1 <h1>Managing a Workshop Assignment
</h1>
3 <p>A Workshop Assignment is more complex than an ordinary assignment.
4 It involves a number of steps or phases. These are
</p>
7 <li><p><b>Set Up Assignment
</b> The assessment of the assignment
8 should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes
9 the grading of an assignment less arbitrary and gives the students a
10 framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of
11 setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See
12 that page for more details.)
</p>
14 <p>With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a
15 small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the
16 students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However,
17 before the assignment is made available to students, these example
18 pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher
19 with specimen
"answers
" when reviewing the students' assessments
20 of those examples (produced in the next phase).
</p>
22 <p>The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional
23 and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.
</p>
25 <li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions
</b> The assignment is now opened
26 to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work, the students
27 are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of
28 assessments is given when the assignment is created.) Once a student has
29 made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own
30 work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free
31 to submit their own work without any delay.
</p>
33 <p>The advantage of leaving the assignment in the Submission phase is to allow
34 a build up of submissions. When they are subsequently allocated, in the next
35 two phases, there is better distribution of work. If the assignment is put
36 straight into the
"Allow Submissions and Assessments
" phase from
37 the
"Set Up
" phase (which is allowed) students who submit early
38 will tend to have early submissions to assess and those students who submit
39 late will tend to have late submissions to assess. Adding a
"delay
"
40 before peer assessment starts will alleviate that problem to a large extent.
</p>
42 <p>When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that
43 work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These
44 assessments can take place in the submission and assessment phases of the
47 <li><p><b>Allow Student Submissions and Assessments
</b> If the assignment includes
48 peer assessment, students who have submitted work are now shown other students'
49 work to assess. Students who have not yet submitted work are allowed to submit
50 their work (but they are
<b>not
</b> shown other students' work to access).
51 In this phase, submissions, re-submissions and assessments of submissions
52 and re-submissions are allowed to take place together.
</p>
54 <p>The teacher may want to split the submission of work and its peer assessment
55 into two distinct phases, waiting for all students to submit their work before
56 going into the peer assessment phase. In that case this phase is not used at all,
57 the assignment goes from
"Allow Submissions
" straight to
"Allow
58 Assessments
". This allows the teacher to place a deadline on submissions,
59 the assignment is moved into the
"Allow Assessments
" phase at that
62 <p>If the teacher, on the other hand, does not want such as clear cut division in
63 the assignment, then the assignment uses this phase. When allowing submissions
64 and assessments to occur together, the teacher should consider setting the
65 Over Allocation Level to ONE (or possibly TWO) to allow the allocations
66 to go smoothly (see the help page on that option for more details). Note
67 that doing this will result in
<b>some
</b> submissions being (peer) assessed more
68 times and some less times than the majority of the submissions.
</p>
70 <p>When a student has made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The
71 student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option
72 was chosen for the assignment.
</p></li>
74 <li><p><b>Allow Student Assessments
</b> In this phase peer assessments continue but
75 students are not allowed to make any submissions, that includes re-submissions.
76 Students who have not made a submission are told that submissions are no longer
77 allowed and they are
<b>not
</b> shown any (peer) submissions to assess.
</p></li>
79 <li><p><b>Display of Final Grades
</b> The final phase of the assignment is entered
80 to allow the students to see their final grades in detail. The individual
81 assessments which contribute to the final grade of each submission can be
84 <p>The students (and the teacher) are shown an optional
"League Table
"
85 of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission
89 <p>At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the
90 "Administration
" page. This shows the current state of the
91 assignment. It lists the Teacher's example submissions (if any), the
92 students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own work, and of
93 other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students. The
94 teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, delete
95 submissions and assessments, and generally watch the progress of the