1 \documentclass[a4paper,russian
]{article
}
3 \usepackage[koi8-r
]{inputenc}
7 \newcommand*
{\axiom}[1]{\textsc{#1}} % The style to use when I refer
9 \newcommand*
{\axiomIntro}[1]{\introStyle{\axiom{#1}}} % The style to use
10 % when I introduce an "axiom" in my text
11 % for the first time. (Bold to make it
12 % easily discoverable in the text.)
13 \newcommand*
{\introStyle}[1]{\textbf{#1}} % For other cases of
14 % introducing a key concept, but not as
17 \author{é×ÁÎ úÁÈÁÒØÑÝÅ×
\url!<imz@altlinux.org>!
}
18 \title{æÏÒÍÁÌÉÚÕÅÍ ×Ù×ÏÄ Gricean implicatures. úÁÞÅÍ ÎÕÖÎÙ
19 \axiom{opinionated speaker
} É
\axiom{informed speaker
}?
}
20 \date{10~ÄÅËÁÂÒÑ
2005~Ç. (Ó ÍÁÌÙÍÉ ÐÒÁ×ËÁÍÉ ÏÔ~
\today)
}
25 %\usepackage{mathpartir} % Do I want to draw the horizontal lines in
26 % the derivations, as usual in logic, or just write it with a word?
27 % A word must be more understandable by anyone...
28 \newcommand*
{\inferrule}[2]{%\samepage
31 #1\qquad \text{ \textsf{--- ×Ù×ÏÄ:
}}% Applying an automatic
32 % derivation rule; logicians usually
33 % use a horizontal line here.
38 \newcommand*
{\iref}[1]{\eqref{#1}\colon}
40 %\newcommand*{\assert}{.}
41 %\DeclareMathOp{\assert}{.}
43 \newcommand*
{\Cimplies}{\rightarrow}
44 \newcommand*
{\Cnot}{\neg}
45 \newcommand*
{\Cor}{\vee}
46 \newcommand*
{\Cand}{\wedge}
48 \newcommand*
{\Pn}[1]{P_
{#1}}
49 \newcommand*
{\Pa}{\Pn{a
}}
50 \newcommand*
{\Pb}{\Pn{b
}}
51 \newcommand*
{\Pc}{\Pn{c
}}
53 %\newcommand*{\said}[1]{[(#1)]}
54 %\newcommand*{\said}[1]{[[#1]]}
55 %\newcommand*{\said}[1]{[#1*]}
56 %\newcommand*{\said}[1]{\blacksquare_{#1}}
57 \newcommand*
{\said}[1]{\boxtimes_{#1}}
66 \text{Many of your students complained.
}
69 alternatives (or, competitors):
70 $\
{\text{a. some
},
\text{b. many
},
\text{c. all
}\
}$.
77 üÔÏ ×Ó£ ËÁË-ÔÏ ÔÏÎËÏ É ÎÅ ÏÞÅÎØ ÕÂÅÄÉÔÅÌØÎÏ ÎÁ ÍÏÊ ×ÚÇÌÑÄ. ÷ÏÔ ÔÁËÁÑ
78 ÓÈÅÍÁ (ÉÚÌÏÖÅÎÉÅ ÐÏÓÌÅ ÐÒÏÞÔÅÎÉÑ
\cite[ÓÔÒ.
2--
3]{KvFCourse
}).
80 \paragraph{îÅËÏÔÏÒÙÅ ÏÂÏÚÎÁÞÅÎÉÑ.
}
81 ðÕÓÔØ $S$~--- the speaker, ÆÏÒÍÕÌÁ $
[S
]P$ ÉÍÅÅÔ ÓÍÙÓÌ <<$S$ ÓÞÉÔÁÅÔ,
82 ÞÔÏ $P$>>, $
\said{S
} P$~--- <<$S$ ÓËÁÚÁÌ $P$>>,
84 \Pa &
\text{--- some of your students complained
}\\
85 \Pb &
\text{--- many of your students complained
}\\
86 \Pc &
\text{--- all of your students complained
}\\
89 \paragraph{âÙÓÔÒÙÊ ÏÔ×ÅÔ.
} ðÕÓÔØ $S$ ÓËÁÚÁÌ $
\Pb$.
90 ðÒÅÄÐÏÌÏÖÅÎÉÅ
\axiom{opinionated speaker
}
91 ÎÕÖÎÏ ÚÁÔÅÍ, ÞÔÏÂÙ × ×Ù×ÏÄÁÈ ÉÍÐÌÉËÁÔÕÒ (ËÁËÉÈ?) ÐÒÏÄ×ÉÎÕÔØÓÑ ÄÁÌØÛÅ
92 ×Ù×ÅÄÅÎÎÏÇÏ ÉÚ ÐÒÉÎÃÉÐÏ× ÒÁÚÇÏ×ÏÒÁ $
\iref{eq:not-believes-c
} \Cnot[S
] \Pc$.
95 \paragraph{æÁËÔ~--- illocutionary act.
}
96 æÁËÔ: $S$ ÓËÁÚÁÌ $
\Pb$
100 % \text{$S$ ÓËÁÚÁÌ $P_b$}
106 \paragraph{Illocutionary force.
}\footnote{üÔÏÔ ÐÁÒÁÇÒÁÆ ÎÅ ÉÍÅÅÔ
107 ÏÔÎÏÛÅÎÉÑ Ë ×ÙÞÉÓÌÅÎÉÀ ÉÍÐÌÉËÁÔÕÒ~--- ÏÓÎÏ×ÎÏÊ ÔÅÍÅ ÒÁÓÓËÁÚÁ, ÎÏ
108 ÐÏËÁÚÙ×ÁÅÔ, ËÁË ÏÂÒÁÂÙÔÙ×ÁÅÔÓÑ ÏÓÎÏ×ÎÏÅ ÚÎÁÞÅÎÉÅ. íÏÖÎÏ ÐÏÔÏÍ
109 ÓÒÁ×ÎÉÔØ Ó ÉÍÐÌÉËÁÔÕÒÁÍÉ.
}
111 õÔ×ÅÒÄÉÔÅÌØÎÁÑ ``illocutionary force'' ÜÔÏÇÏ ÁËÔÁ:
112 $S$ ÚÁÓÔÁ×ÌÑÅÔ ÎÁÓ ÓÞÉÔÁÔØ, ÞÔÏ $
\Pb$:
%
113 \footnote{äÏÐÕÓËÁÅÍ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÅ
\axiomIntro{ÕÔ×ÅÒÄÉÔÅÌØÎÏÊ illocutionary force
}:
115 \said{S
} P
\Cimplies P.
117 ÷ ÞÁÓÔÎÏÓÔÉ (ÐÏÄÓÔÁ×ÌÑÑ~$
\Pb$ ×ÍÅÓÔÏ~$P$ × ÜÔÕ <<ÓÈÅÍÕ-ÁËÓÉÏÍÕ>>),
120 \said{S
} \Pb \Cimplies \Pb.
122 \inferrule{\iref{eq:act
} \said{S
} \Pb ,
\quad
123 \iref{eq:force-b
} \said{S
} \Pb \Cimplies \Pb}
124 {\Pb\tag{\ref{eq:content
}}}}
132 \paragraph{ðÒÉÎÃÉÐÙ ÒÁÚÇÏ×ÏÒÁ, ÞÔÏ-ÔÏ × ÓÔÉÌÅ Gricean/Gamut inference.
}%
133 \footnote{íÅÈÁÎÉÚÍ, ÐÒÅÄÓÔÁ×ÌÅÎÎÙÊ ÔÕÔ, ÍÏÖÅÔ, ÎÅ ÏÞÅÎØ
134 ×ÎÕÔÒÅÎÎÅ ÐÏÓÌÅÄÏ×ÁÔÅÌÅÎ, ÎÏ ÄÏ×ÏÌØÎÏ ÐÒÏÓÔ. ïÎ ÓÌÕÖÉÔ ÄÌÑ ÄÅÍÏÎÓÔÒÁÃÉÉ ÉÄÅÉ Ï
135 ÅÓÔÅÓÔ×ÅÎÎÏÓÔÉ ÐÏÌÕÞÅÎÉÑ ÉÍÅÎÎÏ ×Ù×ÏÄÁ~
\eqref{eq:not-believes-c
} ×
136 ÔÁËÉÈ ÓÉÓÔÅÍÁÈ É ÏÔ×ÅÔÁ ÎÁ ×ÏÐÒÏÓ, ÚÁÞÅÍ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÐÒÅÄÐÏÌÏÖÅÎÉÅ
137 \axiom{opinionated speaker
}.
}
139 \emph{some
} ÐÏÐÁÄÁÅÔ × ÔÁËÏÊ ÎÁÂÏÒ
\introStyle{alternatives
}/competitors:
140 $
\lbrace\text{a. some
},
\text{b. many
},
141 \text{c. all
}\rbrace$. áÌØÔÅÒÎÁÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ×ÙÓËÁÚÙ×ÁÎÉÑ: $
\Pa$, $
\Pb$,
142 $
\Pc$, ÐÒÉÞ£Í, × ÓÏÏÔ×ÅÔÓÔ×ÉÉ Ó ÉÈ ÓÅÍÁÎÔÉËÏÊ,
145 \Pc &
\Cimplies \Pb, &
\Pb &
\Cimplies \Pa.
148 ïÂÏÚÎÁÞÅÎÉÅ: ÆÏÒÍÕÌÁ $
\Diamond R$ ÉÍÅÅÔ ÓÍÙÓÌ <<ÐÏÚ×ÏÌÅÎÏ $R$>>.
150 \introStyle{ðÒÁ×ÉÌÁ ÒÁÚÇÏ×ÏÒÁ
} (ÉÌÉ ÅÝ£ ÞÔÏ-ÔÏ) ÏÐÒÅÄÅÌÑÀÔ ÕÓÌÏ×ÉÑ ÔÏÇÏ, ÞÔÏ $S$
151 ÐÏÚ×ÏÌÅÎÏ ÓËÁÚÁÔØ $P$:
152 %(in a position to say $P$):
153 \begin{equation
}\label{eq:in-a-pos
}
154 (
\Diamond \said{S
} P)
\leftrightarrow ( (
[S
] P)
\Cand \dotsb )
156 (ÎÁ ÍÅÓÔÅ <<$
\dotsb$>> ÅÝ£ ËÁËÉÅ-ÔÏ ÕÓÌÏ×ÉÑ, ËÏÔÏÒÙÅ ÎÁÍ ÎÅ ×ÁÖÎÙ;
157 ÐÕÓÔØ ÏÎÉ ×ÓÅÇÄÁ ×ÙÐÏÌÎÅÎÙ; ÂÅÚ ÕÞ£ÔÁ <<$
\dotsb$>> ÜÔÏ ÐÏÈÏÖÅ ÎÁ quality maxim).
159 ðÒÅÄÐÏÌÁÇÁÅÍ pragmatic
\axiomIntro{correctness
}, Á ÉÍÅÎÎÏ, ÞÔÏ <<ÐÏ×ÅÄÅÎÉÅ
160 ÐÒÏÉÓÈÏÄÉÔ × ÒÁÍËÁÈ ÄÏÚ×ÏÌÅÎÎÏÇÏ>>:
162 R
\Cimplies \Diamond R,
164 É ÞÔÏ ×ÙÐÏÌÎÑÔÓÑ
\axiomIntro{quantity maxim
}:
167 &
\Cimplies ( (
\Diamond \said{S
} Q)
\Cimplies (P
\Cimplies Q))
168 &&
\text{ÄÌÑ ÌÀÂÏÇÏ $Q$~--- ÁÌØÔÅÒÎÁÔÉ×Ù $P$
}
170 ($S$ ÄÏÌÖÅÎ ÂÙÌ ÓËÁÚÁÔØ ÁÌØÔÅÒÎÁÔÉ×Õ, ÄÁÀÝÕÀ ÂÏÌØÛÅ ×ÓÅÇÏ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÉ =
171 ÎÁÉÂÏÌÅÅ ÓÉÌØÎÕÀ; ËÏÎÅÞÎÏ, ÉÚ ÔÅÈ, ËÏÔÏÒÙÅ ÐÏÚ×ÏÌÅÎÏ ÓËÁÚÁÔØ).
173 ÷ ÞÁÓÔÎÏÓÔÉ, × ÎÁÛÅÍ ÐÒÉÍÅÒÅ (ÐÏÄÓÔÁ×ÌÑÑ ËÏÎËÒÅÔÎÙÅ ÕÔ×ÅÒÖÄÅÎÉÑ × ÜÔÉ Ä×Å <<ÓÈÅÍÙ-ÁËÓÉÏÍÙ>>):
174 %(ÎÅ ÂÕÄÅÍ ÏÂÒÁÝÁÔØ ×ÎÉÍÁÎÉÅ ÎÁ ÄÒÕÇÉÅ ÎÅÏÂÈÏÄÉÍÙÅ ÕÓÌÏ×ÉÑ, ËÒÏÍÅ ÕËÁÚÁÎÎÏÇÏ):
176 \label{eq:in-a-position-b
}
177 \said{S
}\Pb &
\Cimplies \Diamond \said{S
}\Pb\\
179 \said{S
}\Pb &
\Cimplies (
\Diamond \said{S
}\Pa \Cimplies (
\Pb \Cimplies \Pa))\\
181 \said{S
}\Pb &
\Cimplies (
\Diamond \said{S
}\Pc \Cimplies (
\Pb \Cimplies \Pc))
184 %inference (ËÁË Õ Grice/Gamut):
187 \iref{eq:act
}\said{S
}\Pb,
\quad
188 \iref{eq:strength
} \Pc \Cimplies \Pb,
\quad
190 {\label{eq:not-in-a-position-c
}
191 \Cnot \Diamond \said{S
}\Pc}
194 \eqref{eq:not-in-a-position-c
},
\quad \eqref{eq:in-a-pos
}}
195 {\label{eq:not-believes-c
}
198 üÔÏ ÏÞÅÎØ ÓÌÁÂÏÅ ÚÁËÌÀÞÅÎÉÅ; × ÏÂÌÁÓÔØ ÔÏÇÏ, ÞÔÏ ÍÙ ÄÏÌÖÎÙ ÓÞÉÔÁÔØ
199 ×ÅÒÎÙÍ, ÎÅ ÐÏÐÁÄÁÅÔ ÎÉÞÅÇÏ ÐÒÏ ×ÅÒÎÏÓÔØ/ÎÅ×ÅÒÎÏÓÔØ
200 $
\Pc$.
\footnote{<<ïÂÌÁÓÔØ ÔÏÇÏ, ÞÔÏ ÍÙ ÄÏÌÖÎÙ ÓÞÉÔÁÔØ ×ÅÒÎÙÍ>>~---
201 ÜÔÏ ËÁË ÒÁÚ ÎÁÛÉ ×Ù×ÏÄÙ, ÐÒÅÄÓÔÁ×ÌÅÎÎÙÅ ÚÄÅÓØ ÎÕÍÅÒÏ×ÁÎÎÙÍÉ
202 ÆÏÒÍÕÌÁÍÉ; ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÅ ÞØÅÇÏ-ÔÏ ×ÙÓËÁÚÙ×ÁÎÉÑ ÎÁ ÎÁÓ-ÓÌÕÛÁÀÝÉÈ~--- ÜÔÏ
203 ÐÏÐÁÄÁÎÉÅ ËÁËÉÈ-ÔÏ ÎÏ×ÙÈ ÕÔ×ÅÒÖÄÅÎÉÊ × ÜÔÕ <<ÏÂÌÁÓÔØ>>. ÷ ÜÔÏÍ
204 ÒÁÓÓËÁÚÅ ÐÒÅÄÌÁÇÁÅÔÓÑ ÏÄÉÎ ÁÎÁÌÉÚ, ÐÏÞÅÍÕ ÜÔÏ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÅ ÔÁËÏÅ, ËÁËÏÅ
205 ÎÁÂÌÀÄÁÅÔÓÑ ÎÁ ÓÁÍÏÍ ÄÅÌÅ; Á ÉÍÅÎÎÏ, ÐÏÞÅÍÕ ×ÙÓËÁÚÁÎÎÏÅ~$
\Pb$
206 ÄÏÌÖÎÏ ÚÁÓÔÁ×ÌÑÔØ ÎÁÓ-ÓÌÕÛÁÀÝÉÈ ÄÅÌÁÔØ ×Ù×ÏÄ, ÞÔÏ~$
\Cnot\Pc$~--- ÔÏ, ÞÔÏ,
207 É ÎÁÂÌÀÄÁÅÔÓÑ ÎÁ ÓÁÍÏÍ ÄÅÌÅ ÐÒÉ ÏÂÝÅÎÉÉ,
208 ËÁË ÓÞÉÔÁÅÔÓÑ ÌÉÎÇ×ÉÓÔÁÍÉ.
}
210 \paragraph{Opinionated speaker.
}
211 îÁ ÜÔÏÍ ÐÒÉÛÌÏÓØ ÂÙ ÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ÉÔØÓÑ. îÏ ÐÒÅÄÐÏÌÁÇÁÅÍ
\axiomIntro{opinionated
214 (
[S
]P) &
\Cor (
[S
] \Cnot P) &&
\text{ÄÌÑ ÌÀÂÏÇÏ $P$
}
216 ÷ ÞÁÓÔÎÏÓÔÉ (ÐÏÄÓÔÁ×ÌÑÑ~$
\Pc$ ×ÍÅÓÔÏ~$P$ × ÜÔÕ <<ÓÈÅÍÕ-ÁËÓÉÏÍÕ>>),
218 \label{eq:op-speaker-c
}
219 (
[S
]\Pc)
\Cor (
[S
] \Cnot \Pc).
223 \iref{eq:not-believes-c
} \Cnot (
[S
]\Pc),
\quad \eqref{eq:op-speaker-c
}}
224 {[S
] \Cnot \Pc \label{eq:believes-not-c
}}
226 \paragraph{``A Final Step (if so desired)''
\cite{KvFCourse
}.
}
227 îÁ ÜÔÏÍ ÐÒÉÛÌÏÓØ ÂÙ ÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ÉÔØÓÑ.
228 îÏ ÐÒÅÄÐÏÌÁÇÁÅÍ
\axiomIntro{informed speaker
}:
230 (
[S
]P) &
\Cimplies P &&
\text{ÄÌÑ ÌÀÂÏÇÏ ÒÅÌÅ×ÁÎÔÎÏÇÏ $P$
}
233 ÷ ÞÁÓÔÎÏÓÔÉ (ÐÏÄÓÔÁ×ÌÑÑ~$
\Pc$ ×ÍÅÓÔÏ~$P$ × ÜÔÕ <<ÓÈÅÍÕ-ÁËÓÉÏÍÕ>>),
235 \label{eq:informed-c
}
236 (
[S
]\Cnot \Pc)
\Cimplies \Pc
239 \inferrule{\eqref{eq:believes-not-c
},
\quad \eqref{eq:informed-c
}}
240 {\Cnot \Pc \label{eq:not-c
}}
242 (äÌÑ $
\Pa$ ×Ó£ ÔÁË ÖÅ ÎÅ ÒÁÂÏÔÁÅÔ, ÐÏÔÏÍÕ ÞÔÏ ÏÎÏ ÓÌÁÂÅÅ $
\Pb$.)
245 ôÁËÉÍ ÏÂÒÁÚÏÍ, illocutionary force ÚÁÓÔÁ×ÌÑÅÔ ÎÁc ÐÒÉÎÑÔØ $
\Pb$,
246 pragmatic inference ÉÚ
\eqref{eq:act
} ÄÁ£Ô ÉÍÐÌÉËÁÔÕÒÕ $
\Cnot\Pc$.
248 íÏÖÎÏ ÂÙÌÏ ÂÙ ÒÁÚÌÏÖÉÔØ illocutionary force ÎÁ ÔÅ ÖÅ ÐÒÉÎÃÉÐÙ,
249 Á ÉÍÅÎÎÏ ÉÚ $
\said{S
} \Pb$ ×Ù×ÏÄÉÍ $
[S
] \Pb$,
250 É ÉÚ $
[S
] \Pb$ É
\axiom{informed speaker
}: $
\Pb$.
252 ÷ÏÔ ÔÁËÏÅ ÍÏ£ ÉÚÌÏÖÅÎÉÅ, Ñ ÓÍÏÔÒÅÌ
\cite[ÓÔÒ.
2--
3]{KvFCourse
}.
255 \begin{thebibliography
}{}
257 \bibitem[KvF course
]{KvFCourse
} Kai von Fintel's course on Pragmatics
258 at LSA summer institute
2005. The handouts were at
259 \url!http://semantics-online.org/lsa311/lsa311-ho-
2.pdf!.
261 \end{thebibliography
}