3 # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
4 # a legal notice, here is a blessing:
6 # May you do good and not evil.
7 # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
8 # May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
10 #***********************************************************************
12 # This file implements tests to verify that the "testable statements" in
13 # the lang_select.html document are correct.
16 set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
17 source $testdir/tester.tcl
24 do_execsql_test e_select-1.0 {
25 CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
26 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a', 'one');
27 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('b', 'two');
28 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('c', 'three');
30 CREATE TABLE t2(a, b);
31 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('a', 'I');
32 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('b', 'II');
33 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('c', 'III');
35 CREATE TABLE t3(a, c);
36 INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('a', 1);
37 INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('b', 2);
39 CREATE TABLE t4(a, c);
40 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('a', NULL);
41 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('b', 2);
43 set t1_cross_t2 [list \
44 a one a I a one b II \
45 a one c III b two a I \
46 b two b II b two c III \
47 c three a I c three b II \
50 set t1_cross_t1 [list \
51 a one a one a one b two \
52 a one c three b two a one \
53 b two b two b two c three \
54 c three a one c three b two \
59 # This proc is a specialized version of [do_execsql_test].
61 # The second argument to this proc must be a SELECT statement that
62 # features a cross join of some time. Instead of the usual ",",
63 # "CROSS JOIN" or "INNER JOIN" join-op, the string %JOIN% must be
66 # This test runs the SELECT three times - once with:
70 # * s/%JOIN%/INNER JOIN/
71 # * s/%JOIN%/CROSS JOIN/
73 # and checks that each time the results of the SELECT are $res.
75 proc do_join_test {tn select res} {
76 foreach {tn2 joinop} [list 1 , 2 "CROSS JOIN" 3 "INNER JOIN"] {
77 set S [string map [list %JOIN% $joinop] $select]
78 uplevel do_execsql_test $tn.$tn2 [list $S] [list $res]
82 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
83 # The following tests check that all paths on the syntax diagrams on
84 # the lang_select.html page may be taken.
86 # -- syntax diagram join-constraint
88 do_join_test e_select-0.1.1 {
89 SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a)
91 do_join_test e_select-0.1.2 {
92 SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 USING (a)
94 do_join_test e_select-0.1.3 {
95 SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2
97 do_catchsql_test e_select-0.1.4 {
98 SELECT count(*) FROM t1, t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a) USING (a)
99 } {1 {cannot have both ON and USING clauses in the same join}}
100 do_catchsql_test e_select-0.1.5 {
101 SELECT count(*) FROM t1, t2 USING (a) ON (t1.a=t2.a)
102 } {1 {near "ON": syntax error}}
104 # -- syntax diagram select-core
107 # 1: SELECT DISTINCT ...
114 # 1: Has WHERE clause
116 # 0: No GROUP BY clause
117 # 1: Has GROUP BY clause
118 # 2: Has GROUP BY and HAVING clauses
120 do_select_tests e_select-0.2 {
121 0000.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 " {1 2 3}
122 1000.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 " {1 2 3}
123 2000.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 " {1 2 3}
125 0100.1 "SELECT a, b, a||b FROM t1 " {
126 a one aone b two btwo c three cthree
128 1100.1 "SELECT DISTINCT a, b, a||b FROM t1 " {
129 a one aone b two btwo c three cthree
131 1200.1 "SELECT ALL a, b, a||b FROM t1 " {
132 a one aone b two btwo c three cthree
135 0010.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 " {1 2 3}
136 0010.2 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 0 " {}
137 0010.3 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE NULL " {}
139 1010.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 " {1 2 3}
141 2010.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 " {1 2 3}
143 0110.1 "SELECT a, b, a||b FROM t1 WHERE a!='x' " {
144 a one aone b two btwo c three cthree
146 0110.2 "SELECT a, b, a||b FROM t1 WHERE a=='x'" {}
148 1110.1 "SELECT DISTINCT a, b, a||b FROM t1 WHERE a!='x' " {
149 a one aone b two btwo c three cthree
152 2110.0 "SELECT ALL a, b, a||b FROM t1 WHERE a=='x'" {}
154 0001.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2" {1 2 3}
155 0002.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1" {1 2 3}
156 0002.2 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
158 1001.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2" {1 2 3}
159 1002.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1" {1 2 3}
160 1002.2 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
162 2001.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2" {1 2 3}
163 2002.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1" {1 2 3}
164 2002.2 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
166 0101.1 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 GROUP BY b" {1 a 1 c 1 b}
167 0102.1 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {
170 0102.2 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" { }
172 1101.1 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 GROUP BY b" {1 a 1 c 1 b}
173 1102.1 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1
174 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {
177 1102.2 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1
178 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" {
181 2101.1 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1 GROUP BY b" {1 a 1 c 1 b}
182 2102.1 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1
183 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {
186 2102.2 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1
187 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" {
190 0011.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 GROUP BY 2" {1 2 3}
191 0012.1 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 0 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1" {}
192 0012.2 "SELECT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 0 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
194 1011.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 0 GROUP BY 2" {}
195 1012.1 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1"
197 1012.2 "SELECT DISTINCT 1, 2, 3 WHERE NULL GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
199 2011.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 WHERE 1 GROUP BY 2" {1 2 3}
200 2012.1 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 WHERE 0 GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)=1" {}
201 2012.2 "SELECT ALL 1, 2, 3 WHERE 'abc' GROUP BY 2 HAVING count(*)>1" {}
203 0111.1 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE a='a' GROUP BY b" {1 a}
204 0112.1 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1
205 WHERE a='c' GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {1 c}
206 0112.2 "SELECT count(*), max(a) FROM t1
207 WHERE 0 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" { }
208 1111.1 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE a<'c' GROUP BY b"
210 1112.1 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE a>'a'
211 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {
214 1112.2 "SELECT DISTINCT count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE 0
215 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" {
218 2111.1 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE b>'one' GROUP BY b"
220 2112.1 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1 WHERE a!='b'
221 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=1" {
224 2112.2 "SELECT ALL count(*), max(a) FROM t1
225 WHERE 0 GROUP BY b HAVING count(*)=2" { }
229 # -- syntax diagram result-column
231 do_select_tests e_select-0.3 {
232 1 "SELECT * FROM t1" {a one b two c three}
233 2 "SELECT t1.* FROM t1" {a one b two c three}
234 3 "SELECT 'x'||a||'x' FROM t1" {xax xbx xcx}
235 4 "SELECT 'x'||a||'x' alias FROM t1" {xax xbx xcx}
236 5 "SELECT 'x'||a||'x' AS alias FROM t1" {xax xbx xcx}
239 # -- syntax diagram join-source
241 # -- syntax diagram join-op
243 do_select_tests e_select-0.4 {
244 1 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1" {1 2 3}
245 2 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1,t2" {1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3}
246 3 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1,t2,t3" {1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3}
248 4 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1" {1 2 3}
249 5 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 JOIN t2" {1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3}
250 6 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 JOIN t2 JOIN t3"
251 {1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3}
253 7 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 NATURAL JOIN t3" {1 2}
254 8 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT OUTER JOIN t3" {1 2 3}
255 9 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t3" {1 2 3}
256 10 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 NATURAL INNER JOIN t3" {1 2}
257 11 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 NATURAL CROSS JOIN t3" {1 2}
259 12 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 JOIN t3" {1 1 2 2 3 3}
260 13 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN t3" {1 1 2 2 3 3}
261 14 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t3" {1 1 2 2 3 3}
262 15 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 INNER JOIN t3" {1 1 2 2 3 3}
263 16 "SELECT t1.rowid FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t3" {1 1 2 2 3 3}
266 # -- syntax diagram compound-operator
268 do_select_tests e_select-0.5 {
269 1 "SELECT rowid FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT rowid+2 FROM t4" {1 2 3 3 4}
270 2 "SELECT rowid FROM t1 UNION SELECT rowid+2 FROM t4" {1 2 3 4}
271 3 "SELECT rowid FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT rowid+2 FROM t4" {3}
272 4 "SELECT rowid FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT rowid+2 FROM t4" {1 2}
275 # -- syntax diagram ordering-term
277 do_select_tests e_select-0.6 {
278 1 "SELECT b||a FROM t1 ORDER BY b||a" {onea threec twob}
279 2 "SELECT b||a FROM t1 ORDER BY (b||a) COLLATE nocase" {onea threec twob}
280 3 "SELECT b||a FROM t1 ORDER BY (b||a) ASC" {onea threec twob}
281 4 "SELECT b||a FROM t1 ORDER BY (b||a) DESC" {twob threec onea}
284 # -- syntax diagram select-stmt
286 do_select_tests e_select-0.7 {
287 1 "SELECT * FROM t1" {a one b two c three}
288 2 "SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b" {a one c three b two}
289 3 "SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a" {a one c three b two}
291 4 "SELECT * FROM t1 LIMIT 10" {a one b two c three}
292 5 "SELECT * FROM t1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5" {}
293 6 "SELECT * FROM t1 LIMIT 10, 5" {}
295 7 "SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10" {a one b two c three}
296 8 "SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY b LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5" {}
297 9 "SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a,b LIMIT 10, 5" {}
299 10 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1"
300 {a one b two c three one a three c two b}
301 11 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 ORDER BY b"
302 {one a two b three c a one c three b two}
303 12 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 ORDER BY b, a"
304 {one a two b three c a one c three b two}
305 13 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 LIMIT 10"
306 {a one b two c three one a three c two b}
307 14 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
309 15 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 LIMIT 10, 5"
311 16 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10"
312 {a one b two c three one a three c two b}
313 17 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 ORDER BY b LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
315 18 "SELECT * FROM t1 UNION SELECT b, a FROM t1 ORDER BY a,b LIMIT 10, 5"
319 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
320 # The following tests focus on FROM clause (join) processing.
323 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-16074-54196 If the FROM clause is omitted from a simple
324 # SELECT statement, then the input data is implicitly a single row zero
327 do_select_tests e_select-1.1 {
328 1 "SELECT 'abc'" {abc}
329 2 "SELECT 'abc' WHERE NULL" {}
331 4 "SELECT count(*)" {1}
332 5 "SELECT count(*) WHERE 0" {0}
333 6 "SELECT count(*) WHERE 1" {1}
336 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-45424-07352 If there is only a single table or subquery
337 # in the FROM clause, then the input data used by the SELECT statement
338 # is the contents of the named table.
340 # The results of the SELECT queries suggest that they are operating on the
341 # contents of the table 'xx'.
343 do_execsql_test e_select-1.2.0 {
344 CREATE TABLE xx(x, y);
345 INSERT INTO xx VALUES('IiJlsIPepMuAhU', X'10B00B897A15BAA02E3F98DCE8F2');
346 INSERT INTO xx VALUES(NULL, -16.87);
347 INSERT INTO xx VALUES(-17.89, 'linguistically');
349 do_select_tests e_select-1.2 {
350 1 "SELECT quote(x), quote(y) FROM xx" {
351 'IiJlsIPepMuAhU' X'10B00B897A15BAA02E3F98DCE8F2'
353 -17.89 'linguistically'
356 2 "SELECT count(*), count(x), count(y) FROM xx" {3 2 3}
357 3 "SELECT sum(x), sum(y) FROM xx" {-17.89 -16.87}
360 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-28355-09804 If there is more than one table or subquery
361 # in FROM clause then the contents of all tables and/or subqueries are
362 # joined into a single dataset for the simple SELECT statement to
365 # There are more detailed tests for subsequent requirements that add
366 # more detail to this idea. We just add a single test that shows that
367 # data is coming from each of the three tables following the FROM clause
368 # here to show that the statement, vague as it is, is not incorrect.
370 do_select_tests e_select-1.3 {
371 1 "SELECT * FROM t1, t2, t3" {
372 a one a I a 1 a one a I b 2 a one b II a 1
373 a one b II b 2 a one c III a 1 a one c III b 2
374 b two a I a 1 b two a I b 2 b two b II a 1
375 b two b II b 2 b two c III a 1 b two c III b 2
376 c three a I a 1 c three a I b 2 c three b II a 1
377 c three b II b 2 c three c III a 1 c three c III b 2
382 # The following block of tests - e_select-1.4.* - test that the description
383 # of cartesian joins in the SELECT documentation is consistent with SQLite.
384 # In doing so, we test the following three requirements as a side-effect:
386 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-49872-03192 If the join-operator is "CROSS JOIN",
387 # "INNER JOIN", "JOIN" or a comma (",") and there is no ON or USING
388 # clause, then the result of the join is simply the cartesian product of
389 # the left and right-hand datasets.
391 # The tests are built on this assertion. Really, they test that the output
392 # of a CROSS JOIN, JOIN, INNER JOIN or "," join matches the expected result
393 # of calculating the cartesian product of the left and right-hand datasets.
395 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-46256-57243 There is no difference between the "INNER
396 # JOIN", "JOIN" and "," join operators.
398 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-25071-21202 The "CROSS JOIN" join operator produces the
399 # same result as the "INNER JOIN", "JOIN" and "," operators
401 # All tests are run 4 times, with the only difference in each run being
402 # which of the 4 equivalent cartesian product join operators are used.
403 # Since the output data is the same in all cases, we consider that this
404 # qualifies as testing the two statements above.
406 do_execsql_test e_select-1.4.0 {
407 CREATE TABLE x1(a, b);
408 CREATE TABLE x2(c, d, e);
409 CREATE TABLE x3(f, g, h, i);
411 -- x1: 3 rows, 2 columns
412 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(24, 'converging');
413 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(NULL, X'CB71');
414 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES('blonds', 'proprietary');
416 -- x2: 2 rows, 3 columns
417 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(-60.06, NULL, NULL);
418 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(-58, NULL, 1.21);
420 -- x3: 5 rows, 4 columns
421 INSERT INTO x3 VALUES(-39.24, NULL, 'encompass', -1);
422 INSERT INTO x3 VALUES('presenting', 51, 'reformation', 'dignified');
423 INSERT INTO x3 VALUES('conducting', -87.24, 37.56, NULL);
424 INSERT INTO x3 VALUES('coldest', -96, 'dramatists', 82.3);
425 INSERT INTO x3 VALUES('alerting', NULL, -93.79, NULL);
428 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-59089-25828 The columns of the cartesian product
429 # dataset are, in order, all the columns of the left-hand dataset
430 # followed by all the columns of the right-hand dataset.
432 do_join_test e_select-1.4.1.1 {
433 SELECT * FROM x1 %JOIN% x2 LIMIT 1
434 } [concat {24 converging} {-60.06 {} {}}]
436 do_join_test e_select-1.4.1.2 {
437 SELECT * FROM x2 %JOIN% x1 LIMIT 1
438 } [concat {-60.06 {} {}} {24 converging}]
440 do_join_test e_select-1.4.1.3 {
441 SELECT * FROM x3 %JOIN% x2 LIMIT 1
442 } [concat {-39.24 {} encompass -1} {-60.06 {} {}}]
444 do_join_test e_select-1.4.1.4 {
445 SELECT * FROM x2 %JOIN% x3 LIMIT 1
446 } [concat {-60.06 {} {}} {-39.24 {} encompass -1}]
448 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-44414-54710 There is a row in the cartesian product
449 # dataset formed by combining each unique combination of a row from the
450 # left-hand and right-hand datasets.
452 do_join_test e_select-1.4.2.1 {
453 SELECT * FROM x2 %JOIN% x3 ORDER BY +c, +f
454 } [list -60.06 {} {} -39.24 {} encompass -1 \
455 -60.06 {} {} alerting {} -93.79 {} \
456 -60.06 {} {} coldest -96 dramatists 82.3 \
457 -60.06 {} {} conducting -87.24 37.56 {} \
458 -60.06 {} {} presenting 51 reformation dignified \
459 -58 {} 1.21 -39.24 {} encompass -1 \
460 -58 {} 1.21 alerting {} -93.79 {} \
461 -58 {} 1.21 coldest -96 dramatists 82.3 \
462 -58 {} 1.21 conducting -87.24 37.56 {} \
463 -58 {} 1.21 presenting 51 reformation dignified \
465 # TODO: Come back and add a few more like the above.
467 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-18439-38548 In other words, if the left-hand dataset
468 # consists of Nleft rows of Mleft columns, and the right-hand dataset of
469 # Nright rows of Mright columns, then the cartesian product is a dataset
470 # of Nleft×Nright rows, each containing Mleft+Mright columns.
472 # x1, x2 (Nlhs=3, Nrhs=2) (Mlhs=2, Mrhs=3)
473 do_join_test e_select-1.4.3.1 {
474 SELECT count(*) FROM x1 %JOIN% x2
476 do_test e_select-1.4.3.2 {
477 expr {[llength [execsql {SELECT * FROM x1, x2}]] / 6}
480 # x2, x3 (Nlhs=2, Nrhs=5) (Mlhs=3, Mrhs=4)
481 do_join_test e_select-1.4.3.3 {
482 SELECT count(*) FROM x2 %JOIN% x3
484 do_test e_select-1.4.3.4 {
485 expr {[llength [execsql {SELECT * FROM x2 JOIN x3}]] / 10}
488 # x3, x1 (Nlhs=5, Nrhs=3) (Mlhs=4, Mrhs=2)
489 do_join_test e_select-1.4.3.5 {
490 SELECT count(*) FROM x3 %JOIN% x1
492 do_test e_select-1.4.3.6 {
493 expr {[llength [execsql {SELECT * FROM x3 CROSS JOIN x1}]] / 15}
496 # x3, x3 (Nlhs=5, Nrhs=5) (Mlhs=4, Mrhs=4)
497 do_join_test e_select-1.4.3.7 {
498 SELECT count(*) FROM x3 %JOIN% x3
500 do_test e_select-1.4.3.8 {
501 expr {[llength [execsql {SELECT * FROM x3 INNER JOIN x3 AS x4}]] / 25}
504 # Some extra cartesian product tests using tables t1 and t2.
506 do_execsql_test e_select-1.4.4.1 { SELECT * FROM t1, t2 } $t1_cross_t2
507 do_execsql_test e_select-1.4.4.2 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS x, t1 AS y} $t1_cross_t1
509 do_select_tests e_select-1.4.5 [list \
510 1 { SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2 } $t1_cross_t2 \
511 2 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS y CROSS JOIN t1 AS x } $t1_cross_t1 \
512 3 { SELECT * FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 } $t1_cross_t2 \
513 4 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS y INNER JOIN t1 AS x } $t1_cross_t1 \
516 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-38465-03616 If there is an ON clause then the ON
517 # expression is evaluated for each row of the cartesian product as a
518 # boolean expression. Only rows for which the expression evaluates to
519 # true are included from the dataset.
521 foreach {tn select res} [list \
522 1 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (1) } $t1_cross_t2 \
523 2 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0) } [list] \
524 3 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (NULL) } [list] \
525 4 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('abc') } [list] \
526 5 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('1ab') } $t1_cross_t2 \
527 6 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0.9) } $t1_cross_t2 \
528 7 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('0.9') } $t1_cross_t2 \
529 8 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0.0) } [list] \
531 9 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a) } \
532 {one I two II three III} \
533 10 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a = 'a') } \
534 {one I one II one III} \
535 11 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b
536 FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (CASE WHEN t1.a = 'a' THEN NULL ELSE 1 END) } \
537 {two I two II two III three I three II three III} \
539 do_join_test e_select-1.3.$tn $select $res
542 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-49933-05137 If there is a USING clause then each of the
543 # column names specified must exist in the datasets to both the left and
544 # right of the join-operator.
546 do_select_tests e_select-1.4 -error {
547 cannot join using column %s - column not present in both tables
549 1 { SELECT * FROM t1, t3 USING (b) } "b"
550 2 { SELECT * FROM t3, t1 USING (c) } "c"
551 3 { SELECT * FROM t3, (SELECT a AS b, b AS c FROM t1) USING (a) } "a"
554 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-22776-52830 For each pair of named columns, the
555 # expression "lhs.X = rhs.X" is evaluated for each row of the cartesian
556 # product as a boolean expression. Only rows for which all such
557 # expressions evaluates to true are included from the result set.
559 do_select_tests e_select-1.5 {
560 1 { SELECT * FROM t1, t3 USING (a) } {a one 1 b two 2}
561 2 { SELECT * FROM t3, t4 USING (a,c) } {b 2}
564 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-54046-48600 When comparing values as a result of a
565 # USING clause, the normal rules for handling affinities, collation
566 # sequences and NULL values in comparisons apply.
568 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-38422-04402 The column from the dataset on the
569 # left-hand side of the join-operator is considered to be on the
570 # left-hand side of the comparison operator (=) for the purposes of
571 # collation sequence and affinity precedence.
573 do_execsql_test e_select-1.6.0 {
574 CREATE TABLE t5(a COLLATE nocase, b COLLATE binary);
575 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('AA', 'cc');
576 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('BB', 'dd');
577 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
578 CREATE TABLE t6(a COLLATE binary, b COLLATE nocase);
579 INSERT INTO t6 VALUES('aa', 'cc');
580 INSERT INTO t6 VALUES('bb', 'DD');
581 INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
583 foreach {tn select res} {
584 1 { SELECT * FROM t5 %JOIN% t6 USING (a) } {AA cc cc BB dd DD}
585 2 { SELECT * FROM t6 %JOIN% t5 USING (a) } {}
586 3 { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) %JOIN% t5 USING (a) }
588 4 { SELECT * FROM t5 %JOIN% t6 USING (a,b) } {AA cc}
589 5 { SELECT * FROM t6 %JOIN% t5 USING (a,b) } {}
591 do_join_test e_select-1.6.$tn $select $res
594 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-57047-10461 For each pair of columns identified by a
595 # USING clause, the column from the right-hand dataset is omitted from
596 # the joined dataset.
598 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-56132-15700 This is the only difference between a USING
599 # clause and its equivalent ON constraint.
601 foreach {tn select res} {
602 1a { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 USING (a) }
603 {a one I b two II c three III}
604 1b { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a) }
605 {a one a I b two b II c three c III}
607 2a { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 USING (a) }
609 2b { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 ON (t3.a=t4.a) }
612 3a { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 USING (a,c) } {b 2}
613 3b { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 ON (t3.a=t4.a AND t3.c=t4.c) } {b 2 b 2}
615 4a { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) AS x
616 %JOIN% t5 USING (a) }
618 4b { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) AS x
619 %JOIN% t5 ON (x.a=t5.a) }
620 {aa cc AA cc bb DD BB dd}
622 do_join_test e_select-1.7.$tn $select $res
624 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-42531-52874 If the join-operator is a "LEFT JOIN" or
625 # "LEFT OUTER JOIN", then after the ON or USING filtering clauses have
626 # been applied, an extra row is added to the output for each row in the
627 # original left-hand input dataset that corresponds to no rows at all in
628 # the composite dataset (if any).
630 do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.0 {
631 CREATE TABLE t7(a, b, c);
632 CREATE TABLE t8(a, d, e);
634 INSERT INTO t7 VALUES('x', 'ex', 24);
635 INSERT INTO t7 VALUES('y', 'why', 25);
637 INSERT INTO t8 VALUES('x', 'abc', 24);
638 INSERT INTO t8 VALUES('z', 'ghi', 26);
641 do_select_tests e_select-1.8 {
642 1a "SELECT count(*) FROM t7 JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)" {1}
643 1b "SELECT count(*) FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)" {2}
644 2a "SELECT count(*) FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a)" {1}
645 2b "SELECT count(*) FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a)" {2}
649 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-15607-52988 The added rows contain NULL values in the
650 # columns that would normally contain values copied from the right-hand
653 do_select_tests e_select-1.9 {
654 1a "SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)" {x ex 24 x abc 24}
655 1b "SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)"
656 {x ex 24 x abc 24 y why 25 {} {} {}}
657 2a "SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a)" {x ex 24 abc 24}
658 2b "SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a)" {x ex 24 abc 24 y why 25 {} {}}
661 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-04932-55942 If the NATURAL keyword is in the
662 # join-operator then an implicit USING clause is added to the
663 # join-constraints. The implicit USING clause contains each of the
664 # column names that appear in both the left and right-hand input
667 do_select_tests e_select-1-10 {
668 1a "SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a)" {x ex 24 abc 24}
669 1b "SELECT * FROM t7 NATURAL JOIN t8" {x ex 24 abc 24}
671 2a "SELECT * FROM t8 JOIN t7 USING (a)" {x abc 24 ex 24}
672 2b "SELECT * FROM t8 NATURAL JOIN t7" {x abc 24 ex 24}
674 3a "SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a)" {x ex 24 abc 24 y why 25 {} {}}
675 3b "SELECT * FROM t7 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t8" {x ex 24 abc 24 y why 25 {} {}}
677 4a "SELECT * FROM t8 LEFT JOIN t7 USING (a)" {x abc 24 ex 24 z ghi 26 {} {}}
678 4b "SELECT * FROM t8 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t7" {x abc 24 ex 24 z ghi 26 {} {}}
680 5a "SELECT * FROM t3 JOIN t4 USING (a,c)" {b 2}
681 5b "SELECT * FROM t3 NATURAL JOIN t4" {b 2}
683 6a "SELECT * FROM t3 LEFT JOIN t4 USING (a,c)" {a 1 b 2}
684 6b "SELECT * FROM t3 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t4" {a 1 b 2}
687 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-49566-01570 If the left and right-hand input datasets
688 # feature no common column names, then the NATURAL keyword has no effect
689 # on the results of the join.
691 do_execsql_test e_select-1.11.0 {
692 CREATE TABLE t10(x, y);
693 INSERT INTO t10 VALUES(1, 'true');
694 INSERT INTO t10 VALUES(0, 'false');
696 do_select_tests e_select-1-11 {
697 1a "SELECT a, x FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t10" {a 1 a 0 b 1 b 0 c 1 c 0}
698 1b "SELECT a, x FROM t1 NATURAL CROSS JOIN t10" {a 1 a 0 b 1 b 0 c 1 c 0}
701 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-39625-59133 A USING or ON clause may not be added to a
702 # join that specifies the NATURAL keyword.
705 1 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 USING (a)}
706 2 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a)}
707 3 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 ON (45)}
709 do_catchsql_test e_select-1.12.$tn "
711 " {1 {a NATURAL join may not have an ON or USING clause}}
714 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
715 # The next block of tests - e_select-3.* - concentrate on verifying
716 # statements made regarding WHERE clause processing.
719 do_execsql_test e_select-3.0 {
720 CREATE TABLE x1(k, x, y, z);
721 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(1, 'relinquished', 'aphasia', 78.43);
722 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(2, X'A8E8D66F', X'07CF', -81);
723 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(3, -22, -27.57, NULL);
724 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(4, NULL, 'bygone', 'picky');
725 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(5, NULL, 96.28, NULL);
726 INSERT INTO x1 VALUES(6, 0, 1, 2);
728 CREATE TABLE x2(k, x, y2);
729 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(1, 50, X'B82838');
730 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(5, 84.79, 65.88);
731 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(3, -22, X'0E1BE452A393');
732 INSERT INTO x2 VALUES(7, 'mistrusted', 'standardized');
735 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-60775-64916 If a WHERE clause is specified, the WHERE
736 # expression is evaluated for each row in the input data as a boolean
737 # expression. Only rows for which the WHERE clause expression evaluates
738 # to true are included from the dataset before continuing.
740 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.1 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE x } {3}
741 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.2 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE y } {3 5 6}
742 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.3 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE z } {1 2 6}
743 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.4 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE '1'||z } {1 2 4 6}
744 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.5 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE x IS NULL } {4 5}
745 do_execsql_test e_select-3.1.6 { SELECT k FROM x1 WHERE z - 78.43 } {2 4 6}
747 do_execsql_test e_select-3.2.1a {
748 SELECT k FROM x1 LEFT JOIN x2 USING(k)
750 do_execsql_test e_select-3.2.1b {
751 SELECT k FROM x1 LEFT JOIN x2 USING(k) WHERE x2.k
753 do_execsql_test e_select-3.2.2 {
754 SELECT k FROM x1 LEFT JOIN x2 USING(k) WHERE x2.k IS NULL
757 do_execsql_test e_select-3.2.3 {
758 SELECT k FROM x1 NATURAL JOIN x2 WHERE x2.k
760 do_execsql_test e_select-3.2.4 {
761 SELECT k FROM x1 NATURAL JOIN x2 WHERE x2.k-3
764 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
765 # Tests below this point are focused on verifying the testable statements
766 # related to caculating the result rows of a simple SELECT statement.
770 do_execsql_test e_select-4.0 {
771 CREATE TABLE z1(a, b, c);
772 CREATE TABLE z2(d, e);
773 CREATE TABLE z3(a, b);
775 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(51.65, -59.58, 'belfries');
776 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(-5, NULL, 75);
777 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(-2.2, -23.18, 'suiters');
778 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(NULL, 67, 'quartets');
779 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(-1.04, -32.3, 'aspen');
780 INSERT INTO z1 VALUES(63, 'born', -26);
782 INSERT INTO z2 VALUES(NULL, 21);
783 INSERT INTO z2 VALUES(36, 6);
785 INSERT INTO z3 VALUES('subsistence', 'gauze');
786 INSERT INTO z3 VALUES(49.17, -67);
789 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-36327-17224 If a result expression is the special
790 # expression "*" then all columns in the input data are substituted for
791 # that one expression.
793 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-43693-30522 If the expression is the alias of a table
794 # or subquery in the FROM clause followed by ".*" then all columns from
795 # the named table or subquery are substituted for the single expression.
797 do_select_tests e_select-4.1 {
798 1 "SELECT * FROM z1 LIMIT 1" {51.65 -59.58 belfries}
799 2 "SELECT * FROM z1,z2 LIMIT 1" {51.65 -59.58 belfries {} 21}
800 3 "SELECT z1.* FROM z1,z2 LIMIT 1" {51.65 -59.58 belfries}
801 4 "SELECT z2.* FROM z1,z2 LIMIT 1" {{} 21}
802 5 "SELECT z2.*, z1.* FROM z1,z2 LIMIT 1" {{} 21 51.65 -59.58 belfries}
804 6 "SELECT count(*), * FROM z1" {6 63 born -26}
805 7 "SELECT max(a), * FROM z1" {63 63 born -26}
806 8 "SELECT *, min(a) FROM z1" {-5 {} 75 -5}
808 9 "SELECT *,* FROM z1,z2 LIMIT 1" {
809 51.65 -59.58 belfries {} 21 51.65 -59.58 belfries {} 21
811 10 "SELECT z1.*,z1.* FROM z2,z1 LIMIT 1" {
812 51.65 -59.58 belfries 51.65 -59.58 belfries
816 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-38023-18396 It is an error to use a "*" or "alias.*"
817 # expression in any context other than a result expression list.
819 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-44324-41166 It is also an error to use a "*" or
820 # "alias.*" expression in a simple SELECT query that does not have a
823 foreach {tn select err} {
824 1.1 "SELECT a, b, c FROM z1 WHERE *" {near "*": syntax error}
825 1.2 "SELECT a, b, c FROM z1 GROUP BY *" {near "*": syntax error}
826 1.3 "SELECT 1 + * FROM z1" {near "*": syntax error}
827 1.4 "SELECT * + 1 FROM z1" {near "+": syntax error}
829 2.1 "SELECT *" {no tables specified}
830 2.2 "SELECT * WHERE 1" {no tables specified}
831 2.3 "SELECT * WHERE 0" {no tables specified}
832 2.4 "SELECT count(*), *" {no tables specified}
834 do_catchsql_test e_select-4.2.$tn $select [list 1 $err]
837 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-08669-22397 The number of columns in the rows returned
838 # by a simple SELECT statement is equal to the number of expressions in
839 # the result expression list after substitution of * and alias.*
842 foreach {tn select nCol} {
843 1 "SELECT * FROM z1" 3
844 2 "SELECT * FROM z1 NATURAL JOIN z3" 3
845 3 "SELECT z1.* FROM z1 NATURAL JOIN z3" 3
846 4 "SELECT z3.* FROM z1 NATURAL JOIN z3" 2
847 5 "SELECT z1.*, z3.* FROM z1 NATURAL JOIN z3" 5
848 6 "SELECT 1, 2, z1.* FROM z1" 5
849 7 "SELECT a, *, b, c FROM z1" 6
851 set ::stmt [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db $select -1 DUMMY]
852 do_test e_select-4.3.$tn { sqlite3_column_count $::stmt } $nCol
853 sqlite3_finalize $::stmt
858 # In lang_select.html, a non-aggregate query is defined as any simple SELECT
859 # that has no GROUP BY clause and no aggregate expressions in the result
860 # expression list. Other queries are aggregate queries. Test cases
861 # e_select-4.4.* through e_select-4.12.*, inclusive, which test the part of
862 # simple SELECT that is different for aggregate and non-aggregate queries
863 # verify (in a way) that these definitions are consistent:
865 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-20637-43463 A simple SELECT statement is an aggregate
866 # query if it contains either a GROUP BY clause or one or more aggregate
867 # functions in the result-set.
869 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-23155-55597 Otherwise, if a simple SELECT contains no
870 # aggregate functions or a GROUP BY clause, it is a non-aggregate query.
873 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-44050-47362 If the SELECT statement is a non-aggregate
874 # query, then each expression in the result expression list is evaluated
875 # for each row in the dataset filtered by the WHERE clause.
877 do_select_tests e_select-4.4 {
878 1 "SELECT a, b FROM z1"
879 {51.65 -59.58 -5 {} -2.2 -23.18 {} 67 -1.04 -32.3 63 born}
881 2 "SELECT a IS NULL, b+1, * FROM z1" {
882 0 -58.58 51.65 -59.58 belfries
884 0 -22.18 -2.2 -23.18 suiters
886 0 -31.3 -1.04 -32.3 aspen
890 3 "SELECT 32*32, d||e FROM z2" {1024 {} 1024 366}
894 # Test cases e_select-4.5.* and e_select-4.6.* together show that:
896 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-51988-01124 The single row of result-set data created
897 # by evaluating the aggregate and non-aggregate expressions in the
898 # result-set forms the result of an aggregate query without a GROUP BY
902 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-57629-25253 If the SELECT statement is an aggregate
903 # query without a GROUP BY clause, then each aggregate expression in the
904 # result-set is evaluated once across the entire dataset.
906 do_select_tests e_select-4.5 {
907 1 "SELECT count(a), max(a), count(b), max(b) FROM z1" {5 63 5 born}
908 2 "SELECT count(*), max(1)" {1 1}
910 3 "SELECT sum(b+1) FROM z1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN z3" {-43.06}
911 4 "SELECT sum(b+2) FROM z1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN z3" {-38.06}
912 5 "SELECT sum(b IS NOT NULL) FROM z1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN z3" {5}
915 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-26684-40576 Each non-aggregate expression in the
916 # result-set is evaluated once for an arbitrarily selected row of the
919 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-27994-60376 The same arbitrarily selected row is used
920 # for each non-aggregate expression.
922 # Note: The results of many of the queries in this block of tests are
923 # technically undefined, as the documentation does not specify which row
924 # SQLite will arbitrarily select to use for the evaluation of the
925 # non-aggregate expressions.
928 do_execsql_test e_select-4.6.0 {
929 CREATE TABLE a1(one PRIMARY KEY, two);
930 INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(1, 1);
931 INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(2, 3);
932 INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(3, 6);
933 INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(4, 10);
935 CREATE TABLE a2(one PRIMARY KEY, three);
936 INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(1, 1);
937 INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(3, 2);
938 INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(6, 3);
939 INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(10, 4);
941 do_select_tests e_select-4.6 {
942 1 "SELECT one, two, count(*) FROM a1" {4 10 4}
943 2 "SELECT one, two, count(*) FROM a1 WHERE one<3" {2 3 2}
944 3 "SELECT one, two, count(*) FROM a1 WHERE one>3" {4 10 1}
945 4 "SELECT *, count(*) FROM a1 JOIN a2" {4 10 10 4 16}
946 5 "SELECT *, sum(three) FROM a1 NATURAL JOIN a2" {3 6 2 3}
947 6 "SELECT *, sum(three) FROM a1 NATURAL JOIN a2" {3 6 2 3}
948 7 "SELECT group_concat(three, ''), a1.* FROM a1 NATURAL JOIN a2" {12 3 6}
951 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-04486-07266 Or, if the dataset contains zero rows, then
952 # each non-aggregate expression is evaluated against a row consisting
953 # entirely of NULL values.
955 do_select_tests e_select-4.7 {
956 1 "SELECT one, two, count(*) FROM a1 WHERE 0" {{} {} 0}
957 2 "SELECT sum(two), * FROM a1, a2 WHERE three>5" {{} {} {} {} {}}
958 3 "SELECT max(one) IS NULL, one IS NULL, two IS NULL FROM a1 WHERE two=7" {
963 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-64138-28774 An aggregate query without a GROUP BY
964 # clause always returns exactly one row of data, even if there are zero
965 # rows of input data.
967 foreach {tn select} {
968 8.1 "SELECT count(*) FROM a1"
969 8.2 "SELECT count(*) FROM a1 WHERE 0"
970 8.3 "SELECT count(*) FROM a1 WHERE 1"
971 8.4 "SELECT max(a1.one)+min(two), a1.one, two, * FROM a1, a2 WHERE 1"
972 8.5 "SELECT max(a1.one)+min(two), a1.one, two, * FROM a1, a2 WHERE 0"
974 # Set $nRow to the number of rows returned by $select:
975 set ::stmt [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db $select -1 DUMMY]
977 while {"SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $::stmt]} { incr nRow }
978 set rc [sqlite3_finalize $::stmt]
980 # Test that $nRow==1 and that statement execution was successful
982 do_test e_select-4.$tn [list list $rc $nRow] {SQLITE_OK 1}
986 do_execsql_test e_select-4.9.0 {
987 CREATE TABLE b1(one PRIMARY KEY, two);
988 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(1, 'o');
989 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(4, 'f');
990 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(3, 't');
991 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(2, 't');
992 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(5, 'f');
993 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(7, 's');
994 INSERT INTO b1 VALUES(6, 's');
996 CREATE TABLE b2(x, y);
997 INSERT INTO b2 VALUES(NULL, 0);
998 INSERT INTO b2 VALUES(NULL, 1);
999 INSERT INTO b2 VALUES('xyz', 2);
1000 INSERT INTO b2 VALUES('abc', 3);
1001 INSERT INTO b2 VALUES('xyz', 4);
1003 CREATE TABLE b3(a COLLATE nocase, b COLLATE binary);
1004 INSERT INTO b3 VALUES('abc', 'abc');
1005 INSERT INTO b3 VALUES('aBC', 'aBC');
1006 INSERT INTO b3 VALUES('Def', 'Def');
1007 INSERT INTO b3 VALUES('dEF', 'dEF');
1010 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-07284-35990 If the SELECT statement is an aggregate
1011 # query with a GROUP BY clause, then each of the expressions specified
1012 # as part of the GROUP BY clause is evaluated for each row of the
1013 # dataset. Each row is then assigned to a "group" based on the results;
1014 # rows for which the results of evaluating the GROUP BY expressions are
1015 # the same get assigned to the same group.
1017 # These tests also show that the following is not untrue:
1019 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-25883-55063 The expressions in the GROUP BY clause do
1020 # not have to be expressions that appear in the result.
1022 do_select_tests e_select-4.9 {
1023 1 "SELECT group_concat(one), two FROM b1 GROUP BY two" {
1024 /#,# f 1 o #,# s #,# t/
1026 2 "SELECT group_concat(one), sum(one) FROM b1 GROUP BY (one>4)" {
1029 3 "SELECT group_concat(one) FROM b1 GROUP BY (two>'o'), one%2" {
1032 4 "SELECT group_concat(one) FROM b1 GROUP BY (one==2 OR two=='o')" {
1037 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-14926-50129 For the purposes of grouping rows, NULL
1038 # values are considered equal.
1040 do_select_tests e_select-4.10 {
1041 1 "SELECT group_concat(y) FROM b2 GROUP BY x" {/#,# 3 #,#/}
1042 2 "SELECT count(*) FROM b2 GROUP BY CASE WHEN y<4 THEN NULL ELSE 0 END" {4 1}
1045 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-10470-30318 The usual rules for selecting a collation
1046 # sequence with which to compare text values apply when evaluating
1047 # expressions in a GROUP BY clause.
1049 do_select_tests e_select-4.11 {
1050 1 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY b" {1 1 1 1}
1051 2 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY a" {2 2}
1052 3 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY +b" {1 1 1 1}
1053 4 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY +a" {2 2}
1054 5 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY b||''" {1 1 1 1}
1055 6 "SELECT count(*) FROM b3 GROUP BY a||''" {1 1 1 1}
1058 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-63573-50730 The expressions in a GROUP BY clause may
1059 # not be aggregate expressions.
1061 foreach {tn select} {
1062 12.1 "SELECT * FROM b3 GROUP BY count(*)"
1063 12.2 "SELECT max(a) FROM b3 GROUP BY max(b)"
1064 12.3 "SELECT group_concat(a) FROM b3 GROUP BY a, max(b)"
1066 set res {1 {aggregate functions are not allowed in the GROUP BY clause}}
1067 do_catchsql_test e_select-4.$tn $select $res
1070 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-31537-00101 If a HAVING clause is specified, it is
1071 # evaluated once for each group of rows as a boolean expression. If the
1072 # result of evaluating the HAVING clause is false, the group is
1075 # This requirement is tested by all e_select-4.13.* tests.
1077 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-04132-09474 If the HAVING clause is an aggregate
1078 # expression, it is evaluated across all rows in the group.
1080 # Tested by e_select-4.13.1.*
1082 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-28262-47447 If a HAVING clause is a non-aggregate
1083 # expression, it is evaluated with respect to an arbitrarily selected
1084 # row from the group.
1086 # Tested by e_select-4.13.2.*
1088 # Tests in this block also show that this is not untrue:
1090 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-55403-13450 The HAVING expression may refer to values,
1091 # even aggregate functions, that are not in the result.
1093 do_execsql_test e_select-4.13.0 {
1094 CREATE TABLE c1(up, down);
1095 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('x', 1);
1096 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('x', 2);
1097 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('x', 4);
1098 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('x', 8);
1099 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('y', 16);
1100 INSERT INTO c1 VALUES('y', 32);
1102 CREATE TABLE c2(i, j);
1103 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(1, 0);
1104 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(2, 1);
1105 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(3, 3);
1106 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(4, 6);
1107 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(5, 10);
1108 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(6, 15);
1109 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(7, 21);
1110 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(8, 28);
1111 INSERT INTO c2 VALUES(9, 36);
1113 CREATE TABLE c3(i PRIMARY KEY, k TEXT);
1114 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(1, 'hydrogen');
1115 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(2, 'helium');
1116 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(3, 'lithium');
1117 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(4, 'beryllium');
1118 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(5, 'boron');
1119 INSERT INTO c3 VALUES(94, 'plutonium');
1122 do_select_tests e_select-4.13 {
1123 1.1 "SELECT up FROM c1 GROUP BY up HAVING count(*)>3" {x}
1124 1.2 "SELECT up FROM c1 GROUP BY up HAVING sum(down)>16" {y}
1125 1.3 "SELECT up FROM c1 GROUP BY up HAVING sum(down)<16" {x}
1126 1.4 "SELECT up||down FROM c1 GROUP BY (down<5) HAVING max(down)<10" {x4}
1128 2.1 "SELECT up FROM c1 GROUP BY up HAVING down>10" {y}
1129 2.2 "SELECT up FROM c1 GROUP BY up HAVING up='y'" {y}
1131 2.3 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i>4 HAVING i>6" {9 36}
1134 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-23927-54081 Each expression in the result-set is then
1135 # evaluated once for each group of rows.
1137 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-53735-47017 If the expression is an aggregate
1138 # expression, it is evaluated across all rows in the group.
1140 do_select_tests e_select-4.15 {
1141 1 "SELECT sum(down) FROM c1 GROUP BY up" {15 48}
1142 2 "SELECT sum(j), max(j) FROM c2 GROUP BY (i%3)" {54 36 27 21 39 28}
1143 3 "SELECT sum(j), max(j) FROM c2 GROUP BY (j%2)" {80 36 40 21}
1144 4 "SELECT 1+sum(j), max(j)+1 FROM c2 GROUP BY (j%2)" {81 37 41 22}
1145 5 "SELECT count(*), round(avg(i),2) FROM c1, c2 ON (i=down) GROUP BY j%2"
1149 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-62913-19830 Otherwise, it is evaluated against a single
1150 # arbitrarily chosen row from within the group.
1152 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-53924-08809 If there is more than one non-aggregate
1153 # expression in the result-set, then all such expressions are evaluated
1156 do_select_tests e_select-4.15 {
1157 1 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i%2" {8 28 9 36}
1158 2 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i%2 HAVING j<30" {8 28}
1159 3 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i%2 HAVING j>30" {9 36}
1160 4 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i%2 HAVING j>30" {9 36}
1161 5 "SELECT count(*), i, k FROM c2 NATURAL JOIN c3 GROUP BY substr(k, 1, 1)"
1162 {2 5 boron 2 2 helium 1 3 lithium}
1165 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-19334-12811 Each group of input dataset rows
1166 # contributes a single row to the set of result rows.
1168 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-02223-49279 Subject to filtering associated with the
1169 # DISTINCT keyword, the number of rows returned by an aggregate query
1170 # with a GROUP BY clause is the same as the number of groups of rows
1171 # produced by applying the GROUP BY and HAVING clauses to the filtered
1174 do_select_tests e_select.4.16 -count {
1175 1 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i%2" 2
1176 2 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i" 9
1177 3 "SELECT i, j FROM c2 GROUP BY i HAVING i<5" 4
1180 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1181 # The following tests attempt to verify statements made regarding the ALL
1182 # and DISTINCT keywords.
1185 do_execsql_test e_select-5.1.0 {
1186 CREATE TABLE h1(a, b);
1187 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(1, 'one');
1188 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(1, 'I');
1189 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(1, 'i');
1190 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(4, 'four');
1191 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(4, 'IV');
1192 INSERT INTO h1 VALUES(4, 'iv');
1194 CREATE TABLE h2(x COLLATE nocase);
1195 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('One');
1196 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('Two');
1197 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('Three');
1198 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('Four');
1199 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('one');
1200 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('two');
1201 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('three');
1202 INSERT INTO h2 VALUES('four');
1204 CREATE TABLE h3(c, d);
1205 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(1, NULL);
1206 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(2, NULL);
1207 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(3, NULL);
1208 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(4, '2');
1209 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(5, NULL);
1210 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(6, '2,3');
1211 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(7, NULL);
1212 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(8, '2,4');
1213 INSERT INTO h3 VALUES(9, '3');
1216 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-60770-10612 One of the ALL or DISTINCT keywords may
1217 # follow the SELECT keyword in a simple SELECT statement.
1219 do_select_tests e_select-5.1 {
1220 1 "SELECT ALL a FROM h1" {1 1 1 4 4 4}
1221 2 "SELECT DISTINCT a FROM h1" {1 4}
1224 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-08861-34280 If the simple SELECT is a SELECT ALL, then
1225 # the entire set of result rows are returned by the SELECT.
1227 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-01256-01950 If neither ALL or DISTINCT are present,
1228 # then the behavior is as if ALL were specified.
1230 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-14442-41305 If the simple SELECT is a SELECT DISTINCT,
1231 # then duplicate rows are removed from the set of result rows before it
1234 # The three testable statements above are tested by e_select-5.2.*,
1235 # 5.3.* and 5.4.* respectively.
1237 do_select_tests e_select-5 {
1238 3.1 "SELECT ALL x FROM h2" {One Two Three Four one two three four}
1239 3.2 "SELECT ALL x FROM h1, h2 ON (x=b)" {One one Four four}
1241 3.1 "SELECT x FROM h2" {One Two Three Four one two three four}
1242 3.2 "SELECT x FROM h1, h2 ON (x=b)" {One one Four four}
1244 4.1 "SELECT DISTINCT x FROM h2" {One Two Three Four}
1245 4.2 "SELECT DISTINCT x FROM h1, h2 ON (x=b)" {One Four}
1248 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-02054-15343 For the purposes of detecting duplicate
1249 # rows, two NULL values are considered to be equal.
1251 do_select_tests e_select-5.5 {
1252 1 "SELECT DISTINCT d FROM h3" {{} 2 2,3 2,4 3}
1255 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-58359-52112 The normal rules for selecting a collation
1256 # sequence to compare text values with apply.
1258 do_select_tests e_select-5.6 {
1259 1 "SELECT DISTINCT b FROM h1" {one I i four IV iv}
1260 2 "SELECT DISTINCT b COLLATE nocase FROM h1" {one I four IV}
1261 3 "SELECT DISTINCT x FROM h2" {One Two Three Four}
1262 4 "SELECT DISTINCT x COLLATE binary FROM h2" {
1263 One Two Three Four one two three four
1267 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1268 # The following tests - e_select-7.* - test that statements made to do
1269 # with compound SELECT statements are correct.
1272 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-39368-64333 In a compound SELECT, all the constituent
1273 # SELECTs must return the same number of result columns.
1275 # All the other tests in this section use compound SELECTs created
1276 # using component SELECTs that do return the same number of columns.
1277 # So the tests here just show that it is an error to attempt otherwise.
1280 do_execsql_test e_select-7.1.0 {
1281 CREATE TABLE j1(a, b, c);
1282 CREATE TABLE j2(e, f);
1285 do_select_tests e_select-7.1 -error {
1286 SELECTs to the left and right of %s do not have the same number of result columns
1288 1 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT g FROM j3" {{UNION ALL}}
1289 2 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j3" {{UNION ALL}}
1290 3 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT g FROM j3" {{UNION ALL}}
1291 4 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j3,j2" {{UNION ALL}}
1292 5 "SELECT * FROM j3,j2 UNION ALL SELECT a, b FROM j1" {{UNION ALL}}
1294 6 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION SELECT g FROM j3" {UNION}
1295 7 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION SELECT * FROM j3" {UNION}
1296 8 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION SELECT g FROM j3" {UNION}
1297 9 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 UNION SELECT * FROM j3,j2" {UNION}
1298 10 "SELECT * FROM j3,j2 UNION SELECT a, b FROM j1" {UNION}
1300 11 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT g FROM j3" {INTERSECT}
1301 12 "SELECT * FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j3" {INTERSECT}
1302 13 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT g FROM j3" {INTERSECT}
1303 14 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j3,j2" {INTERSECT}
1304 15 "SELECT * FROM j3,j2 INTERSECT SELECT a, b FROM j1" {INTERSECT}
1306 16 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT g FROM j3" {EXCEPT}
1307 17 "SELECT * FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j3" {EXCEPT}
1308 18 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT g FROM j3" {EXCEPT}
1309 19 "SELECT a, b FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j3,j2" {EXCEPT}
1310 20 "SELECT * FROM j3,j2 EXCEPT SELECT a, b FROM j1" {EXCEPT}
1313 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-01450-11152 As the components of a compound SELECT must
1314 # be simple SELECT statements, they may not contain ORDER BY or LIMIT
1317 foreach {tn select op1 op2} {
1318 1 "SELECT * FROM j1 ORDER BY a UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1319 {ORDER BY} {UNION ALL}
1320 2 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 ORDER BY 1 UNION ALL SELECT max(e) FROM j2"
1321 {ORDER BY} {UNION ALL}
1322 3 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 ORDER BY 1,2,3 UNION ALL SELECT *,* FROM j2"
1323 {ORDER BY} {UNION ALL}
1324 4 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1326 5 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1328 6 "SELECT a FROM j1 LIMIT (SELECT e FROM j2) UNION ALL SELECT g FROM j2,j3"
1331 7 "SELECT * FROM j1 ORDER BY a UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1333 8 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 ORDER BY 1 UNION SELECT max(e) FROM j2"
1335 9 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 ORDER BY 1,2,3 UNION SELECT *,* FROM j2"
1337 10 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1339 11 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5 UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1341 12 "SELECT a FROM j1 LIMIT (SELECT e FROM j2) UNION SELECT g FROM j2,j3"
1344 13 "SELECT * FROM j1 ORDER BY a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1346 14 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 ORDER BY 1 EXCEPT SELECT max(e) FROM j2"
1348 15 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 ORDER BY 1,2,3 EXCEPT SELECT *,* FROM j2"
1350 16 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1352 17 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1354 18 "SELECT a FROM j1 LIMIT (SELECT e FROM j2) EXCEPT SELECT g FROM j2,j3"
1357 19 "SELECT * FROM j1 ORDER BY a INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1358 {ORDER BY} {INTERSECT}
1359 20 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 ORDER BY 1 INTERSECT SELECT max(e) FROM j2"
1360 {ORDER BY} {INTERSECT}
1361 21 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 ORDER BY 1,2,3 INTERSECT SELECT *,* FROM j2"
1362 {ORDER BY} {INTERSECT}
1363 22 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1365 23 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1367 24 "SELECT a FROM j1 LIMIT (SELECT e FROM j2) INTERSECT SELECT g FROM j2,j3"
1370 set err "$op1 clause should come after $op2 not before"
1371 do_catchsql_test e_select-7.2.$tn $select [list 1 $err]
1374 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-45440-25633 ORDER BY and LIMIT clauses may only occur
1375 # at the end of the entire compound SELECT, and then only if the final
1376 # element of the compound is not a VALUES clause.
1378 foreach {tn select} {
1379 1 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3 ORDER BY a"
1380 2 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT max(e) FROM j2 ORDER BY 1"
1381 3 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT *,* FROM j2 ORDER BY 1,2,3"
1382 4 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10"
1383 5 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
1384 6 "SELECT a FROM j1 UNION ALL SELECT g FROM j2,j3 LIMIT (SELECT 10)"
1386 7 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3 ORDER BY a"
1387 8 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 UNION SELECT max(e) FROM j2 ORDER BY 1"
1388 8b "VALUES('8b') UNION SELECT max(e) FROM j2 ORDER BY 1"
1389 9 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 UNION SELECT *,* FROM j2 ORDER BY 1,2,3"
1390 10 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10"
1391 11 "SELECT * FROM j1 UNION SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
1392 12 "SELECT a FROM j1 UNION SELECT g FROM j2,j3 LIMIT (SELECT 10)"
1394 13 "SELECT * FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 ORDER BY a"
1395 14 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT max(e) FROM j2 ORDER BY 1"
1396 15 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT *,* FROM j2 ORDER BY 1,2,3"
1397 16 "SELECT * FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10"
1398 17 "SELECT * FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
1399 18 "SELECT a FROM j1 EXCEPT SELECT g FROM j2,j3 LIMIT (SELECT 10)"
1401 19 "SELECT * FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 ORDER BY a"
1402 20 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT max(e) FROM j2 ORDER BY 1"
1403 21 "SELECT count(*), * FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT *,* FROM j2 ORDER BY 1,2,3"
1404 22 "SELECT * FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10"
1405 23 "SELECT * FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM j2,j3 LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5"
1406 24 "SELECT a FROM j1 INTERSECT SELECT g FROM j2,j3 LIMIT (SELECT 10)"
1408 do_test e_select-7.3.$tn { catch {execsql $select} msg } 0
1410 foreach {tn select} {
1411 50 "SELECT * FROM j1 ORDER BY 1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1412 51 "SELECT * FROM j1 LIMIT 1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM j2,j3"
1413 52 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 UNION ALL VALUES(11) ORDER BY 1"
1414 53 "SELECT count(*) FROM j1 UNION ALL VALUES(11) LIMIT 1"
1416 do_test e_select-7.3.$tn { catch {execsql $select} msg } 1
1419 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-08531-36543 A compound SELECT created using UNION ALL
1420 # operator returns all the rows from the SELECT to the left of the UNION
1421 # ALL operator, and all the rows from the SELECT to the right of it.
1424 do_execsql_test e_select-7.4.0 {
1425 CREATE TABLE q1(a TEXT, b INTEGER, c);
1426 CREATE TABLE q2(d NUMBER, e BLOB);
1427 CREATE TABLE q3(f REAL, g);
1429 INSERT INTO q1 VALUES(16, -87.66, NULL);
1430 INSERT INTO q1 VALUES('legible', 94, -42.47);
1431 INSERT INTO q1 VALUES('beauty', 36, NULL);
1433 INSERT INTO q2 VALUES('legible', 1);
1434 INSERT INTO q2 VALUES('beauty', 2);
1435 INSERT INTO q2 VALUES(-65.91, 4);
1436 INSERT INTO q2 VALUES('emanating', -16.56);
1438 INSERT INTO q3 VALUES('beauty', 2);
1439 INSERT INTO q3 VALUES('beauty', 2);
1441 do_select_tests e_select-7.4 {
1442 1 {SELECT a FROM q1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM q2}
1443 {16 legible beauty legible beauty -65.91 emanating}
1445 2 {SELECT * FROM q1 WHERE a=16 UNION ALL SELECT 'x', * FROM q2 WHERE oid=1}
1446 {16 -87.66 {} x legible 1}
1448 3 {SELECT count(*) FROM q1 UNION ALL SELECT min(e) FROM q2}
1451 4 {SELECT * FROM q2 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM q3}
1452 {legible 1 beauty 2 -65.91 4 emanating -16.56 beauty 2 beauty 2}
1455 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-20560-39162 The UNION operator works the same way as
1456 # UNION ALL, except that duplicate rows are removed from the final
1459 do_select_tests e_select-7.5 {
1460 1 {SELECT a FROM q1 UNION SELECT d FROM q2}
1461 {-65.91 16 beauty emanating legible}
1463 2 {SELECT * FROM q1 WHERE a=16 UNION SELECT 'x', * FROM q2 WHERE oid=1}
1464 {16 -87.66 {} x legible 1}
1466 3 {SELECT count(*) FROM q1 UNION SELECT min(e) FROM q2}
1469 4 {SELECT * FROM q2 UNION SELECT * FROM q3}
1470 {-65.91 4 beauty 2 emanating -16.56 legible 1}
1473 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-45764-31737 The INTERSECT operator returns the
1474 # intersection of the results of the left and right SELECTs.
1476 do_select_tests e_select-7.6 {
1477 1 {SELECT a FROM q1 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM q2} {beauty legible}
1478 2 {SELECT * FROM q2 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM q3} {beauty 2}
1481 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-25787-28949 The EXCEPT operator returns the subset of
1482 # rows returned by the left SELECT that are not also returned by the
1483 # right-hand SELECT.
1485 do_select_tests e_select-7.7 {
1486 1 {SELECT a FROM q1 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM q2} {16}
1488 2 {SELECT * FROM q2 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM q3}
1489 {-65.91 4 emanating -16.56 legible 1}
1492 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-40729-56447 Duplicate rows are removed from the results
1493 # of INTERSECT and EXCEPT operators before the result set is returned.
1495 do_select_tests e_select-7.8 {
1496 0 {SELECT * FROM q3} {beauty 2 beauty 2}
1498 1 {SELECT * FROM q3 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM q3} {beauty 2}
1499 2 {SELECT * FROM q3 EXCEPT SELECT a,b FROM q1} {beauty 2}
1502 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-46765-43362 For the purposes of determining duplicate
1503 # rows for the results of compound SELECT operators, NULL values are
1504 # considered equal to other NULL values and distinct from all non-NULL
1508 do_select_tests e_select-7.9 {
1509 1 {SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT NULL} {null null}
1510 2 {SELECT NULL UNION SELECT NULL} {null}
1511 3 {SELECT NULL INTERSECT SELECT NULL} {null}
1512 4 {SELECT NULL EXCEPT SELECT NULL} {}
1514 5 {SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT 'ab'} {null ab}
1515 6 {SELECT NULL UNION SELECT 'ab'} {null ab}
1516 7 {SELECT NULL INTERSECT SELECT 'ab'} {}
1517 8 {SELECT NULL EXCEPT SELECT 'ab'} {null}
1519 9 {SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT 0} {null 0}
1520 10 {SELECT NULL UNION SELECT 0} {null 0}
1521 11 {SELECT NULL INTERSECT SELECT 0} {}
1522 12 {SELECT NULL EXCEPT SELECT 0} {null}
1524 13 {SELECT c FROM q1 UNION ALL SELECT g FROM q3} {null -42.47 null 2 2}
1525 14 {SELECT c FROM q1 UNION SELECT g FROM q3} {null -42.47 2}
1526 15 {SELECT c FROM q1 INTERSECT SELECT g FROM q3} {}
1527 16 {SELECT c FROM q1 EXCEPT SELECT g FROM q3} {null -42.47}
1531 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-51232-50224 The collation sequence used to compare two
1532 # text values is determined as if the columns of the left and right-hand
1533 # SELECT statements were the left and right-hand operands of the equals
1534 # (=) operator, except that greater precedence is not assigned to a
1535 # collation sequence specified with the postfix COLLATE operator.
1538 do_execsql_test e_select-7.10.0 {
1539 CREATE TABLE y1(a COLLATE nocase, b COLLATE binary, c);
1540 INSERT INTO y1 VALUES('Abc', 'abc', 'aBC');
1542 do_select_tests e_select-7.10 {
1543 1 {SELECT 'abc' UNION SELECT 'ABC'} {ABC abc}
1544 2 {SELECT 'abc' COLLATE nocase UNION SELECT 'ABC'} {ABC}
1545 3 {SELECT 'abc' UNION SELECT 'ABC' COLLATE nocase} {ABC}
1546 4 {SELECT 'abc' COLLATE binary UNION SELECT 'ABC' COLLATE nocase} {ABC abc}
1547 5 {SELECT 'abc' COLLATE nocase UNION SELECT 'ABC' COLLATE binary} {ABC}
1549 6 {SELECT a FROM y1 UNION SELECT b FROM y1} {abc}
1550 7 {SELECT b FROM y1 UNION SELECT a FROM y1} {Abc abc}
1551 8 {SELECT a FROM y1 UNION SELECT c FROM y1} {aBC}
1553 9 {SELECT a FROM y1 UNION SELECT c COLLATE binary FROM y1} {aBC}
1556 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-32706-07403 No affinity transformations are applied to
1557 # any values when comparing rows as part of a compound SELECT.
1560 do_execsql_test e_select-7.10.0 {
1561 CREATE TABLE w1(a TEXT, b NUMBER);
1562 CREATE TABLE w2(a, b TEXT);
1564 INSERT INTO w1 VALUES('1', 4.1);
1565 INSERT INTO w2 VALUES(1, 4.1);
1568 do_select_tests e_select-7.11 {
1569 1 { SELECT a FROM w1 UNION SELECT a FROM w2 } {1 1}
1570 2 { SELECT a FROM w2 UNION SELECT a FROM w1 } {1 1}
1571 3 { SELECT b FROM w1 UNION SELECT b FROM w2 } {4.1 4.1}
1572 4 { SELECT b FROM w2 UNION SELECT b FROM w1 } {4.1 4.1}
1574 5 { SELECT a FROM w1 INTERSECT SELECT a FROM w2 } {}
1575 6 { SELECT a FROM w2 INTERSECT SELECT a FROM w1 } {}
1576 7 { SELECT b FROM w1 INTERSECT SELECT b FROM w2 } {}
1577 8 { SELECT b FROM w2 INTERSECT SELECT b FROM w1 } {}
1579 9 { SELECT a FROM w1 EXCEPT SELECT a FROM w2 } {1}
1580 10 { SELECT a FROM w2 EXCEPT SELECT a FROM w1 } {1}
1581 11 { SELECT b FROM w1 EXCEPT SELECT b FROM w2 } {4.1}
1582 12 { SELECT b FROM w2 EXCEPT SELECT b FROM w1 } {4.1}
1586 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-32562-20566 When three or more simple SELECTs are
1587 # connected into a compound SELECT, they group from left to right. In
1588 # other words, if "A", "B" and "C" are all simple SELECT statements, (A
1589 # op B op C) is processed as ((A op B) op C).
1591 # e_select-7.12.1: Precedence of UNION vs. INTERSECT
1592 # e_select-7.12.2: Precedence of UNION vs. UNION ALL
1593 # e_select-7.12.3: Precedence of UNION vs. EXCEPT
1594 # e_select-7.12.4: Precedence of INTERSECT vs. UNION ALL
1595 # e_select-7.12.5: Precedence of INTERSECT vs. EXCEPT
1596 # e_select-7.12.6: Precedence of UNION ALL vs. EXCEPT
1597 # e_select-7.12.7: Check that "a EXCEPT b EXCEPT c" is processed as
1598 # "(a EXCEPT b) EXCEPT c".
1600 # The INTERSECT and EXCEPT operations are mutually commutative. So
1601 # the e_select-7.12.5 test cases do not prove very much.
1604 do_execsql_test e_select-7.12.0 {
1606 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1);
1607 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2);
1608 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3);
1610 foreach {tn select res} {
1611 1a "(1,2) INTERSECT (1) UNION (3)" {1 3}
1612 1b "(3) UNION (1,2) INTERSECT (1)" {1}
1614 2a "(1,2) UNION (3) UNION ALL (1)" {1 2 3 1}
1615 2b "(1) UNION ALL (3) UNION (1,2)" {1 2 3}
1617 3a "(1,2) UNION (3) EXCEPT (1)" {2 3}
1618 3b "(1,2) EXCEPT (3) UNION (1)" {1 2}
1620 4a "(1,2) INTERSECT (1) UNION ALL (3)" {1 3}
1621 4b "(3) UNION (1,2) INTERSECT (1)" {1}
1623 5a "(1,2) INTERSECT (2) EXCEPT (2)" {}
1624 5b "(2,3) EXCEPT (2) INTERSECT (2)" {}
1626 6a "(2) UNION ALL (2) EXCEPT (2)" {}
1627 6b "(2) EXCEPT (2) UNION ALL (2)" {2}
1629 7 "(2,3) EXCEPT (2) EXCEPT (3)" {}
1631 set select [string map {( {SELECT x FROM t1 WHERE x IN (}} $select]
1632 do_execsql_test e_select-7.12.$tn $select [list {*}$res]
1636 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1641 do_execsql_test e_select-8.1.0 {
1642 CREATE TABLE d1(x, y, z);
1644 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 2, 3);
1645 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(2, 5, -1);
1646 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 2, 8);
1647 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 2, 7);
1648 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(2, 4, 93);
1649 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 2, -20);
1650 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 4, 93);
1651 INSERT INTO d1 VALUES(1, 5, -1);
1653 CREATE TABLE d2(a, b);
1654 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('gently', 'failings');
1655 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('commercials', 'bathrobe');
1656 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('iterate', 'sexton');
1657 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('babied', 'charitableness');
1658 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('solemnness', 'annexed');
1659 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('rejoicing', 'liabilities');
1660 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('pragmatist', 'guarded');
1661 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('barked', 'interrupted');
1662 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('reemphasizes', 'reply');
1663 INSERT INTO d2 VALUES('lad', 'relenting');
1666 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-44988-41064 Rows are first sorted based on the results
1667 # of evaluating the left-most expression in the ORDER BY list, then ties
1668 # are broken by evaluating the second left-most expression and so on.
1670 do_select_tests e_select-8.1 {
1671 1 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x, y, z" {
1672 1 2 -20 1 2 3 1 2 7 1 2 8
1673 1 4 93 1 5 -1 2 4 93 2 5 -1
1677 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-06617-54588 Each ORDER BY expression may be optionally
1678 # followed by one of the keywords ASC (smaller values are returned
1679 # first) or DESC (larger values are returned first).
1681 # Test cases e_select-8.2.* test the above.
1683 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-18705-33393 If neither ASC or DESC are specified, rows
1684 # are sorted in ascending (smaller values first) order by default.
1686 # Test cases e_select-8.3.* test the above. All 8.3 test cases are
1687 # copies of 8.2 test cases with the explicit "ASC" removed.
1689 do_select_tests e_select-8 {
1690 2.1 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x ASC, y ASC, z ASC" {
1691 1 2 -20 1 2 3 1 2 7 1 2 8
1692 1 4 93 1 5 -1 2 4 93 2 5 -1
1694 2.2 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x DESC, y DESC, z DESC" {
1695 2 5 -1 2 4 93 1 5 -1 1 4 93
1696 1 2 8 1 2 7 1 2 3 1 2 -20
1698 2.3 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x DESC, y ASC, z DESC" {
1699 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 8 1 2 7
1700 1 2 3 1 2 -20 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1702 2.4 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x DESC, y ASC, z ASC" {
1703 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 -20 1 2 3
1704 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1707 3.1 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x, y, z" {
1708 1 2 -20 1 2 3 1 2 7 1 2 8
1709 1 4 93 1 5 -1 2 4 93 2 5 -1
1711 3.3 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x DESC, y, z DESC" {
1712 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 8 1 2 7
1713 1 2 3 1 2 -20 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1715 3.4 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x DESC, y, z" {
1716 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 -20 1 2 3
1717 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1721 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-29779-04281 If the ORDER BY expression is a constant
1722 # integer K then the expression is considered an alias for the K-th
1723 # column of the result set (columns are numbered from left to right
1726 do_select_tests e_select-8.4 {
1727 1 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 ASC, 2 ASC, 3 ASC" {
1728 1 2 -20 1 2 3 1 2 7 1 2 8
1729 1 4 93 1 5 -1 2 4 93 2 5 -1
1731 2 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2 DESC, 3 DESC" {
1732 2 5 -1 2 4 93 1 5 -1 1 4 93
1733 1 2 8 1 2 7 1 2 3 1 2 -20
1735 3 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2 ASC, 3 DESC" {
1736 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 8 1 2 7
1737 1 2 3 1 2 -20 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1739 4 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2 ASC, 3 ASC" {
1740 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 -20 1 2 3
1741 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1743 5 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3" {
1744 1 2 -20 1 2 3 1 2 7 1 2 8
1745 1 4 93 1 5 -1 2 4 93 2 5 -1
1747 6 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2, 3 DESC" {
1748 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 8 1 2 7
1749 1 2 3 1 2 -20 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1751 7 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2, 3" {
1752 2 4 93 2 5 -1 1 2 -20 1 2 3
1753 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 1 5 -1
1755 8 "SELECT z, x FROM d1 ORDER BY 2" {
1759 9 "SELECT z, x FROM d1 ORDER BY 1" {
1760 /-20 1 -1 # -1 # 3 1
1765 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-63286-51977 If the ORDER BY expression is an identifier
1766 # that corresponds to the alias of one of the output columns, then the
1767 # expression is considered an alias for that column.
1769 do_select_tests e_select-8.5 {
1770 1 "SELECT z+1 AS abc FROM d1 ORDER BY abc" {
1773 2 "SELECT z+1 AS abc FROM d1 ORDER BY abc DESC" {
1776 3 "SELECT z AS x, x AS z FROM d1 ORDER BY z" {
1777 /# 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 # 2 # 2/
1779 4 "SELECT z AS x, x AS z FROM d1 ORDER BY x" {
1780 /-20 1 -1 # -1 # 3 1 7 1 8 1 93 # 93 #/
1784 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-65068-27207 Otherwise, if the ORDER BY expression is
1785 # any other expression, it is evaluated and the returned value used to
1786 # order the output rows.
1788 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-03421-57988 If the SELECT statement is a simple SELECT,
1789 # then an ORDER BY may contain any arbitrary expressions.
1791 do_select_tests e_select-8.6 {
1792 1 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x+y+z" {
1793 1 2 -20 1 5 -1 1 2 3 2 5 -1
1794 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 2 4 93
1796 2 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY x*z" {
1797 1 2 -20 2 5 -1 1 5 -1 1 2 3
1798 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 4 93 2 4 93
1800 3 "SELECT * FROM d1 ORDER BY y*z" {
1801 1 2 -20 2 5 -1 1 5 -1 1 2 3
1802 1 2 7 1 2 8 2 4 93 1 4 93
1806 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-28853-08147 However, if the SELECT is a compound
1807 # SELECT, then ORDER BY expressions that are not aliases to output
1808 # columns must be exactly the same as an expression used as an output
1811 do_select_tests e_select-8.7.1 -error {
1812 %s ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set
1814 1 "SELECT x FROM d1 UNION ALL SELECT a FROM d2 ORDER BY x*z" 1st
1815 2 "SELECT x,z FROM d1 UNION ALL SELECT a,b FROM d2 ORDER BY x, x/z" 2nd
1818 do_select_tests e_select-8.7.2 {
1819 1 "SELECT x*z FROM d1 UNION ALL SELECT a FROM d2 ORDER BY x*z" {
1820 -20 -2 -1 3 7 8 93 186 babied barked commercials gently
1821 iterate lad pragmatist reemphasizes rejoicing solemnness
1823 2 "SELECT x, x/z FROM d1 UNION ALL SELECT a,b FROM d2 ORDER BY x, x/z" {
1824 1 -1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 -2 2 0
1825 babied charitableness barked interrupted commercials bathrobe gently
1826 failings iterate sexton lad relenting pragmatist guarded reemphasizes reply
1827 rejoicing liabilities solemnness annexed
1831 do_execsql_test e_select-8.8.0 {
1833 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES('text');
1834 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(14.1);
1835 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(13);
1836 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(X'78787878');
1837 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(15);
1838 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(12.9);
1839 INSERT INTO d3 VALUES(null);
1841 CREATE TABLE d4(x COLLATE nocase);
1842 INSERT INTO d4 VALUES('abc');
1843 INSERT INTO d4 VALUES('ghi');
1844 INSERT INTO d4 VALUES('DEF');
1845 INSERT INTO d4 VALUES('JKL');
1848 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-10883-17697 For the purposes of sorting rows, values
1849 # are compared in the same way as for comparison expressions.
1851 # The following tests verify that values of different types are sorted
1852 # correctly, and that mixed real and integer values are compared properly.
1854 do_execsql_test e_select-8.8.1 {
1855 SELECT a FROM d3 ORDER BY a
1856 } {{} 12.9 13 14.1 15 text xxxx}
1857 do_execsql_test e_select-8.8.2 {
1858 SELECT a FROM d3 ORDER BY a DESC
1859 } {xxxx text 15 14.1 13 12.9 {}}
1862 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-64199-22471 If the ORDER BY expression is assigned a
1863 # collation sequence using the postfix COLLATE operator, then the
1864 # specified collation sequence is used.
1866 do_execsql_test e_select-8.9.1 {
1867 SELECT x FROM d4 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE binary
1869 do_execsql_test e_select-8.9.2 {
1870 SELECT x COLLATE binary FROM d4 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE nocase
1873 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-09398-26102 Otherwise, if the ORDER BY expression is
1874 # an alias to an expression that has been assigned a collation sequence
1875 # using the postfix COLLATE operator, then the collation sequence
1876 # assigned to the aliased expression is used.
1878 # In the test 8.10.2, the only result-column expression has no alias. So the
1879 # ORDER BY expression is not a reference to it and therefore does not inherit
1880 # the collation sequence. In test 8.10.3, "x" is the alias (as well as the
1881 # column name), so the ORDER BY expression is interpreted as an alias and the
1882 # collation sequence attached to the result column is used for sorting.
1884 do_execsql_test e_select-8.10.1 {
1885 SELECT x COLLATE binary FROM d4 ORDER BY 1
1887 do_execsql_test e_select-8.10.2 {
1888 SELECT x COLLATE binary FROM d4 ORDER BY x
1890 do_execsql_test e_select-8.10.3 {
1891 SELECT x COLLATE binary AS x FROM d4 ORDER BY x
1894 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-27301-09658 Otherwise, if the ORDER BY expression is a
1895 # column or an alias of an expression that is a column, then the default
1896 # collation sequence for the column is used.
1898 do_execsql_test e_select-8.11.1 {
1899 SELECT x AS y FROM d4 ORDER BY y
1901 do_execsql_test e_select-8.11.2 {
1902 SELECT x||'' FROM d4 ORDER BY x
1905 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-49925-55905 Otherwise, the BINARY collation sequence is
1908 do_execsql_test e_select-8.12.1 {
1909 SELECT x FROM d4 ORDER BY x||''
1912 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-44130-32593 If an ORDER BY expression is not an integer
1913 # alias, then SQLite searches the left-most SELECT in the compound for a
1914 # result column that matches either the second or third rules above. If
1915 # a match is found, the search stops and the expression is handled as an
1916 # alias for the result column that it has been matched against.
1917 # Otherwise, the next SELECT to the right is tried, and so on.
1919 do_execsql_test e_select-8.13.0 {
1920 CREATE TABLE d5(a, b);
1921 CREATE TABLE d6(c, d);
1922 CREATE TABLE d7(e, f);
1924 INSERT INTO d5 VALUES(1, 'f');
1925 INSERT INTO d6 VALUES(2, 'e');
1926 INSERT INTO d7 VALUES(3, 'd');
1927 INSERT INTO d5 VALUES(4, 'c');
1928 INSERT INTO d6 VALUES(5, 'b');
1929 INSERT INTO d7 VALUES(6, 'a');
1931 CREATE TABLE d8(x COLLATE nocase);
1932 CREATE TABLE d9(y COLLATE nocase);
1934 INSERT INTO d8 VALUES('a');
1935 INSERT INTO d9 VALUES('B');
1936 INSERT INTO d8 VALUES('c');
1937 INSERT INTO d9 VALUES('D');
1939 do_select_tests e_select-8.13 {
1940 1 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c FROM d6 UNION ALL SELECT e FROM d7
1943 2 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c FROM d6 UNION ALL SELECT e FROM d7
1946 3 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c FROM d6 UNION ALL SELECT e FROM d7
1949 4 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c FROM d6 UNION ALL SELECT e FROM d7
1953 5 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a FROM d5 ORDER BY b }
1955 6 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a FROM d5 ORDER BY 2 }
1958 7 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a FROM d5 ORDER BY a }
1960 8 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a FROM d5 ORDER BY 1 }
1963 9 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a+1 FROM d5 ORDER BY a+1 }
1965 10 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a+1 FROM d5 ORDER BY 2 }
1968 11 { SELECT a+1, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a+1 FROM d5 ORDER BY a+1 }
1970 12 { SELECT a+1, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT b, a+1 FROM d5 ORDER BY 1 }
1974 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-39265-04070 If no matching expression can be found in
1975 # the result columns of any constituent SELECT, it is an error.
1977 do_select_tests e_select-8.14 -error {
1978 %s ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set
1980 1 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION SELECT c FROM d6 ORDER BY a+1 } 1st
1981 2 { SELECT a FROM d5 UNION SELECT c FROM d6 ORDER BY a, a+1 } 2nd
1982 3 { SELECT * FROM d5 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM d6 ORDER BY 'hello' } 1st
1983 4 { SELECT * FROM d5 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM d6 ORDER BY blah } 1st
1984 5 { SELECT * FROM d5 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM d6 ORDER BY c,d,c+d } 3rd
1985 6 { SELECT * FROM d5 EXCEPT SELECT * FROM d7 ORDER BY 1,2,b,a/b } 4th
1988 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-03407-11483 Each term of the ORDER BY clause is
1989 # processed separately and may be matched against result columns from
1990 # different SELECT statements in the compound.
1992 do_select_tests e_select-8.15 {
1993 1 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c-1, d FROM d6 ORDER BY a, d }
1995 2 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c-1, d FROM d6 ORDER BY c-1, b }
1997 3 { SELECT a, b FROM d5 UNION ALL SELECT c-1, d FROM d6 ORDER BY 1, 2 }
2002 #-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 # Tests related to statements made about the LIMIT/OFFSET clause.
2005 do_execsql_test e_select-9.0 {
2006 CREATE TABLE f1(a, b);
2007 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(26, 'z');
2008 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(25, 'y');
2009 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(24, 'x');
2010 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(23, 'w');
2011 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(22, 'v');
2012 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(21, 'u');
2013 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(20, 't');
2014 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(19, 's');
2015 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(18, 'r');
2016 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(17, 'q');
2017 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(16, 'p');
2018 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(15, 'o');
2019 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(14, 'n');
2020 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(13, 'm');
2021 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(12, 'l');
2022 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(11, 'k');
2023 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(10, 'j');
2024 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(9, 'i');
2025 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(8, 'h');
2026 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(7, 'g');
2027 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(6, 'f');
2028 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(5, 'e');
2029 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(4, 'd');
2030 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(3, 'c');
2031 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(2, 'b');
2032 INSERT INTO f1 VALUES(1, 'a');
2035 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-30481-56627 Any scalar expression may be used in the
2036 # LIMIT clause, so long as it evaluates to an integer or a value that
2037 # can be losslessly converted to an integer.
2039 do_select_tests e_select-9.1 {
2040 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5 } {a b c d e}
2041 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2+3 } {a b c d e}
2042 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT (SELECT a FROM f1 WHERE b = 'e') }
2044 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5.0 } {a b c d e}
2045 5 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT '5' } {a b c d e}
2048 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-46155-47219 If the expression evaluates to a NULL value
2049 # or any other value that cannot be losslessly converted to an integer,
2050 # an error is returned.
2053 do_select_tests e_select-9.2 -error "datatype mismatch" {
2054 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 'hello' } {}
2055 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT NULL } {}
2056 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT X'ABCD' } {}
2057 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5.1 } {}
2058 5 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT (SELECT group_concat(b) FROM f1) } {}
2061 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-03014-26414 If the LIMIT expression evaluates to a
2062 # negative value, then there is no upper bound on the number of rows
2065 do_select_tests e_select-9.4 {
2066 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT -1 }
2067 {a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z}
2068 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT length('abc')-100 }
2069 {a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z}
2070 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT (SELECT count(*) FROM f1)/2 - 14 }
2071 {a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z}
2074 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-33750-29536 Otherwise, the SELECT returns the first N
2075 # rows of its result set only, where N is the value that the LIMIT
2076 # expression evaluates to.
2078 do_select_tests e_select-9.5 {
2079 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 0 } {}
2080 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 4 } {z y x w}
2081 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 8 } {z y x w v u t s}
2082 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT '12.0' } {z y x w v u t s r q p o}
2085 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-54935-19057 Or, if the SELECT statement would return
2086 # less than N rows without a LIMIT clause, then the entire result set is
2089 do_select_tests e_select-9.6 {
2090 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 WHERE a>21 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10 } {v w x y z}
2091 2 { SELECT count(*) FROM f1 GROUP BY a/5 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 10 } {2 4 5 5 5 5}
2095 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-24188-24349 The expression attached to the optional
2096 # OFFSET clause that may follow a LIMIT clause must also evaluate to an
2097 # integer, or a value that can be losslessly converted to an integer.
2099 foreach {tn select} {
2100 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2 OFFSET 'hello' }
2101 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2 OFFSET NULL }
2102 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2 OFFSET X'ABCD' }
2103 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2 OFFSET 5.1 }
2104 5 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a
2105 LIMIT 2 OFFSET (SELECT group_concat(b) FROM f1)
2108 do_catchsql_test e_select-9.7.$tn $select {1 {datatype mismatch}}
2111 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-20467-43422 If an expression has an OFFSET clause, then
2112 # the first M rows are omitted from the result set returned by the
2113 # SELECT statement and the next N rows are returned, where M and N are
2114 # the values that the OFFSET and LIMIT clauses evaluate to,
2117 do_select_tests e_select-9.8 {
2118 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 5} {f g h i j k l m n o}
2119 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 2+3 OFFSET 10} {k l m n o}
2120 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a
2121 LIMIT (SELECT a FROM f1 WHERE b='j')
2122 OFFSET (SELECT a FROM f1 WHERE b='b')
2123 } {c d e f g h i j k l}
2124 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT '5' OFFSET 3.0 } {d e f g h}
2125 5 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT '5' OFFSET 0 } {a b c d e}
2126 6 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 0 OFFSET 10 } {}
2127 7 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 OFFSET '1'||'5' } {p q r}
2130 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-34648-44875 Or, if the SELECT would return less than
2131 # M+N rows if it did not have a LIMIT clause, then the first M rows are
2132 # skipped and the remaining rows (if any) are returned.
2134 do_select_tests e_select-9.9 {
2135 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20} {u v w x y z}
2136 2 { SELECT a FROM f1 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 100 OFFSET 18+4} {4 3 2 1}
2140 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-23293-62447 If the OFFSET clause evaluates to a
2141 # negative value, the results are the same as if it had evaluated to
2144 do_select_tests e_select-9.10 {
2145 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5 OFFSET -1 } {a b c d e}
2146 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5 OFFSET -500 } {a b c d e}
2147 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5 OFFSET 0 } {a b c d e}
2150 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-19509-40356 Instead of a separate OFFSET clause, the
2151 # LIMIT clause may specify two scalar expressions separated by a comma.
2153 # EVIDENCE-OF: R-33788-46243 In this case, the first expression is used
2154 # as the OFFSET expression and the second as the LIMIT expression.
2156 do_select_tests e_select-9.11 {
2157 1 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 5, 10 } {f g h i j k l m n o}
2158 2 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10, 2+3 } {k l m n o}
2159 3 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a
2160 LIMIT (SELECT a FROM f1 WHERE b='b'), (SELECT a FROM f1 WHERE b='j')
2161 } {c d e f g h i j k l}
2162 4 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3.0, '5' } {d e f g h}
2163 5 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 0, '5' } {a b c d e}
2164 6 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10, 0 } {}
2165 7 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT '1'||'5', 3 } {p q r}
2167 8 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 20, 10 } {u v w x y z}
2168 9 { SELECT a FROM f1 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 18+4, 100 } {4 3 2 1}
2170 10 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT -1, 5 } {a b c d e}
2171 11 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT -500, 5 } {a b c d e}
2172 12 { SELECT b FROM f1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 0, 5 } {a b c d e}