lldb/test/API/commands/expression/deleting-implicit-copy-constructor/main.cpp

   1 struct NoCopyCstr {
   2   NoCopyCstr() {}
   3   // No copy constructor but a move constructor means we have an
   4   // implicitly deleted copy constructor (C++11 [class.copy]p7, p18).
   5   NoCopyCstr(NoCopyCstr &&);
   6 };
   7 struct IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr {
   8   // This field indirectly deletes the implicit copy constructor.
   9   NoCopyCstr field;
  10   // Completing in the constructor or constructing the class
  11   // will cause Sema to declare the special members of IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr.
  12   // If we correctly set the deleted implicit copy constructor in NoCopyCstr then this
  13   // should have propagated to this record and Clang won't crash.
  14   IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr() { //%self.expect_expr("IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr x; 1+1", result_type="int", result_value="2")
  15                                 //%self.dbg.GetCommandInterpreter().HandleCompletion("e ", len("e "), 0, -1, lldb.SBStringList())
  16   }
  17 };
  18 int main() {
  19   IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr{};
  20 }