[InstCombine] Signed saturation patterns
[llvm-complete.git] / test / MC / AArch64 / SVE / smax-diagnostics.s
blobe61aadcf58c84477662e498e4c390b92872d26f0
1 // RUN: not llvm-mc -triple=aarch64 -show-encoding -mattr=+sve 2>&1 < %s| FileCheck %s
3 smax z0.b, z0.b, #-129
4 // CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: error: index must be an integer in range [-128, 127].
5 // CHECK-NEXT: smax z0.b, z0.b, #-129
6 // CHECK-NOT: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}:
8 smax z31.b, z31.b, #128
9 // CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: error: index must be an integer in range [-128, 127].
10 // CHECK-NEXT: smax z31.b, z31.b, #128
11 // CHECK-NOT: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}:
13 smax z0.b, p8/m, z0.b, z0.b
14 // CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: error: invalid restricted predicate register, expected p0..p7 (without element suffix)
15 // CHECK-NEXT: smax z0.b, p8/m, z0.b, z0.b
16 // CHECK-NOT: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}:
19 // --------------------------------------------------------------------------//
20 // Negative tests for instructions that are incompatible with movprfx
22 movprfx z31.d, p0/z, z6.d
23 smax z31.d, z31.d, #127
24 // CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: error: instruction is unpredictable when following a predicated movprfx, suggest using unpredicated movprfx
25 // CHECK-NEXT: smax z31.d, z31.d, #127
26 // CHECK-NOT: [[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: