| commit | f664f1f9b77d6c64f3cee1875dcb4faba0da6dd4 | |
| author | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | |
| Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:37:21 +0000 (29 14:37 -0700) | ||
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | |
| Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:06:55 +0000 (30 08:06 -0700) | ||
| tree | 005a3d40481cd3bed0462e9fe5e42653190bddd3 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 487e9bf25cbae11b131d6a14bdbb3a6a77380837 | commitdiff |
revert "ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()"
Evgeniy said:
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch? NetBSD and FreeBSD
do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag, only Solaris does check
like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck, but NetBSD's fsck
says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Evgeniy said:
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch? NetBSD and FreeBSD
do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag, only Solaris does check
like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck, but NetBSD's fsck
says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| fs/ufs/super.c | diffblobblamehistory |