| commit | 2fb270f3212a1e6a73f86f76c85caee93aae4386 | |
| author | Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> | |
| Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:21:02 +0000 (9 08:21 +0000) | ||
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | |
| Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:26:53 +0000 (10 13:26 +0100) | ||
| tree | 439f6cad53875482e770600b2b2d65f51446feac | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 100b33c8bd8a3235fd0b7948338d6cbb3db3c63d | commitdiff |
x86: Fix section mismatch in LAPIC initialization
Additionally doing things conditionally upon smp_processor_id()
being zero is generally a bad idea, as this means CPU 0 cannot
be offlined and brought back online later again.
While there may be other places where this is done, I think adding
more of those should be avoided so that some day SMP can really
become "symmetrical".
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D525C7E0200007800030EE1@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Additionally doing things conditionally upon smp_processor_id()
being zero is generally a bad idea, as this means CPU 0 cannot
be offlined and brought back online later again.
While there may be other places where this is done, I think adding
more of those should be avoided so that some day SMP can really
become "symmetrical".
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D525C7E0200007800030EE1@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | diffblobblamehistory | |
| arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | diffblobblamehistory | |
| arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | diffblobblamehistory |