1 =================================
2 How To Release LLVM To The Public
3 =================================
8 This document contains information about successfully releasing LLVM ---
9 including sub-projects: e.g., ``clang`` and ``compiler-rt`` --- to the public.
10 It is the Release Manager's responsibility to ensure that a high quality build
13 If you're looking for the document on how to test the release candidates and
14 create the binary packages, please refer to the :doc:`ReleaseProcess` instead.
21 LLVM is released on a time based schedule --- with major releases roughly
22 every 6 months. In between major releases there may be dot releases.
23 The release manager will determine if and when to make a dot release based
24 on feedback from the community. Typically, dot releases should be made if
25 there are large number of bug-fixes in the stable branch or a critical bug
26 has been discovered that affects a large number of users.
28 Unless otherwise stated, dot releases will follow the same procedure as
31 Annual Release Schedule
32 -----------------------
34 Here is the annual release schedule for LLVM. This is meant to be a
35 guide, and release managers are not required to follow this exactly.
36 Releases should be tagged on Tuesdays.
38 =============================== =========================
40 =============================== =========================
41 *release branch: even releases* *4th Tue in January*
42 *release branch: odd releases* *4th Tue in July*
43 X.1.0-rc1 3 days after branch.
44 X.1.0-rc2 2 weeks after branch.
45 X.1.0-rc3 4 weeks after branch
46 **X.1.0-final** **6 weeks after branch**
47 **X.1.1** **8 weeks after branch**
48 **X.1.2** **10 weeks after branch**
49 **X.1.3** **12 weeks after branch**
50 **X.1.4** **14 weeks after branch**
51 **X.1.5** **16 weeks after branch**
52 **X.1.6 (if necessary)** **18 weeks after branch**
53 =============================== =========================
55 Release Process Summary
56 -----------------------
58 * Announce release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website. Do
59 this at least 3 weeks before the -rc1 release.
61 * Create release branch and begin release process.
63 * Send out release candidate sources for first round of testing. Testing lasts
64 6 weeks. During the first round of testing, any regressions found should be
65 fixed. Patches are merged from mainline into the release branch. Also, all
66 features need to be completed during this time. Any features not completed at
67 the end of the first round of testing will be removed or disabled for the
70 * Generate and send out the second release candidate sources. Only *critical*
71 bugs found during this testing phase will be fixed. Any bugs introduced by
72 merged patches will be fixed. If so a third round of testing is needed.
74 * The release notes are updated.
78 * Announce bug fix release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website.
80 * Do bug-fix releases every two weeks until X.1.5 or X.1.6 (if necessary).
88 Release Administrative Tasks
89 ----------------------------
91 This section describes a few administrative tasks that need to be done for the
92 release process to begin. Specifically, it involves:
94 * Updating version numbers,
96 * Creating the release branch, and
98 * Tagging release candidates for the release team to begin testing.
100 Create Release Branch
101 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
103 Branch the Git trunk using the following procedure:
105 #. Remind developers that the release branching is imminent and to refrain from
106 committing patches that might break the build. E.g., new features, large
107 patches for works in progress, an overhaul of the type system, an exciting
108 new TableGen feature, etc.
110 #. Verify that the current git trunk is in decent shape by
111 examining nightly tester and buildbot results.
113 #. Bump the version in trunk to N.0.0git and tag the commit with llvmorg-N-init.
114 If ``X`` is the version to be released, then ``N`` is ``X + 1``.
118 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-N-init
120 #. Clear the release notes in trunk.
122 #. Create the release branch from the last known good revision from before the
123 version bump. The branch's name is release/X.x where ``X`` is the major version
124 number and ``x`` is just the letter ``x``.
126 #. On the newly-created release branch, immediately bump the version
127 to X.1.0git (where ``X`` is the major version of the branch.)
129 #. All tags and branches need to be created in both the llvm/llvm-project and
130 llvm/llvm-test-suite repos.
135 After creating the LLVM release branch, update the release branches'
136 version with the script in ``llvm/utils/release/bump-version.py``.
138 Tagging the LLVM Release Candidates
139 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
141 Tag release candidates:
145 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-X.Y.Z-rcN
147 The pre-packaged source tarballs will be automatically generated via the
148 "Release Sources" workflow on GitHub. This workflow will create an artifact
149 containing all the release tarballs and the artifact attestation. The
150 Release Manager should download the artifact, verify the tarballs, sign them,
151 and then upload them to the release page.
157 $ for f in *.xz; do gh attestation verify --owner llvm $f && gpg -b $f; done
159 Tarballs, release binaries, or any other release artifacts must be uploaded to
160 GitHub. This can be done using the github-upload-release.py script in utils/release.
164 $ github-upload-release.py upload --token <github-token> --release X.Y.Z-rcN --files <release_files>
167 Build The Binary Distribution
168 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
170 Creating the binary distribution requires following the instructions
171 :doc:`here <ReleaseProcess>`.
173 That process will perform both Release+Asserts and Release builds but only
174 pack the Release build for upload. You should use the Release+Asserts sysroot,
175 normally under ``final/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.8.1-RCn.install/``,
176 for test-suite and run-time benchmarks, to make sure nothing serious has
177 passed through the net. For compile-time benchmarks, use the Release version.
179 The minimum required version of the tools you'll need are :doc:`here <GettingStarted>`
181 Release Qualification Criteria
182 ------------------------------
184 There are no official release qualification criteria. It is up to the
185 the release manager to determine when a release is ready. The release manager
186 should pay attention to the results of community testing, the number of outstanding
187 bugs, and then number of regressions when determining whether or not to make a
190 The community values time based releases, so releases should not be delayed for
191 too long unless there are critical issues remaining. In most cases, the only
192 kind of bugs that are critical enough to block a release would be a major regression
193 from a previous release.
198 A few developers in the community have dedicated time to validate the release
199 candidates and volunteered to be the official release testers for each
202 These will be the ones testing, generating and uploading the official binaries
203 to the server, and will be the minimum tests *necessary* for the release to
206 This will obviously not cover all OSs and distributions, so additional community
207 validation is important. However, if community input is not reached before the
208 release is out, all bugs reported will have to go on the next stable release.
210 The official release managers are:
212 * Even releases: Tom Stellard (tstellar@redhat.com)
213 * Odd releases: Tobias Hieta (tobias@hieta.se)
215 The official release testers are volunteered from the community and have
216 consistently validated and released binaries for their targets/OSs. To contact
217 them, you should post on the `Discourse forums (Project
218 Infrastructure - Release Testers). <https://discourse.llvm.org/c/infrastructure/release-testers/66>`_
220 The official testers list is in the file ``RELEASE_TESTERS.TXT``, in the ``LLVM``
226 Once all testing has been completed and appropriate bugs filed, the release
227 candidate tarballs are put on the website and the LLVM community is notified.
229 We ask that all LLVM developers test the release in any the following ways:
231 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
232 binary. Build LLVM. Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
233 TEST=nightly report``).
235 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the ``clang`` sources. Compile
236 everything. Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
237 TEST=nightly report``).
239 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
240 binary. Build whole programs with it (ex. Chromium, Firefox, Apache) for
243 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
244 binary. Build *your* programs with it and check for conformance and
245 performance regressions.
247 #. Run the :doc:`release process <ReleaseProcess>`, if your platform is
248 *different* than that which is officially supported, and report back errors
249 only if they were not reported by the official release tester for that
252 We also ask that the OS distribution release managers test their packages with
253 the first candidate of every release, and report any *new* errors in GitHub.
254 If the bug can be reproduced with an unpatched upstream version of the release
255 candidate (as opposed to the distribution's own build), the priority should be
258 During the first round of testing, all regressions must be fixed before the
259 second release candidate is tagged.
261 In the subsequent stages, the testing is only to ensure that bug
262 fixes previously merged in have not created new major problems. *This is not
263 the time to solve additional and unrelated bugs!* If no patches are merged in,
264 the release is determined to be ready and the release manager may move onto the
267 Reporting Regressions
268 ---------------------
270 Every regression that is found during the tests (as per the criteria above),
271 should be filled in a bug in GitHub and added to the release milestone.
273 If a bug can't be reproduced, or stops being a blocker, it should be removed
274 from the Milestone. Debugging can continue, but on trunk.
279 Instructions for requesting a backport to a stable branch can be found :doc:`here <GitHub>`.
281 Triaging Bug Reports for Releases
282 ---------------------------------
284 This section describes how to triage bug reports:
286 #. Search for bugs with a Release Milestone that have not been added to the
287 "Release Status" github project:
289 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22LLVM+14.0.5+Release%22+no%3Aproject+
291 Replace 14.0.5 in this query with the version from the Release Milestone being
294 Add these bugs to the "Release Status" project.
296 #. Navigate to the `Release Status project <https://github.com/orgs/llvm/projects/3>`_
297 to see the list of bugs that are being considered for the release.
299 #. Review each bug and first check if it has been fixed in main. If it has, update
300 its status to "Needs Pull Request", and create a pull request for the fix
301 using the /cherry-pick or /branch comments if this has not been done already.
303 #. If a bug has been fixed and has a pull request created for backporting it,
304 then update its status to "Needs Review" and notify a knowledgeable reviewer.
305 Usually you will want to notify the person who approved the patch in Phabricator,
306 but you may use your best judgement on who a good reviewer would be. Once
307 you have identified the reviewer(s), assign the issue to them and mention
308 them (i.e @username) in a comment and ask them if the patch is safe to backport.
309 You should also review the bug yourself to ensure that it meets the requirements
310 for committing to the release branch.
312 #. Once a bug has been reviewed, add the release:reviewed label and update the
313 issue's status to "Needs Merge". Check the pull request associated with the
314 issue. If all the tests pass, then the pull request can be merged. If not,
315 then add a comment on the issue asking someone to take a look at the failures.
317 #. Once the pull request has been merged push it to the official release branch
318 with the script ``llvm/utils/git/sync-release-repo.sh``.
320 Then add a comment to the issue stating that the fix has been merged along with
321 the git hashes from the release branch. Add the release:merged label to the issue
328 Below are the rules regarding patching the release branch:
330 #. Patches applied to the release branch may only be applied by the release
331 manager, the official release testers or the maintainers with approval from
334 #. Release managers are encouraged, but not required, to get approval from a
335 maintainer before approving patches. If there are no reachable maintainers
336 then release managers can ask approval from patch reviewers or other
337 developers active in that area.
339 #. *Before RC1* Patches should be limited to bug fixes, important optimization
340 improvements, or completion of features that were started before the branch
341 was created. As with all phases, release managers and maintainers can reject
342 patches that are deemed too invasive.
344 #. *Before RC2* Patches should be limited to bug fixes or backend specific
345 improvements that are determined to be very safe.
347 #. *Before RC3/Final Major Release* Patches should be limited to critical
350 #. *Bug fix releases* Patches should be limited to bug fixes or very safe
351 and critical performance improvements. Patches must maintain both API and
352 ABI compatibility with the previous major release.
358 The final stages of the release process involves tagging the "final" release
359 branch, updating documentation that refers to the release, and updating the
365 Review the documentation in the release branch and ensure that it is up
366 to date. The "Release Notes" must be updated to reflect new features, bug
367 fixes, new known issues, and changes in the list of supported platforms.
368 The "Getting Started Guide" should be updated to reflect the new release
369 version number tag available from Subversion and changes in basic system
374 Tag the LLVM Final Release
375 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
377 Tag the final release sources:
381 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-X.Y.Z
382 $ git push https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-X.Y.Z
384 Update the LLVM Website
385 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
387 The website must be updated before the release announcement is sent out. Here
390 #. Check out the ``www-releases`` module from GitHub.
392 #. Create a new sub-directory ``X.Y.Z`` in the releases directory.
394 #. Copy and commit the ``llvm/docs`` and ``LICENSE.txt`` files into this new
397 #. Update the ``releases/download.html`` file with links to the release
400 #. Update the ``releases/index.html`` with the new release and link to release
403 #. After you push the changes to the www-releases repo, someone with admin
404 access must login to prereleases-origin.llvm.org and manually pull the new
405 changes into /data/www-releases/. This is where the website is served from.
407 #. Finally checkout the llvm-www repo and update the main page
408 (``index.html`` and sidebar) to point to the new release and release
414 Create a new post in the `Announce Category <https://discourse.llvm.org/c/announce>`_
415 once all the release tasks are complete. For X.1.0 releases, make sure to include a
416 link to the release notes in the post. For X.1.1+ releases, generate a changelog
417 using this command and add it to the post.
421 $ git log --format="- %aN: [%s (%h)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/%H)" llvmorg-X.1.N-1..llvmorg-X.1.N
423 Once the release has been announced add a link to the announcement on the llvm
424 homepage (from the llvm-www repo) in the "Release Emails" section.