could possibly be visible
231 int wasOpaque
= -1; // 0:false, 1:true, -1:not applicable
233 // use a signed comparison because y can wrap around when decremented
234 for (int y
= topY
; y
>= bottomY
; y
--) {
235 // skip the tile if it's out of visual range
236 if (rangeLimit
< 0 ||
get_distance(x
, y
) <= rangeLimit
) {
237 bool isOpaque
= blocks_light(x
, y
, octant
, origin
);
239 * every tile where topY > y > bottomY is guaranteed to be visible.
240 * also, the code that initializes topY and bottomY guarantees that
241 * if the tile is opaque then it's visible. so we only have to do
242 * extra work for the case where the tile is clear and y == topY or
243 * y == bottomY. if y == topY then we have to make sure that the top
244 * vector is above the bottom-right corner of the inner square.
245 * if y == bottomY then we have to make sure that the bottom vector
246 * is below the top-left corner of the inner square
248 bool isVisible
= isOpaque ||
((y
!= topY || top
.greater(y
*4-1, x
*4+1)) && (y
!= bottomY || bottom
.less(y
*4+1, x
*4-1)));
250 * NOTE: if you want the algorithm to be either fully or mostly
251 * symmetrical, replace the line above with the following line (and
252 * uncomment the Slope.less_or_equal method). the line ensures that a
253 * clear tile is visible only if there's an unobstructed line to its
254 * center. if you want it to be fully symmetrical, also remove the
255 * "isOpaque ||" part and see NOTE comments further down
257 * bool isVisible = isOpaque || ((y != topY || top.greaterOrEqual(y, x)) && (y != bottomY || bottom.less_or_equal(y, x)));
260 set_visible(x
, y
, octant
, origin
);
263 // if we found a transition from clear to opaque or vice versa, adjust the top and bottom vectors
264 // but don't bother adjusting them if this is the last column anyway
265 if (x
!= rangeLimit
) {
267 // if we found a transition from clear to opaque, this sector is done in this column,
268 // so adjust the bottom vector upward and continue processing it in the next column
269 if (wasOpaque
== 0) {
271 * if the opaque tile has a beveled top-left
272 * corner, move the bottom vector up to the
273 * top center. otherwise, move it up to the
274 * top left. the corner is beveled if the
275 * tiles above and to the left are clear. we
276 * can assume the tile to the left is clear
277 * because otherwise the vector would be
278 * higher, so we only have to check the tile
281 int nx
= x
*2, ny
= y
*2+1; // top center by default
282 // NOTE: if you're using full symmetry and
283 // want more expansive walls (recommended),
284 // comment out the next line
286 // top left if the corner is not beveled
287 if (blocks_light(x
, y
+1, octant
, origin
))
290 // we have to maintain the invariant that top > bottom, so the new sector
291 // created by adjusting the bottom is only valid if that's the case
292 if (top
.greater(ny
, nx
)) {
293 // if we're at the bottom of the column,
294 // then just adjust the current sector rather than recursing
295 // since there's no chance that this sector
296 // can be split in two by a later transition back to clear
298 bottom
= Slope(ny
, nx
); break;
300 // don't recurse unless necessary
302 compute(map
, lightmap
, octant
, origin
, rangeLimit
, lightLimit
, x
+1, top
, Slope(ny
, nx
));
305 // the new bottom is greater than or equal
306 // to the top, so the new sector is empty
307 // and we'll ignore it. if we're at the
308 // bottom of the column, we'd normally
309 // adjust the current sector rather than
311 // recursing, so that invalidates the current sector and we're done
318 // if we found a transition from opaque to clear, adjust the top vector downwards
320 // if the opaque tile has a beveled bottom-
321 // right corner, move the top vector down to
322 // the bottom center. otherwise, move it
323 // down to the bottom right. the corner is
324 // beveled if the tiles below and to the
325 // right are clear. we know the tile below
326 // is clear because that's the current tile,
327 // so just check to the right
329 // the bottom of the opaque tile (oy*2-1) equals the top of this tile (y*2+1)
330 int nx
= x
*2, ny
= y
*2+1;
332 // NOTE: if you're using full symmetry and
333 // want more expansive walls (recommended),
334 // comment out the next line
336 // check the right of the opaque tile (y+1), not this one
337 if (blocks_light(x
+1, y
+1, octant
, origin
)) {
341 // we have to maintain the invariant that
342 // top > bottom. if not, the sector is empty
344 if (bottom
.greater_or_equal(ny
, nx
)) {
356 // if the column didn't end in a clear tile, then there's no reason to continue processing the current sector
357 // because that means either 1) wasOpaque == -1, implying that the sector is empty or at its range limit, or 2)
358 // wasOpaque == 1, implying that we found a transition from clear to opaque and we recursed and we never found
359 // a transition back to clear, so there's nothing else for us to do that the recursive method hasn't already. (if
360 // we didn't recurse (because y == bottomY), it would have executed a break, leaving wasOpaque equal to 0.)
367 private int get_distance(int x
, int y
) {
368 return x
* x
+ y
* y
;