1 //===-- InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp -----------------------*- C++ -*-===//
3 // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
4 // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
5 // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
7 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
8 // Implements a class that is able to define some instructions as "special"
9 // (e.g. as having implicit control flow, or writing memory, or having another
10 // interesting property) and then efficiently answers queries of the types:
11 // 1. Are there any special instructions in the block of interest?
12 // 2. Return first of the special instructions in the given block;
13 // 3. Check if the given instruction is preceeded by the first special
14 // instruction in the same block.
15 // The class provides caching that allows to answer these queries quickly. The
16 // user must make sure that the cached data is invalidated properly whenever
17 // a content of some tracked block is changed.
18 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
20 #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionPrecedenceTracking.h"
21 #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
22 #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
27 static cl::opt
<bool> ExpensiveAsserts(
28 "ipt-expensive-asserts",
29 cl::desc("Perform expensive assert validation on every query to Instruction"
30 " Precedence Tracking"),
31 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden
);
34 const Instruction
*InstructionPrecedenceTracking::getFirstSpecialInstruction(
35 const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
37 // If there is a bug connected to invalid cache, turn on ExpensiveAsserts to
38 // catch this situation as early as possible.
45 if (FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
) == FirstSpecialInsts
.end()) {
47 assert(FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
) != FirstSpecialInsts
.end() && "Must be!");
49 return FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
];
52 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::hasSpecialInstructions(
53 const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
54 return getFirstSpecialInstruction(BB
) != nullptr;
57 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::isPreceededBySpecialInstruction(
58 const Instruction
*Insn
) {
59 const Instruction
*MaybeFirstSpecial
=
60 getFirstSpecialInstruction(Insn
->getParent());
61 return MaybeFirstSpecial
&& OI
.dominates(MaybeFirstSpecial
, Insn
);
64 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::fill(const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
65 FirstSpecialInsts
.erase(BB
);
67 if (isSpecialInstruction(&I
)) {
68 FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
] = &I
;
72 // Mark this block as having no special instructions.
73 FirstSpecialInsts
[BB
] = nullptr;
77 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validate(const BasicBlock
*BB
) const {
78 auto It
= FirstSpecialInsts
.find(BB
);
79 // Bail if we don't have anything cached for this block.
80 if (It
== FirstSpecialInsts
.end())
83 for (const Instruction
&Insn
: *BB
)
84 if (isSpecialInstruction(&Insn
)) {
85 assert(It
->second
== &Insn
&&
86 "Cached first special instruction is wrong!");
90 assert(It
->second
== nullptr &&
91 "Block is marked as having special instructions but in fact it has "
95 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validateAll() const {
96 // Check that for every known block the cached value is correct.
97 for (auto &It
: FirstSpecialInsts
)
102 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::insertInstructionTo(const Instruction
*Inst
,
103 const BasicBlock
*BB
) {
104 if (isSpecialInstruction(Inst
))
105 FirstSpecialInsts
.erase(BB
);
106 OI
.invalidateBlock(BB
);
109 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::removeInstruction(const Instruction
*Inst
) {
110 if (isSpecialInstruction(Inst
))
111 FirstSpecialInsts
.erase(Inst
->getParent());
112 OI
.invalidateBlock(Inst
->getParent());
115 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::clear() {
116 for (auto It
: FirstSpecialInsts
)
117 OI
.invalidateBlock(It
.first
);
118 FirstSpecialInsts
.clear();
120 // The map should be valid after clearing (at least empty).
125 bool ImplicitControlFlowTracking::isSpecialInstruction(
126 const Instruction
*Insn
) const {
127 // If a block's instruction doesn't always pass the control to its successor
128 // instruction, mark the block as having implicit control flow. We use them
129 // to avoid wrong assumptions of sort "if A is executed and B post-dominates
130 // A, then B is also executed". This is not true is there is an implicit
131 // control flow instruction (e.g. a guard) between them.
133 // TODO: Currently, isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns false
134 // for volatile stores and loads because they can trap. The discussion on
135 // whether or not it is correct is still ongoing. We might want to get rid
136 // of this logic in the future. Anyways, trapping instructions shouldn't
137 // introduce implicit control flow, so we explicitly allow them here. This
138 // must be removed once isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is fixed.
139 if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(Insn
))
141 if (isa
<LoadInst
>(Insn
)) {
142 assert(cast
<LoadInst
>(Insn
)->isVolatile() &&
143 "Non-volatile load should transfer execution to successor!");
146 if (isa
<StoreInst
>(Insn
)) {
147 assert(cast
<StoreInst
>(Insn
)->isVolatile() &&
148 "Non-volatile store should transfer execution to successor!");
154 bool MemoryWriteTracking::isSpecialInstruction(
155 const Instruction
*Insn
) const {
156 using namespace PatternMatch
;
157 if (match(Insn
, m_Intrinsic
<Intrinsic::experimental_widenable_condition
>()))
159 return Insn
->mayWriteToMemory();