[docs] Add LICENSE.txt to the root of the mono-repo
[llvm-project.git] / clang / test / SemaCXX / linkage2.cpp
blob6fd0081450bf639f5259b553b63d88cb13c9ea99
1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage -std=gnu++11 %s
2 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage -Wno-c++11-extensions -Wno-local-type-template-args %s -std=gnu++98
3 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage -Wno-c++11-extensions -Wno-local-type-template-args -fmodules %s
5 namespace test1 {
6 int x; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
7 static int y;
8 void f() {} // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
10 extern "C" {
11 extern int x; // expected-error {{declaration of 'x' has a different language linkage}}
12 extern int y; // OK, has internal linkage, so no language linkage.
13 void f(); // expected-error {{declaration of 'f' has a different language linkage}}
17 // This is OK. Both test2_f don't have language linkage since they have
18 // internal linkage.
19 extern "C" {
20 static void test2_f() {
22 static void test2_f(int x) {
26 namespace test3 {
27 extern "C" {
28 namespace {
29 extern int x2;
30 void f2();
33 namespace {
34 int x2;
35 void f2() {}
39 namespace test4 {
40 void dummy() {
41 void Bar();
42 class A {
43 friend void Bar();
48 namespace test5 {
49 static void g();
50 void f()
52 void g();
56 // pr14898
57 namespace test6 {
58 template <class _Rp>
59 class __attribute__ ((__visibility__("default"))) shared_future;
60 template <class _Rp>
61 class future {
62 template <class> friend class shared_future;
63 shared_future<_Rp> share();
65 template <class _Rp> future<_Rp>
66 get_future();
67 template <class _Rp>
68 struct shared_future<_Rp&> {
69 shared_future(future<_Rp&>&& __f);
71 void f() {
72 typedef int T;
73 get_future<int>();
74 typedef int& U;
75 shared_future<int&> f1 = get_future<int&>();
79 // This is OK. The variables have internal linkage and therefore no language
80 // linkage.
81 extern "C" {
82 static int test7_x;
84 extern "C++" {
85 extern int test7_x;
87 extern "C++" {
88 static int test7_y;
90 extern "C" {
91 extern int test7_y;
93 extern "C" { typedef int test7_F(); static test7_F test7_f; }
94 extern "C++" { extern test7_F test7_f; }
96 // FIXME: This should be invalid. The function has no language linkage, but
97 // the function type has, so this is redeclaring the function with a different
98 // type.
99 extern "C++" {
100 static void test8_f();
102 extern "C" {
103 extern void test8_f();
105 extern "C" {
106 static void test8_g();
108 extern "C++" {
109 extern void test8_g();
112 extern "C" {
113 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test9_f(int c); // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
115 extern "C++" {
116 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test9_f(int c); // expected-error {{declaration of 'test9_f' has a different language linkage}}
119 extern "C" {
120 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test10_f(int);
121 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test10_f(double);
124 extern "C" {
125 void test11_f() {
126 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test11_g(int);
127 void __attribute__((overloadable)) test11_g(double);
131 namespace test12 {
132 const int n = 0;
133 extern const int n;
134 void f() {
135 extern const int n;
139 namespace test13 {
140 static void a(void);
141 extern void a();
142 static void a(void) {}
145 namespace test14 {
146 // Anonymous namespace implies internal linkage, so 'static' has no effect.
147 namespace {
148 void a(void);
149 static void a(void) {}
153 namespace test15 {
154 const int a = 5; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
155 static const int a; // expected-error {{redefinition of 'a'}}
158 namespace test16 {
159 extern "C" {
160 class Foo {
161 int x;
162 friend int bar(Foo *y);
164 int bar(Foo *y) {
165 return y->x;
170 namespace test17 {
171 namespace {
172 struct I {
175 template <typename T1, typename T2> void foo() {}
176 template <typename T, T x> void bar() {} // expected-note {{candidate function}}
177 inline void *g() {
178 struct L {
180 // foo<L, I>'s linkage should be the merge of UniqueExternalLinkage (or
181 // InternalLinkage in c++11) and VisibleNoLinkage. The correct answer is
182 // NoLinkage in both cases. This means that using foo<L, I> as a template
183 // argument should fail.
184 return reinterpret_cast<void*>(bar<typeof(foo<L, I>), foo<L, I> >); // expected-error {{reinterpret_cast cannot resolve overloaded function 'bar' to type 'void *}}
186 void h() {
187 g();
191 namespace test18 {
192 template <typename T> struct foo {
193 template <T *P> static void f() {}
194 static void *g() { return (void *)f<&x>; }
195 static T x;
197 template <typename T> T foo<T>::x;
198 inline void *f() {
199 struct S {
201 return foo<S>::g();
203 void *h() { return f(); }
206 extern "C" void pr16247_foo(int);
207 static void pr16247_foo(double);
208 void pr16247_foo(int) {}
209 void pr16247_foo(double) {}
211 namespace PR16247 {
212 extern "C" void pr16247_bar(int);
213 static void pr16247_bar(double);
214 void pr16247_bar(int) {}
215 void pr16247_bar(double) {}
217 namespace PR18964 {
218 unsigned &*foo; //expected-error{{'foo' declared as a pointer to a reference of type}}
219 extern struct {} *foo; // don't assert
222 namespace typedef_name_for_linkage {
223 template<typename T> struct Use {};
225 struct A { A(); A(const A&); ~A(); };
227 typedef struct {
228 A a;
229 } B;
231 struct C {
232 typedef struct {
233 A a;
234 } D;
237 typedef struct {
238 void f() { static int n; struct Inner {};}
239 } E;
241 // FIXME: Ideally this would be accepted in all modes. In C++98, we trigger a
242 // linkage calculation to drive the "internal linkage type as template
243 // argument" warning.
244 typedef struct {
245 void f() { struct Inner {}; Use<Inner> ui; }
246 } F;
247 #if __cplusplus < 201103L
248 // expected-error@-4 {{given name for linkage purposes by typedef declaration after its linkage was computed}}
249 // expected-note@-4 {{due to this member}}
250 // expected-note@-4 {{by this typedef}}
251 #endif