1 // Test that misexpect detects mis-annotated switch statements
3 // RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch.proftext -o %t.profdata
4 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
6 #define inner_loop 1000
10 int arry
[arry_size
] = {0};
13 int sum(int *buff
, int size
);
14 int random_sample(int *buff
, int size
);
20 for (j
= 0; j
< outer_loop
; ++j
) {
21 for (k
= 0; k
< inner_loop
; ++k
) {
22 unsigned condition
= rand() % 10000;
23 switch (__builtin_expect(condition
, 0)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% ({{[0-9]+ / [0-9]+}}) of profiled executions.}}
25 val
+= sum(arry
, arry_size
);
32 val
+= random_sample(arry
, arry_size
);