Split out the Dwarf writer stuff into separate files. This is a much more
[llvm/msp430.git] / docs / CodingStandards.html
blobb1199778b0f23ebe82da772ed94b02ee45d74cb1
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3 <html>
4 <head>
5 <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
6 <title>LLVM Coding Standards</title>
7 </head>
8 <body>
10 <div class="doc_title">
11 LLVM Coding Standards
12 </div>
14 <ol>
15 <li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
16 <li><a href="#mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
17 <ol>
18 <li><a href="#sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
19 <ol>
20 <li><a href="#scf_commenting">Commenting</a></li>
21 <li><a href="#scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a></li>
22 <li><a href="#scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a></li>
23 <li><a href="#scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a></li>
24 <li><a href="#scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a></li>
25 <li><a href="#scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a></li>
26 </ol></li>
27 <li><a href="#compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
28 <ol>
29 <li><a href="#ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like
30 Errors</a></li>
31 <li><a href="#ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a></li>
32 <li><a href="#ci_class_struct">Use of class/struct Keywords</a></li>
33 </ol></li>
34 </ol></li>
35 <li><a href="#styleissues">Style Issues</a>
36 <ol>
37 <li><a href="#macro">The High Level Issues</a>
38 <ol>
39 <li><a href="#hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a
40 Module</a></li>
41 <li><a href="#hl_dontinclude">#include as Little as Possible</a></li>
42 <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers
43 Private</a></li>
44 <li><a href="#ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is
45 <em>forbidden</em></a></li>
46 </ol></li>
47 <li><a href="#micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
48 <ol>
49 <li><a href="#ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a></li>
50 <li><a href="#ll_ns_std">Do not use 'using namespace std'</a></li>
51 <li><a href="#ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for
52 classes in headers</a></li>
53 <li><a href="#ll_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a></li>
54 <li><a href="#ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a></li>
55 </ol></li>
56 </ol></li>
57 <li><a href="#seealso">See Also</a></li>
58 </ol>
60 <div class="doc_author">
61 <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a> and
62 <a href="mailto:void@nondot.org">Bill Wendling</a></p>
63 </div>
66 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
67 <div class="doc_section">
68 <a name="introduction">Introduction</a>
69 </div>
70 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
72 <div class="doc_text">
74 <p>This document attempts to describe a few coding standards that are being used
75 in the LLVM source tree. Although no coding standards should be regarded as
76 absolute requirements to be followed in all instances, coding standards can be
77 useful.</p>
79 <p>This document intentionally does not prescribe fixed standards for religious
80 issues such as brace placement and space usage. For issues like this, follow
81 the golden rule:</p>
83 <blockquote>
85 <p><b><a name="goldenrule">If you are adding a significant body of source to a
86 project, feel free to use whatever style you are most comfortable with. If you
87 are extending, enhancing, or bug fixing already implemented code, use the style
88 that is already being used so that the source is uniform and easy to
89 follow.</a></b></p>
91 </blockquote>
93 <p>The ultimate goal of these guidelines is the increase readability and
94 maintainability of our common source base. If you have suggestions for topics to
95 be included, please mail them to <a
96 href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris</a>.</p>
98 </div>
100 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
101 <div class="doc_section">
102 <a name="mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
103 </div>
104 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
106 <!-- ======================================================================= -->
107 <div class="doc_subsection">
108 <a name="sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
109 </div>
111 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
112 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
113 <a name="scf_commenting">Commenting</a>
114 </div>
116 <div class="doc_text">
118 <p>Comments are one critical part of readability and maintainability. Everyone
119 knows they should comment, so should you. Although we all should probably
120 comment our code more than we do, there are a few very critical places that
121 documentation is very useful:</p>
123 <b>File Headers</b>
125 <p>Every source file should have a header on it that describes the basic
126 purpose of the file. If a file does not have a header, it should not be
127 checked into Subversion. Most source trees will probably have a standard
128 file header format. The standard format for the LLVM source tree looks like
129 this:</p>
131 <div class="doc_code">
132 <pre>
133 //===-- llvm/Instruction.h - Instruction class definition -------*- C++ -*-===//
135 // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
137 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
138 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
140 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
142 // This file contains the declaration of the Instruction class, which is the
143 // base class for all of the VM instructions.
145 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
146 </pre>
147 </div>
149 <p>A few things to note about this particular format: The "<tt>-*- C++
150 -*-</tt>" string on the first line is there to tell Emacs that the source file
151 is a C++ file, not a C file (Emacs assumes .h files are C files by default).
152 Note that this tag is not necessary in .cpp files. The name of the file is also
153 on the first line, along with a very short description of the purpose of the
154 file. This is important when printing out code and flipping though lots of
155 pages.</p>
157 <p>The next section in the file is a concise note that defines the license
158 that the file is released under. This makes it perfectly clear what terms the
159 source code can be distributed under and should not be modified in any way.</p>
161 <p>The main body of the description does not have to be very long in most cases.
162 Here it's only two lines. If an algorithm is being implemented or something
163 tricky is going on, a reference to the paper where it is published should be
164 included, as well as any notes or "gotchas" in the code to watch out for.</p>
166 <b>Class overviews</b>
168 <p>Classes are one fundamental part of a good object oriented design. As such,
169 a class definition should have a comment block that explains what the class is
170 used for... if it's not obvious. If it's so completely obvious your grandma
171 could figure it out, it's probably safe to leave it out. Naming classes
172 something sane goes a long ways towards avoiding writing documentation.</p>
175 <b>Method information</b>
177 <p>Methods defined in a class (as well as any global functions) should also be
178 documented properly. A quick note about what it does any a description of the
179 borderline behaviour is all that is necessary here (unless something
180 particularly tricky or insideous is going on). The hope is that people can
181 figure out how to use your interfaces without reading the code itself... that is
182 the goal metric.</p>
184 <p>Good things to talk about here are what happens when something unexpected
185 happens: does the method return null? Abort? Format your hard disk?</p>
187 </div>
189 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
190 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
191 <a name="scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a>
192 </div>
194 <div class="doc_text">
196 <p>In general, prefer C++ style (<tt>//</tt>) comments. They take less space,
197 require less typing, don't have nesting problems, etc. There are a few cases
198 when it is useful to use C style (<tt>/* */</tt>) comments however:</p>
200 <ol>
201 <li>When writing a C code: Obviously if you are writing C code, use C style
202 comments.</li>
203 <li>When writing a header file that may be <tt>#include</tt>d by a C source
204 file.</li>
205 <li>When writing a source file that is used by a tool that only accepts C
206 style comments.</li>
207 </ol>
209 <p>To comment out a large block of code, use <tt>#if 0</tt> and <tt>#endif</tt>.
210 These nest properly and are better behaved in general than C style comments.</p>
212 </div>
214 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
215 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
216 <a name="scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a>
217 </div>
219 <div class="doc_text">
221 <p>Immediately after the <a href="#scf_commenting">header file comment</a> (and
222 include guards if working on a header file), the <a
223 href="#hl_dontinclude">minimal</a> list of <tt>#include</tt>s required by the
224 file should be listed. We prefer these <tt>#include</tt>s to be listed in this
225 order:</p>
227 <ol>
228 <li><a href="#mmheader">Main Module header</a></li>
229 <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Local/Private Headers</a></li>
230 <li><tt>llvm/*</tt></li>
231 <li><tt>llvm/Analysis/*</tt></li>
232 <li><tt>llvm/Assembly/*</tt></li>
233 <li><tt>llvm/Bytecode/*</tt></li>
234 <li><tt>llvm/CodeGen/*</tt></li>
235 <li>...</li>
236 <li><tt>Support/*</tt></li>
237 <li><tt>Config/*</tt></li>
238 <li>System <tt>#includes</tt></li>
239 </ol>
241 <p>... and each category should be sorted by name.</p>
243 <p><a name="mmheader">The "Main Module Header"</a> file applies to .cpp file
244 which implement an interface defined by a .h file. This <tt>#include</tt>
245 should always be included <b>first</b> regardless of where it lives on the file
246 system. By including a header file first in the .cpp files that implement the
247 interfaces, we ensure that the header does not have any hidden dependencies
248 which are not explicitly #included in the header, but should be. It is also a
249 form of documentation in the .cpp file to indicate where the interfaces it
250 implements are defined.</p>
252 </div>
254 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
255 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
256 <a name="scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a>
257 </div>
259 <div class="doc_text">
261 <p>Write your code to fit within 80 columns of text. This helps those of us who
262 like to print out code and look at your code in an xterm without resizing
263 it.</p>
265 <p>The longer answer is that there must be some limit to the width of the code
266 in order to reasonably allow developers to have multiple files side-by-side in
267 windows on a modest display. If you are going to pick a width limit, it is
268 somewhat arbitrary but you might as well pick something standard. Going with
269 90 columns (for example) instead of 80 columns wouldn't add any significant
270 value and would be detrimental to printing out code. Also many other projects
271 have standardized on 80 columns, so some people have already configured their
272 editors for it (vs something else, like 90 columns).</p>
274 <p>This is one of many contentious issues in coding standards, but is not up
275 for debate.</p>
277 </div>
279 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
280 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
281 <a name="scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a>
282 </div>
284 <div class="doc_text">
286 <p>In all cases, prefer spaces to tabs in source files. People have different
287 prefered indentation levels, and different styles of indentation that they
288 like... this is fine. What isn't is that different editors/viewers expand tabs
289 out to different tab stops. This can cause your code to look completely
290 unreadable, and it is not worth dealing with.</p>
292 <p>As always, follow the <a href="#goldenrule">Golden Rule</a> above: follow the
293 style of existing code if your are modifying and extending it. If you like four
294 spaces of indentation, <b>DO NOT</b> do that in the middle of a chunk of code
295 with two spaces of indentation. Also, do not reindent a whole source file: it
296 makes for incredible diffs that are absolutely worthless.</p>
298 </div>
300 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
301 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
302 <a name="scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a>
303 </div>
305 <div class="doc_text">
307 <p>Okay, your first year of programming you were told that indentation is
308 important. If you didn't believe and internalize this then, now is the time.
309 Just do it.</p>
311 </div>
314 <!-- ======================================================================= -->
315 <div class="doc_subsection">
316 <a name="compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
317 </div>
320 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
321 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
322 <a name="ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like Errors</a>
323 </div>
325 <div class="doc_text">
327 <p>If your code has compiler warnings in it, something is wrong: you aren't
328 casting values correctly, your have "questionable" constructs in your code, or
329 you are doing something legitimately wrong. Compiler warnings can cover up
330 legitimate errors in output and make dealing with a translation unit
331 difficult.</p>
333 <p>It is not possible to prevent all warnings from all compilers, nor is it
334 desirable. Instead, pick a standard compiler (like <tt>gcc</tt>) that provides
335 a good thorough set of warnings, and stick to them. At least in the case of
336 <tt>gcc</tt>, it is possible to work around any spurious errors by changing the
337 syntax of the code slightly. For example, an warning that annoys me occurs when
338 I write code like this:</p>
340 <div class="doc_code">
341 <pre>
342 if (V = getValue()) {
345 </pre>
346 </div>
348 <p><tt>gcc</tt> will warn me that I probably want to use the <tt>==</tt>
349 operator, and that I probably mistyped it. In most cases, I haven't, and I
350 really don't want the spurious errors. To fix this particular problem, I
351 rewrite the code like this:</p>
353 <div class="doc_code">
354 <pre>
355 if ((V = getValue())) {
358 </pre>
359 </div>
361 <p>...which shuts <tt>gcc</tt> up. Any <tt>gcc</tt> warning that annoys you can
362 be fixed by massaging the code appropriately.</p>
364 <p>These are the <tt>gcc</tt> warnings that I prefer to enable: <tt>-Wall
365 -Winline -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused</tt></p>
367 </div>
369 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
370 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
371 <a name="ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a>
372 </div>
374 <div class="doc_text">
376 <p>In almost all cases, it is possible and within reason to write completely
377 portable code. If there are cases where it isn't possible to write portable
378 code, isolate it behind a well defined (and well documented) interface.</p>
380 <p>In practice, this means that you shouldn't assume much about the host
381 compiler, including its support for "high tech" features like partial
382 specialization of templates. If these features are used, they should only be
383 an implementation detail of a library which has a simple exposed API.</p>
385 </div>
387 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
388 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
389 <a name="ci_class_struct">Use of <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> Keywords</a>
390 </div>
391 <div class="doc_text">
393 <p>In C++, the <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> keywords can be used almost
394 interchangeably. The only difference is when they are used to declare a class:
395 <tt>class</tt> makes all members private by default while <tt>struct</tt> makes
396 all members public by default.</p>
398 <p>Unfortunately, not all compilers follow the rules and some will generate
399 different symbols based on whether <tt>class</tt> or <tt>struct</tt> was used to
400 declare the symbol. This can lead to problems at link time.</p>
402 <p>So, the rule for LLVM is to always use the <tt>class</tt> keyword, unless
403 <b>all</b> members are public, in which case <tt>struct</tt> is allowed.</p>
405 </div>
407 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
408 <div class="doc_section">
409 <a name="styleissues">Style Issues</a>
410 </div>
411 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
414 <!-- ======================================================================= -->
415 <div class="doc_subsection">
416 <a name="macro">The High Level Issues</a>
417 </div>
420 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
421 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
422 <a name="hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a Module</a>
423 </div>
425 <div class="doc_text">
427 <p>C++ doesn't do too well in the modularity department. There is no real
428 encapsulation or data hiding (unless you use expensive protocol classes), but it
429 is what we have to work with. When you write a public header file (in the LLVM
430 source tree, they live in the top level "include" directory), you are defining a
431 module of functionality.</p>
433 <p>Ideally, modules should be completely independent of each other, and their
434 header files should only include the absolute minimum number of headers
435 possible. A module is not just a class, a function, or a namespace: <a
436 href="http://www.cuj.com/articles/2000/0002/0002c/0002c.htm">it's a collection
437 of these</a> that defines an interface. This interface may be several
438 functions, classes or data structures, but the important issue is how they work
439 together.</p>
441 <p>In general, a module should be implemented with one or more <tt>.cpp</tt>
442 files. Each of these <tt>.cpp</tt> files should include the header that defines
443 their interface first. This ensure that all of the dependences of the module
444 header have been properly added to the module header itself, and are not
445 implicit. System headers should be included after user headers for a
446 translation unit.</p>
448 </div>
450 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
451 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
452 <a name="hl_dontinclude"><tt>#include</tt> as Little as Possible</a>
453 </div>
455 <div class="doc_text">
457 <p><tt>#include</tt> hurts compile time performance. Don't do it unless you
458 have to, especially in header files.</p>
460 <p>But wait, sometimes you need to have the definition of a class to use it, or
461 to inherit from it. In these cases go ahead and <tt>#include</tt> that header
462 file. Be aware however that there are many cases where you don't need to have
463 the full definition of a class. If you are using a pointer or reference to a
464 class, you don't need the header file. If you are simply returning a class
465 instance from a prototyped function or method, you don't need it. In fact, for
466 most cases, you simply don't need the definition of a class... and not
467 <tt>#include</tt>'ing speeds up compilation.</p>
469 <p>It is easy to try to go too overboard on this recommendation, however. You
470 <b>must</b> include all of the header files that you are using -- you can
471 include them either directly
472 or indirectly (through another header file). To make sure that you don't
473 accidently forget to include a header file in your module header, make sure to
474 include your module header <b>first</b> in the implementation file (as mentioned
475 above). This way there won't be any hidden dependencies that you'll find out
476 about later...</p>
478 </div>
480 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
481 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
482 <a name="hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers Private</a>
483 </div>
485 <div class="doc_text">
487 <p>Many modules have a complex implementation that causes them to use more than
488 one implementation (<tt>.cpp</tt>) file. It is often tempting to put the
489 internal communication interface (helper classes, extra functions, etc) in the
490 public module header file. Don't do this.</p>
492 <p>If you really need to do something like this, put a private header file in
493 the same directory as the source files, and include it locally. This ensures
494 that your private interface remains private and undisturbed by outsiders.</p>
496 <p>Note however, that it's okay to put extra implementation methods a public
497 class itself... just make them private (or protected), and all is well.</p>
499 </div>
501 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
502 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
503 <a name="ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is forbidden</a>
504 </div>
506 <div class="doc_text">
508 <p>The use of <tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> in library files is
509 hereby <b><em>forbidden</em></b>. The primary reason for doing this is to
510 support clients using LLVM libraries as part of larger systems. In particular,
511 we statically link LLVM into some dynamic libraries. Even if LLVM isn't used,
512 the static c'tors are run whenever an application start up that uses the dynamic
513 library. There are two problems with this:</p>
515 <ol>
516 <li>The time to run the static c'tors impacts startup time of
517 applications&mdash;a critical time for GUI apps.</li>
518 <li>The static c'tors cause the app to pull many extra pages of memory off the
519 disk: both the code for the static c'tors in each <tt>.o</tt> file and the
520 small amount of data that gets touched. In addition, touched/dirty pages
521 put more pressure on the VM system on low-memory machines.</li>
522 </ol>
524 <p>Note that using the other stream headers (<tt>&lt;sstream&gt;</tt> for
525 example) is allowed normally, it is just <tt>&lt;iostream&gt;</tt> that is
526 causing problems.</p>
528 <p>The preferred replacement for stream functionality is the
529 <tt>llvm::raw_ostream</tt> class (for writing to output streams of various
530 sorts) and the <tt>llvm::MemoryBuffer</tt> API (for reading in files).</p>
532 </div>
535 <!-- ======================================================================= -->
536 <div class="doc_subsection">
537 <a name="micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
538 </div>
541 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
542 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
543 <a name="ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a>
544 </div>
546 <div class="doc_text">
548 <p>Use the "<tt>assert</tt>" function to its fullest. Check all of your
549 preconditions and assumptions, you never know when a bug (not neccesarily even
550 yours) might be caught early by an assertion, which reduces debugging time
551 dramatically. The "<tt>&lt;cassert&gt;</tt>" header file is probably already
552 included by the header files you are using, so it doesn't cost anything to use
553 it.</p>
555 <p>To further assist with debugging, make sure to put some kind of error message
556 in the assertion statement (which is printed if the assertion is tripped). This
557 helps the poor debugging make sense of why an assertion is being made and
558 enforced, and hopefully what to do about it. Here is one complete example:</p>
560 <div class="doc_code">
561 <pre>
562 inline Value *getOperand(unsigned i) {
563 assert(i &lt; Operands.size() &amp;&amp; "getOperand() out of range!");
564 return Operands[i];
566 </pre>
567 </div>
569 <p>Here are some examples:</p>
571 <div class="doc_code">
572 <pre>
573 assert(Ty-&gt;isPointerType() &amp;&amp; "Can't allocate a non pointer type!");
575 assert((Opcode == Shl || Opcode == Shr) &amp;&amp; "ShiftInst Opcode invalid!");
577 assert(idx &lt; getNumSuccessors() &amp;&amp; "Successor # out of range!");
579 assert(V1.getType() == V2.getType() &amp;&amp; "Constant types must be identical!");
581 assert(isa&lt;PHINode&gt;(Succ-&gt;front()) &amp;&amp; "Only works on PHId BBs!");
582 </pre>
583 </div>
585 <p>You get the idea...</p>
587 <p>Please be aware when adding assert statements that not all compilers are aware of
588 the semantics of the assert. In some places, asserts are used to indicate a piece of
589 code that should not be reached. These are typically of the form:</p>
591 <div class="doc_code">
592 <pre>
593 assert(0 &amp;&amp; "Some helpful error message");
594 </pre>
595 </div>
597 <p>When used in a function that returns a value, they should be followed with a return
598 statement and a comment indicating that this line is never reached. This will prevent
599 a compiler which is unable to deduce that the assert statement never returns from
600 generating a warning.</p>
602 <div class="doc_code">
603 <pre>
604 assert(0 &amp;&amp; "Some helpful error message");
605 // Not reached
606 return 0;
607 </pre>
608 </div>
610 </div>
612 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
613 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
614 <a name="ll_ns_std">Do not use '<tt>using namespace std</tt>'</a>
615 </div>
617 <div class="doc_text">
618 <p>In LLVM, we prefer to explicitly prefix all identifiers from the standard
619 namespace with an "<tt>std::</tt>" prefix, rather than rely on
620 "<tt>using namespace std;</tt>".</p>
622 <p> In header files, adding a '<tt>using namespace XXX</tt>' directive pollutes
623 the namespace of any source file that <tt>#include</tt>s the header. This is
624 clearly a bad thing.</p>
626 <p>In implementation files (e.g. .cpp files), the rule is more of a stylistic
627 rule, but is still important. Basically, using explicit namespace prefixes
628 makes the code <b>clearer</b>, because it is immediately obvious what facilities
629 are being used and where they are coming from, and <b>more portable</b>, because
630 namespace clashes cannot occur between LLVM code and other namespaces. The
631 portability rule is important because different standard library implementations
632 expose different symbols (potentially ones they shouldn't), and future revisions
633 to the C++ standard will add more symbols to the <tt>std</tt> namespace. As
634 such, we never use '<tt>using namespace std;</tt>' in LLVM.</p>
636 <p>The exception to the general rule (i.e. it's not an exception for
637 the <tt>std</tt> namespace) is for implementation files. For example, all of
638 the code in the LLVM project implements code that lives in the 'llvm' namespace.
639 As such, it is ok, and actually clearer, for the .cpp files to have a '<tt>using
640 namespace llvm</tt>' directive at their top, after the <tt>#include</tt>s. The
641 general form of this rule is that any .cpp file that implements code in any
642 namespace may use that namespace (and its parents'), but should not use any
643 others.</p>
645 </div>
647 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
648 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
649 <a name="ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for classes
650 in headers</a>
651 </div>
653 <div class="doc_text">
655 <p>If a class is defined in a header file and has a v-table (either it has
656 virtual methods or it derives from classes with virtual methods), it must
657 always have at least one out-of-line virtual method in the class. Without
658 this, the compiler will copy the vtable and RTTI into every <tt>.o</tt> file
659 that <tt>#include</tt>s the header, bloating <tt>.o</tt> file sizes and
660 increasing link times.</p>
662 </div>
665 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
666 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
667 <a name="ll_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a>
668 </div>
670 <div class="doc_text">
672 <p>Hard fast rule: Preincrement (<tt>++X</tt>) may be no slower than
673 postincrement (<tt>X++</tt>) and could very well be a lot faster than it. Use
674 preincrementation whenever possible.</p>
676 <p>The semantics of postincrement include making a copy of the value being
677 incremented, returning it, and then preincrementing the "work value". For
678 primitive types, this isn't a big deal... but for iterators, it can be a huge
679 issue (for example, some iterators contains stack and set objects in them...
680 copying an iterator could invoke the copy ctor's of these as well). In general,
681 get in the habit of always using preincrement, and you won't have a problem.</p>
683 </div>
685 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
686 <div class="doc_subsubsection">
687 <a name="ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a>
688 </div>
690 <div class="doc_text">
692 <p>The <tt>std::endl</tt> modifier, when used with iostreams outputs a newline
693 to the output stream specified. In addition to doing this, however, it also
694 flushes the output stream. In other words, these are equivalent:</p>
696 <div class="doc_code">
697 <pre>
698 std::cout &lt;&lt; std::endl;
699 std::cout &lt;&lt; '\n' &lt;&lt; std::flush;
700 </pre>
701 </div>
703 <p>Most of the time, you probably have no reason to flush the output stream, so
704 it's better to use a literal <tt>'\n'</tt>.</p>
706 </div>
709 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
710 <div class="doc_section">
711 <a name="seealso">See Also</a>
712 </div>
713 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
715 <div class="doc_text">
717 <p>A lot of these comments and recommendations have been culled for other
718 sources. Two particularly important books for our work are:</p>
720 <ol>
722 <li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Specific-Addison-Wesley-Professional-Computing/dp/0321334876">Effective
723 C++</a> by Scott Meyers. Also
724 interesting and useful are "More Effective C++" and "Effective STL" by the same
725 author.</li>
727 <li>Large-Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos</li>
729 </ol>
731 <p>If you get some free time, and you haven't read them: do so, you might learn
732 something.</p>
734 </div>
736 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
738 <hr>
739 <address>
740 <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
741 src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
742 <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
743 src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>
745 <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
746 <a href="http://llvm.org">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
747 Last modified: $Date$
748 </address>
750 </body>
751 </html>