6 git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search
11 'git bisect' <subcommand> <options>
15 The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
19 git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
20 git bisect bad [<rev>]
21 git bisect good [<rev>...]
22 git bisect skip [<rev>...]
23 git bisect reset [<branch>]
25 git bisect replay <logfile>
27 git bisect run <cmd>...
29 This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' to help drive the
30 binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
31 old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
36 Use "git bisect" to get a short usage description, and "git bisect
37 help" or "git bisect -h" to get a long usage description.
39 Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
40 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
42 The way you use it is:
44 ------------------------------------------------
46 $ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
47 $ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
48 # tested that was good
49 ------------------------------------------------
51 When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
52 the revision tree and say something like:
54 ------------------------------------------------
55 Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
56 ------------------------------------------------
58 and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
59 boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
62 ------------------------------------------------
63 $ git bisect good # this one is good
64 ------------------------------------------------
68 ------------------------------------------------
69 Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
70 ------------------------------------------------
72 and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
73 on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
74 bad", and ask for the next bisection.
76 Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
77 bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
82 Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
84 ------------------------------------------------
86 ------------------------------------------------
88 to get back to the original branch, instead of being on the bisection
89 commit ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will
90 reset the bisection state).
95 During the bisection process, you can say
98 $ git bisect visualize
101 to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`. `visualize` is a bit
102 too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
104 If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git-log' is used
105 instead. You can even give command line options such as `-p` and
109 $ git bisect view --stat
112 Bisect log and bisect replay
113 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
115 The good/bad input is logged, and
121 shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
122 and save it in a file, and run
125 $ git bisect replay that-file
128 if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
131 Avoiding to test a commit
132 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
134 If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
135 to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
136 introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
137 does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
138 want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
140 It goes something like this:
143 $ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad.
144 Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
145 $ git bisect visualize # oops, that is uninteresting.
146 $ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what
150 Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
151 bisect what the result was as usual.
156 Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git
157 to do it for you using:
160 $ git bisect skip # Current version cannot be tested
163 But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may
164 eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or
165 more "skip"ped commits.
167 Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
168 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
170 You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
171 the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
172 paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
175 $ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
178 If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the
179 bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you
180 give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start`
181 and then you give all the good revisions you have:
184 $ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 --
186 # v2.6.20-rc4 and v2.6.20-rc1 are good
192 If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
193 or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
196 $ git bisect run my_script
199 Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
200 exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good. Exit with a
201 code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current
204 Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
205 program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
206 the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
208 The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code
209 cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current
210 revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above.
212 You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
213 tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
214 "revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
215 work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
216 applied to the revision being tested.
218 To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git-bisect' finds the
219 next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
220 before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
221 revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
222 tree to the pristine state. Finally the "run" script can exit with
223 the status of the real test to let the "git bisect run" command loop to
224 determine the outcome.
229 * Automatically bisect a broken build between v1.2 and HEAD:
232 $ git bisect start HEAD v1.2 -- # HEAD is bad, v1.2 is good
233 $ git bisect run make # "make" builds the app
236 * Automatically bisect a broken test suite:
241 make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds
242 make test # "make test" runs the test suite
243 $ git bisect start v1.3 v1.1 -- # v1.3 is bad, v1.1 is good
244 $ git bisect run ~/test.sh
247 Here we use a "test.sh" custom script. In this script, if "make"
248 fails, we "skip" the current commit.
250 It's safer to use a custom script outside the repo to prevent
251 interactions between the bisect, make and test processes and the
254 And "make test" should "exit 0", if the test suite passes, and
255 "exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
257 * Automatically bisect a broken test case:
262 make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds
263 ~/check_test_case.sh # does the test case passes ?
264 $ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~10 -- # culprit is among the last 10
265 $ git bisect run ~/test.sh
268 Here "check_test_case.sh" should "exit 0", if the test case passes,
269 and "exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
271 It's safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are
272 outside the repo to prevent interactions between the bisect, make and
273 test processes and the scripts.
277 Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
281 Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
285 Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite