1 //===-- InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp -----------------------*- C++ -*-===//
3 // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
5 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
8 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9 // Implements a class that is able to define some instructions as "special"
10 // (e.g. as having implicit control flow, or writing memory, or having another
11 // interesting property) and then efficiently answers queries of the types:
12 // 1. Are there any special instructions in the block of interest?
13 // 2. Return first of the special instructions in the given block;
14 // 3. Check if the given instruction is preceeded by the first special
15 // instruction in the same block.
16 // The class provides caching that allows to answer these queries quickly. The
17 // user must make sure that the cached data is invalidated properly whenever
18 // a content of some tracked block is changed.
19 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
21 #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionPrecedenceTracking.h"
22 #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
27 static cl::opt
<bool> ExpensiveAsserts(
28 "ipt-expensive-asserts",
29 cl::desc("Perform expensive assert validation on every query to Instruction"
30 " Precedence Tracking"),
31 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden
);
34 const Instruction
*InstructionPrecedenceTracking::getFirstSpecialInstruction(
35 const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
37 // If there is a bug connected to invalid cache, turn on ExpensiveAsserts to
38 // catch this situation as early as possible.
45 if (FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
) == FirstSpecialInsts
.end()) {
47 assert(FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
) != FirstSpecialInsts
.end() && "Must be!");
49 return FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
];
52 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::hasSpecialInstructions(
53 const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
54 return getFirstSpecialInstruction(BB
) != nullptr;
57 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::isPreceededBySpecialInstruction(
58 const Instruction
*Insn
) {
59 const Instruction
*MaybeFirstSpecial
=
60 getFirstSpecialInstruction(Insn
->getParent());
61 return MaybeFirstSpecial
&& OI
.dominates(MaybeFirstSpecial
, Insn
);
64 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::fill(const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
65 FirstSpecialInsts
.erase(BB
);
67 if (isSpecialInstruction(&I
)) {
68 FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
] = &I
;
72 // Mark this block as having no special instructions.
73 FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
] = nullptr;
77 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validate(const BasicBlock
*BB
) const {
78 auto It
= FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
);
79 // Bail if we don't have anything cached for this block.
80 if (It
== FirstSpecialInsts
.end())
83 for (const Instruction
&Insn
: *BB
)
84 if (isSpecialInstruction(&Insn
)) {
85 assert(It
->second
== &Insn
&&
86 "Cached first special instruction is wrong!");
90 assert(It
->second
== nullptr &&
91 "Block is marked as having special instructions but in fact it has "
95 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validateAll() const {
96 // Check that for every known block the cached value is correct.
97 for (auto &It
: FirstSpecialInsts
)
102 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::invalidateBlock(const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
103 OI
.invalidateBlock(BB
);
104 FirstSpecialInsts
.erase(BB
);
107 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::clear() {
108 for (auto It
: FirstSpecialInsts
)
109 OI
.invalidateBlock(It
.first
);
110 FirstSpecialInsts
.clear();
112 // The map should be valid after clearing (at least empty).
117 bool ImplicitControlFlowTracking::isSpecialInstruction(
118 const Instruction
*Insn
) const {
119 // If a block's instruction doesn't always pass the control to its successor
120 // instruction, mark the block as having implicit control flow. We use them
121 // to avoid wrong assumptions of sort "if A is executed and B post-dominates
122 // A, then B is also executed". This is not true is there is an implicit
123 // control flow instruction (e.g. a guard) between them.
125 // TODO: Currently, isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns false
126 // for volatile stores and loads because they can trap. The discussion on
127 // whether or not it is correct is still ongoing. We might want to get rid
128 // of this logic in the future. Anyways, trapping instructions shouldn't
129 // introduce implicit control flow, so we explicitly allow them here. This
130 // must be removed once isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is fixed.
131 if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(Insn
))
133 if (isa
<LoadInst
>(Insn
)) {
134 assert(cast
<LoadInst
>(Insn
)->isVolatile() &&
135 "Non-volatile load should transfer execution to successor!");
138 if (isa
<StoreInst
>(Insn
)) {
139 assert(cast
<StoreInst
>(Insn
)->isVolatile() &&
140 "Non-volatile store should transfer execution to successor!");