Remove old RULE privilege completely.

[pgsql.git] / doc / src / sgml / logical-replication.sgml

<!-- doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml -->

<chapter id="logical-replication">
 <title>Logical Replication</title>

 <para>
  Logical replication is a method of replicating data objects and their
  changes, based upon their replication identity (usually a primary key).  We
  use the term logical in contrast to physical replication, which uses exact
  block addresses and byte-by-byte replication.  PostgreSQL supports both
  mechanisms concurrently, see <xref linkend="high-availability"/>.  Logical
  replication allows fine-grained control over both data replication and
  security.
 </para>

 <para>
  Logical replication uses a <firstterm>publish</firstterm>
  and <firstterm>subscribe</firstterm> model with one or
  more <firstterm>subscribers</firstterm> subscribing to one or more
  <firstterm>publications</firstterm> on a <firstterm>publisher</firstterm>
  node.  Subscribers pull data from the publications they subscribe to and may
  subsequently re-publish data to allow cascading replication or more complex
  configurations.
 </para>

 <para>
  Logical replication of a table typically starts with taking a snapshot
  of the data on the publisher database and copying that to the subscriber.
  Once that is done, the changes on the publisher are sent to the subscriber
  as they occur in real-time.  The subscriber applies the data in the same
  order as the publisher so that transactional consistency is guaranteed for
  publications within a single subscription.  This method of data replication
  is sometimes referred to as transactional replication.
 </para>

 <para>
  The typical use-cases for logical replication are:

  <itemizedlist>
   <listitem>
    <para>
     Sending incremental changes in a single database or a subset of a
     database to subscribers as they occur.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Firing triggers for individual changes as they arrive on the
     subscriber.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Consolidating multiple databases into a single one (for example for
     analytical purposes).
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Replicating between different major versions of PostgreSQL.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Replicating between PostgreSQL instances on different platforms (for
     example Linux to Windows)
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Giving access to replicated data to different groups of users.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Sharing a subset of the database between multiple databases.
    </para>
   </listitem>
  </itemizedlist>
 </para>

 <para>
  The subscriber database behaves in the same way as any other PostgreSQL
  instance and can be used as a publisher for other databases by defining its
  own publications.  When the subscriber is treated as read-only by
  application, there will be no conflicts from a single subscription.  On the
  other hand, if there are other writes done either by an application or by other
  subscribers to the same set of tables, conflicts can arise.
 </para>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-publication">
  <title>Publication</title>

  <para>
   A <firstterm>publication</firstterm> can be defined on any physical
   replication primary.  The node where a publication is defined is referred to
   as <firstterm>publisher</firstterm>.  A publication is a set of changes
   generated from a table or a group of tables, and might also be described as
   a change set or replication set.  Each publication exists in only one database.
  </para>

  <para>
   Publications are different from schemas and do not affect how the table is
   accessed.  Each table can be added to multiple publications if needed.
   Publications may currently only contain tables and all tables in schema.
   Objects must be added explicitly, except when a publication is created for
   <literal>ALL TABLES</literal>.
  </para>

  <para>
   Publications can choose to limit the changes they produce to
   any combination of <command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>,
   <command>DELETE</command>, and <command>TRUNCATE</command>, similar to how triggers are fired by
   particular event types. By default, all operation types are replicated.
   These publication specifications apply only for DML operations; they do not affect the initial
   data synchronization copy. (Row filters have no effect for
   <command>TRUNCATE</command>. See <xref linkend="logical-replication-row-filter"/>).
  </para>

  <para>
   A published table must have a <firstterm>replica identity</firstterm> configured in
   order to be able to replicate <command>UPDATE</command>
   and <command>DELETE</command> operations, so that appropriate rows to
   update or delete can be identified on the subscriber side.  By default,
   this is the primary key, if there is one.  Another unique index (with
   certain additional requirements) can also be set to be the replica
   identity.  If the table does not have any suitable key, then it can be set
   to replica identity <literal>FULL</literal>, which means the entire row becomes
   the key.  When replica identity <literal>FULL</literal> is specified,
   indexes can be used on the subscriber side for searching the rows.  Candidate
   indexes must be btree or hash, non-partial, and the leftmost index field must
   be a column (not an expression) that references the published table column.
   These restrictions on the non-unique index properties adhere to some of the
   restrictions that are enforced for primary keys.  If there are no such
   suitable indexes, the search on the subscriber side can be very inefficient,
   therefore replica identity <literal>FULL</literal> should only be used as a
   fallback if no other solution is possible.  If a replica identity other
   than <literal>FULL</literal> is set on the publisher side, a replica identity
   comprising the same or fewer columns must also be set on the subscriber
   side.  See <xref linkend="sql-altertable-replica-identity"/> for details on
   how to set the replica identity.  If a table without a replica identity is
   added to a publication that replicates <command>UPDATE</command>
   or <command>DELETE</command> operations then
   subsequent <command>UPDATE</command> or <command>DELETE</command>
   operations will cause an error on the publisher.  <command>INSERT</command>
   operations can proceed regardless of any replica identity.
  </para>

  <para>
   Every publication can have multiple subscribers.
  </para>

  <para>
   A publication is created using the <link linkend="sql-createpublication"><command>CREATE PUBLICATION</command></link>
   command and may later be altered or dropped using corresponding commands.
  </para>

  <para>
   The individual tables can be added and removed dynamically using
   <link linkend="sql-alterpublication"><command>ALTER PUBLICATION</command></link>.  Both the <literal>ADD
   TABLE</literal> and <literal>DROP TABLE</literal> operations are
   transactional; so the table will start or stop replicating at the correct
   snapshot once the transaction has committed.
  </para>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-subscription">
  <title>Subscription</title>

  <para>
   A <firstterm>subscription</firstterm> is the downstream side of logical
   replication.  The node where a subscription is defined is referred to as
   the <firstterm>subscriber</firstterm>.  A subscription defines the connection
   to another database and set of publications (one or more) to which it wants
   to subscribe.
  </para>

  <para>
   The subscriber database behaves in the same way as any other PostgreSQL
   instance and can be used as a publisher for other databases by defining its
   own publications.
  </para>

  <para>
   A subscriber node may have multiple subscriptions if desired.  It is
   possible to define multiple subscriptions between a single
   publisher-subscriber pair, in which case care must be taken to ensure
   that the subscribed publication objects don't overlap.
  </para>

  <para>
   Each subscription will receive changes via one replication slot (see
   <xref linkend="streaming-replication-slots"/>).  Additional replication
   slots may be required for the initial data synchronization of
   pre-existing table data and those will be dropped at the end of data
   synchronization.
  </para>

  <para>
   A logical replication subscription can be a standby for synchronous
   replication (see <xref linkend="synchronous-replication"/>).  The standby
   name is by default the subscription name.  An alternative name can be
   specified as <literal>application_name</literal> in the connection
   information of the subscription.
  </para>

  <para>
   Subscriptions are dumped by <command>pg_dump</command> if the current user
   is a superuser.  Otherwise a warning is written and subscriptions are
   skipped, because non-superusers cannot read all subscription information
   from the <structname>pg_subscription</structname> catalog.
  </para>

  <para>
   The subscription is added using <link linkend="sql-createsubscription"><command>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</command></link> and
   can be stopped/resumed at any time using the
   <link linkend="sql-altersubscription"><command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION</command></link> command and removed using
   <link linkend="sql-dropsubscription"><command>DROP SUBSCRIPTION</command></link>.
  </para>

  <para>
   When a subscription is dropped and recreated, the synchronization
   information is lost.  This means that the data has to be resynchronized
   afterwards.
  </para>

  <para>
   The schema definitions are not replicated, and the published tables must
   exist on the subscriber.  Only regular tables may be
   the target of replication.  For example, you can't replicate to a view.
  </para>

  <para>
   The tables are matched between the publisher and the subscriber using the
   fully qualified table name.  Replication to differently-named tables on the
   subscriber is not supported.
  </para>

  <para>
   Columns of a table are also matched by name.  The order of columns in the
   subscriber table does not need to match that of the publisher.  The data
   types of the columns do not need to match, as long as the text
   representation of the data can be converted to the target type.  For
   example, you can replicate from a column of type <type>integer</type> to a
   column of type <type>bigint</type>.  The target table can also have
   additional columns not provided by the published table.  Any such columns
   will be filled with the default value as specified in the definition of the
   target table. However, logical replication in binary format is more
   restrictive. See the
   <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-binary"><literal>binary</literal></link>
   option of <command>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</command> for details.
  </para>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-subscription-slot">
   <title>Replication Slot Management</title>

   <para>
    As mentioned earlier, each (active) subscription receives changes from a
    replication slot on the remote (publishing) side.
   </para>
   <para>
    Additional table synchronization slots are normally transient, created
    internally to perform initial table synchronization and dropped
    automatically when they are no longer needed. These table synchronization
    slots have generated names: <quote><literal>pg_%u_sync_%u_%llu</literal></quote>
    (parameters: Subscription <parameter>oid</parameter>,
    Table <parameter>relid</parameter>, system identifier <parameter>sysid</parameter>)
   </para>
   <para>
    Normally, the remote replication slot is created automatically when the
    subscription is created using <link linkend="sql-createsubscription">
    <command>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</command></link> and it
    is dropped automatically when the subscription is dropped using
    <link linkend="sql-dropsubscription"><command>DROP SUBSCRIPTION</command></link>.
    In some situations, however, it can
    be useful or necessary to manipulate the subscription and the underlying
    replication slot separately.  Here are some scenarios:

    <itemizedlist>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       When creating a subscription, the replication slot already exists.  In
       that case, the subscription can be created using
       the <literal>create_slot = false</literal> option to associate with the
       existing slot.
      </para>
     </listitem>

     <listitem>
      <para>
       When creating a subscription, the remote host is not reachable or in an
       unclear state.  In that case, the subscription can be created using
       the <literal>connect = false</literal> option.  The remote host will then not
       be contacted at all.  This is what <application>pg_dump</application>
       uses.  The remote replication slot will then have to be created
       manually before the subscription can be activated.
      </para>
     </listitem>

     <listitem>
      <para>
       When dropping a subscription, the replication slot should be kept.
       This could be useful when the subscriber database is being moved to a
       different host and will be activated from there.  In that case,
       disassociate the slot from the subscription using
       <link linkend="sql-altersubscription"><command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION</command></link>
       before attempting to drop the subscription.
      </para>
     </listitem>

     <listitem>
      <para>
       When dropping a subscription, the remote host is not reachable.  In
       that case, disassociate the slot from the subscription
       using <command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION</command> before attempting to drop
       the subscription.  If the remote database instance no longer exists, no
       further action is then necessary.  If, however, the remote database
       instance is just unreachable, the replication slot (and any still
       remaining table synchronization slots) should then be
       dropped manually; otherwise it/they would continue to reserve WAL and might
       eventually cause the disk to fill up.  Such cases should be carefully
       investigated.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
   </para>
  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-subscription-examples">
    <title>Examples: Set Up Logical Replication</title>

    <para>
     Create some test tables on the publisher.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t1(a int, b text, PRIMARY KEY(a));
CREATE TABLE
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t2(c int, d text, PRIMARY KEY(c));
CREATE TABLE
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t3(e int, f text, PRIMARY KEY(e));
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Create the same tables on the subscriber.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE t1(a int, b text, PRIMARY KEY(a));
CREATE TABLE
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE t2(c int, d text, PRIMARY KEY(c));
CREATE TABLE
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE t3(e int, f text, PRIMARY KEY(e));
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Insert data to the tables at the publisher side.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three');
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, 'A'), (2, 'B'), (3, 'C');
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (1, 'i'), (2, 'ii'), (3, 'iii');
INSERT 0 3
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Create publications for the tables. The publications <literal>pub2</literal>
     and <literal>pub3a</literal> disallow some
     <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish"><literal>publish</literal></link>
     operations. The publication <literal>pub3b</literal> has a row filter (see
     <xref linkend="logical-replication-row-filter"/>).
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR TABLE t1;
CREATE PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub2 FOR TABLE t2 WITH (publish = 'truncate');
CREATE PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub3a FOR TABLE t3 WITH (publish = 'truncate');
CREATE PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub3b FOR TABLE t3 WHERE (e > 5);
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Create subscriptions for the publications. The subscription
     <literal>sub3</literal> subscribes to both <literal>pub3a</literal> and
     <literal>pub3b</literal>. All subscriptions will copy initial data by default.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=sub1'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub1;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub2
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=sub2'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub2;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub3
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=sub3'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub3a, pub3b;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Observe that initial table data is copied, regardless of the
     <literal>publish</literal> operation of the publication.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |   b
---+-------
 1 | one
 2 | two
 3 | three
(3 rows)

test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t2;
 c | d
---+---
 1 | A
 2 | B
 3 | C
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Furthermore, because the initial data copy ignores the <literal>publish</literal>
     operation, and because publication <literal>pub3a</literal> has no row filter,
     it means the copied table <literal>t3</literal> contains all rows even when
     they do not match the row filter of publication <literal>pub3b</literal>.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t3;
 e |  f
---+-----
 1 | i
 2 | ii
 3 | iii
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Insert more data to the tables at the publisher side.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4, 'four'), (5, 'five'), (6, 'six');
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (4, 'D'), (5, 'E'), (6, 'F');
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (4, 'iv'), (5, 'v'), (6, 'vi');
INSERT 0 3
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Now the publisher side data looks like:
<programlisting>
test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |   b
---+-------
 1 | one
 2 | two
 3 | three
 4 | four
 5 | five
 6 | six
(6 rows)

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t2;
 c | d
---+---
 1 | A
 2 | B
 3 | C
 4 | D
 5 | E
 6 | F
(6 rows)

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t3;
 e |  f
---+-----
 1 | i
 2 | ii
 3 | iii
 4 | iv
 5 | v
 6 | vi
(6 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Observe that during normal replication the appropriate
    <literal>publish</literal> operations are used. This means publications
    <literal>pub2</literal> and <literal>pub3a</literal> will not replicate the
    <literal>INSERT</literal>. Also, publication <literal>pub3b</literal> will
    only replicate data that matches the row filter of <literal>pub3b</literal>.
    Now the subscriber side data looks like:
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |   b
---+-------
 1 | one
 2 | two
 3 | three
 4 | four
 5 | five
 6 | six
(6 rows)

test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t2;
 c | d
---+---
 1 | A
 2 | B
 3 | C
(3 rows)

test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t3;
 e |  f
---+-----
 1 | i
 2 | ii
 3 | iii
 6 | vi
(4 rows)
</programlisting></para>
  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-subscription-examples-deferred-slot">
   <title>Examples: Deferred Replication Slot Creation</title>

   <para>
    There are some cases (e.g.
    <xref linkend="logical-replication-subscription-slot"/>) where, if the
    remote replication slot was not created automatically, the user must create
    it manually before the subscription can be activated. The steps to create
    the slot and activate the subscription are shown in the following examples.
    These examples specify the standard logical decoding output plugin
    (<literal>pgoutput</literal>), which is what the built-in logical
    replication uses.
   </para>
   <para>
    First, create a publication for the examples to use.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL TABLES;
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting></para>
   <para>
    Example 1: Where the subscription says <literal>connect = false</literal>
   </para>
   <para>
    <itemizedlist>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Create the subscription.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub1
test_sub-# WITH (connect=false);
WARNING:  subscription was created, but is not connected
HINT:  To initiate replication, you must manually create the replication slot, enable the subscription, and refresh the subscription.
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the publisher, manually create a slot. Because the name was not
       specified during <literal>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</literal>, the name of the
       slot to create is same as the subscription name, e.g. "sub1".
<programlisting>
test_pub=# SELECT * FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('sub1', 'pgoutput');
 slot_name |    lsn
-----------+-----------
 sub1      | 0/19404D0
(1 row)
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the subscriber, complete the activation of the subscription. After
       this the tables of <literal>pub1</literal> will start replicating.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 ENABLE;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 REFRESH PUBLICATION;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
   </para>

   <para>
    Example 2: Where the subscription says <literal>connect = false</literal>,
    but also specifies the
    <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-slot-name"><literal>slot_name</literal></link>
    option.
    <itemizedlist>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Create the subscription.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub1
test_sub-# WITH (connect=false, slot_name='myslot');
WARNING:  subscription was created, but is not connected
HINT:  To initiate replication, you must manually create the replication slot, enable the subscription, and refresh the subscription.
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the publisher, manually create a slot using the same name that was
       specified during <literal>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</literal>, e.g. "myslot".
<programlisting>
test_pub=# SELECT * FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('myslot', 'pgoutput');
 slot_name |    lsn
-----------+-----------
 myslot    | 0/19059A0
(1 row)
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the subscriber, the remaining subscription activation steps are the
       same as before.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 ENABLE;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 REFRESH PUBLICATION;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
   </para>

   <para>
    Example 3: Where the subscription specifies <literal>slot_name = NONE</literal>
    <itemizedlist>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Create the subscription. When <literal>slot_name = NONE</literal> then
       <literal>enabled = false</literal>, and
       <literal>create_slot = false</literal> are also needed.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION pub1
test_sub-# WITH (slot_name=NONE, enabled=false, create_slot=false);
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the publisher, manually create a slot using any name, e.g. "myslot".
<programlisting>
test_pub=# SELECT * FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('myslot', 'pgoutput');
 slot_name |    lsn
-----------+-----------
 myslot    | 0/1905930
(1 row)
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       On the subscriber, associate the subscription with the slot name just
       created.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 SET (slot_name='myslot');
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       The remaining subscription activation steps are same as before.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 ENABLE;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 REFRESH PUBLICATION;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>
     </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
   </para>
  </sect2>

 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-failover">
  <title>Logical Replication Failover</title>

  <para>
   To allow subscriber nodes to continue replicating data from the publisher
   node even when the publisher node goes down, there must be a physical standby
   corresponding to the publisher node. The logical slots on the primary server
   corresponding to the subscriptions can be synchronized to the standby server by
   specifying <literal>failover = true</literal> when creating subscriptions. See
   <xref linkend="logicaldecoding-replication-slots-synchronization"/> for details.
   Enabling the
   <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-failover"><literal>failover</literal></link>
   parameter ensures a seamless transition of those subscriptions after the
   standby is promoted. They can continue subscribing to publications on the
   new primary server.
  </para>

  <para>
   Because the slot synchronization logic copies asynchronously, it is
   necessary to confirm that replication slots have been synced to the standby
   server before the failover happens. To ensure a successful failover, the
   standby server must be ahead of the subscriber. This can be achieved by
   configuring
   <link linkend="guc-synchronized-standby-slots"><varname>synchronized_standby_slots</varname></link>.
  </para>

  <para>
   To confirm that the standby server is indeed ready for failover, follow these
   steps to verify that all necessary logical replication slots have been
   synchronized to the standby server:
  </para>

  <procedure>
   <step performance="required">
    <para>
     On the subscriber node, use the following SQL to identify which replication
     slots should be synced to the standby that we plan to promote. This query
     will return the relevant replication slots associated with the
     failover-enabled subscriptions.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT
               array_agg(quote_literal(s.subslotname)) AS slots
           FROM  pg_subscription s
           WHERE s.subfailover AND
                 s.subslotname IS NOT NULL;
 slots
-------
 {'sub1','sub2','sub3'}
(1 row)
</programlisting></para>
   </step>
   <step performance="required">
    <para>
     On the subscriber node, use the following SQL to identify which table
     synchronization slots should be synced to the standby that we plan to promote.
     This query needs to be run on each database that includes the failover-enabled
     subscription(s). Note that the table sync slot should be synced to the standby
     server only if the table copy is finished
     (See <xref linkend="catalog-pg-subscription-rel"/>).
     We don't need to ensure that the table sync slots are synced in other scenarios
     as they will either be dropped or re-created on the new primary server in those
     cases.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT
               array_agg(quote_literal(slot_name)) AS slots
           FROM
           (
               SELECT CONCAT('pg_', srsubid, '_sync_', srrelid, '_', ctl.system_identifier) AS slot_name
               FROM pg_control_system() ctl, pg_subscription_rel r, pg_subscription s
               WHERE r.srsubstate = 'f' AND s.oid = r.srsubid AND s.subfailover
           );
 slots
-------
 {'pg_16394_sync_16385_7394666715149055164'}
(1 row)
</programlisting></para>
   </step>
   <step performance="required">
    <para>
     Check that the logical replication slots identified above exist on
     the standby server and are ready for failover.
<programlisting>
test_standby=# SELECT slot_name, (synced AND NOT temporary AND NOT conflicting) AS failover_ready
               FROM pg_replication_slots
               WHERE slot_name IN
                   ('sub1','sub2','sub3', 'pg_16394_sync_16385_7394666715149055164');
  slot_name                                 | failover_ready
--------------------------------------------+----------------
  sub1                                      | t
  sub2                                      | t
  sub3                                      | t
  pg_16394_sync_16385_7394666715149055164   | t
(4 rows)
</programlisting></para>
    </step>
  </procedure>

  <para>
   If all the slots are present on the standby server and the result
   (<literal>failover_ready</literal>) of the above SQL query is true, then
   existing subscriptions can continue subscribing to publications now on the
   new primary server.
  </para>

 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-row-filter">
  <title>Row Filters</title>

  <para>
   By default, all data from all published tables will be replicated to the
   appropriate subscribers. The replicated data can be reduced by using a
   <firstterm>row filter</firstterm>. A user might choose to use row filters
   for behavioral, security or performance reasons. If a published table sets a
   row filter, a row is replicated only if its data satisfies the row filter
   expression. This allows a set of tables to be partially replicated. The row
   filter is defined per table. Use a <literal>WHERE</literal> clause after the
   table name for each published table that requires data to be filtered out.
   The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause must be enclosed by parentheses. See
   <xref linkend="sql-createpublication"/> for details.
  </para>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-rules">
   <title>Row Filter Rules</title>

   <para>
    Row filters are applied <emphasis>before</emphasis> publishing the changes.
    If the row filter evaluates to <literal>false</literal> or <literal>NULL</literal>
    then the row is not replicated. The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause expression
    is evaluated with the same role used for the replication connection (i.e.
    the role specified in the
    <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-connection"><literal>CONNECTION</literal></link>
    clause of the <xref linkend="sql-createsubscription"/>). Row filters have
    no effect for <command>TRUNCATE</command> command.
   </para>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-restrictions">
   <title>Expression Restrictions</title>

   <para>
    The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause allows only simple expressions. It
    cannot contain user-defined functions, operators, types, and collations,
    system column references or non-immutable built-in functions.
   </para>

   <para>
    If a publication publishes <command>UPDATE</command> or
    <command>DELETE</command> operations, the row filter <literal>WHERE</literal>
    clause must contain only columns that are covered by the replica identity
    (see <xref linkend="sql-altertable-replica-identity"/>). If a publication
    publishes only <command>INSERT</command> operations, the row filter
    <literal>WHERE</literal> clause can use any column.
   </para>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-transformations">
   <title>UPDATE Transformations</title>

   <para>
    Whenever an <command>UPDATE</command> is processed, the row filter
    expression is evaluated for both the old and new row (i.e. using the data
    before and after the update). If both evaluations are <literal>true</literal>,
    it replicates the <command>UPDATE</command> change. If both evaluations are
    <literal>false</literal>, it doesn't replicate the change. If only one of
    the old/new rows matches the row filter expression, the <command>UPDATE</command>
    is transformed to <command>INSERT</command> or <command>DELETE</command>, to
    avoid any data inconsistency. The row on the subscriber should reflect what
    is defined by the row filter expression on the publisher.
   </para>

   <para>
    If the old row satisfies the row filter expression (it was sent to the
    subscriber) but the new row doesn't, then, from a data consistency
    perspective the old row should be removed from the subscriber.
    So the <command>UPDATE</command> is transformed into a <command>DELETE</command>.
   </para>

   <para>
    If the old row doesn't satisfy the row filter expression (it wasn't sent
    to the subscriber) but the new row does, then, from a data consistency
    perspective the new row should be added to the subscriber.
    So the <command>UPDATE</command> is transformed into an <command>INSERT</command>.
   </para>

   <para>
    <xref linkend="logical-replication-row-filter-transformations-summary"/>
    summarizes the applied transformations.
   </para>

   <table id="logical-replication-row-filter-transformations-summary">
    <title><command>UPDATE</command> Transformation Summary</title>
    <tgroup cols="3">
    <thead>
     <row>
      <entry>Old row</entry><entry>New row</entry><entry>Transformation</entry>
     </row>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
     <row>
      <entry>no match</entry><entry>no match</entry><entry>don't replicate</entry>
     </row>
     <row>
      <entry>no match</entry><entry>match</entry><entry><literal>INSERT</literal></entry>
     </row>
     <row>
      <entry>match</entry><entry>no match</entry><entry><literal>DELETE</literal></entry>
     </row>
     <row>
      <entry>match</entry><entry>match</entry><entry><literal>UPDATE</literal></entry>
     </row>
    </tbody>
   </tgroup>
   </table>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-partitioned-table">
   <title>Partitioned Tables</title>

   <para>
    If the publication contains a partitioned table, the publication parameter
    <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish-via-partition-root"><literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal></link>
    determines which row filter is used. If <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal>
    is <literal>true</literal>, the <emphasis>root partitioned table's</emphasis>
    row filter is used. Otherwise, if <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal>
    is <literal>false</literal> (default), each <emphasis>partition's</emphasis>
    row filter is used.
   </para>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-initial-data-sync">
   <title>Initial Data Synchronization</title>

   <para>
    If the subscription requires copying pre-existing table data
    and a publication contains <literal>WHERE</literal> clauses, only data that
    satisfies the row filter expressions is copied to the subscriber.
   </para>

   <para>
    If the subscription has several publications in which a table has been
    published with different <literal>WHERE</literal> clauses, rows that satisfy
    <emphasis>any</emphasis> of the expressions will be copied. See
    <xref linkend="logical-replication-row-filter-combining"/> for details.
   </para>

   <warning>
    <para>
     Because initial data synchronization does not take into account the
     <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish"><literal>publish</literal></link>
     parameter when copying existing table data, some rows may be copied that
     would not be replicated using DML. Refer to
     <xref linkend="logical-replication-snapshot"/>, and see
     <xref linkend="logical-replication-subscription-examples"/> for examples.
    </para>
   </warning>

   <note>
    <para>
     If the subscriber is in a release prior to 15, copy pre-existing data
     doesn't use row filters even if they are defined in the publication.
     This is because old releases can only copy the entire table data.
    </para>
   </note>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-combining">
   <title>Combining Multiple Row Filters</title>

   <para>
    If the subscription has several publications in which the same table has
    been published with different row filters (for the same
    <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish"><literal>publish</literal></link>
    operation), those expressions get ORed together, so that rows satisfying
    <emphasis>any</emphasis> of the expressions will be replicated. This means all
    the other row filters for the same table become redundant if:
    <itemizedlist>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       One of the publications has no row filter.
      </para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       One of the publications was created using
       <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-for-all-tables"><literal>FOR ALL TABLES</literal></link>.
       This clause does not allow row filters.
      </para>
     </listitem>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       One of the publications was created using
       <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-for-tables-in-schema"><literal>FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA</literal></link>
       and the table belongs to the referred schema. This clause does not allow
       row filters.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </itemizedlist></para>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-row-filter-examples">
   <title>Examples</title>

   <para>
    Create some tables to be used in the following examples.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t1(a int, b int, c text, PRIMARY KEY(a,c));
CREATE TABLE
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t2(d int, e int, f int, PRIMARY KEY(d));
CREATE TABLE
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t3(g int, h int, i int, PRIMARY KEY(g));
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Create some publications. Publication <literal>p1</literal> has one table
    (<literal>t1</literal>) and that table has a row filter. Publication
    <literal>p2</literal> has two tables. Table <literal>t1</literal> has no row
    filter, and table <literal>t2</literal> has a row filter. Publication
    <literal>p3</literal> has two tables, and both of them have a row filter.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p1 FOR TABLE t1 WHERE (a > 5 AND c = 'NSW');
CREATE PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p2 FOR TABLE t1, t2 WHERE (e = 99);
CREATE PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p3 FOR TABLE t2 WHERE (d = 10), t3 WHERE (g = 10);
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    <command>psql</command> can be used to show the row filter expressions (if
    defined) for each publication.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# \dRp+
                               Publication p1
  Owner   | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------
 postgres | f          | t       | t       | t       | t         | f
Tables:
    "public.t1" WHERE ((a > 5) AND (c = 'NSW'::text))

                               Publication p2
  Owner   | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------
 postgres | f          | t       | t       | t       | t         | f
Tables:
    "public.t1"
    "public.t2" WHERE (e = 99)

                               Publication p3
  Owner   | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------
 postgres | f          | t       | t       | t       | t         | f
Tables:
    "public.t2" WHERE (d = 10)
    "public.t3" WHERE (g = 10)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    <command>psql</command> can be used to show the row filter expressions (if
    defined) for each table. See that table <literal>t1</literal> is a member
    of two publications, but has a row filter only in <literal>p1</literal>.
    See that table <literal>t2</literal> is a member of two publications, and
    has a different row filter in each of them.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# \d t1
                 Table "public.t1"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
 a      | integer |           | not null |
 b      | integer |           |          |
 c      | text    |           | not null |
Indexes:
    "t1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a, c)
Publications:
    "p1" WHERE ((a > 5) AND (c = 'NSW'::text))
    "p2"

test_pub=# \d t2
                 Table "public.t2"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
 d      | integer |           | not null |
 e      | integer |           |          |
 f      | integer |           |          |
Indexes:
    "t2_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (d)
Publications:
    "p2" WHERE (e = 99)
    "p3" WHERE (d = 10)

test_pub=# \d t3
                 Table "public.t3"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
 g      | integer |           | not null |
 h      | integer |           |          |
 i      | integer |           |          |
Indexes:
    "t3_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (g)
Publications:
    "p3" WHERE (g = 10)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    On the subscriber node, create a table <literal>t1</literal> with the same
    definition as the one on the publisher, and also create the subscription
    <literal>s1</literal> that subscribes to the publication <literal>p1</literal>.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE t1(a int, b int, c text, PRIMARY KEY(a,c));
CREATE TABLE
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION s1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=s1'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION p1;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Insert some rows. Only the rows satisfying the <literal>t1 WHERE</literal>
    clause of publication <literal>p1</literal> are replicated.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2, 102, 'NSW');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (3, 103, 'QLD');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4, 104, 'VIC');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (5, 105, 'ACT');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (6, 106, 'NSW');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (7, 107, 'NT');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (8, 108, 'QLD');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (9, 109, 'NSW');
INSERT 0 1

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |  b  |  c
---+-----+-----
 2 | 102 | NSW
 3 | 103 | QLD
 4 | 104 | VIC
 5 | 105 | ACT
 6 | 106 | NSW
 7 | 107 | NT
 8 | 108 | QLD
 9 | 109 | NSW
(8 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |  b  |  c
---+-----+-----
 6 | 106 | NSW
 9 | 109 | NSW
(2 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Update some data, where the old and new row values both
    satisfy the <literal>t1 WHERE</literal> clause of publication
    <literal>p1</literal>. The <command>UPDATE</command> replicates
    the change as normal.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# UPDATE t1 SET b = 999 WHERE a = 6;
UPDATE 1

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |  b  |  c
---+-----+-----
 2 | 102 | NSW
 3 | 103 | QLD
 4 | 104 | VIC
 5 | 105 | ACT
 7 | 107 | NT
 8 | 108 | QLD
 9 | 109 | NSW
 6 | 999 | NSW
(8 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
 a |  b  |  c
---+-----+-----
 9 | 109 | NSW
 6 | 999 | NSW
(2 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Update some data, where the old row values did not satisfy
    the <literal>t1 WHERE</literal> clause of publication <literal>p1</literal>,
    but the new row values do satisfy it. The <command>UPDATE</command> is
    transformed into an <command>INSERT</command> and the change is replicated.
    See the new row on the subscriber.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# UPDATE t1 SET a = 555 WHERE a = 2;
UPDATE 1

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
  a  |  b  |  c
-----+-----+-----
   3 | 103 | QLD
   4 | 104 | VIC
   5 | 105 | ACT
   7 | 107 | NT
   8 | 108 | QLD
   9 | 109 | NSW
   6 | 999 | NSW
 555 | 102 | NSW
(8 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
  a  |  b  |  c
-----+-----+-----
   9 | 109 | NSW
   6 | 999 | NSW
 555 | 102 | NSW
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Update some data, where the old row values satisfied
    the <literal>t1 WHERE</literal> clause of publication <literal>p1</literal>,
    but the new row values do not satisfy it. The <command>UPDATE</command> is
    transformed into a <command>DELETE</command> and the change is replicated.
    See that the row is removed from the subscriber.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# UPDATE t1 SET c = 'VIC' WHERE a = 9;
UPDATE 1

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
  a  |  b  |  c
-----+-----+-----
   3 | 103 | QLD
   4 | 104 | VIC
   5 | 105 | ACT
   7 | 107 | NT
   8 | 108 | QLD
   6 | 999 | NSW
 555 | 102 | NSW
   9 | 109 | VIC
(8 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1;
  a  |  b  |  c
-----+-----+-----
   6 | 999 | NSW
 555 | 102 | NSW
(2 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    The following examples show how the publication parameter
    <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish-via-partition-root"><literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal></link>
    determines whether the row filter of the parent or child table will be used
    in the case of partitioned tables.
   </para>

   <para>
    Create a partitioned table on the publisher.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE parent(a int PRIMARY KEY) PARTITION BY RANGE(a);
CREATE TABLE
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE child PARTITION OF parent DEFAULT;
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting>
   Create the same tables on the subscriber.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE parent(a int PRIMARY KEY) PARTITION BY RANGE(a);
CREATE TABLE
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE child PARTITION OF parent DEFAULT;
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Create a publication <literal>p4</literal>, and then subscribe to it. The
    publication parameter <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal> is set
    as true. There are row filters defined on both the partitioned table
    (<literal>parent</literal>), and on the partition (<literal>child</literal>).
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p4 FOR TABLE parent WHERE (a &lt; 5), child WHERE (a >= 5)
test_pub-# WITH (publish_via_partition_root=true);
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION s4
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=s4'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION p4;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Insert some values directly into the <literal>parent</literal> and
    <literal>child</literal> tables. They replicate using the row filter of
    <literal>parent</literal> (because <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal>
    is true).
<programlisting>
test_pub=# INSERT INTO parent VALUES (2), (4), (6);
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO child VALUES (3), (5), (7);
INSERT 0 3

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM parent ORDER BY a;
 a
---
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
(6 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM parent ORDER BY a;
 a
---
 2
 3
 4
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Repeat the same test, but with a different value for <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal>.
    The publication parameter <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal> is
    set as false. A row filter is defined on the partition (<literal>child</literal>).
<programlisting>
test_pub=# DROP PUBLICATION p4;
DROP PUBLICATION
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p4 FOR TABLE parent, child WHERE (a >= 5)
test_pub-# WITH (publish_via_partition_root=false);
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION s4 REFRESH PUBLICATION;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Do the inserts on the publisher same as before. They replicate using the
    row filter of <literal>child</literal> (because
    <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal> is false).
<programlisting>
test_pub=# TRUNCATE parent;
TRUNCATE TABLE
test_pub=# INSERT INTO parent VALUES (2), (4), (6);
INSERT 0 3
test_pub=# INSERT INTO child VALUES (3), (5), (7);
INSERT 0 3

test_pub=# SELECT * FROM parent ORDER BY a;
 a
---
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
(6 rows)
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM child ORDER BY a;
 a
---
 5
 6
 7
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

  </sect2>

 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-col-lists">
  <title>Column Lists</title>

  <para>
   Each publication can optionally specify which columns of each table are
   replicated to subscribers. The table on the subscriber side must have at
   least all the columns that are published. If no column list is specified,
   then all columns on the publisher are replicated.
   See <xref linkend="sql-createpublication"/> for details on the syntax.
  </para>

  <para>
   The choice of columns can be based on behavioral or performance reasons.
   However, do not rely on this feature for security: a malicious subscriber
   is able to obtain data from columns that are not specifically
   published.  If security is a consideration, protections can be applied
   at the publisher side.
  </para>

  <para>
   If no column list is specified, any columns added to the table later are
   automatically replicated. This means that having a column list which names
   all columns is not the same as having no column list at all.
  </para>

  <para>
   A column list can contain only simple column references.  The order
   of columns in the list is not preserved.
  </para>

  <para>
   Specifying a column list when the publication also publishes
   <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-for-tables-in-schema"><literal>FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA</literal></link>
   is not supported.
  </para>

  <para>
   For partitioned tables, the publication parameter
   <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish-via-partition-root"><literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal></link>
   determines which column list is used. If <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal>
   is <literal>true</literal>, the root partitioned table's column list is
   used. Otherwise, if <literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal> is
   <literal>false</literal> (the default), each partition's column list is used.
  </para>

  <para>
   If a publication publishes <command>UPDATE</command> or
   <command>DELETE</command> operations, any column list must include the
   table's replica identity columns (see
   <xref linkend="sql-altertable-replica-identity"/>).
   If a publication publishes only <command>INSERT</command> operations, then
   the column list may omit replica identity columns.
  </para>

  <para>
   Column lists have no effect for the <literal>TRUNCATE</literal> command.
  </para>

  <para>
   During initial data synchronization, only the published columns are
   copied.  However, if the subscriber is from a release prior to 15, then
   all the columns in the table are copied during initial data synchronization,
   ignoring any column lists.
  </para>

   <warning id="logical-replication-col-list-combining">
    <title>Warning: Combining Column Lists from Multiple Publications</title>
    <para>
     There's currently no support for subscriptions comprising several
     publications where the same table has been published with different
     column lists.  <xref linkend="sql-createsubscription"/> disallows
     creating such subscriptions, but it is still possible to get into
     that situation by adding or altering column lists on the publication
     side after a subscription has been created.
    </para>
    <para>
     This means changing the column lists of tables on publications that are
     already subscribed could lead to errors being thrown on the subscriber
     side.
    </para>
    <para>
     If a subscription is affected by this problem, the only way to resume
     replication is to adjust one of the column lists on the publication
     side so that they all match; and then either recreate the subscription,
     or use <link linkend="sql-altersubscription-params-setadddrop-publication">
     <literal>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DROP PUBLICATION</literal></link> to
     remove one of the offending publications and add it again.
    </para>
   </warning>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-col-list-examples">
   <title>Examples</title>

   <para>
    Create a table <literal>t1</literal> to be used in the following example.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE TABLE t1(id int, a text, b text, c text, d text, e text, PRIMARY KEY(id));
CREATE TABLE
</programlisting></para>

   <para>
    Create a publication <literal>p1</literal>. A column list is defined for
    table <literal>t1</literal> to reduce the number of columns that will be
    replicated. Notice that the order of column names in the column list does
    not matter.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# CREATE PUBLICATION p1 FOR TABLE t1 (id, b, a, d);
CREATE PUBLICATION
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     <literal>psql</literal> can be used to show the column lists (if defined)
     for each publication.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# \dRp+
                               Publication p1
  Owner   | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------
 postgres | f          | t       | t       | t       | t         | f
Tables:
    "public.t1" (id, a, b, d)
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     <literal>psql</literal> can be used to show the column lists (if defined)
     for each table.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# \d t1
                 Table "public.t1"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
 id     | integer |           | not null |
 a      | text    |           |          |
 b      | text    |           |          |
 c      | text    |           |          |
 d      | text    |           |          |
 e      | text    |           |          |
Indexes:
    "t1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
Publications:
    "p1" (id, a, b, d)
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     On the subscriber node, create a table <literal>t1</literal> which now
     only needs a subset of the columns that were on the publisher table
     <literal>t1</literal>, and also create the subscription
     <literal>s1</literal> that subscribes to the publication
     <literal>p1</literal>.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# CREATE TABLE t1(id int, b text, a text, d text, PRIMARY KEY(id));
CREATE TABLE
test_sub=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION s1
test_sub-# CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=test_pub application_name=s1'
test_sub-# PUBLICATION p1;
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     On the publisher node, insert some rows to table <literal>t1</literal>.
<programlisting>
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 'a-1', 'b-1', 'c-1', 'd-1', 'e-1');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 'a-2', 'b-2', 'c-2', 'd-2', 'e-2');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 'a-3', 'b-3', 'c-3', 'd-3', 'e-3');
INSERT 0 1
test_pub=# SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY id;
 id |  a  |  b  |  c  |  d  |  e
----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----
  1 | a-1 | b-1 | c-1 | d-1 | e-1
  2 | a-2 | b-2 | c-2 | d-2 | e-2
  3 | a-3 | b-3 | c-3 | d-3 | e-3
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

    <para>
     Only data from the column list of publication <literal>p1</literal> is
     replicated.
<programlisting>
test_sub=# SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY id;
 id |  b  |  a  |  d
----+-----+-----+-----
  1 | b-1 | a-1 | d-1
  2 | b-2 | a-2 | d-2
  3 | b-3 | a-3 | d-3
(3 rows)
</programlisting></para>

  </sect2>

 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-conflicts">
  <title>Conflicts</title>

  <para>
   Logical replication behaves similarly to normal DML operations in that
   the data will be updated even if it was changed locally on the subscriber
   node.  If incoming data violates any constraints the replication will
   stop.  This is referred to as a <firstterm>conflict</firstterm>.  When
   replicating <command>UPDATE</command> or <command>DELETE</command>
   operations, missing data is also considered as a
   <firstterm>conflict</firstterm>, but does not result in an error and such
   operations will simply be skipped.
  </para>

  <para>
   Additional logging is triggered, and the conflict statistics are collected (displayed in the
   <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription-stats"><structname>pg_stat_subscription_stats</structname></link> view)
   in the following <firstterm>conflict</firstterm> cases:
   <variablelist>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-insert-exists" xreflabel="insert_exists">
     <term><literal>insert_exists</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Inserting a row that violates a <literal>NOT DEFERRABLE</literal>
       unique constraint. Note that to log the origin and commit
       timestamp details of the conflicting key,
       <link linkend="guc-track-commit-timestamp"><varname>track_commit_timestamp</varname></link>
       should be enabled on the subscriber. In this case, an error will be
       raised until the conflict is resolved manually.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-update-origin-differs" xreflabel="update_origin_differs">
     <term><literal>update_origin_differs</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Updating a row that was previously modified by another origin.
       Note that this conflict can only be detected when
       <link linkend="guc-track-commit-timestamp"><varname>track_commit_timestamp</varname></link>
       is enabled on the subscriber. Currently, the update is always applied
       regardless of the origin of the local row.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-update-exists" xreflabel="update_exists">
     <term><literal>update_exists</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       The updated value of a row violates a <literal>NOT DEFERRABLE</literal>
       unique constraint. Note that to log the origin and commit
       timestamp details of the conflicting key,
       <link linkend="guc-track-commit-timestamp"><varname>track_commit_timestamp</varname></link>
       should be enabled on the subscriber. In this case, an error will be
       raised until the conflict is resolved manually. Note that when updating a
       partitioned table, if the updated row value satisfies another partition
       constraint resulting in the row being inserted into a new partition, the
       <literal>insert_exists</literal> conflict may arise if the new row
       violates a <literal>NOT DEFERRABLE</literal> unique constraint.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-update-missing" xreflabel="update_missing">
     <term><literal>update_missing</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       The tuple to be updated was not found. The update will simply be
       skipped in this scenario.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-delete-origin-differs" xreflabel="delete_origin_differs">
     <term><literal>delete_origin_differs</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       Deleting a row that was previously modified by another origin. Note that
       this conflict can only be detected when
       <link linkend="guc-track-commit-timestamp"><varname>track_commit_timestamp</varname></link>
       is enabled on the subscriber. Currently, the delete is always applied
       regardless of the origin of the local row.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
    <varlistentry id="conflict-delete-missing" xreflabel="delete_missing">
     <term><literal>delete_missing</literal></term>
     <listitem>
      <para>
       The tuple to be deleted was not found. The delete will simply be
       skipped in this scenario.
      </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
   </variablelist>
    Note that there are other conflict scenarios, such as exclusion constraint
    violations. Currently, we do not provide additional details for them in the
    log.
  </para>

  <para>
   The log format for logical replication conflicts is as follows:
<synopsis>
LOG:  conflict detected on relation "<replaceable>schemaname</replaceable>.<replaceable>tablename</replaceable>": conflict=<replaceable>conflict_type</replaceable>
DETAIL:  <replaceable class="parameter">detailed_explanation</replaceable>.
{<replaceable class="parameter">detail_values</replaceable> [; ... ]}.

<phrase>where <replaceable class="parameter">detail_values</replaceable> is one of:</phrase>

    <literal>Key</literal> (<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)=(<replaceable>column_value</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)
    <literal>existing local tuple</literal> <optional>(<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)=</optional>(<replaceable>column_value</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)
    <literal>remote tuple</literal> <optional>(<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)=</optional>(<replaceable>column_value</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)
    <literal>replica identity</literal> {(<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)=(<replaceable>column_value</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>) | full <optional>(<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)=</optional>(<replaceable>column_value</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional>)}
</synopsis>

   The log provides the following information:
   <variablelist>
    <varlistentry>
     <term><literal>LOG</literal></term>
      <listitem>
       <itemizedlist>
        <listitem>
         <para>
         <replaceable>schemaname</replaceable>.<replaceable>tablename</replaceable>
         identifies the local relation involved in the conflict.
         </para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
         <para>
         <replaceable>conflict_type</replaceable> is the type of conflict that occurred
         (e.g., <literal>insert_exists</literal>, <literal>update_exists</literal>).
         </para>
        </listitem>
       </itemizedlist>
      </listitem>
    </varlistentry>

    <varlistentry>
     <term><literal>DETAIL</literal></term>
      <listitem>
      <itemizedlist>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         <replaceable class="parameter">detailed_explanation</replaceable> includes
         the origin, transaction ID, and commit timestamp of the transaction that
         modified the existing local tuple, if available.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         The <literal>Key</literal> section includes the key values of the local
         tuple that violated a unique constraint for
         <literal>insert_exists</literal> or <literal>update_exists</literal>
         conflicts.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         The <literal>existing local tuple</literal> section includes the local
         tuple if its origin differs from the remote tuple for
         <literal>update_origin_differs</literal> or <literal>delete_origin_differs</literal>
         conflicts, or if the key value conflicts with the remote tuple for
         <literal>insert_exists</literal> or <literal>update_exists</literal>
         conflicts.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         The <literal>remote tuple</literal> section includes the new tuple from
         the remote insert or update operation that caused the conflict. Note that
         for an update operation, the column value of the new tuple will be null
         if the value is unchanged and toasted.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         The <literal>replica identity</literal> section includes the replica
         identity key values that were used to search for the existing local
         tuple to be updated or deleted. This may include the full tuple value
         if the local relation is marked with
         <link linkend="sql-altertable-replica-identity-full"><literal>REPLICA IDENTITY FULL</literal></link>.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         <replaceable class="parameter">column_name</replaceable> is the column name.
         For <literal>existing local tuple</literal>, <literal>remote tuple</literal>,
         and <literal>replica identity full</literal> cases, column names are
         logged only if the user lacks the privilege to access all columns of
         the table. If column names are present, they appear in the same order
         as the corresponding column values.
        </para>
       </listitem>
       <listitem>
        <para>
         <replaceable class="parameter">column_value</replaceable> is the column value.
         The large column values are truncated to 64 bytes.
        </para>
       </listitem>
      </itemizedlist>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
   </variablelist>
  </para>

  <para>
   Logical replication operations are performed with the privileges of the role
   which owns the subscription.  Permissions failures on target tables will
   cause replication conflicts, as will enabled
   <link linkend="ddl-rowsecurity">row-level security</link> on target tables
   that the subscription owner is subject to, without regard to whether any
   policy would ordinarily reject the <command>INSERT</command>,
   <command>UPDATE</command>, <command>DELETE</command> or
   <command>TRUNCATE</command> which is being replicated.  This restriction on
   row-level security may be lifted in a future version of
   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>.
  </para>

  <para>
   A conflict that produces an error will stop the replication; it must be
   resolved manually by the user.  Details about the conflict can be found in
   the subscriber's server log.
  </para>

  <para>
   The resolution can be done either by changing data or permissions on the subscriber so
   that it does not conflict with the incoming change or by skipping the
   transaction that conflicts with the existing data.  When a conflict produces
   an error, the replication won't proceed, and the logical replication worker will
   emit the following kind of message to the subscriber's server log:
<screen>
ERROR:  conflict detected on relation "public.test": conflict=insert_exists
DETAIL:  Key already exists in unique index "t_pkey", which was modified locally in transaction 740 at 2024-06-26 10:47:04.727375+08.
Key (c)=(1); existing local tuple (1, 'local'); remote tuple (1, 'remote').
CONTEXT:  processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16395" during "INSERT" for replication target relation "public.test" in transaction 725 finished at 0/14C0378
</screen>
   The LSN of the transaction that contains the change violating the constraint and
   the replication origin name can be found from the server log (LSN 0/14C0378 and
   replication origin <literal>pg_16395</literal> in the above case).  The
   transaction that produced the conflict can be skipped by using
   <link linkend="sql-altersubscription-params-skip"><command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SKIP</command></link>
   with the finish LSN
   (i.e., LSN 0/14C0378).  The finish LSN could be an LSN at which the transaction
   is committed or prepared on the publisher.  Alternatively, the transaction can
   also be skipped by calling the <link linkend="pg-replication-origin-advance">
   <function>pg_replication_origin_advance()</function></link> function.
   Before using this function, the subscription needs to be disabled temporarily
   either by <link linkend="sql-altersubscription-params-disable">
   <command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE</command></link> or, the
   subscription can be used with the
   <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-disable-on-error"><literal>disable_on_error</literal></link>
   option. Then, you can use <function>pg_replication_origin_advance()</function>
   function with the <parameter>node_name</parameter> (i.e., <literal>pg_16395</literal>)
   and the next LSN of the finish LSN (i.e., 0/14C0379).  The current position of
   origins can be seen in the <link linkend="view-pg-replication-origin-status">
   <structname>pg_replication_origin_status</structname></link> system view.
   Please note that skipping the whole transaction includes skipping changes that
   might not violate any constraint.  This can easily make the subscriber
   inconsistent.
   The additional details regarding conflicting rows, such as their origin and
   commit timestamp can be seen in the <literal>DETAIL</literal> line of the
   log. But note that this information is only available when
   <link linkend="guc-track-commit-timestamp"><varname>track_commit_timestamp</varname></link>
   is enabled on the subscriber. Users can use this information to decide
   whether to retain the local change or adopt the remote alteration. For
   instance, the <literal>DETAIL</literal> line in the above log indicates that
   the existing row was modified locally. Users can manually perform a
   remote-change-win.
  </para>

  <para>
   When the
   <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-streaming"><literal>streaming</literal></link>
   mode is <literal>parallel</literal>, the finish LSN of failed transactions
   may not be logged. In that case, it may be necessary to change the streaming
   mode to <literal>on</literal> or <literal>off</literal> and cause the same
   conflicts again so the finish LSN of the failed transaction will be written
   to the server log. For the usage of finish LSN, please refer to <link
   linkend="sql-altersubscription"><command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ...
   SKIP</command></link>.
  </para>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-restrictions">
  <title>Restrictions</title>

  <para>
   Logical replication currently has the following restrictions or missing
   functionality.  These might be addressed in future releases.
  </para>

  <itemizedlist>
   <listitem>
    <para>
     The database schema and DDL commands are not replicated.  The initial
     schema can be copied by hand using <literal>pg_dump
     --schema-only</literal>.  Subsequent schema changes would need to be kept
     in sync manually.  (Note, however, that there is no need for the schemas
     to be absolutely the same on both sides.)  Logical replication is robust
     when schema definitions change in a live database: When the schema is
     changed on the publisher and replicated data starts arriving at the
     subscriber but does not fit into the table schema, replication will error
     until the schema is updated.  In many cases, intermittent errors can be
     avoided by applying additive schema changes to the subscriber first.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Sequence data is not replicated.  The data in serial or identity columns
     backed by sequences will of course be replicated as part of the table,
     but the sequence itself would still show the start value on the
     subscriber.  If the subscriber is used as a read-only database, then this
     should typically not be a problem.  If, however, some kind of switchover
     or failover to the subscriber database is intended, then the sequences
     would need to be updated to the latest values, either by copying the
     current data from the publisher (perhaps
     using <command>pg_dump</command>) or by determining a sufficiently high
     value from the tables themselves.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Replication of <command>TRUNCATE</command> commands is supported, but
     some care must be taken when truncating groups of tables connected by
     foreign keys.  When replicating a truncate action, the subscriber will
     truncate the same group of tables that was truncated on the publisher,
     either explicitly specified or implicitly collected via
     <literal>CASCADE</literal>, minus tables that are not part of the
     subscription.  This will work correctly if all affected tables are part
     of the same subscription.  But if some tables to be truncated on the
     subscriber have foreign-key links to tables that are not part of the same
     (or any) subscription, then the application of the truncate action on the
     subscriber will fail.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Large objects (see <xref linkend="largeobjects"/>) are not replicated.
     There is no workaround for that, other than storing data in normal
     tables.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     Replication is only supported by tables, including partitioned tables.
     Attempts to replicate other types of relations, such as views, materialized
     views, or foreign tables, will result in an error.
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     When replicating between partitioned tables, the actual replication
     originates, by default, from the leaf partitions on the publisher, so
     partitions on the publisher must also exist on the subscriber as valid
     target tables. (They could either be leaf partitions themselves, or they
     could be further subpartitioned, or they could even be independent
     tables.)  Publications can also specify that changes are to be replicated
     using the identity and schema of the partitioned root table instead of
     that of the individual leaf partitions in which the changes actually
     originate (see
     <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish-via-partition-root"><literal>publish_via_partition_root</literal></link>
     parameter of <command>CREATE PUBLICATION</command>).
    </para>
   </listitem>

   <listitem>
    <para>
     When using
     <link linkend="sql-altertable-replica-identity-full"><literal>REPLICA IDENTITY FULL</literal></link>
     on published tables, it is important to note that the <literal>UPDATE</literal>
     and <literal>DELETE</literal> operations cannot be applied to subscribers
     if the tables include attributes with datatypes (such as point or box)
     that do not have a default operator class for B-tree or Hash. However,
     this limitation can be overcome by ensuring that the table has a primary
     key or replica identity defined for it.
    </para>
   </listitem>
  </itemizedlist>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-architecture">
  <title>Architecture</title>

  <para>
   Logical replication starts by copying a snapshot of the data on the
   publisher database.  Once that is done, changes on the publisher are sent
   to the subscriber as they occur in real time.  The subscriber applies data
   in the order in which commits were made on the publisher so that
   transactional consistency is guaranteed for the publications within any
   single subscription.
  </para>

  <para>
   Logical replication is built with an architecture similar to physical
   streaming replication (see <xref linkend="streaming-replication"/>).  It is
   implemented by <literal>walsender</literal> and <literal>apply</literal>
   processes.  The walsender process starts logical decoding (described
   in <xref linkend="logicaldecoding"/>) of the WAL and loads the standard
   logical decoding output plugin (<literal>pgoutput</literal>).  The plugin
   transforms the changes read
   from WAL to the logical replication protocol
   (see <xref linkend="protocol-logical-replication"/>) and filters the data
   according to the publication specification.  The data is then continuously
   transferred using the streaming replication protocol to the apply worker,
   which maps the data to local tables and applies the individual changes as
   they are received, in correct transactional order.
  </para>

  <para>
   The apply process on the subscriber database always runs with
   <link linkend="guc-session-replication-role"><varname>session_replication_role</varname></link>
   set to <literal>replica</literal>. This means that, by default,
   triggers and rules will not fire on a subscriber. Users can optionally choose to
   enable triggers and rules on a table using the
   <link linkend="sql-altertable"><command>ALTER TABLE</command></link> command
   and the <literal>ENABLE TRIGGER</literal> and <literal>ENABLE RULE</literal>
   clauses.
  </para>

  <para>
   The logical replication apply process currently only fires row triggers,
   not statement triggers.  The initial table synchronization, however, is
   implemented like a <command>COPY</command> command and thus fires both row
   and statement triggers for <command>INSERT</command>.
  </para>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-snapshot">
    <title>Initial Snapshot</title>
    <para>
     The initial data in existing subscribed tables are snapshotted and
     copied in a parallel instance of a special kind of apply process.
     This process will create its own replication slot and copy the existing
     data.  As soon as the copy is finished the table contents will become
     visible to other backends.  Once existing data is copied, the worker
     enters synchronization mode, which ensures that the table is brought
     up to a synchronized state with the main apply process by streaming
     any changes that happened during the initial data copy using standard
     logical replication.  During this synchronization phase, the changes
     are applied and committed in the same order as they happened on the
     publisher.  Once synchronization is done, control of the
     replication of the table is given back to the main apply process where
     replication continues as normal.
    </para>
    <note>
     <para>
      The publication
      <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-with-publish"><literal>publish</literal></link>
      parameter only affects what DML operations will be replicated. The
      initial data synchronization does not take this parameter into account
      when copying the existing table data.
     </para>
    </note>
  </sect2>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-monitoring">
  <title>Monitoring</title>

  <para>
   Because logical replication is based on a similar architecture as
   <link linkend="streaming-replication">physical streaming replication</link>,
   the monitoring on a publication node is similar to monitoring of a
   physical replication primary
   (see <xref linkend="streaming-replication-monitoring"/>).
  </para>

  <para>
   The monitoring information about subscription is visible in
   <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-subscription">
   <structname>pg_stat_subscription</structname></link>.
   This view contains one row for every subscription worker.  A subscription
   can have zero or more active subscription workers depending on its state.
  </para>

  <para>
   Normally, there is a single apply process running for an enabled
   subscription.  A disabled subscription or a crashed subscription will have
   zero rows in this view.  If the initial data synchronization of any
   table is in progress, there will be additional workers for the tables
   being synchronized. Moreover, if the
   <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-streaming"><literal>streaming</literal></link>
   transaction is applied in parallel, there may be additional parallel apply
   workers.
  </para>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-security">
  <title>Security</title>

  <para>
   The role used for the replication connection must have
   the <literal>REPLICATION</literal> attribute (or be a superuser).  If the
   role lacks <literal>SUPERUSER</literal> and <literal>BYPASSRLS</literal>,
   publisher row security policies can execute.  If the role does not trust
   all table owners, include <literal>options=-crow_security=off</literal> in
   the connection string; if a table owner then adds a row security policy,
   that setting will cause replication to halt rather than execute the policy.
   Access for the role must be configured in <filename>pg_hba.conf</filename>
   and it must have the <literal>LOGIN</literal> attribute.
  </para>

  <para>
   In order to be able to copy the initial table data, the role used for the
   replication connection must have the <literal>SELECT</literal> privilege on
   a published table (or be a superuser).
  </para>

  <para>
   To create a publication, the user must have the <literal>CREATE</literal>
   privilege in the database.
  </para>

  <para>
   To add tables to a publication, the user must have ownership rights on the
   table. To add all tables in schema to a publication, the user must be a
   superuser. To create a publication that publishes all tables or all tables in
   schema automatically, the user must be a superuser.
  </para>

  <para>
   There are currently no privileges on publications.  Any subscription (that
   is able to connect) can access any publication.  Thus, if you intend to
   hide some information from particular subscribers, such as by using row
   filters or column lists, or by not adding the whole table to the
   publication, be aware that other publications in the same database could
   expose the same information.  Publication privileges might be added to
   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> in the future to allow for
   finer-grained access control.
  </para>

  <para>
   To create a subscription, the user must have the privileges of
   the <literal>pg_create_subscription</literal> role, as well as
   <literal>CREATE</literal> privileges on the database.
  </para>

  <para>
   The subscription apply process will, at a session level, run with the
   privileges of the subscription owner. However, when performing an insert,
   update, delete, or truncate operation on a particular table, it will switch
   roles to the table owner and perform the operation with the table owner's
   privileges. This means that the subscription owner needs to be able to
   <literal>SET ROLE</literal> to each role that owns a replicated table.
  </para>

  <para>
   If the subscription has been configured with
   <literal>run_as_owner = true</literal>, then no user switching will
   occur. Instead, all operations will be performed with the permissions
   of the subscription owner. In this case, the subscription owner only
   needs privileges to <literal>SELECT</literal>, <literal>INSERT</literal>,
   <literal>UPDATE</literal>, and <literal>DELETE</literal> from the
   target table, and does not need privileges to <literal>SET ROLE</literal>
   to the table owner. However, this also means that any user who owns
   a table into which replication is happening can execute arbitrary code with
   the privileges of the subscription owner. For example, they could do this
   by simply attaching a trigger to one of the tables which they own.
   Because it is usually undesirable to allow one role to freely assume
   the privileges of another, this option should be avoided unless user
   security within the database is of no concern.
  </para>

  <para>
   On the publisher, privileges are only checked once at the start of a
   replication connection and are not re-checked as each change record is read.
  </para>

  <para>
   On the subscriber, the subscription owner's privileges are re-checked for
   each transaction when applied. If a worker is in the process of applying a
   transaction when the ownership of the subscription is changed by a
   concurrent transaction, the application of the current transaction will
   continue under the old owner's privileges.
  </para>
 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-config">
  <title>Configuration Settings</title>

  <para>
   Logical replication requires several configuration options to be set. Most
   options are relevant only on one side of the replication. However,
   <varname>max_replication_slots</varname> is used on both the publisher and
   the subscriber, but it has a different meaning for each.
  </para>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-config-publisher">
   <title>Publishers</title>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-wal-level"><varname>wal_level</varname></link> must be
    set to <literal>logical</literal>.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-replication-slots"><varname>max_replication_slots</varname></link>
    must be set to at least the number of subscriptions expected to connect,
    plus some reserve for table synchronization.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-wal-senders"><varname>max_wal_senders</varname></link>
    should be set to at least the same as
    <varname>max_replication_slots</varname>, plus the number of physical
    replicas that are connected at the same time.
   </para>

   <para>
    Logical replication walsender is also affected by
    <link linkend="guc-wal-sender-timeout"><varname>wal_sender_timeout</varname></link>.
   </para>

  </sect2>

  <sect2 id="logical-replication-config-subscriber">
   <title>Subscribers</title>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-replication-slots-subscriber"><varname>max_replication_slots</varname></link>
    must be set to at least the number of subscriptions that will be added to
    the subscriber, plus some reserve for table synchronization.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-logical-replication-workers"><varname>max_logical_replication_workers</varname></link>
    must be set to at least the number of subscriptions (for leader apply
    workers), plus some reserve for the table synchronization workers and
    parallel apply workers.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-worker-processes"><varname>max_worker_processes</varname></link>
    may need to be adjusted to accommodate for replication workers, at least
    (<link linkend="guc-max-logical-replication-workers"><varname>max_logical_replication_workers</varname></link>
    + <literal>1</literal>). Note, some extensions and parallel queries also
    take worker slots from <varname>max_worker_processes</varname>.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-sync-workers-per-subscription"><varname>max_sync_workers_per_subscription</varname></link>
     controls the amount of parallelism of the initial data copy during the
     subscription initialization or when new tables are added.
   </para>

   <para>
    <link linkend="guc-max-parallel-apply-workers-per-subscription"><varname>max_parallel_apply_workers_per_subscription</varname></link>
     controls the amount of parallelism for streaming of in-progress
     transactions with subscription parameter
     <literal>streaming = parallel</literal>.
   </para>

   <para>
    Logical replication workers are also affected by
    <link linkend="guc-wal-receiver-timeout"><varname>wal_receiver_timeout</varname></link>,
    <link linkend="guc-wal-receiver-status-interval"><varname>wal_receiver_status_interval</varname></link> and
    <link linkend="guc-wal-retrieve-retry-interval"><varname>wal_retrieve_retry_interval</varname></link>.
   </para>

  </sect2>

 </sect1>

 <sect1 id="logical-replication-quick-setup">
  <title>Quick Setup</title>

  <para>
   First set the configuration options in <filename>postgresql.conf</filename>:
<programlisting>
wal_level = logical
</programlisting>
   The other required settings have default values that are sufficient for a
   basic setup.
  </para>

  <para>
   <filename>pg_hba.conf</filename> needs to be adjusted to allow replication
   (the values here depend on your actual network configuration and user you
   want to use for connecting):
<programlisting>
host     all     repuser     0.0.0.0/0     md5
</programlisting>
  </para>

  <para>
   Then on the publisher database:
<programlisting>
CREATE PUBLICATION mypub FOR TABLE users, departments;
</programlisting>
  </para>

  <para>
   And on the subscriber database:
<programlisting>
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION mysub CONNECTION 'dbname=foo host=bar user=repuser' PUBLICATION mypub;
</programlisting>
  </para>

  <para>
   The above will start the replication process, which synchronizes the
   initial table contents of the tables <literal>users</literal> and
   <literal>departments</literal> and then starts replicating
   incremental changes to those tables.
  </para>
 </sect1>
</chapter>