[clang-tidy][modernize-use-starts-ends-with] Fix operator rewriting false negative...
[llvm-project.git] / clang / test / Sema / ext-int.c
blobebc5bc61260b4593eea8247a3af71f609d05e95e
1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -Wimplicit-int-conversion -Wno-unused -triple x86_64-gnu-linux
3 typedef _BitInt(31) EI31;
5 void Ternary(_BitInt(30) s30, EI31 s31a, _BitInt(31) s31b,
6 _BitInt(32) s32, int b) {
7 b ? s30 : s31a;
8 b ? s31a : s30;
9 b ? s32 : 0;
10 (void)(b ? s31a : s31b);
11 (void)(s30 ? s31a : s31b);
14 struct CursedBitField {
15 _BitInt(4) A : 8; // expected-error {{width of bit-field 'A' (8 bits) exceeds the width of its type (4 bits)}}
18 #define EXPR_HAS_TYPE(EXPR, TYPE) _Generic((EXPR), default : 0, TYPE : 1)
20 void Ops(void) {
21 _BitInt(4) x4_s = 1;
22 _BitInt(32) x32_s = 1;
23 _BitInt(43) x43_s = 1;
24 unsigned _BitInt(4) x4_u = 1;
25 unsigned _BitInt(43) x43_u = 1;
26 unsigned _BitInt(32) x32_u = 1;
27 int x_int = 1;
28 unsigned x_uint = 1;
30 // Same size/sign ops don't change type.
31 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x43_s + x43_s, _BitInt(43)), "");
32 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_s - x4_s, _BitInt(4)), "");
33 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x43_u * x43_u, unsigned _BitInt(43)), "");
34 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_u / x4_u, unsigned _BitInt(4)), "");
36 // Unary ops shouldn't go through integer promotions.
37 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_s++, _BitInt(4)), "");
38 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(++x4_s, _BitInt(4)), "");
39 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_u++, unsigned _BitInt(4)), "");
40 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(++x4_u, unsigned _BitInt(4)), "");
41 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(+x4_s, _BitInt(4)), "");
42 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(-x4_s, _BitInt(4)), "");
43 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(~x4_u, unsigned _BitInt(4)), "");
45 // This one really does convert to a different result type though.
46 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(!x4_u, int), "");
48 // Test binary ops pick the correct common type.
49 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x43_s + x_int, _BitInt(43)), "");
50 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x43_u + x_int, unsigned _BitInt(43)), "");
51 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x32_s + x_int, int), "");
52 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x32_u + x_int, unsigned int), "");
53 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x32_s + x_uint, unsigned int), "");
54 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x32_u + x_uint, unsigned int), "");
55 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_s + x_int, int), "");
56 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_u + x_int, int), "");
57 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_s + x_uint, unsigned int), "");
58 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(x4_u + x_uint, unsigned int), "");
61 void FromPaper1(void) {
62 // Test the examples of conversion and promotion rules from C2x 6.3.1.8.
63 _BitInt(2) a2 = 1;
64 _BitInt(3) a3 = 2;
65 _BitInt(33) a33 = 1;
66 char c = 3;
68 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(a2 * a3, _BitInt(3)), "");
69 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(a2 * c, int), "");
70 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(a33 * c, _BitInt(33)), "");
73 void FromPaper2(_BitInt(8) a1, _BitInt(24) a2) {
74 _Static_assert(EXPR_HAS_TYPE(a1 * (_BitInt(32))a2, _BitInt(32)), "");