1 <?xml version=
"1.0" encoding=
"UTF-8"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
3 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
4 <html xmlns=
"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:
lang=
"en">
6 <meta http-equiv=
"Content-Type" content=
"application/xhtml+xml; charset=UTF-8" />
7 <meta name=
"generator" content=
"AsciiDoc 10.2.0" />
8 <title>Submitting Patches
</title>
9 <style type=
"text/css">
10 /* Shared CSS for AsciiDoc xhtml11 and html5 backends */
14 font-family: Georgia,serif;
18 h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6,
19 div.title, caption.title,
20 thead, p.table.header,
22 #author, #revnumber, #revdate, #revremark,
24 font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
28 margin:
1em
5%
1em
5%;
33 text-decoration: underline;
49 h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
57 border-bottom:
2px solid silver;
77 border:
1px solid silver;
88 ul
> li { color: #aaa; }
89 ul
> li
> * { color: black; }
91 .monospaced, code, pre {
92 font-family:
"Courier New", Courier, monospace;
99 white-space: pre-wrap;
109 #revnumber, #revdate, #revremark {
114 border-top:
2px solid silver;
120 padding-bottom:
0.5em;
124 padding-bottom:
0.5em;
129 margin-bottom:
1.5em;
131 div.imageblock, div.exampleblock, div.verseblock,
132 div.quoteblock, div.literalblock, div.listingblock, div.sidebarblock,
133 div.admonitionblock {
135 margin-bottom:
1.5em;
137 div.admonitionblock {
139 margin-bottom:
2.0em;
144 div.content { /* Block element content. */
148 /* Block element titles. */
149 div.title, caption.title {
154 margin-bottom:
0.5em;
160 td div.title:first-child {
163 div.content div.title:first-child {
166 div.content + div.title {
170 div.sidebarblock
> div.content {
172 border:
1px solid #dddddd;
173 border-left:
4px solid #f0f0f0;
177 div.listingblock
> div.content {
178 border:
1px solid #dddddd;
179 border-left:
5px solid #f0f0f0;
184 div.quoteblock, div.verseblock {
188 border-left:
5px solid #f0f0f0;
192 div.quoteblock
> div.attribution {
197 div.verseblock
> pre.content {
198 font-family: inherit;
201 div.verseblock
> div.attribution {
205 /* DEPRECATED: Pre version
8.2.7 verse style literal block. */
206 div.verseblock + div.attribution {
210 div.admonitionblock .icon {
214 text-decoration: underline;
216 padding-right:
0.5em;
218 div.admonitionblock td.content {
220 border-left:
3px solid #dddddd;
223 div.exampleblock
> div.content {
224 border-left:
3px solid #dddddd;
228 div.imageblock div.content { padding-left:
0; }
229 span.image img { border-style: none; vertical-align: text-bottom; }
230 a.image:visited { color: white; }
234 margin-bottom:
0.8em;
247 list-style-position: outside;
250 list-style-type: decimal;
253 list-style-type: lower-alpha;
256 list-style-type: upper-alpha;
259 list-style-type: lower-roman;
262 list-style-type: upper-roman;
265 div.compact ul, div.compact ol,
266 div.compact p, div.compact p,
267 div.compact div, div.compact div {
269 margin-bottom:
0.1em;
281 margin-bottom:
0.8em;
284 padding-bottom:
15px;
286 dt.hdlist1.strong, td.hdlist1.strong {
292 padding-right:
0.8em;
298 div.hdlist.compact tr {
307 .footnote, .footnoteref {
311 span.footnote, span.footnoteref {
312 vertical-align: super;
316 margin:
20px
0 20px
0;
320 #footnotes div.footnote {
326 border-top:
1px solid silver;
335 padding-right:
0.5em;
336 padding-bottom:
0.3em;
344 #footer-badges { display: none; }
348 margin-bottom:
2.5em;
356 margin-bottom:
0.1em;
359 div.toclevel0, div.toclevel1, div.toclevel2, div.toclevel3, div.toclevel4 {
376 span.aqua { color: aqua; }
377 span.black { color: black; }
378 span.blue { color: blue; }
379 span.fuchsia { color: fuchsia; }
380 span.gray { color: gray; }
381 span.green { color: green; }
382 span.lime { color: lime; }
383 span.maroon { color: maroon; }
384 span.navy { color: navy; }
385 span.olive { color: olive; }
386 span.purple { color: purple; }
387 span.red { color: red; }
388 span.silver { color: silver; }
389 span.teal { color: teal; }
390 span.white { color: white; }
391 span.yellow { color: yellow; }
393 span.aqua-background { background: aqua; }
394 span.black-background { background: black; }
395 span.blue-background { background: blue; }
396 span.fuchsia-background { background: fuchsia; }
397 span.gray-background { background: gray; }
398 span.green-background { background: green; }
399 span.lime-background { background: lime; }
400 span.maroon-background { background: maroon; }
401 span.navy-background { background: navy; }
402 span.olive-background { background: olive; }
403 span.purple-background { background: purple; }
404 span.red-background { background: red; }
405 span.silver-background { background: silver; }
406 span.teal-background { background: teal; }
407 span.white-background { background: white; }
408 span.yellow-background { background: yellow; }
410 span.big { font-size:
2em; }
411 span.small { font-size:
0.6em; }
413 span.underline { text-decoration: underline; }
414 span.overline { text-decoration: overline; }
415 span.line-through { text-decoration: line-through; }
417 div.unbreakable { page-break-inside: avoid; }
427 margin-bottom:
1.5em;
429 div.tableblock
> table {
430 border:
3px solid #
527bbd;
432 thead, p.table.header {
439 /* Because the table frame attribute is overridden by CSS in most browsers. */
440 div.tableblock
> table[
frame=
"void"] {
443 div.tableblock
> table[
frame=
"hsides"] {
444 border-left-style: none;
445 border-right-style: none;
447 div.tableblock
> table[
frame=
"vsides"] {
448 border-top-style: none;
449 border-bottom-style: none;
460 margin-bottom:
1.5em;
462 thead, p.tableblock.header {
473 border-color: #
527bbd;
474 border-collapse: collapse;
476 th.tableblock, td.tableblock {
480 border-color: #
527bbd;
483 table.tableblock.frame-topbot {
484 border-left-style: hidden;
485 border-right-style: hidden;
487 table.tableblock.frame-sides {
488 border-top-style: hidden;
489 border-bottom-style: hidden;
491 table.tableblock.frame-none {
492 border-style: hidden;
495 th.tableblock.halign-left, td.tableblock.halign-left {
498 th.tableblock.halign-center, td.tableblock.halign-center {
501 th.tableblock.halign-right, td.tableblock.halign-right {
505 th.tableblock.valign-top, td.tableblock.valign-top {
508 th.tableblock.valign-middle, td.tableblock.valign-middle {
509 vertical-align: middle;
511 th.tableblock.valign-bottom, td.tableblock.valign-bottom {
512 vertical-align: bottom;
523 padding-bottom:
0.5em;
524 border-top:
2px solid silver;
525 border-bottom:
2px solid silver;
530 body.manpage div.sectionbody {
535 body.manpage div#toc { display: none; }
540 <script type=
"text/javascript">
542 var asciidoc = { // Namespace.
544 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
545 // Table Of Contents generator
546 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
548 /* Author: Mihai Bazon, September
2002
549 * http://students.infoiasi.ro/~mishoo
551 * Table Of Content generator
554 * Feel free to use this script under the terms of the GNU General Public
555 * License, as long as you do not remove or alter this notice.
558 /* modified by Troy D. Hanson, September
2006. License: GPL */
559 /* modified by Stuart Rackham,
2006,
2009. License: GPL */
562 toc: function (toclevels) {
564 function getText(el) {
566 for (var i = el.firstChild; i != null; i = i.nextSibling) {
567 if (i.nodeType ==
3 /* Node.TEXT_NODE */) // IE doesn't speak constants.
569 else if (i.firstChild != null)
575 function TocEntry(el, text, toclevel) {
578 this.toclevel = toclevel;
581 function tocEntries(el, toclevels) {
582 var result = new Array;
583 var re = new RegExp('[hH]([
1-'+(toclevels+
1)+'])');
584 // Function that scans the DOM tree for header elements (the DOM2
585 // nodeIterator API would be a better technique but not supported by all
587 var iterate = function (el) {
588 for (var i = el.firstChild; i != null; i = i.nextSibling) {
589 if (i.nodeType ==
1 /* Node.ELEMENT_NODE */) {
590 var mo = re.exec(i.tagName);
591 if (mo && (i.getAttribute(
"class") || i.getAttribute(
"className")) !=
"float") {
592 result[result.length] = new TocEntry(i, getText(i), mo[
1]-
1);
602 var toc = document.getElementById(
"toc");
607 // Delete existing TOC entries in case we're reloading the TOC.
608 var tocEntriesToRemove = [];
610 for (i =
0; i < toc.childNodes.length; i++) {
611 var entry = toc.childNodes[i];
612 if (entry.nodeName.toLowerCase() == 'div'
613 && entry.getAttribute(
"class")
614 && entry.getAttribute(
"class").match(/^toclevel/))
615 tocEntriesToRemove.push(entry);
617 for (i =
0; i < tocEntriesToRemove.length; i++) {
618 toc.removeChild(tocEntriesToRemove[i]);
621 // Rebuild TOC entries.
622 var entries = tocEntries(document.getElementById(
"content"), toclevels);
623 for (var i =
0; i < entries.length; ++i) {
624 var entry = entries[i];
625 if (entry.element.id ==
"")
626 entry.element.id =
"_toc_" + i;
627 var a = document.createElement(
"a");
628 a.href =
"#" + entry.element.id;
629 a.appendChild(document.createTextNode(entry.text));
630 var div = document.createElement(
"div");
632 div.className =
"toclevel" + entry.toclevel;
633 toc.appendChild(div);
635 if (entries.length ==
0)
636 toc.parentNode.removeChild(toc);
640 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
641 // Footnotes generator
642 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
644 /* Based on footnote generation code from:
645 * http://www.brandspankingnew.net/archive/
2005/
07/format_footnote.html
648 footnotes: function () {
649 // Delete existing footnote entries in case we're reloading the footnodes.
651 var noteholder = document.getElementById(
"footnotes");
655 var entriesToRemove = [];
656 for (i =
0; i < noteholder.childNodes.length; i++) {
657 var entry = noteholder.childNodes[i];
658 if (entry.nodeName.toLowerCase() == 'div' && entry.getAttribute(
"class") ==
"footnote")
659 entriesToRemove.push(entry);
661 for (i =
0; i < entriesToRemove.length; i++) {
662 noteholder.removeChild(entriesToRemove[i]);
665 // Rebuild footnote entries.
666 var cont = document.getElementById(
"content");
667 var spans = cont.getElementsByTagName(
"span");
670 for (i=
0; i
<spans.length; i++) {
671 if (spans[i].className ==
"footnote") {
673 var note = spans[i].getAttribute(
"data-note");
675 // Use [\s\S] in place of . so multi-line matches work.
676 // Because JavaScript has no s (dotall) regex flag.
677 note = spans[i].innerHTML.match(/\s*\[([\s\S]*)]\s*/)[
1];
679 "[<a id='_footnoteref_" + n +
"' href='#_footnote_" + n +
680 "' title='View footnote' class='footnote'>" + n +
"</a>]";
681 spans[i].setAttribute(
"data-note", note);
683 noteholder.innerHTML +=
684 "<div class='footnote' id='_footnote_" + n +
"'>" +
685 "<a href='#_footnoteref_" + n +
"' title='Return to text'>" +
686 n +
"</a>. " + note +
"</div>";
687 var id =spans[i].getAttribute(
"id");
688 if (id != null) refs[
"#"+id] = n;
692 noteholder.parentNode.removeChild(noteholder);
694 // Process footnoterefs.
695 for (i=
0; i
<spans.length; i++) {
696 if (spans[i].className ==
"footnoteref") {
697 var href = spans[i].getElementsByTagName(
"a")[
0].getAttribute(
"href");
698 href = href.match(/#.*/)[
0]; // Because IE return full URL.
701 "[<a href='#_footnote_" + n +
702 "' title='View footnote' class='footnote'>" + n +
"</a>]";
708 install: function(toclevels) {
711 function reinstall() {
712 asciidoc.footnotes();
714 asciidoc.toc(toclevels);
718 function reinstallAndRemoveTimer() {
719 clearInterval(timerId);
723 timerId = setInterval(reinstall,
500);
724 if (document.addEventListener)
725 document.addEventListener(
"DOMContentLoaded", reinstallAndRemoveTimer, false);
727 window.onload = reinstallAndRemoveTimer;
735 <body class=
"article">
737 <h1>Submitting Patches
</h1>
738 <span id=
"revdate">2024-
04-
22</span>
742 <h2 id=
"_guidelines">Guidelines
</h2>
743 <div class=
"sectionbody">
744 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Here are some guidelines for contributing back to this
745 project. There is also a
<a href=
"MyFirstContribution.html">step-by-step tutorial
</a>
746 available which covers many of these same guidelines.
</p></div>
748 <h3 id=
"choose-starting-point">Choose a starting point.
</h3>
749 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>As a preliminary step, you must first choose a starting point for your
750 work. Typically this means choosing a branch, although technically
751 speaking it is actually a particular commit (typically the HEAD, or tip,
752 of the branch).
</p></div>
753 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>There are several important branches to be aware of. Namely, there are
754 four integration branches as discussed in
<a href=
"gitworkflows.html">gitworkflows(
7)
</a>:
</p></div>
755 <div class=
"ulist"><ul>
777 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>The branches lower on the list are typically descendants of the ones
778 that come before it. For example,
<code>maint
</code> is an
"older" branch than
779 <code>master
</code> because
<code>master
</code> usually has patches (commits) on top of
780 <code>maint
</code>.
</p></div>
781 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>There are also
"topic" branches, which contain work from other
782 contributors. Topic branches are created by the Git maintainer (in
783 their fork) to organize the current set of incoming contributions on
784 the mailing list, and are itemized in the regular
"What’s cooking in
785 git.git" announcements. To find the tip of a topic branch, run
<code>git log
786 --first-parent master..seen
</code> and look for the merge commit. The second
787 parent of this commit is the tip of the topic branch.
</p></div>
788 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>There is one guiding principle for choosing the right starting point: in
789 general, always base your work on the oldest integration branch that
790 your change is relevant to (see
"Merge upwards" in
791 <a href=
"gitworkflows.html">gitworkflows(
7)
</a>). What this principle means is that for the
792 vast majority of cases, the starting point for new work should be the
793 latest HEAD commit of
<code>maint
</code> or
<code>master
</code> based on the following cases:
</p></div>
794 <div class=
"ulist"><ul>
797 If you are fixing bugs in the released version, use
<code>maint
</code> as the
798 starting point (which may mean you have to fix things without using
799 new API features on the cutting edge that recently appeared in
800 <code>master
</code> but were not available in the released version).
805 Otherwise (such as if you are adding new features) use
<code>master
</code>.
809 <div class=
"admonitionblock">
812 <div class=
"title">Note
</div>
814 <td class=
"content">In exceptional cases, a bug that was introduced in an old
815 version may have to be fixed for users of releases that are much older
816 than the recent releases.
<code>git describe --contains X
</code> may describe
817 <code>X
</code> as
<code>v2.30
.0-rc2-gXXXXXX
</code> for the commit
<code>X
</code> that introduced the
818 bug, and the bug may be so high-impact that we may need to issue a new
819 maintenance release for Git
2.30.x series, when
"Git 2.41.0" is the
820 current release. In such a case, you may want to use the tip of the
821 maintenance branch for the
2.30.x series, which may be available in the
822 <code>maint-
2.30</code> branch in
<a href=
"https://github.com/gitster/git">the maintainer
’s
823 "broken out" repo
</a>.
</td>
826 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>This also means that
<code>next
</code> or
<code>seen
</code> are inappropriate starting points
827 for your work, if you want your work to have a realistic chance of
828 graduating to
<code>master
</code>. They are simply not designed to be used as a
829 base for new work; they are only there to make sure that topics in
830 flight work well together. This is why both
<code>next
</code> and
<code>seen
</code> are
831 frequently re-integrated with incoming patches on the mailing list and
832 force-pushed to replace previous versions of themselves. A topic that is
833 literally built on top of
<code>next
</code> cannot be merged to
<code>master
</code> without
834 dragging in all the other topics in
<code>next
</code>, some of which may not be
836 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>For example, if you are making tree-wide changes, while somebody else is
837 also making their own tree-wide changes, your work may have severe
838 overlap with the other person
’s work. This situation may tempt you to
839 use
<code>next
</code> as your starting point (because it would have the other
840 person
’s work included in it), but doing so would mean you
’ll not only
841 depend on the other person
’s work, but all the other random things from
842 other contributors that are already integrated into
<code>next
</code>. And as soon
843 as
<code>next
</code> is updated with a new version, all of your work will need to
844 be rebased anyway in order for them to be cleanly applied by the
845 maintainer.
</p></div>
846 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Under truly exceptional circumstances where you absolutely must depend
847 on a select few topic branches that are already in
<code>next
</code> but not in
848 <code>master
</code>, you may want to create your own custom base-branch by forking
849 <code>master
</code> and merging the required topic branches into it. You could then
850 work on top of this base-branch. But keep in mind that this base-branch
851 would only be known privately to you. So when you are ready to send
852 your patches to the list, be sure to communicate how you created it in
853 your cover letter. This critical piece of information would allow
854 others to recreate your base-branch on their end in order for them to
855 try out your work.
</p></div>
856 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Finally, note that some parts of the system have dedicated maintainers
857 with their own separate source code repositories (see the section
858 "Subsystems" below).
</p></div>
861 <h3 id=
"separate-commits">Make separate commits for logically separate changes.
</h3>
862 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Unless your patch is really trivial, you should not be sending
863 out a patch that was generated between your working tree and
864 your commit head. Instead, always make a commit with complete
865 commit message and generate a series of patches from your
866 repository. It is a good discipline.
</p></div>
867 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Give an explanation for the change(s) that is detailed enough so
868 that people can judge if it is good thing to do, without reading
869 the actual patch text to determine how well the code does what
870 the explanation promises to do.
</p></div>
871 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>If your description starts to get too long, that
’s a sign that you
872 probably need to split up your commit to finer grained pieces.
873 That being said, patches which plainly describe the things that
874 help reviewers check the patch, and future maintainers understand
875 the code, are the most beautiful patches. Descriptions that summarize
876 the point in the subject well, and describe the motivation for the
877 change, the approach taken by the change, and if relevant how this
878 differs substantially from the prior version, are all good things
880 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing. See
881 <code>t/README
</code> for guidance.
</p></div>
882 <div class=
"paragraph" id=
"tests"><p>When adding a new feature, make sure that you have new tests to show
883 the feature triggers the new behavior when it should, and to show the
884 feature does not trigger when it shouldn
’t. After any code change,
885 make sure that the entire test suite passes. When fixing a bug, make
886 sure you have new tests that break if somebody else breaks what you
887 fixed by accident to avoid regression. Also, try merging your work to
888 <em>next
</em> and
<em>seen
</em> and make sure the tests still pass; topics by others
889 that are still in flight may have unexpected interactions with what
890 you are trying to do in your topic.
</p></div>
891 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Pushing to a fork of
<a href=
"https://github.com/git/git">https://github.com/git/git
</a> will use their CI
892 integration to test your changes on Linux, Mac and Windows. See the
893 <a href=
"#GHCI">GitHub CI
</a> section for details.
</p></div>
894 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>Do not forget to update the documentation to describe the updated
895 behavior and make sure that the resulting documentation set formats
896 well (try the Documentation/doc-diff script).
</p></div>
897 <div class=
"paragraph"><p>We currently have a liberal mixture of US and UK English norms for
898 spelling and grammar, which is somewhat unfortunate. A huge patch that
899 touches the files all over the place only to correct the inconsistency
900 is not welcome, though. Potential clashes with other changes that can
901 result from such a patch are not worth it. We prefer to gradually
902 reconcile the inconsistencies in favor of US English, with small and
903 easily digestible patches, as a side effect of doing some other real
904 work in the vicinity (e.g. rewriting a paragraph for clarity, while
905 turning en_UK spelling to en_US). Obvious typographical fixes are much
906 more welcomed (
"teh → "the
"), preferably submitted as independent
907 patches separate from other documentation changes.</p></div>
908 <div class="paragraph
" id="whitespace-check
"><p>Oh, another thing. We are picky about whitespaces. Make sure your
909 changes do not trigger errors with the sample pre-commit hook shipped
910 in <code>templates/hooks--pre-commit</code>. To help ensure this does not happen,
911 run <code>git diff --check</code> on your changes before you commit.</p></div>
914 <h3 id="describe-changes
">Describe your changes well.</h3>
915 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The log message that explains your changes is just as important as the
916 changes themselves. Your code may be clearly written with in-code
917 comment to sufficiently explain how it works with the surrounding
918 code, but those who need to fix or enhance your code in the future
919 will need to know <em>why</em> your code does what it does, for a few
921 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
924 Your code may be doing something differently from what you wanted it
925 to do. Writing down what you actually wanted to achieve will help
926 them fix your code and make it do what it should have been doing
927 (also, you often discover your own bugs yourself, while writing the
928 log message to summarize the thought behind it).
933 Your code may be doing things that were only necessary for your
934 immediate needs (e.g. "do X to directories
" without implementing or
935 even designing what is to be done on files). Writing down why you
936 excluded what the code does not do will help guide future developers.
937 Writing down "we do X to directories, because directories have
938 characteristic Y
" would help them infer "oh, files also have the same
939 characteristic Y, so perhaps doing X to them would also make sense?
".
940 Saying "we don
’t do the same X to files, because
…" will help them
941 decide if the reasoning is sound (in which case they do not waste
942 time extending your code to cover files), or reason differently (in
943 which case, they can explain why they extend your code to cover
948 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The goal of your log message is to convey the <em>why</em> behind your
949 change to help future developers.</p></div>
950 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The first line of the commit message should be a short description (50
951 characters is the soft limit, see DISCUSSION in <a href="git-commit.html
">git-commit(1)</a>),
952 and should skip the full stop. It is also conventional in most cases to
953 prefix the first line with "area:
" where the area is a filename or
954 identifier for the general area of the code being modified, e.g.</p></div>
955 <div class="ulist
"><ul>
958 doc: clarify distinction between sign-off and pgp-signing
963 githooks.txt: improve the intro section
967 <div class="paragraph
"><p>If in doubt which identifier to use, run <code>git log --no-merges</code> on the
968 files you are modifying to see the current conventions.</p></div>
969 <div class="paragraph
" id="summary-section
"><p>The title sentence after the "area:
" prefix omits the full stop at the
970 end, and its first word is not capitalized (the omission
971 of capitalization applies only to the word after the "area:
"
972 prefix of the title) unless there is a reason to
973 capitalize it other than because it is the first word in the sentence.
974 E.g. "doc: clarify
…", not "doc: Clarify
…", or "githooks.txt:
975 improve
…", not "githooks.txt: Improve
…". But "refs: HEAD is also
976 treated as a ref
" is correct, as we spell <code>HEAD</code> in all caps even when
977 it appears in the middle of a sentence.</p></div>
978 <div class="paragraph
" id="meaningful-message
"><p>The body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:</p></div>
979 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
982 explains the problem the change tries to solve, i.e. what is wrong
983 with the current code without the change.
988 justifies the way the change solves the problem, i.e. why the
989 result with the change is better.
994 alternate solutions considered but discarded, if any.
998 <div class="paragraph
" id="present-tense
"><p>The problem statement that describes the status quo is written in the
999 present tense. Write "The code does X when it is given input Y
",
1000 instead of "The code used to do Y when given input X
". You do not
1001 have to say "Currently
"---the status quo in the problem statement is
1002 about the code <em>without</em> your change, by project convention.</p></div>
1003 <div class="paragraph
" id="imperative-mood
"><p>Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz
"
1004 instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz
" or "[I] changed xyzzy
1005 to do frotz
", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
1006 its behavior. Try to make sure your explanation can be understood
1007 without external resources. Instead of giving a URL to a mailing list
1008 archive, summarize the relevant points of the discussion.</p></div>
1009 <div class="paragraph
" id="commit-reference
"><p>There are a few reasons why you may want to refer to another commit in
1010 the "more stable
" part of the history (i.e. on branches like <code>maint</code>,
1011 <code>master</code>, and <code>next</code>):</p></div>
1012 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
1015 A commit that introduced the root cause of a bug you are fixing.
1020 A commit that introduced a feature that you are enhancing.
1025 A commit that conflicts with your work when you made a trial merge
1026 of your work into <code>next</code> and <code>seen</code> for testing.
1030 <div class="paragraph
"><p>When you reference a commit on a more stable branch (like <code>master</code>,
1031 <code>maint</code> and <code>next</code>), use the format "abbreviated hash (subject,
1032 date)
", like this:</p></div>
1033 <div class="literalblock
">
1034 <div class="content
">
1035 <pre><code> Commit f86a374 (pack-bitmap.c: fix a memleak, 2015-03-30)
1036 noticed that ...</code></pre>
1038 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The "Copy commit reference
" command of gitk can be used to obtain this
1039 format (with the subject enclosed in a pair of double-quotes), or this
1040 invocation of <code>git show</code>:</p></div>
1041 <div class="literalblock
">
1042 <div class="content
">
1043 <pre><code> git show -s --pretty=reference <commit></code></pre>
1045 <div class="paragraph
"><p>or, on an older version of Git without support for --pretty=reference:</p></div>
1046 <div class="literalblock
">
1047 <div class="content
">
1048 <pre><code> git show -s --date=short --pretty='format:%h (%s, %ad)' <commit></code></pre>
1052 <h3 id="sign-off
">Certify your work by adding your <code>Signed-off-by</code> trailer</h3>
1053 <div class="paragraph
"><p>To improve tracking of who did what, we ask you to certify that you
1054 wrote the patch or have the right to pass it on under the same license
1055 as ours, by "signing off
" your patch. Without sign-off, we cannot
1056 accept your patches.</p></div>
1057 <div class="paragraph
"><p>If (and only if) you certify the below D-C-O:</p></div>
1058 <div class="quoteblock
" id="dco
">
1059 <div class="title
">Developer’s Certificate of Origin 1.1</div>
1060 <div class="content
">
1061 <div class="paragraph
"><p>By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:</p></div>
1062 <div class="olist loweralpha
"><ol class="loweralpha
">
1065 The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
1066 have the right to submit it under the open source license
1067 indicated in the file; or
1072 The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
1073 of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
1074 license and I have the right under that license to submit that
1075 work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
1076 by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
1077 permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
1083 The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
1084 person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
1090 I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
1091 are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
1092 personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
1093 maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
1094 this project or the open source license(s) involved.
1099 <div class="attribution
">
1101 <div class="paragraph
"><p>you add a "Signed-off-by
" trailer to your commit, that looks like
1103 <div class="literalblock
">
1104 <div class="content
">
1105 <pre><code> Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org></code></pre>
1107 <div class="paragraph
"><p>This line can be added by Git if you run the git-commit command with
1108 the -s option.</p></div>
1109 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Notice that you can place your own <code>Signed-off-by</code> trailer when
1110 forwarding somebody else’s patch with the above rules for
1111 D-C-O. Indeed you are encouraged to do so. Do not forget to
1112 place an in-body "From:
" line at the beginning to properly attribute
1113 the change to its true author (see (2) above).</p></div>
1114 <div class="paragraph
"><p>This procedure originally came from the Linux kernel project, so our
1115 rule is quite similar to theirs, but what exactly it means to sign-off
1116 your patch differs from project to project, so it may be different
1117 from that of the project you are accustomed to.</p></div>
1118 <div class="paragraph
" id="real-name
"><p>Also notice that a real name is used in the <code>Signed-off-by</code> trailer. Please
1119 don’t hide your real name.</p></div>
1120 <div class="paragraph
" id="commit-trailers
"><p>If you like, you can put extra tags at the end:</p></div>
1121 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
1124 <code>Reported-by:</code> is used to credit someone who found the bug that
1125 the patch attempts to fix.
1130 <code>Acked-by:</code> says that the person who is more familiar with the area
1131 the patch attempts to modify liked the patch.
1136 <code>Reviewed-by:</code>, unlike the other tags, can only be offered by the
1137 reviewers themselves when they are completely satisfied with the
1138 patch after a detailed analysis.
1143 <code>Tested-by:</code> is used to indicate that the person applied the patch
1144 and found it to have the desired effect.
1149 <code>Co-authored-by:</code> is used to indicate that people exchanged drafts
1150 of a patch before submitting it.
1155 <code>Helped-by:</code> is used to credit someone who suggested ideas for
1156 changes without providing the precise changes in patch form.
1161 <code>Mentored-by:</code> is used to credit someone with helping develop a
1162 patch as part of a mentorship program (e.g., GSoC or Outreachy).
1167 <code>Suggested-by:</code> is used to credit someone with suggesting the idea
1172 <div class="paragraph
"><p>While you can also create your own trailer if the situation warrants it, we
1173 encourage you to instead use one of the common trailers in this project
1174 highlighted above.</p></div>
1175 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Only capitalize the very first letter of tags, i.e. favor
1176 "Signed-off-by
" over "Signed-Off-By
" and "Acked-by:
" over "Acked-By
".</p></div>
1179 <h3 id="git-tools
">Generate your patch using Git tools out of your commits.</h3>
1180 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Git based diff tools generate unidiff which is the preferred format.</p></div>
1181 <div class="paragraph
"><p>You do not have to be afraid to use <code>-M</code> option to <code>git diff</code> or
1182 <code>git format-patch</code>, if your patch involves file renames. The
1183 receiving end can handle them just fine.</p></div>
1184 <div class="paragraph
" id="review-patch
"><p>Please make sure your patch does not add commented out debugging code,
1185 or include any extra files which do not relate to what your patch
1186 is trying to achieve. Make sure to review
1187 your patch after generating it, to ensure accuracy. Before
1188 sending out, please make sure it cleanly applies to the starting point you
1189 have chosen in the "Choose a starting point
" section.</p></div>
1190 <div class="admonitionblock
">
1193 <div class="title
">Note</div>
1195 <td class="content
">From the perspective of those reviewing your patch, the <code>master</code>
1196 branch is the default expected starting point. So if you have chosen a
1197 different starting point, please communicate this choice in your cover
1203 <h3 id="send-patches
">Sending your patches.</h3>
1204 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Before sending any patches, please note that patches that may be
1205 security relevant should be submitted privately to the Git Security
1206 mailing list<span class="footnote
" id="_footnote_security-ml
"><br />[The Git Security mailing list: <a href="mailto:git-security@googlegroups.com
">git-security@googlegroups.com</a>]<br /></span>, instead of the public mailing list.</p></div>
1207 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Learn to use format-patch and send-email if possible. These commands
1208 are optimized for the workflow of sending patches, avoiding many ways
1209 your existing e-mail client (often optimized for "multipart/*
" MIME
1210 type e-mails) might render your patches unusable.</p></div>
1211 <div class="paragraph
"><p>People on the Git mailing list need to be able to read and
1212 comment on the changes you are submitting. It is important for
1213 a developer to be able to "quote
" your changes, using standard
1214 e-mail tools, so that they may comment on specific portions of
1215 your code. For this reason, each patch should be submitted
1216 "inline
" in a separate message.</p></div>
1217 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Multiple related patches should be grouped into their own e-mail
1218 thread to help readers find all parts of the series. To that end,
1219 send them as replies to either an additional "cover letter
" message
1220 (see below), the first patch, or the respective preceding patch.</p></div>
1221 <div class="paragraph
"><p>If your log message (including your name on the
1222 <code>Signed-off-by</code> trailer) is not writable in ASCII, make sure that
1223 you send off a message in the correct encoding.</p></div>
1224 <div class="admonitionblock
">
1227 <div class="title
">Warning</div>
1229 <td class="content
">Be wary of your MUAs word-wrap
1230 corrupting your patch. Do not cut-n-paste your patch; you can
1231 lose tabs that way if you are not careful.</td>
1234 <div class="paragraph
"><p>It is a common convention to prefix your subject line with
1235 [PATCH]. This lets people easily distinguish patches from other
1236 e-mail discussions. Use of markers in addition to PATCH within
1237 the brackets to describe the nature of the patch is also
1238 encouraged. E.g. [RFC PATCH] (where RFC stands for "request for
1239 comments
") is often used to indicate a patch needs further
1240 discussion before being accepted, [PATCH v2], [PATCH v3] etc.
1241 are often seen when you are sending an update to what you have
1242 previously sent.</p></div>
1243 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The <code>git format-patch</code> command follows the best current practice to
1244 format the body of an e-mail message. At the beginning of the
1245 patch should come your commit message, ending with the
1246 <code>Signed-off-by</code> trailers, and a line that consists of three dashes,
1247 followed by the diffstat information and the patch itself. If
1248 you are forwarding a patch from somebody else, optionally, at
1249 the beginning of the e-mail message just before the commit
1250 message starts, you can put a "From:
" line to name that person.
1251 To change the default "[PATCH]
" in the subject to "[
<text
>]
", use
1252 <code>git format-patch --subject-prefix=<text></code>. As a shortcut, you
1253 can use <code>--rfc</code> instead of <code>--subject-prefix="RFC PATCH
"</code>, or
1254 <code>-v <n></code> instead of <code>--subject-prefix="PATCH v
<n
>"</code>.</p></div>
1255 <div class="paragraph
"><p>You often want to add additional explanation about the patch,
1256 other than the commit message itself. Place such "cover letter
"
1257 material between the three-dash line and the diffstat. For
1258 patches requiring multiple iterations of review and discussion,
1259 an explanation of changes between each iteration can be kept in
1260 Git-notes and inserted automatically following the three-dash
1261 line via <code>git format-patch --notes</code>.</p></div>
1262 <div class="paragraph
" id="the-topic-summary
"><p><strong>This is EXPERIMENTAL</strong>.</p></div>
1263 <div class="paragraph
"><p>When sending a topic, you can propose a one-paragraph summary that
1264 should appear in the "What
’s cooking
" report when it is picked up to
1265 explain the topic. If you choose to do so, please write a 2-5 line
1266 paragraph that will fit well in our release notes (see many bulleted
1267 entries in the Documentation/RelNotes/* files for examples), and make
1268 it the first paragraph of the cover letter. For a single-patch
1269 series, use the space between the three-dash line and the diffstat, as
1270 described earlier.</p></div>
1271 <div class="paragraph
" id="attachment
"><p>Do not attach the patch as a MIME attachment, compressed or not.
1272 Do not let your e-mail client send quoted-printable. Do not let
1273 your e-mail client send format=flowed which would destroy
1274 whitespaces in your patches. Many
1275 popular e-mail applications will not always transmit a MIME
1276 attachment as plain text, making it impossible to comment on
1277 your code. A MIME attachment also takes a bit more time to
1278 process. This does not decrease the likelihood of your
1279 MIME-attached change being accepted, but it makes it more likely
1280 that it will be postponed.</p></div>
1281 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
1282 you to re-send them using MIME, that is OK.</p></div>
1283 <div class="paragraph
" id="pgp-signature
"><p>Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other people on the
1284 list would not have your PGP key and would not bother obtaining it anyway.
1285 Your patch is not judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin
1286 has a far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known, respected
1287 origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things.</p></div>
1288 <div class="paragraph
"><p>If you really really really really want to do a PGP signed
1289 patch, format it as "multipart/signed
", not a text/plain message
1290 that starts with <code>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----</code>. That is
1291 not a text/plain, it’s something else.</p></div>
1292 <div class="paragraph
"><p>As mentioned at the beginning of the section, patches that may be
1293 security relevant should not be submitted to the public mailing list
1294 mentioned below, but should instead be sent privately to the Git
1295 Security mailing list<span class="footnoteref
"><br /><a href="#_footnote_security-ml
">[security-ml]</a><br /></span>.</p></div>
1296 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Send your patch with "To:
" set to the mailing list, with "cc:
" listing
1297 people who are involved in the area you are touching (the <code>git
1298 contacts</code> command in <code>contrib/contacts/</code> can help to
1299 identify them), to solicit comments and reviews. Also, when you made
1300 trial merges of your topic to <code>next</code> and <code>seen</code>, you may have noticed
1301 work by others conflicting with your changes. There is a good possibility
1302 that these people may know the area you are touching well.</p></div>
1303 <div class="paragraph
"><p>After the list reached a consensus that it is a good idea to apply the
1304 patch, re-send it with "To:
" set to the maintainer<span class="footnote
"><br />[The current maintainer: <a href="mailto:gitster@pobox.com
">gitster@pobox.com</a>]<br /></span>
1305 and "cc:
" the list<span class="footnote
"><br />[The mailing list: <a href="mailto:git@vger.kernel.org
">git@vger.kernel.org</a>]<br /></span> for inclusion. This is especially relevant
1306 when the maintainer did not heavily participate in the discussion and
1307 instead left the review to trusted others.</p></div>
1308 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Do not forget to add trailers such as <code>Acked-by:</code>, <code>Reviewed-by:</code> and
1309 <code>Tested-by:</code> lines as necessary to credit people who helped your
1310 patch, and "cc:
" them when sending such a final version for inclusion.</p></div>
1315 <h2 id="_subsystems_with_dedicated_maintainers
">Subsystems with dedicated maintainers</h2>
1316 <div class="sectionbody
">
1317 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Some parts of the system have dedicated maintainers with their own
1318 repositories.</p></div>
1319 <div class="ulist
"><ul>
1322 <code>git-gui/</code> comes from git-gui project, maintained by Pratyush Yadav:
1324 <div class="literalblock
">
1325 <div class="content
">
1326 <pre><code>https://github.com/prati0100/git-gui.git</code></pre>
1331 <code>gitk-git/</code> comes from Paul Mackerras’s gitk project:
1333 <div class="literalblock
">
1334 <div class="content
">
1335 <pre><code>git://git.ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk</code></pre>
1337 <div class="literalblock
">
1338 <div class="content
">
1339 <pre><code>Those who are interested in improving gitk can volunteer to help Paul
1340 maintain it, cf. <YntxL/fTplFm8lr6@cleo>.</code></pre>
1345 <code>po/</code> comes from the localization coordinator, Jiang Xin:
1347 <div class="literalblock
">
1348 <div class="content
">
1349 <pre><code>https://github.com/git-l10n/git-po/</code></pre>
1353 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Patches to these parts should be based on their trees.</p></div>
1357 <h2 id="patch-flow
">An ideal patch flow</h2>
1358 <div class="sectionbody
">
1359 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Here is an ideal patch flow for this project the current maintainer
1360 suggests to the contributors:</p></div>
1361 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
1364 You come up with an itch. You code it up.
1369 Send it to the list and cc people who may need to know about
1372 <div class="paragraph
"><p>The people who may need to know are the ones whose code you
1373 are butchering. These people happen to be the ones who are
1374 most likely to be knowledgeable enough to help you, but
1375 they have no obligation to help you (i.e. you ask for help,
1376 don’t demand). <code>git log -p -- <em>$area_you_are_modifying</em></code> would
1377 help you find out who they are.</p></div>
1381 You get comments and suggestions for improvements. You may
1382 even get them in an "on top of your change
" patch form.
1387 Polish, refine, and re-send to the list and the people who
1388 spend their time to improve your patch. Go back to step (2).
1393 The list forms consensus that the last round of your patch is
1394 good. Send it to the maintainer and cc the list.
1399 A topic branch is created with the patch and is merged to <code>next</code>,
1400 and cooked further and eventually graduates to <code>master</code>.
1404 <div class="paragraph
"><p>In any time between the (2)-(3) cycle, the maintainer may pick it up
1405 from the list and queue it to <code>seen</code>, in order to make it easier for
1406 people to play with it without having to pick up and apply the patch to
1407 their trees themselves.</p></div>
1411 <h2 id="patch-status
">Know the status of your patch after submission</h2>
1412 <div class="sectionbody
">
1413 <div class="ulist
"><ul>
1416 You can use Git itself to find out when your patch is merged in
1417 master. <code>git pull --rebase</code> will automatically skip already-applied
1418 patches, and will let you know. This works only if you rebase on top
1419 of the branch in which your patch has been merged (i.e. it will not
1420 tell you if your patch is merged in <code>seen</code> if you rebase on top of
1426 Read the Git mailing list, the maintainer regularly posts messages
1427 entitled "What
’s cooking in git.git
" giving
1428 the status of various proposed changes.
1435 <h2 id="_github_ci_a_id_ghci_a
">GitHub CI<a id="GHCI
"></a></h2>
1436 <div class="sectionbody
">
1437 <div class="paragraph
"><p>With an account at GitHub, you can use GitHub CI to test your changes
1438 on Linux, Mac and Windows. See
1439 <a href="https://github.com/git/git/actions/workflows/main.yml
">https://github.com/git/git/actions/workflows/main.yml</a> for examples of
1440 recent CI runs.</p></div>
1441 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Follow these steps for the initial setup:</p></div>
1442 <div class="olist arabic
"><ol class="arabic
">
1445 Fork <a href="https://github.com/git/git
">https://github.com/git/git</a> to your GitHub account.
1446 You can find detailed instructions how to fork here:
1447 <a href="https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/
">https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/</a>
1451 <div class="paragraph
"><p>After the initial setup, CI will run whenever you push new changes
1452 to your fork of Git on GitHub. You can monitor the test state of all your
1453 branches here: <code>https://github.com/<Your GitHub handle>/git/actions/workflows/main.yml</code></p></div>
1454 <div class="paragraph
"><p>If a branch does not pass all test cases then it will be marked with a
1455 red <code>x</code>, instead of a green check. In that case, you can click on the
1456 failing job and navigate to "ci/run-build-and-tests.sh
" and/or
1457 "ci/print-test-failures.sh
". You can also download "Artifacts
" which
1458 are zip archives containing tarred (or zipped) archives with test data
1459 relevant for debugging.</p></div>
1460 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Then fix the problem and push your fix to your GitHub fork. This will
1461 trigger a new CI build to ensure all tests pass.</p></div>
1465 <h2 id="mua
">MUA specific hints</h2>
1466 <div class="sectionbody
">
1467 <div class="paragraph
"><p>Some of the patches I receive or pick up from the list share common
1468 patterns of breakage. Please make sure your MUA is set up
1469 properly not to corrupt whitespaces.</p></div>
1470 <div class="paragraph
"><p>See the DISCUSSION section of <a href="git-format-patch.html
">git-format-patch(1)</a> for hints on
1471 checking your patch by mailing it to yourself and applying with
1472 <a href="git-am.html
">git-am(1)</a>.</p></div>
1473 <div class="paragraph
"><p>While you are at it, check the resulting commit log message from
1474 a trial run of applying the patch. If what is in the resulting
1475 commit is not exactly what you would want to see, it is very
1476 likely that your maintainer would end up hand editing the log
1477 message when he applies your patch. Things like "Hi, this is my
1478 first patch.\n
", if you really want to put in the patch e-mail,
1479 should come after the three-dash line that signals the end of the
1480 commit message.</p></div>
1482 <h3 id="_pine
">Pine</h3>
1483 <div class="paragraph
"><p>(Johannes Schindelin)</p></div>
1484 <div class="literalblock
">
1485 <div class="content
">
1486 <pre><code>I don't know how many people still use pine, but for those poor
1487 souls it may be good to mention that the quell-flowed-text is
1488 needed for recent versions.
1490 ... the "no-strip-whitespace-before-send
" option, too. AFAIK it
1491 was introduced in 4.60.</code></pre>
1493 <div class="paragraph
"><p>(Linus Torvalds)</p></div>
1494 <div class="literalblock
">
1495 <div class="content
">
1496 <pre><code>And 4.58 needs at least this.
1498 diff-tree 8326dd8350be64ac7fc805f6563a1d61ad10d32c (from e886a61f76edf5410573e92e38ce22974f9c40f1)
1499 Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
1500 Date: Mon Aug 15 17:23:51 2005 -0700
1502 Fix pine whitespace-corruption bug
1504 There's no excuse for unconditionally removing whitespace from
1505 the pico buffers on close.
1507 diff --git a/pico/pico.c b/pico/pico.c
1510 @@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ PICO *pm;
1511 switch(pico_all_done){ /* prepare for/handle final events */
1512 case COMP_EXIT : /* already confirmed */
1520 <div class="paragraph
"><p>(Daniel Barkalow)</p></div>
1521 <div class="literalblock
">
1522 <div class="content
">
1523 <pre><code>> A patch to SubmittingPatches, MUA specific help section for
1524 > users of Pine 4.63 would be very much appreciated.
1526 Ah, it looks like a recent version changed the default behavior to do the
1527 right thing, and inverted the sense of the configuration option. (Either
1528 that or Gentoo did it.) So you need to set the
1529 "no-strip-whitespace-before-send
" option, unless the option you have is
1530 "strip-whitespace-before-send
", in which case you should avoid checking
1535 <h3 id="_thunderbird_kmail_gmail
">Thunderbird, KMail, GMail</h3>
1536 <div class="paragraph
"><p>See the MUA-SPECIFIC HINTS section of <a href="git-format-patch.html
">git-format-patch(1)</a>.</p></div>
1539 <h3 id="_gnus
">Gnus</h3>
1540 <div class="paragraph
"><p>"|
" in the <code>*Summary*</code> buffer can be used to pipe the current
1541 message to an external program, and this is a handy way to drive
1542 <code>git am</code>. However, if the message is MIME encoded, what is
1543 piped into the program is the representation you see in your
1544 <code>*Article*</code> buffer after unwrapping MIME. This is often not what
1545 you would want for two reasons. It tends to screw up non-ASCII
1546 characters (most notably in people’s names), and also
1547 whitespaces (fatal in patches). Running "C-u g
" to display the
1548 message in raw form before using "|
" to run the pipe can work
1549 this problem around.</p></div>
1554 <div id="footnotes
"><hr /></div>
1556 <div id="footer-text
">
1558 2024-04-19 09:43:35 PDT