[llvm-exegesis] Fix missing std::move.
[llvm-complete.git] / lib / Analysis / InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp
blobc667c28228183fcd3c58a828f40f8ce6cea70183
1 //===-- InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp -----------------------*- C++ -*-===//
2 //
3 // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4 //
5 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
7 //
8 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9 // Implements a class that is able to define some instructions as "special"
10 // (e.g. as having implicit control flow, or writing memory, or having another
11 // interesting property) and then efficiently answers queries of the types:
12 // 1. Are there any special instructions in the block of interest?
13 // 2. Return first of the special instructions in the given block;
14 // 3. Check if the given instruction is preceeded by the first special
15 // instruction in the same block.
16 // The class provides caching that allows to answer these queries quickly. The
17 // user must make sure that the cached data is invalidated properly whenever
18 // a content of some tracked block is changed.
19 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
21 #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionPrecedenceTracking.h"
22 #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
24 using namespace llvm;
26 #ifndef NDEBUG
27 static cl::opt<bool> ExpensiveAsserts(
28 "ipt-expensive-asserts",
29 cl::desc("Perform expensive assert validation on every query to Instruction"
30 " Precedence Tracking"),
31 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden);
32 #endif
34 const Instruction *InstructionPrecedenceTracking::getFirstSpecialInstruction(
35 const BasicBlock *BB) {
36 #ifndef NDEBUG
37 // If there is a bug connected to invalid cache, turn on ExpensiveAsserts to
38 // catch this situation as early as possible.
39 if (ExpensiveAsserts)
40 validateAll();
41 else
42 validate(BB);
43 #endif
45 if (FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) == FirstSpecialInsts.end()) {
46 fill(BB);
47 assert(FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) != FirstSpecialInsts.end() && "Must be!");
49 return FirstSpecialInsts[BB];
52 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::hasSpecialInstructions(
53 const BasicBlock *BB) {
54 return getFirstSpecialInstruction(BB) != nullptr;
57 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::isPreceededBySpecialInstruction(
58 const Instruction *Insn) {
59 const Instruction *MaybeFirstSpecial =
60 getFirstSpecialInstruction(Insn->getParent());
61 return MaybeFirstSpecial && OI.dominates(MaybeFirstSpecial, Insn);
64 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::fill(const BasicBlock *BB) {
65 FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB);
66 for (auto &I : *BB)
67 if (isSpecialInstruction(&I)) {
68 FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = &I;
69 return;
72 // Mark this block as having no special instructions.
73 FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = nullptr;
76 #ifndef NDEBUG
77 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validate(const BasicBlock *BB) const {
78 auto It = FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB);
79 // Bail if we don't have anything cached for this block.
80 if (It == FirstSpecialInsts.end())
81 return;
83 for (const Instruction &Insn : *BB)
84 if (isSpecialInstruction(&Insn)) {
85 assert(It->second == &Insn &&
86 "Cached first special instruction is wrong!");
87 return;
90 assert(It->second == nullptr &&
91 "Block is marked as having special instructions but in fact it has "
92 "none!");
95 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validateAll() const {
96 // Check that for every known block the cached value is correct.
97 for (auto &It : FirstSpecialInsts)
98 validate(It.first);
100 #endif
102 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::invalidateBlock(const BasicBlock *BB) {
103 OI.invalidateBlock(BB);
104 FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB);
107 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::clear() {
108 for (auto It : FirstSpecialInsts)
109 OI.invalidateBlock(It.first);
110 FirstSpecialInsts.clear();
111 #ifndef NDEBUG
112 // The map should be valid after clearing (at least empty).
113 validateAll();
114 #endif
117 bool ImplicitControlFlowTracking::isSpecialInstruction(
118 const Instruction *Insn) const {
119 // If a block's instruction doesn't always pass the control to its successor
120 // instruction, mark the block as having implicit control flow. We use them
121 // to avoid wrong assumptions of sort "if A is executed and B post-dominates
122 // A, then B is also executed". This is not true is there is an implicit
123 // control flow instruction (e.g. a guard) between them.
125 // TODO: Currently, isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns false
126 // for volatile stores and loads because they can trap. The discussion on
127 // whether or not it is correct is still ongoing. We might want to get rid
128 // of this logic in the future. Anyways, trapping instructions shouldn't
129 // introduce implicit control flow, so we explicitly allow them here. This
130 // must be removed once isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is fixed.
131 if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(Insn))
132 return false;
133 if (isa<LoadInst>(Insn)) {
134 assert(cast<LoadInst>(Insn)->isVolatile() &&
135 "Non-volatile load should transfer execution to successor!");
136 return false;
138 if (isa<StoreInst>(Insn)) {
139 assert(cast<StoreInst>(Insn)->isVolatile() &&
140 "Non-volatile store should transfer execution to successor!");
141 return false;
143 return true;