1 #include <linux/atomic.h>
2 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
3 #include <linux/percpu.h>
4 #include <linux/wait.h>
5 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
6 #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
7 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
8 #include <linux/sched.h>
9 #include <linux/errno.h>
11 int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
,
12 const char *name
, struct lock_class_key
*rwsem_key
)
14 sem
->read_count
= alloc_percpu(int);
15 if (unlikely(!sem
->read_count
))
18 /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
19 rcu_sync_init(&sem
->rss
, RCU_SCHED_SYNC
);
20 __init_rwsem(&sem
->rw_sem
, name
, rwsem_key
);
21 init_waitqueue_head(&sem
->writer
);
22 sem
->readers_block
= 0;
25 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem
);
27 void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
)
30 * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super()
31 * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc().
36 rcu_sync_dtor(&sem
->rss
);
37 free_percpu(sem
->read_count
);
38 sem
->read_count
= NULL
; /* catch use after free bugs */
40 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem
);
42 int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
, int try)
45 * Due to having preemption disabled the decrement happens on
46 * the same CPU as the increment, avoiding the
47 * increment-on-one-CPU-and-decrement-on-another problem.
49 * If the reader misses the writer's assignment of readers_block, then
50 * the writer is guaranteed to see the reader's increment.
52 * Conversely, any readers that increment their sem->read_count after
53 * the writer looks are guaranteed to see the readers_block value,
54 * which in turn means that they are guaranteed to immediately
55 * decrement their sem->read_count, so that it doesn't matter that the
59 smp_mb(); /* A matches D */
62 * If !readers_block the critical section starts here, matched by the
63 * release in percpu_up_write().
65 if (likely(!smp_load_acquire(&sem
->readers_block
)))
69 * Per the above comment; we still have preemption disabled and
70 * will thus decrement on the same CPU as we incremented.
72 __percpu_up_read(sem
);
78 * We either call schedule() in the wait, or we'll fall through
79 * and reschedule on the preempt_enable() in percpu_down_read().
81 preempt_enable_no_resched();
84 * Avoid lockdep for the down/up_read() we already have them.
86 __down_read(&sem
->rw_sem
);
87 this_cpu_inc(*sem
->read_count
);
88 __up_read(&sem
->rw_sem
);
93 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_down_read
);
95 void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
)
97 smp_mb(); /* B matches C */
99 * In other words, if they see our decrement (presumably to aggregate
100 * zero, as that is the only time it matters) they will also see our
103 __this_cpu_dec(*sem
->read_count
);
105 /* Prod writer to recheck readers_active */
106 wake_up(&sem
->writer
);
108 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_up_read
);
110 #define per_cpu_sum(var) \
112 typeof(var) __sum = 0; \
114 compiletime_assert_atomic_type(__sum); \
115 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) \
116 __sum += per_cpu(var, cpu); \
121 * Return true if the modular sum of the sem->read_count per-CPU variable is
122 * zero. If this sum is zero, then it is stable due to the fact that if any
123 * newly arriving readers increment a given counter, they will immediately
124 * decrement that same counter.
126 static bool readers_active_check(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
)
128 if (per_cpu_sum(*sem
->read_count
) != 0)
132 * If we observed the decrement; ensure we see the entire critical
136 smp_mb(); /* C matches B */
141 void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
)
143 /* Notify readers to take the slow path. */
144 rcu_sync_enter(&sem
->rss
);
146 down_write(&sem
->rw_sem
);
149 * Notify new readers to block; up until now, and thus throughout the
150 * longish rcu_sync_enter() above, new readers could still come in.
152 WRITE_ONCE(sem
->readers_block
, 1);
154 smp_mb(); /* D matches A */
157 * If they don't see our writer of readers_block, then we are
158 * guaranteed to see their sem->read_count increment, and therefore
159 * will wait for them.
162 /* Wait for all now active readers to complete. */
163 wait_event(sem
->writer
, readers_active_check(sem
));
165 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write
);
167 void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore
*sem
)
170 * Signal the writer is done, no fast path yet.
172 * One reason that we cannot just immediately flip to readers_fast is
173 * that new readers might fail to see the results of this writer's
176 * Therefore we force it through the slow path which guarantees an
177 * acquire and thereby guarantees the critical section's consistency.
179 smp_store_release(&sem
->readers_block
, 0);
182 * Release the write lock, this will allow readers back in the game.
184 up_write(&sem
->rw_sem
);
187 * Once this completes (at least one RCU-sched grace period hence) the
188 * reader fast path will be available again. Safe to use outside the
189 * exclusive write lock because its counting.
191 rcu_sync_exit(&sem
->rss
);
193 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_write
);