1 ramfs, rootfs and initramfs
3 Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
4 =============================
9 Ramfs is a very simple filesystem that exports Linux's disk caching
10 mechanisms (the page cache and dentry cache) as a dynamically resizable
13 Normally all files are cached in memory by Linux. Pages of data read from
14 backing store (usually the block device the filesystem is mounted on) are kept
15 around in case it's needed again, but marked as clean (freeable) in case the
16 Virtual Memory system needs the memory for something else. Similarly, data
17 written to files is marked clean as soon as it has been written to backing
18 store, but kept around for caching purposes until the VM reallocates the
19 memory. A similar mechanism (the dentry cache) greatly speeds up access to
22 With ramfs, there is no backing store. Files written into ramfs allocate
23 dentries and page cache as usual, but there's nowhere to write them to.
24 This means the pages are never marked clean, so they can't be freed by the
25 VM when it's looking to recycle memory.
27 The amount of code required to implement ramfs is tiny, because all the
28 work is done by the existing Linux caching infrastructure. Basically,
29 you're mounting the disk cache as a filesystem. Because of this, ramfs is not
30 an optional component removable via menuconfig, since there would be negligible
36 The older "ram disk" mechanism created a synthetic block device out of
37 an area of RAM and used it as backing store for a filesystem. This block
38 device was of fixed size, so the filesystem mounted on it was of fixed
39 size. Using a ram disk also required unnecessarily copying memory from the
40 fake block device into the page cache (and copying changes back out), as well
41 as creating and destroying dentries. Plus it needed a filesystem driver
42 (such as ext2) to format and interpret this data.
44 Compared to ramfs, this wastes memory (and memory bus bandwidth), creates
45 unnecessary work for the CPU, and pollutes the CPU caches. (There are tricks
46 to avoid this copying by playing with the page tables, but they're unpleasantly
47 complicated and turn out to be about as expensive as the copying anyway.)
48 More to the point, all the work ramfs is doing has to happen _anyway_,
49 since all file access goes through the page and dentry caches. The RAM
50 disk is simply unnecessary; ramfs is internally much simpler.
52 Another reason ramdisks are semi-obsolete is that the introduction of
53 loopback devices offered a more flexible and convenient way to create
54 synthetic block devices, now from files instead of from chunks of memory.
55 See losetup (8) for details.
60 One downside of ramfs is you can keep writing data into it until you fill
61 up all memory, and the VM can't free it because the VM thinks that files
62 should get written to backing store (rather than swap space), but ramfs hasn't
63 got any backing store. Because of this, only root (or a trusted user) should
64 be allowed write access to a ramfs mount.
66 A ramfs derivative called tmpfs was created to add size limits, and the ability
67 to write the data to swap space. Normal users can be allowed write access to
68 tmpfs mounts. See Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt for more information.
73 Rootfs is a special instance of ramfs (or tmpfs, if that's enabled), which is
74 always present in 2.6 systems. You can't unmount rootfs for approximately the
75 same reason you can't kill the init process; rather than having special code
76 to check for and handle an empty list, it's smaller and simpler for the kernel
77 to just make sure certain lists can't become empty.
79 Most systems just mount another filesystem over rootfs and ignore it. The
80 amount of space an empty instance of ramfs takes up is tiny.
82 If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
83 default. To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
89 All 2.6 Linux kernels contain a gzipped "cpio" format archive, which is
90 extracted into rootfs when the kernel boots up. After extracting, the kernel
91 checks to see if rootfs contains a file "init", and if so it executes it as PID
92 1. If found, this init process is responsible for bringing the system the
93 rest of the way up, including locating and mounting the real root device (if
94 any). If rootfs does not contain an init program after the embedded cpio
95 archive is extracted into it, the kernel will fall through to the older code
96 to locate and mount a root partition, then exec some variant of /sbin/init
99 All this differs from the old initrd in several ways:
101 - The old initrd was always a separate file, while the initramfs archive is
102 linked into the linux kernel image. (The directory linux-*/usr is devoted
103 to generating this archive during the build.)
105 - The old initrd file was a gzipped filesystem image (in some file format,
106 such as ext2, that needed a driver built into the kernel), while the new
107 initramfs archive is a gzipped cpio archive (like tar only simpler,
108 see cpio(1) and Documentation/early-userspace/buffer-format.txt). The
109 kernel's cpio extraction code is not only extremely small, it's also
110 __init text and data that can be discarded during the boot process.
112 - The program run by the old initrd (which was called /initrd, not /init) did
113 some setup and then returned to the kernel, while the init program from
114 initramfs is not expected to return to the kernel. (If /init needs to hand
115 off control it can overmount / with a new root device and exec another init
116 program. See the switch_root utility, below.)
118 - When switching another root device, initrd would pivot_root and then
119 umount the ramdisk. But initramfs is rootfs: you can neither pivot_root
120 rootfs, nor unmount it. Instead delete everything out of rootfs to
121 free up the space (find -xdev / -exec rm '{}' ';'), overmount rootfs
122 with the new root (cd /newmount; mount --move . /; chroot .), attach
123 stdin/stdout/stderr to the new /dev/console, and exec the new init.
125 Since this is a remarkably persnickety process (and involves deleting
126 commands before you can run them), the klibc package introduced a helper
127 program (utils/run_init.c) to do all this for you. Most other packages
128 (such as busybox) have named this command "switch_root".
130 Populating initramfs:
131 ---------------------
133 The 2.6 kernel build process always creates a gzipped cpio format initramfs
134 archive and links it into the resulting kernel binary. By default, this
135 archive is empty (consuming 134 bytes on x86).
137 The config option CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE (in General Setup in menuconfig,
138 and living in usr/Kconfig) can be used to specify a source for the
139 initramfs archive, which will automatically be incorporated into the
140 resulting binary. This option can point to an existing gzipped cpio
141 archive, a directory containing files to be archived, or a text file
142 specification such as the following example:
145 nod /dev/console 644 0 0 c 5 1
146 nod /dev/loop0 644 0 0 b 7 0
147 dir /bin 755 1000 1000
148 slink /bin/sh busybox 777 0 0
149 file /bin/busybox initramfs/busybox 755 0 0
153 file /init initramfs/init.sh 755 0 0
155 Run "usr/gen_init_cpio" (after the kernel build) to get a usage message
156 documenting the above file format.
158 One advantage of the configuration file is that root access is not required to
159 set permissions or create device nodes in the new archive. (Note that those
160 two example "file" entries expect to find files named "init.sh" and "busybox" in
161 a directory called "initramfs", under the linux-2.6.* directory. See
162 Documentation/early-userspace/README for more details.)
164 The kernel does not depend on external cpio tools. If you specify a
165 directory instead of a configuration file, the kernel's build infrastructure
166 creates a configuration file from that directory (usr/Makefile calls
167 scripts/gen_initramfs_list.sh), and proceeds to package up that directory
168 using the config file (by feeding it to usr/gen_init_cpio, which is created
169 from usr/gen_init_cpio.c). The kernel's build-time cpio creation code is
170 entirely self-contained, and the kernel's boot-time extractor is also
171 (obviously) self-contained.
173 The one thing you might need external cpio utilities installed for is creating
174 or extracting your own preprepared cpio files to feed to the kernel build
175 (instead of a config file or directory).
177 The following command line can extract a cpio image (either by the above script
178 or by the kernel build) back into its component files:
180 cpio -i -d -H newc -F initramfs_data.cpio --no-absolute-filenames
182 The following shell script can create a prebuilt cpio archive you can
183 use in place of the above config file:
187 # Copyright 2006 Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> and TimeSys Corporation.
188 # Licensed under GPL version 2
192 echo "usage: mkinitramfs directory imagename.cpio.gz"
198 echo "creating $2 from $1"
199 (cd "$1"; find . | cpio -o -H newc | gzip) > "$2"
201 echo "First argument must be a directory"
205 Note: The cpio man page contains some bad advice that will break your initramfs
206 archive if you follow it. It says "A typical way to generate the list
207 of filenames is with the find command; you should give find the -depth option
208 to minimize problems with permissions on directories that are unwritable or not
209 searchable." Don't do this when creating initramfs.cpio.gz images, it won't
210 work. The Linux kernel cpio extractor won't create files in a directory that
211 doesn't exist, so the directory entries must go before the files that go in
212 those directories. The above script gets them in the right order.
214 External initramfs images:
215 --------------------------
217 If the kernel has initrd support enabled, an external cpio.gz archive can also
218 be passed into a 2.6 kernel in place of an initrd. In this case, the kernel
219 will autodetect the type (initramfs, not initrd) and extract the external cpio
220 archive into rootfs before trying to run /init.
222 This has the memory efficiency advantages of initramfs (no ramdisk block
223 device) but the separate packaging of initrd (which is nice if you have
224 non-GPL code you'd like to run from initramfs, without conflating it with
225 the GPL licensed Linux kernel binary).
227 It can also be used to supplement the kernel's built-in initramfs image. The
228 files in the external archive will overwrite any conflicting files in
229 the built-in initramfs archive. Some distributors also prefer to customize
230 a single kernel image with task-specific initramfs images, without recompiling.
232 Contents of initramfs:
233 ----------------------
235 An initramfs archive is a complete self-contained root filesystem for Linux.
236 If you don't already understand what shared libraries, devices, and paths
237 you need to get a minimal root filesystem up and running, here are some
239 http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Bootdisk-HOWTO/
240 http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/From-PowerUp-To-Bash-Prompt-HOWTO.html
241 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/
243 The "klibc" package (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/klibc) is
244 designed to be a tiny C library to statically link early userspace
245 code against, along with some related utilities. It is BSD licensed.
247 I use uClibc (http://www.uclibc.org) and busybox (http://www.busybox.net)
248 myself. These are LGPL and GPL, respectively. (A self-contained initramfs
249 package is planned for the busybox 1.3 release.)
251 In theory you could use glibc, but that's not well suited for small embedded
252 uses like this. (A "hello world" program statically linked against glibc is
253 over 400k. With uClibc it's 7k. Also note that glibc dlopens libnss to do
254 name lookups, even when otherwise statically linked.)
256 A good first step is to get initramfs to run a statically linked "hello world"
257 program as init, and test it under an emulator like qemu (www.qemu.org) or
258 User Mode Linux, like so:
264 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
266 printf("Hello world!\n");
270 gcc -static hello.c -o init
271 echo init | cpio -o -H newc | gzip > test.cpio.gz
272 # Testing external initramfs using the initrd loading mechanism.
273 qemu -kernel /boot/vmlinuz -initrd test.cpio.gz /dev/zero
275 When debugging a normal root filesystem, it's nice to be able to boot with
276 "init=/bin/sh". The initramfs equivalent is "rdinit=/bin/sh", and it's
279 Why cpio rather than tar?
280 -------------------------
282 This decision was made back in December, 2001. The discussion started here:
284 http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1538.html
286 And spawned a second thread (specifically on tar vs cpio), starting here:
288 http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1587.html
290 The quick and dirty summary version (which is no substitute for reading
291 the above threads) is:
293 1) cpio is a standard. It's decades old (from the AT&T days), and already
294 widely used on Linux (inside RPM, Red Hat's device driver disks). Here's
295 a Linux Journal article about it from 1996:
297 http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/1213
299 It's not as popular as tar because the traditional cpio command line tools
300 require _truly_hideous_ command line arguments. But that says nothing
301 either way about the archive format, and there are alternative tools,
304 http://freecode.com/projects/afio
306 2) The cpio archive format chosen by the kernel is simpler and cleaner (and
307 thus easier to create and parse) than any of the (literally dozens of)
308 various tar archive formats. The complete initramfs archive format is
309 explained in buffer-format.txt, created in usr/gen_init_cpio.c, and
310 extracted in init/initramfs.c. All three together come to less than 26k
311 total of human-readable text.
313 3) The GNU project standardizing on tar is approximately as relevant as
314 Windows standardizing on zip. Linux is not part of either, and is free
315 to make its own technical decisions.
317 4) Since this is a kernel internal format, it could easily have been
318 something brand new. The kernel provides its own tools to create and
319 extract this format anyway. Using an existing standard was preferable,
322 5) Al Viro made the decision (quote: "tar is ugly as hell and not going to be
323 supported on the kernel side"):
325 http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1540.html
327 explained his reasoning:
329 http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1550.html
330 http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1638.html
332 and, most importantly, designed and implemented the initramfs code.
337 Today (2.6.16), initramfs is always compiled in, but not always used. The
338 kernel falls back to legacy boot code that is reached only if initramfs does
339 not contain an /init program. The fallback is legacy code, there to ensure a
340 smooth transition and allowing early boot functionality to gradually move to
341 "early userspace" (I.E. initramfs).
343 The move to early userspace is necessary because finding and mounting the real
344 root device is complex. Root partitions can span multiple devices (raid or
345 separate journal). They can be out on the network (requiring dhcp, setting a
346 specific MAC address, logging into a server, etc). They can live on removable
347 media, with dynamically allocated major/minor numbers and persistent naming
348 issues requiring a full udev implementation to sort out. They can be
349 compressed, encrypted, copy-on-write, loopback mounted, strangely partitioned,
352 This kind of complexity (which inevitably includes policy) is rightly handled
353 in userspace. Both klibc and busybox/uClibc are working on simple initramfs
354 packages to drop into a kernel build.
356 The klibc package has now been accepted into Andrew Morton's 2.6.17-mm tree.
357 The kernel's current early boot code (partition detection, etc) will probably
358 be migrated into a default initramfs, automatically created and used by the