1 ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -pass-remarks-output=%t -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-info \
2 ; RUN: -pass-remarks=loop-interchange -pass-remarks-missed=loop-interchange
3 ; RUN: FileCheck -input-file %t %s
5 ;; We test profitability model in these test cases.
7 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
8 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
10 @A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
11 @B = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
13 ;;---------------------------------------Test case 01---------------------------------
14 ;; Loops interchange will result in code vectorization and hence profitable. Check for interchange.
15 ;; for(int i=1;i<100;i++)
16 ;; for(int j=1;j<100;j++)
17 ;; A[j][i] = A[j - 1][i] + B[j][i];
18 ;; FIXME: DA misses this case after D35430
20 ; CHECK: Name: Dependence
21 ; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_01
22 define void @interchange_01() {
24 br label %for2.preheader
27 %i30 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next31, %for1.inc14 ]
31 %j = phi i64 [ %i.next, %for2 ], [ 1, %for2.preheader ]
32 %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j, -1
33 %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i30
34 %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
35 %arrayidx9 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %j, i64 %i30
36 %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx9
37 %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
38 %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j, i64 %i30
39 store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13
40 %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j, 1
41 %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j, 99
42 br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc14, label %for2
45 %i.next31 = add nuw nsw i64 %i30, 1
46 %exitcond33 = icmp eq i64 %i30, 99
47 br i1 %exitcond33, label %for.end16, label %for2.preheader
53 ;; ---------------------------------------Test case 02---------------------------------
54 ;; Check loop interchange profitability model.
55 ;; This tests profitability model when operands of getelementpointer and not exactly the induction variable but some
56 ;; arithmetic operation on them.
57 ;; for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
58 ;; for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
59 ;; A[j-1][i-1] = A[j - 1][i-1] + B[j-1][i-1];
61 ; CHECK: Name: Interchanged
62 ; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_02
63 define void @interchange_02() {
68 %i35 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next36, %for1.inc19 ]
69 %i.prev = add nsw i64 %i35, -1
73 %j = phi i64 [ 1, %for1.header ], [ %i.next, %for2 ]
74 %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j, -1
75 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i.prev
76 %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
77 %arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i.prev
78 %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx12
79 %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
80 store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
81 %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j, 1
82 %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j, 99
83 br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc19, label %for2
86 %i.next36 = add nuw nsw i64 %i35, 1
87 %exitcond39 = icmp eq i64 %i35, 99
88 br i1 %exitcond39, label %for.end21, label %for1.header
94 ;;---------------------------------------Test case 03---------------------------------
95 ;; Loops interchange is not profitable.
96 ;; for(int i=1;i<100;i++)
97 ;; for(int j=1;j<100;j++)
98 ;; A[i-1][j-1] = A[i - 1][j-1] + B[i][j];
100 ; CHECK: Name: InterchangeNotProfitable
101 ; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_03
102 define void @interchange_03(){
104 br label %for1.header
107 %i34 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next35, %for1.inc17 ]
108 %i.prev = add nsw i64 %i34, -1
112 %j = phi i64 [ 1, %for1.header ], [ %i.next, %for2 ]
113 %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j, -1
114 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %i.prev, i64 %j.prev
115 %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
116 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %i34, i64 %j
117 %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx10
118 %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
119 store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
120 %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j, 1
121 %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j, 99
122 br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc17, label %for2
125 %i.next35 = add nuw nsw i64 %i34, 1
126 %exitcond38 = icmp eq i64 %i34, 99
127 br i1 %exitcond38, label %for.end19, label %for1.header
133 ;; Loops should not be interchanged in this case as it is not profitable.
134 ;; for(int i=0;i<100;i++)
135 ;; for(int j=0;j<100;j++)
136 ;; A[i][j] = A[i][j]+k;
138 ; CHECK: Name: InterchangeNotProfitable
139 ; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_04
140 define void @interchange_04(i32 %k) {
142 br label %for.cond1.preheader
145 %indvars.iv21 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next22, %for.inc10 ]
149 %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
150 %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv21, i64 %indvars.iv
151 %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
152 %add = add nsw i32 %0, %k
153 store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx5
154 %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
155 %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 100
156 br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc10, label %for.body3
159 %indvars.iv.next22 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv21, 1
160 %exitcond23 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next22, 100
161 br i1 %exitcond23, label %for.end12, label %for.cond1.preheader