1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -verify %s
3 // Note: [class.inhctor] was removed by P0136R1. This tests the new behavior
4 // for the wording that used to be there.
6 template<int> struct X
{};
8 // Constructor characteristics are:
9 // - the template parameter list
10 // - the parameter-type-list
11 // - absence or presence of explicit
12 // - absence or presence of constexpr
14 A(X
<0>) {} // expected-note 4{{here}}
16 explicit A(X
<2>) {} // expected-note 6{{here}}
17 explicit constexpr A(X
<3>) {} // expected-note 4{{here}}
22 constexpr A a0c
{ X
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
23 constexpr A a0ic
= { X
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
27 constexpr A a1c
{ X
<1>{} };
28 constexpr A a1ic
= { X
<1>{} };
31 A a2i
= { X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
32 constexpr A a2c
{ X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
33 constexpr A a2ic
= { X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
36 A a3i
= { X
<3>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
37 constexpr A a3c
{ X
<3>{} };
38 constexpr A a3ic
= { X
<3>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
47 constexpr B b0c
{ X
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
48 constexpr B b0ic
= { X
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
52 constexpr B b1c
{ X
<1>{} };
53 constexpr B b1ic
= { X
<1>{} };
56 B b2i
= { X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
57 constexpr B b2c
{ X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
58 constexpr B b2ic
= { X
<2>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
61 B b3i
= { X
<3>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
62 constexpr B b3c
{ X
<3>{} };
63 constexpr B b3ic
= { X
<3>{} }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
66 // 'constexpr' is OK even if the constructor doesn't obey the constraints.
67 struct NonLiteral
{ NonLiteral(); };
68 struct NonConstexpr
{ NonConstexpr(); constexpr NonConstexpr(int); };
69 struct Constexpr
{ constexpr Constexpr(int) {} };
71 struct BothNonLiteral
: NonLiteral
, Constexpr
{ using Constexpr::Constexpr
; }; // expected-note {{base class 'NonLiteral' of non-literal type}}
72 constexpr BothNonLiteral bothNL
{42}; // expected-error {{constexpr variable cannot have non-literal type 'const BothNonLiteral'}}
74 // FIXME: This diagnostic is not very good. We should explain that the problem is that base class NonConstexpr cannot be initialized.
75 struct BothNonConstexpr
78 using Constexpr::Constexpr
; // expected-note {{here}}
80 constexpr BothNonConstexpr bothNC
{42}; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{inherited from base class 'Constexpr'}}
83 struct ConstexprEval
{
84 constexpr ConstexprEval(int a
, const char *p
) : k(p
[a
]) {}
87 struct ConstexprEval2
{
90 struct ConstexprEval3
: ConstexprEval
, ConstexprEval2
{
91 using ConstexprEval::ConstexprEval
;
93 constexpr ConstexprEval3 ce
{4, "foobar"};
94 static_assert(ce
.k
== 'a', "");
95 static_assert(ce
.k2
== 'x', "");
98 struct TemplateCtors
{ // expected-note 2{{candidate constructor (the implicit}}
99 constexpr TemplateCtors() {}
100 template<template<int> class T
> TemplateCtors(X
<0>, T
<0>); // expected-note {{here}} expected-note {{candidate inherited constructor}}
101 template<int N
> TemplateCtors(X
<1>, X
<N
>); // expected-note {{here}} expected-note {{candidate inherited constructor}}
102 template<typename T
> TemplateCtors(X
<2>, T
); // expected-note {{here}} expected-note {{candidate inherited constructor}}
104 template<typename T
= int> TemplateCtors(int, int = 0, int = 0);
107 struct UsingTemplateCtors
: TemplateCtors
{ // expected-note 3{{candidate constructor (the implicit}}
108 using TemplateCtors::TemplateCtors
; // expected-note 5{{inherited here}}
110 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(X
<0>, X
<0>) {} // expected-note {{not viable}}
111 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(X
<1>, X
<1>) {} // expected-note {{not viable}}
112 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(X
<2>, X
<2>) {} // expected-note {{not viable}}
114 template<int = 0> constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(int) {} // expected-note {{not viable}}
115 template<typename T
= void> constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(int, int) {} // expected-note {{not viable}}
116 template<typename T
, typename U
> constexpr UsingTemplateCtors(int, int, int) {} // expected-note {{couldn't infer}}
119 template<int> struct Y
{};
120 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct1
{ X
<0>{}, X
<0>{} };
121 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct2
{ X
<0>{}, Y
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
122 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct3
{ X
<1>{}, X
<0>{} }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
123 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct4
{ X
<1>{}, X
<1>{} };
124 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct5
{ X
<2>{}, 0 }; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} expected-note {{non-constexpr}}
125 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors uct6
{ X
<2>{}, X
<2>{} };
127 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors utc7
{ 0 }; // ok
128 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors utc8
{ 0, 0 }; // ok
129 // FIXME: The standard says that UsingTemplateCtors' (int, int, int) constructor
130 // hides the one from TemplateCtors, even though the template parameter lists
131 // don't match. It's not clear that that's *really* the intent, and it's not
132 // what other compilers do.
133 constexpr UsingTemplateCtors utc9
{ 0, 0, 0 }; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}