1 \chapter{Extending Python with
\C{} or
\Cpp{} \label{intro
}}
4 It is quite easy to add new built-in modules to Python, if you know
5 how to program in C. Such
\dfn{extension modules
} can do two things
6 that can't be done directly in Python: they can implement new built-in
7 object types, and they can call C library functions and system calls.
9 To support extensions, the Python API (Application Programmers
10 Interface) defines a set of functions, macros and variables that
11 provide access to most aspects of the Python run-time system. The
12 Python API is incorporated in a C source file by including the header
15 The compilation of an extension module depends on its intended use as
16 well as on your system setup; details are given in later chapters.
19 \section{A Simple Example
20 \label{simpleExample
}}
22 Let's create an extension module called
\samp{spam
} (the favorite food
23 of Monty Python fans...) and let's say we want to create a Python
24 interface to the C library function
\cfunction{system()
}.
\footnote{An
25 interface for this function already exists in the standard module
26 \module{os
} --- it was chosen as a simple and straightfoward example.
}
27 This function takes a null-terminated character string as argument and
28 returns an integer. We want this function to be callable from Python
33 >>> status = spam.system("ls -l")
36 Begin by creating a file
\file{spammodule.c
}. (Historically, if a
37 module is called
\samp{spam
}, the C file containing its implementation
38 is called
\file{spammodule.c
}; if the module name is very long, like
39 \samp{spammify
}, the module name can be just
\file{spammify.c
}.)
41 The first line of our file can be:
47 which pulls in the Python API (you can add a comment describing the
48 purpose of the module and a copyright notice if you like).
50 \begin{notice
}[warning
]
51 Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect
52 the standard headers on some systems, you
\emph{must
} include
53 \file{Python.h
} before any standard headers are included.
56 All user-visible symbols defined by
\file{Python.h
} have a prefix of
57 \samp{Py
} or
\samp{PY
}, except those defined in standard header files.
58 For convenience, and since they are used extensively by the Python
59 interpreter,
\code{"Python.h"
} includes a few standard header files:
60 \code{<stdio.h>
},
\code{<string.h>
},
\code{<errno.h>
}, and
61 \code{<stdlib.h>
}. If the latter header file does not exist on your
62 system, it declares the functions
\cfunction{malloc()
},
63 \cfunction{free()
} and
\cfunction{realloc()
} directly.
65 The next thing we add to our module file is the C function that will
66 be called when the Python expression
\samp{spam.system(
\var{string
})
}
67 is evaluated (we'll see shortly how it ends up being called):
71 spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
76 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
78 sts = system(command);
79 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
83 There is a straightforward translation from the argument list in
84 Python (for example, the single expression
\code{"ls -l"
}) to the
85 arguments passed to the C function. The C function always has two
86 arguments, conventionally named
\var{self
} and
\var{args
}.
88 The
\var{self
} argument is only used when the C function implements a
89 built-in method, not a function. In the example,
\var{self
} will
90 always be a
\NULL{} pointer, since we are defining a function, not a
91 method. (This is done so that the interpreter doesn't have to
92 understand two different types of C functions.)
94 The
\var{args
} argument will be a pointer to a Python tuple object
95 containing the arguments. Each item of the tuple corresponds to an
96 argument in the call's argument list. The arguments are Python
97 objects --- in order to do anything with them in our C function we have
98 to convert them to C values. The function
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}
99 in the Python API checks the argument types and converts them to C
100 values. It uses a template string to determine the required types of
101 the arguments as well as the types of the C variables into which to
102 store the converted values. More about this later.
104 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} returns true (nonzero) if all arguments have
105 the right type and its components have been stored in the variables
106 whose addresses are passed. It returns false (zero) if an invalid
107 argument list was passed. In the latter case it also raises an
108 appropriate exception so the calling function can return
109 \NULL{} immediately (as we saw in the example).
112 \section{Intermezzo: Errors and Exceptions
115 An important convention throughout the Python interpreter is the
116 following: when a function fails, it should set an exception condition
117 and return an error value (usually a
\NULL{} pointer). Exceptions
118 are stored in a static global variable inside the interpreter; if this
119 variable is
\NULL{} no exception has occurred. A second global
120 variable stores the ``associated value'' of the exception (the second
121 argument to
\keyword{raise
}). A third variable contains the stack
122 traceback in case the error originated in Python code. These three
123 variables are the C equivalents of the Python variables
124 \code{sys.exc_type
},
\code{sys.exc_value
} and
\code{sys.exc_traceback
} (see
125 the section on module
\module{sys
} in the
126 \citetitle[../lib/lib.html
]{Python Library Reference
}). It is
127 important to know about them to understand how errors are passed
130 The Python API defines a number of functions to set various types of
133 The most common one is
\cfunction{PyErr_SetString()
}. Its arguments
134 are an exception object and a C string. The exception object is
135 usually a predefined object like
\cdata{PyExc_ZeroDivisionError
}. The
136 C string indicates the cause of the error and is converted to a
137 Python string object and stored as the ``associated value'' of the
140 Another useful function is
\cfunction{PyErr_SetFromErrno()
}, which only
141 takes an exception argument and constructs the associated value by
142 inspection of the global variable
\cdata{errno
}. The most
143 general function is
\cfunction{PyErr_SetObject()
}, which takes two object
144 arguments, the exception and its associated value. You don't need to
145 \cfunction{Py_INCREF()
} the objects passed to any of these functions.
147 You can test non-destructively whether an exception has been set with
148 \cfunction{PyErr_Occurred()
}. This returns the current exception object,
149 or
\NULL{} if no exception has occurred. You normally don't need
150 to call
\cfunction{PyErr_Occurred()
} to see whether an error occurred in a
151 function call, since you should be able to tell from the return value.
153 When a function
\var{f
} that calls another function
\var{g
} detects
154 that the latter fails,
\var{f
} should itself return an error value
155 (usually
\NULL{} or
\code{-
1}). It should
\emph{not
} call one of the
156 \cfunction{PyErr_*()
} functions --- one has already been called by
\var{g
}.
157 \var{f
}'s caller is then supposed to also return an error indication
158 to
\emph{its
} caller, again
\emph{without
} calling
\cfunction{PyErr_*()
},
159 and so on --- the most detailed cause of the error was already
160 reported by the function that first detected it. Once the error
161 reaches the Python interpreter's main loop, this aborts the currently
162 executing Python code and tries to find an exception handler specified
163 by the Python programmer.
165 (There are situations where a module can actually give a more detailed
166 error message by calling another
\cfunction{PyErr_*()
} function, and in
167 such cases it is fine to do so. As a general rule, however, this is
168 not necessary, and can cause information about the cause of the error
169 to be lost: most operations can fail for a variety of reasons.)
171 To ignore an exception set by a function call that failed, the exception
172 condition must be cleared explicitly by calling
\cfunction{PyErr_Clear()
}.
173 The only time C code should call
\cfunction{PyErr_Clear()
} is if it doesn't
174 want to pass the error on to the interpreter but wants to handle it
175 completely by itself (possibly by trying something else, or pretending
178 Every failing
\cfunction{malloc()
} call must be turned into an
179 exception --- the direct caller of
\cfunction{malloc()
} (or
180 \cfunction{realloc()
}) must call
\cfunction{PyErr_NoMemory()
} and
181 return a failure indicator itself. All the object-creating functions
182 (for example,
\cfunction{PyInt_FromLong()
}) already do this, so this
183 note is only relevant to those who call
\cfunction{malloc()
} directly.
185 Also note that, with the important exception of
186 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} and friends, functions that return an
187 integer status usually return a positive value or zero for success and
188 \code{-
1} for failure, like
\UNIX{} system calls.
190 Finally, be careful to clean up garbage (by making
191 \cfunction{Py_XDECREF()
} or
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
} calls for objects
192 you have already created) when you return an error indicator!
194 The choice of which exception to raise is entirely yours. There are
195 predeclared C objects corresponding to all built-in Python exceptions,
196 such as
\cdata{PyExc_ZeroDivisionError
}, which you can use directly.
197 Of course, you should choose exceptions wisely --- don't use
198 \cdata{PyExc_TypeError
} to mean that a file couldn't be opened (that
199 should probably be
\cdata{PyExc_IOError
}). If something's wrong with
200 the argument list, the
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} function usually
201 raises
\cdata{PyExc_TypeError
}. If you have an argument whose value
202 must be in a particular range or must satisfy other conditions,
203 \cdata{PyExc_ValueError
} is appropriate.
205 You can also define a new exception that is unique to your module.
206 For this, you usually declare a static object variable at the
207 beginning of your file:
210 static PyObject *SpamError;
213 and initialize it in your module's initialization function
214 (
\cfunction{initspam()
}) with an exception object (leaving out
215 the error checking for now):
223 m = Py_InitModule("spam", SpamMethods);
225 SpamError = PyErr_NewException("spam.error", NULL, NULL);
226 Py_INCREF(SpamError);
227 PyModule_AddObject(m, "error", SpamError);
231 Note that the Python name for the exception object is
232 \exception{spam.error
}. The
\cfunction{PyErr_NewException()
} function
233 may create a class with the base class being
\exception{Exception
}
234 (unless another class is passed in instead of
\NULL), described in the
235 \citetitle[../lib/lib.html
]{Python Library Reference
} under ``Built-in
238 Note also that the
\cdata{SpamError
} variable retains a reference to
239 the newly created exception class; this is intentional! Since the
240 exception could be removed from the module by external code, an owned
241 reference to the class is needed to ensure that it will not be
242 discarded, causing
\cdata{SpamError
} to become a dangling pointer.
243 Should it become a dangling pointer, C code which raises the exception
244 could cause a core dump or other unintended side effects.
246 We discuss the use of PyMODINIT_FUNC later in this sample.
248 \section{Back to the Example
249 \label{backToExample
}}
251 Going back to our example function, you should now be able to
252 understand this statement:
255 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
259 It returns
\NULL{} (the error indicator for functions returning
260 object pointers) if an error is detected in the argument list, relying
261 on the exception set by
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}. Otherwise the
262 string value of the argument has been copied to the local variable
263 \cdata{command
}. This is a pointer assignment and you are not supposed
264 to modify the string to which it points (so in Standard C, the variable
265 \cdata{command
} should properly be declared as
\samp{const char
268 The next statement is a call to the
\UNIX{} function
269 \cfunction{system()
}, passing it the string we just got from
270 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}:
273 sts = system(command);
276 Our
\function{spam.system()
} function must return the value of
277 \cdata{sts
} as a Python object. This is done using the function
278 \cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
}, which is something like the inverse of
279 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}: it takes a format string and an
280 arbitrary number of C values, and returns a new Python object.
281 More info on
\cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
} is given later.
284 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
287 In this case, it will return an integer object. (Yes, even integers
288 are objects on the heap in Python!)
290 If you have a C function that returns no useful argument (a function
291 returning
\ctype{void
}), the corresponding Python function must return
292 \code{None
}. You need this idiom to do so:
299 \cdata{Py_None
} is the C name for the special Python object
300 \code{None
}. It is a genuine Python object rather than a
\NULL{}
301 pointer, which means ``error'' in most contexts, as we have seen.
304 \section{The Module's Method Table and Initialization Function
307 I promised to show how
\cfunction{spam_system()
} is called from Python
308 programs. First, we need to list its name and address in a ``method
312 static PyMethodDef SpamMethods
[] =
{
314 {"system", spam_system, METH_VARARGS,
315 "Execute a shell command."
},
317 {NULL, NULL,
0, NULL
} /* Sentinel */
321 Note the third entry (
\samp{METH_VARARGS
}). This is a flag telling
322 the interpreter the calling convention to be used for the C
323 function. It should normally always be
\samp{METH_VARARGS
} or
324 \samp{METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS
}; a value of
\code{0} means that an
325 obsolete variant of
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} is used.
327 When using only
\samp{METH_VARARGS
}, the function should expect
328 the Python-level parameters to be passed in as a tuple acceptable for
329 parsing via
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}; more information on this
330 function is provided below.
332 The
\constant{METH_KEYWORDS
} bit may be set in the third field if
333 keyword arguments should be passed to the function. In this case, the
334 C function should accept a third
\samp{PyObject *
} parameter which
335 will be a dictionary of keywords. Use
336 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
} to parse the arguments to
339 The method table must be passed to the interpreter in the module's
340 initialization function. The initialization function must be named
341 \cfunction{init
\var{name
}()
}, where
\var{name
} is the name of the
342 module, and should be the only non-
\keyword{static
} item defined in
349 (void) Py_InitModule("spam", SpamMethods);
353 Note that PyMODINIT_FUNC declares the function as
\code{void
} return type,
354 declares any special linkage declarations required by the platform, and for
355 \Cpp{} declares the function as
\code{extern "C"
}.
357 When the Python program imports module
\module{spam
} for the first
358 time,
\cfunction{initspam()
} is called. (See below for comments about
359 embedding Python.) It calls
360 \cfunction{Py_InitModule()
}, which creates a ``module object'' (which
361 is inserted in the dictionary
\code{sys.modules
} under the key
362 \code{"spam"
}), and inserts built-in function objects into the newly
363 created module based upon the table (an array of
\ctype{PyMethodDef
}
364 structures) that was passed as its second argument.
365 \cfunction{Py_InitModule()
} returns a pointer to the module object
366 that it creates (which is unused here). It aborts with a fatal error
367 if the module could not be initialized satisfactorily, so the caller
368 doesn't need to check for errors.
370 When embedding Python, the
\cfunction{initspam()
} function is not
371 called automatically unless there's an entry in the
372 \cdata{_PyImport_Inittab
} table. The easiest way to handle this is to
373 statically initialize your statically-linked modules by directly
374 calling
\cfunction{initspam()
} after the call to
375 \cfunction{Py_Initialize()
} or
\cfunction{PyMac_Initialize()
}:
379 main(int argc, char *argv
[])
381 /* Pass argv
[0] to the Python interpreter */
382 Py_SetProgramName(argv
[0]);
384 /* Initialize the Python interpreter. Required. */
387 /* Add a static module */
391 An example may be found in the file
\file{Demo/embed/demo.c
} in the
392 Python source distribution.
394 \note{Removing entries from
\code{sys.modules
} or importing
395 compiled modules into multiple interpreters within a process (or
396 following a
\cfunction{fork()
} without an intervening
397 \cfunction{exec()
}) can create problems for some extension modules.
398 Extension module authors should exercise caution when initializing
399 internal data structures.
400 Note also that the
\function{reload()
} function can be used with
401 extension modules, and will call the module initialization function
402 (
\cfunction{initspam()
} in the example), but will not load the module
403 again if it was loaded from a dynamically loadable object file
404 (
\file{.so
} on
\UNIX,
\file{.dll
} on Windows).
}
406 A more substantial example module is included in the Python source
407 distribution as
\file{Modules/xxmodule.c
}. This file may be used as a
408 template or simply read as an example. The
\program{modulator.py
}
409 script included in the source distribution or Windows install provides
410 a simple graphical user interface for declaring the functions and
411 objects which a module should implement, and can generate a template
412 which can be filled in. The script lives in the
413 \file{Tools/modulator/
} directory; see the
\file{README
} file there
414 for more information.
417 \section{Compilation and Linkage
420 There are two more things to do before you can use your new extension:
421 compiling and linking it with the Python system. If you use dynamic
422 loading, the details may depend on the style of dynamic loading your
423 system uses; see the chapters about building extension modules
424 (chapter
\ref{building
}) and additional information that pertains only
425 to building on Windows (chapter
\ref{building-on-windows
}) for more
426 information about this.
427 % XXX Add information about Mac OS
429 If you can't use dynamic loading, or if you want to make your module a
430 permanent part of the Python interpreter, you will have to change the
431 configuration setup and rebuild the interpreter. Luckily, this is
432 very simple on
\UNIX: just place your file (
\file{spammodule.c
} for
433 example) in the
\file{Modules/
} directory of an unpacked source
434 distribution, add a line to the file
\file{Modules/Setup.local
}
435 describing your file:
441 and rebuild the interpreter by running
\program{make
} in the toplevel
442 directory. You can also run
\program{make
} in the
\file{Modules/
}
443 subdirectory, but then you must first rebuild
\file{Makefile
}
444 there by running `
\program{make
} Makefile'. (This is necessary each
445 time you change the
\file{Setup
} file.)
447 If your module requires additional libraries to link with, these can
448 be listed on the line in the configuration file as well, for instance:
451 spam spammodule.o -lX11
454 \section{Calling Python Functions from C
455 \label{callingPython
}}
457 So far we have concentrated on making C functions callable from
458 Python. The reverse is also useful: calling Python functions from C.
459 This is especially the case for libraries that support so-called
460 ``callback'' functions. If a C interface makes use of callbacks, the
461 equivalent Python often needs to provide a callback mechanism to the
462 Python programmer; the implementation will require calling the Python
463 callback functions from a C callback. Other uses are also imaginable.
465 Fortunately, the Python interpreter is easily called recursively, and
466 there is a standard interface to call a Python function. (I won't
467 dwell on how to call the Python parser with a particular string as
468 input --- if you're interested, have a look at the implementation of
469 the
\programopt{-c
} command line option in
\file{Python/pythonmain.c
}
470 from the Python source code.)
472 Calling a Python function is easy. First, the Python program must
473 somehow pass you the Python function object. You should provide a
474 function (or some other interface) to do this. When this function is
475 called, save a pointer to the Python function object (be careful to
476 \cfunction{Py_INCREF()
} it!) in a global variable --- or wherever you
477 see fit. For example, the following function might be part of a module
481 static PyObject *my_callback = NULL;
484 my_set_callback(PyObject *dummy, PyObject *args)
486 PyObject *result = NULL;
489 if (PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O:set_callback", &temp))
{
490 if (!PyCallable_Check(temp))
{
491 PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "parameter must be callable");
494 Py_XINCREF(temp); /* Add a reference to new callback */
495 Py_XDECREF(my_callback); /* Dispose of previous callback */
496 my_callback = temp; /* Remember new callback */
497 /* Boilerplate to return "None" */
505 This function must be registered with the interpreter using the
506 \constant{METH_VARARGS
} flag; this is described in section
507 \ref{methodTable
}, ``The Module's Method Table and Initialization
508 Function.'' The
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} function and its
509 arguments are documented in section~
\ref{parseTuple
}, ``Extracting
510 Parameters in Extension Functions.''
512 The macros
\cfunction{Py_XINCREF()
} and
\cfunction{Py_XDECREF()
}
513 increment/decrement the reference count of an object and are safe in
514 the presence of
\NULL{} pointers (but note that
\var{temp
} will not be
515 \NULL{} in this context). More info on them in
516 section~
\ref{refcounts
}, ``Reference Counts.''
518 Later, when it is time to call the function, you call the C function
519 \cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
}.
\ttindex{PyEval_CallObject()
} This
520 function has two arguments, both pointers to arbitrary Python objects:
521 the Python function, and the argument list. The argument list must
522 always be a tuple object, whose length is the number of arguments. To
523 call the Python function with no arguments, pass an empty tuple; to
524 call it with one argument, pass a singleton tuple.
525 \cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
} returns a tuple when its format string
526 consists of zero or more format codes between parentheses. For
536 /* Time to call the callback */
537 arglist = Py_BuildValue("(i)", arg);
538 result = PyEval_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
542 \cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
} returns a Python object pointer: this is
543 the return value of the Python function.
\cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
} is
544 ``reference-count-neutral'' with respect to its arguments. In the
545 example a new tuple was created to serve as the argument list, which
546 is
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
}-ed immediately after the call.
548 The return value of
\cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
} is ``new'': either it
549 is a brand new object, or it is an existing object whose reference
550 count has been incremented. So, unless you want to save it in a
551 global variable, you should somehow
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
} the result,
552 even (especially!) if you are not interested in its value.
554 Before you do this, however, it is important to check that the return
555 value isn't
\NULL. If it is, the Python function terminated by
556 raising an exception. If the C code that called
557 \cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
} is called from Python, it should now
558 return an error indication to its Python caller, so the interpreter
559 can print a stack trace, or the calling Python code can handle the
560 exception. If this is not possible or desirable, the exception should
561 be cleared by calling
\cfunction{PyErr_Clear()
}. For example:
565 return NULL; /* Pass error back */
570 Depending on the desired interface to the Python callback function,
571 you may also have to provide an argument list to
572 \cfunction{PyEval_CallObject()
}. In some cases the argument list is
573 also provided by the Python program, through the same interface that
574 specified the callback function. It can then be saved and used in the
575 same manner as the function object. In other cases, you may have to
576 construct a new tuple to pass as the argument list. The simplest way
577 to do this is to call
\cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
}. For example, if
578 you want to pass an integral event code, you might use the following
584 arglist = Py_BuildValue("(l)", eventcode);
585 result = PyEval_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
588 return NULL; /* Pass error back */
589 /* Here maybe use the result */
593 Note the placement of
\samp{Py_DECREF(arglist)
} immediately after the
594 call, before the error check! Also note that strictly spoken this
595 code is not complete:
\cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
} may run out of
596 memory, and this should be checked.
599 \section{Extracting Parameters in Extension Functions
602 \ttindex{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}
604 The
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} function is declared as follows:
607 int PyArg_ParseTuple(PyObject *arg, char *format, ...);
610 The
\var{arg
} argument must be a tuple object containing an argument
611 list passed from Python to a C function. The
\var{format
} argument
612 must be a format string, whose syntax is explained in
613 ``
\ulink{Parsing arguments and building
614 values
}{../api/arg-parsing.html
}'' in the
615 \citetitle[../api/api.html
]{Python/C API Reference Manual
}. The
616 remaining arguments must be addresses of variables whose type is
617 determined by the format string.
619 Note that while
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} checks that the Python
620 arguments have the required types, it cannot check the validity of the
621 addresses of C variables passed to the call: if you make mistakes
622 there, your code will probably crash or at least overwrite random bits
623 in memory. So be careful!
625 Note that any Python object references which are provided to the
626 caller are
\emph{borrowed
} references; do not decrement their
638 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ""); /* No arguments */
639 /* Python call: f() */
643 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &s); /* A string */
644 /* Possible Python call: f('whoops!') */
648 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lls", &k, &l, &s); /* Two longs and a string */
649 /* Possible Python call: f(
1,
2, 'three') */
653 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "(ii)s#", &i, &j, &s, &size);
654 /* A pair of ints and a string, whose size is also returned */
655 /* Possible Python call: f((
1,
2), 'three') */
663 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s|si", &file, &mode, &bufsize);
664 /* A string, and optionally another string and an integer */
665 /* Possible Python calls:
668 f('spam', 'wb',
100000) */
674 int left, top, right, bottom, h, v;
675 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "((ii)(ii))(ii)",
676 &left, &top, &right, &bottom, &h, &v);
677 /* A rectangle and a point */
678 /* Possible Python call:
679 f(((
0,
0), (
400,
300)), (
10,
10)) */
686 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "D:myfunction", &c);
687 /* a complex, also providing a function name for errors */
688 /* Possible Python call: myfunction(
1+
2j) */
693 \section{Keyword Parameters for Extension Functions
694 \label{parseTupleAndKeywords
}}
696 \ttindex{PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
}
698 The
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
} function is declared as
702 int PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(PyObject *arg, PyObject *kwdict,
703 char *format, char *kwlist
[], ...);
706 The
\var{arg
} and
\var{format
} parameters are identical to those of the
707 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
} function. The
\var{kwdict
} parameter
708 is the dictionary of keywords received as the third parameter from the
709 Python runtime. The
\var{kwlist
} parameter is a
\NULL-terminated
710 list of strings which identify the parameters; the names are matched
711 with the type information from
\var{format
} from left to right. On
712 success,
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
} returns true,
713 otherwise it returns false and raises an appropriate exception.
715 \note{Nested tuples cannot be parsed when using keyword
716 arguments! Keyword parameters passed in which are not present in the
717 \var{kwlist
} will cause
\exception{TypeError
} to be raised.
}
719 Here is an example module which uses keywords, based on an example by
720 Geoff Philbrick (
\email{philbrick@hks.com
}):
%
721 \index{Philbrick, Geoff
}
727 keywdarg_parrot(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *keywds)
730 char *state = "a stiff";
731 char *action = "voom";
732 char *type = "Norwegian Blue";
734 static char *kwlist
[] =
{"voltage", "state", "action", "type", NULL
};
736 if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, keywds, "i|sss", kwlist,
737 &voltage, &state, &action, &type))
740 printf("-- This parrot wouldn't
%s if you put %i Volts through it.\n",
742 printf("-- Lovely plumage, the
%s -- It's %s!\n", type, state);
749 static PyMethodDef keywdarg_methods
[] =
{
750 /* The cast of the function is necessary since PyCFunction values
751 * only take two PyObject* parameters, and keywdarg_parrot() takes
754 {"parrot", (PyCFunction)keywdarg_parrot, METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS,
755 "Print a lovely skit to standard output."
},
756 {NULL, NULL,
0, NULL
} /* sentinel */
764 /* Create the module and add the functions */
765 Py_InitModule("keywdarg", keywdarg_methods);
770 \section{Building Arbitrary Values
773 This function is the counterpart to
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}. It is
777 PyObject *Py_BuildValue(char *format, ...);
780 It recognizes a set of format units similar to the ones recognized by
781 \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}, but the arguments (which are input to the
782 function, not output) must not be pointers, just values. It returns a
783 new Python object, suitable for returning from a C function called
786 One difference with
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()
}: while the latter
787 requires its first argument to be a tuple (since Python argument lists
788 are always represented as tuples internally),
789 \cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
} does not always build a tuple. It builds
790 a tuple only if its format string contains two or more format units.
791 If the format string is empty, it returns
\code{None
}; if it contains
792 exactly one format unit, it returns whatever object is described by
793 that format unit. To force it to return a tuple of size
0 or one,
794 parenthesize the format string.
796 Examples (to the left the call, to the right the resulting Python value):
799 Py_BuildValue("") None
800 Py_BuildValue("i",
123)
123
801 Py_BuildValue("iii",
123,
456,
789) (
123,
456,
789)
802 Py_BuildValue("s", "hello") 'hello'
803 Py_BuildValue("ss", "hello", "world") ('hello', 'world')
804 Py_BuildValue("s#", "hello",
4) 'hell'
805 Py_BuildValue("()") ()
806 Py_BuildValue("(i)",
123) (
123,)
807 Py_BuildValue("(ii)",
123,
456) (
123,
456)
808 Py_BuildValue("(i,i)",
123,
456) (
123,
456)
809 Py_BuildValue("
[i,i
]",
123,
456)
[123,
456]
810 Py_BuildValue("
{s:i,s:i
}",
811 "abc",
123, "def",
456)
{'abc':
123, 'def':
456}
812 Py_BuildValue("((ii)(ii)) (ii)",
813 1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6) (((
1,
2), (
3,
4)), (
5,
6))
817 \section{Reference Counts
820 In languages like C or
\Cpp, the programmer is responsible for
821 dynamic allocation and deallocation of memory on the heap. In C,
822 this is done using the functions
\cfunction{malloc()
} and
823 \cfunction{free()
}. In
\Cpp, the operators
\keyword{new
} and
824 \keyword{delete
} are used with essentially the same meaning and
825 we'll restrict the following discussion to the C case.
827 Every block of memory allocated with
\cfunction{malloc()
} should
828 eventually be returned to the pool of available memory by exactly one
829 call to
\cfunction{free()
}. It is important to call
830 \cfunction{free()
} at the right time. If a block's address is
831 forgotten but
\cfunction{free()
} is not called for it, the memory it
832 occupies cannot be reused until the program terminates. This is
833 called a
\dfn{memory leak
}. On the other hand, if a program calls
834 \cfunction{free()
} for a block and then continues to use the block, it
835 creates a conflict with re-use of the block through another
836 \cfunction{malloc()
} call. This is called
\dfn{using freed memory
}.
837 It has the same bad consequences as referencing uninitialized data ---
838 core dumps, wrong results, mysterious crashes.
840 Common causes of memory leaks are unusual paths through the code. For
841 instance, a function may allocate a block of memory, do some
842 calculation, and then free the block again. Now a change in the
843 requirements for the function may add a test to the calculation that
844 detects an error condition and can return prematurely from the
845 function. It's easy to forget to free the allocated memory block when
846 taking this premature exit, especially when it is added later to the
847 code. Such leaks, once introduced, often go undetected for a long
848 time: the error exit is taken only in a small fraction of all calls,
849 and most modern machines have plenty of virtual memory, so the leak
850 only becomes apparent in a long-running process that uses the leaking
851 function frequently. Therefore, it's important to prevent leaks from
852 happening by having a coding convention or strategy that minimizes
855 Since Python makes heavy use of
\cfunction{malloc()
} and
856 \cfunction{free()
}, it needs a strategy to avoid memory leaks as well
857 as the use of freed memory. The chosen method is called
858 \dfn{reference counting
}. The principle is simple: every object
859 contains a counter, which is incremented when a reference to the
860 object is stored somewhere, and which is decremented when a reference
861 to it is deleted. When the counter reaches zero, the last reference
862 to the object has been deleted and the object is freed.
864 An alternative strategy is called
\dfn{automatic garbage collection
}.
865 (Sometimes, reference counting is also referred to as a garbage
866 collection strategy, hence my use of ``automatic'' to distinguish the
867 two.) The big advantage of automatic garbage collection is that the
868 user doesn't need to call
\cfunction{free()
} explicitly. (Another claimed
869 advantage is an improvement in speed or memory usage --- this is no
870 hard fact however.) The disadvantage is that for C, there is no
871 truly portable automatic garbage collector, while reference counting
872 can be implemented portably (as long as the functions
\cfunction{malloc()
}
873 and
\cfunction{free()
} are available --- which the C Standard guarantees).
874 Maybe some day a sufficiently portable automatic garbage collector
875 will be available for C. Until then, we'll have to live with
878 While Python uses the traditional reference counting implementation,
879 it also offers a cycle detector that works to detect reference
880 cycles. This allows applications to not worry about creating direct
881 or indirect circular references; these are the weakness of garbage
882 collection implemented using only reference counting. Reference
883 cycles consist of objects which contain (possibly indirect) references
884 to themselves, so that each object in the cycle has a reference count
885 which is non-zero. Typical reference counting implementations are not
886 able to reclaim the memory belonging to any objects in a reference
887 cycle, or referenced from the objects in the cycle, even though there
888 are no further references to the cycle itself.
890 The cycle detector is able to detect garbage cycles and can reclaim
891 them so long as there are no finalizers implemented in Python
892 (
\method{__del__()
} methods). When there are such finalizers, the
893 detector exposes the cycles through the
\ulink{\module{gc
}
894 module
}{../lib/module-gc.html
} (specifically, the
\code{garbage
}
895 variable in that module). The
\module{gc
} module also exposes a way
896 to run the detector (the
\function{collect()
} function), as well as
897 configuration interfaces and the ability to disable the detector at
898 runtime. The cycle detector is considered an optional component;
899 though it is included by default, it can be disabled at build time
900 using the
\longprogramopt{without-cycle-gc
} option to the
901 \program{configure
} script on
\UNIX{} platforms (including Mac OS X)
902 or by removing the definition of
\code{WITH_CYCLE_GC
} in the
903 \file{pyconfig.h
} header on other platforms. If the cycle detector is
904 disabled in this way, the
\module{gc
} module will not be available.
907 \subsection{Reference Counting in Python
908 \label{refcountsInPython
}}
910 There are two macros,
\code{Py_INCREF(x)
} and
\code{Py_DECREF(x)
},
911 which handle the incrementing and decrementing of the reference count.
912 \cfunction{Py_DECREF()
} also frees the object when the count reaches zero.
913 For flexibility, it doesn't call
\cfunction{free()
} directly --- rather, it
914 makes a call through a function pointer in the object's
\dfn{type
915 object
}. For this purpose (and others), every object also contains a
916 pointer to its type object.
918 The big question now remains: when to use
\code{Py_INCREF(x)
} and
919 \code{Py_DECREF(x)
}? Let's first introduce some terms. Nobody
920 ``owns'' an object; however, you can
\dfn{own a reference
} to an
921 object. An object's reference count is now defined as the number of
922 owned references to it. The owner of a reference is responsible for
923 calling
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
} when the reference is no longer
924 needed. Ownership of a reference can be transferred. There are three
925 ways to dispose of an owned reference: pass it on, store it, or call
926 \cfunction{Py_DECREF()
}. Forgetting to dispose of an owned reference
927 creates a memory leak.
929 It is also possible to
\dfn{borrow
}\footnote{The metaphor of
930 ``borrowing'' a reference is not completely correct: the owner still
931 has a copy of the reference.
} a reference to an object. The borrower
932 of a reference should not call
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
}. The borrower must
933 not hold on to the object longer than the owner from which it was
934 borrowed. Using a borrowed reference after the owner has disposed of
935 it risks using freed memory and should be avoided
936 completely.
\footnote{Checking that the reference count is at least
1
937 \strong{does not work
} --- the reference count itself could be in
938 freed memory and may thus be reused for another object!
}
940 The advantage of borrowing over owning a reference is that you don't
941 need to take care of disposing of the reference on all possible paths
942 through the code --- in other words, with a borrowed reference you
943 don't run the risk of leaking when a premature exit is taken. The
944 disadvantage of borrowing over leaking is that there are some subtle
945 situations where in seemingly correct code a borrowed reference can be
946 used after the owner from which it was borrowed has in fact disposed
949 A borrowed reference can be changed into an owned reference by calling
950 \cfunction{Py_INCREF()
}. This does not affect the status of the owner from
951 which the reference was borrowed --- it creates a new owned reference,
952 and gives full owner responsibilities (the new owner must
953 dispose of the reference properly, as well as the previous owner).
956 \subsection{Ownership Rules
957 \label{ownershipRules
}}
959 Whenever an object reference is passed into or out of a function, it
960 is part of the function's interface specification whether ownership is
961 transferred with the reference or not.
963 Most functions that return a reference to an object pass on ownership
964 with the reference. In particular, all functions whose function it is
965 to create a new object, such as
\cfunction{PyInt_FromLong()
} and
966 \cfunction{Py_BuildValue()
}, pass ownership to the receiver. Even if
967 the object is not actually new, you still receive ownership of a new
968 reference to that object. For instance,
\cfunction{PyInt_FromLong()
}
969 maintains a cache of popular values and can return a reference to a
972 Many functions that extract objects from other objects also transfer
973 ownership with the reference, for instance
974 \cfunction{PyObject_GetAttrString()
}. The picture is less clear, here,
975 however, since a few common routines are exceptions:
976 \cfunction{PyTuple_GetItem()
},
\cfunction{PyList_GetItem()
},
977 \cfunction{PyDict_GetItem()
}, and
\cfunction{PyDict_GetItemString()
}
978 all return references that you borrow from the tuple, list or
981 The function
\cfunction{PyImport_AddModule()
} also returns a borrowed
982 reference, even though it may actually create the object it returns:
983 this is possible because an owned reference to the object is stored in
986 When you pass an object reference into another function, in general,
987 the function borrows the reference from you --- if it needs to store
988 it, it will use
\cfunction{Py_INCREF()
} to become an independent
989 owner. There are exactly two important exceptions to this rule:
990 \cfunction{PyTuple_SetItem()
} and
\cfunction{PyList_SetItem()
}. These
991 functions take over ownership of the item passed to them --- even if
992 they fail! (Note that
\cfunction{PyDict_SetItem()
} and friends don't
993 take over ownership --- they are ``normal.'')
995 When a C function is called from Python, it borrows references to its
996 arguments from the caller. The caller owns a reference to the object,
997 so the borrowed reference's lifetime is guaranteed until the function
998 returns. Only when such a borrowed reference must be stored or passed
999 on, it must be turned into an owned reference by calling
1000 \cfunction{Py_INCREF()
}.
1002 The object reference returned from a C function that is called from
1003 Python must be an owned reference --- ownership is tranferred from the
1004 function to its caller.
1007 \subsection{Thin Ice
1010 There are a few situations where seemingly harmless use of a borrowed
1011 reference can lead to problems. These all have to do with implicit
1012 invocations of the interpreter, which can cause the owner of a
1013 reference to dispose of it.
1015 The first and most important case to know about is using
1016 \cfunction{Py_DECREF()
} on an unrelated object while borrowing a
1017 reference to a list item. For instance:
1023 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list,
0);
1025 PyList_SetItem(list,
1, PyInt_FromLong(
0L));
1026 PyObject_Print(item, stdout,
0); /* BUG! */
1030 This function first borrows a reference to
\code{list
[0]}, then
1031 replaces
\code{list
[1]} with the value
\code{0}, and finally prints
1032 the borrowed reference. Looks harmless, right? But it's not!
1034 Let's follow the control flow into
\cfunction{PyList_SetItem()
}. The list
1035 owns references to all its items, so when item
1 is replaced, it has
1036 to dispose of the original item
1. Now let's suppose the original
1037 item
1 was an instance of a user-defined class, and let's further
1038 suppose that the class defined a
\method{__del__()
} method. If this
1039 class instance has a reference count of
1, disposing of it will call
1040 its
\method{__del__()
} method.
1042 Since it is written in Python, the
\method{__del__()
} method can execute
1043 arbitrary Python code. Could it perhaps do something to invalidate
1044 the reference to
\code{item
} in
\cfunction{bug()
}? You bet! Assuming
1045 that the list passed into
\cfunction{bug()
} is accessible to the
1046 \method{__del__()
} method, it could execute a statement to the effect of
1047 \samp{del list
[0]}, and assuming this was the last reference to that
1048 object, it would free the memory associated with it, thereby
1049 invalidating
\code{item
}.
1051 The solution, once you know the source of the problem, is easy:
1052 temporarily increment the reference count. The correct version of the
1057 no_bug(PyObject *list)
1059 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list,
0);
1062 PyList_SetItem(list,
1, PyInt_FromLong(
0L));
1063 PyObject_Print(item, stdout,
0);
1068 This is a true story. An older version of Python contained variants
1069 of this bug and someone spent a considerable amount of time in a C
1070 debugger to figure out why his
\method{__del__()
} methods would fail...
1072 The second case of problems with a borrowed reference is a variant
1073 involving threads. Normally, multiple threads in the Python
1074 interpreter can't get in each other's way, because there is a global
1075 lock protecting Python's entire object space. However, it is possible
1076 to temporarily release this lock using the macro
1077 \csimplemacro{Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
}, and to re-acquire it using
1078 \csimplemacro{Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
}. This is common around blocking
1079 I/O calls, to let other threads use the processor while waiting for
1080 the I/O to complete. Obviously, the following function has the same
1081 problem as the previous one:
1087 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list,
0);
1088 Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
1089 ...some blocking I/O call...
1090 Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
1091 PyObject_Print(item, stdout,
0); /* BUG! */
1096 \subsection{NULL Pointers
1097 \label{nullPointers
}}
1099 In general, functions that take object references as arguments do not
1100 expect you to pass them
\NULL{} pointers, and will dump core (or
1101 cause later core dumps) if you do so. Functions that return object
1102 references generally return
\NULL{} only to indicate that an
1103 exception occurred. The reason for not testing for
\NULL{}
1104 arguments is that functions often pass the objects they receive on to
1105 other function --- if each function were to test for
\NULL,
1106 there would be a lot of redundant tests and the code would run more
1109 It is better to test for
\NULL{} only at the ``source:'' when a
1110 pointer that may be
\NULL{} is received, for example, from
1111 \cfunction{malloc()
} or from a function that may raise an exception.
1113 The macros
\cfunction{Py_INCREF()
} and
\cfunction{Py_DECREF()
}
1114 do not check for
\NULL{} pointers --- however, their variants
1115 \cfunction{Py_XINCREF()
} and
\cfunction{Py_XDECREF()
} do.
1117 The macros for checking for a particular object type
1118 (
\code{Py
\var{type
}_Check()
}) don't check for
\NULL{} pointers ---
1119 again, there is much code that calls several of these in a row to test
1120 an object against various different expected types, and this would
1121 generate redundant tests. There are no variants with
\NULL{}
1124 The C function calling mechanism guarantees that the argument list
1125 passed to C functions (
\code{args
} in the examples) is never
1126 \NULL{} --- in fact it guarantees that it is always a tuple.
\footnote{
1127 These guarantees don't hold when you use the ``old'' style
1128 calling convention --- this is still found in much existing code.
}
1130 It is a severe error to ever let a
\NULL{} pointer ``escape'' to
1134 % A pedagogically buggy example, along the lines of the previous listing,
1135 % would be helpful here -- showing in more concrete terms what sort of
1136 % actions could cause the problem. I can't very well imagine it from the
1140 \section{Writing Extensions in
\Cpp
1143 It is possible to write extension modules in
\Cpp. Some restrictions
1144 apply. If the main program (the Python interpreter) is compiled and
1145 linked by the C compiler, global or static objects with constructors
1146 cannot be used. This is not a problem if the main program is linked
1147 by the
\Cpp{} compiler. Functions that will be called by the
1148 Python interpreter (in particular, module initalization functions)
1149 have to be declared using
\code{extern "C"
}.
1150 It is unnecessary to enclose the Python header files in
1151 \code{extern "C" \
{...\
}} --- they use this form already if the symbol
1152 \samp{__cplusplus
} is defined (all recent
\Cpp{} compilers define this
1156 \section{Providing a C API for an Extension Module
1157 \label{using-cobjects
}}
1158 \sectionauthor{Konrad Hinsen
}{hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr
}
1160 Many extension modules just provide new functions and types to be
1161 used from Python, but sometimes the code in an extension module can
1162 be useful for other extension modules. For example, an extension
1163 module could implement a type ``collection'' which works like lists
1164 without order. Just like the standard Python list type has a C API
1165 which permits extension modules to create and manipulate lists, this
1166 new collection type should have a set of C functions for direct
1167 manipulation from other extension modules.
1169 At first sight this seems easy: just write the functions (without
1170 declaring them
\keyword{static
}, of course), provide an appropriate
1171 header file, and
document the C API. And in fact this would work if
1172 all extension modules were always linked statically with the Python
1173 interpreter. When modules are used as shared libraries, however, the
1174 symbols defined in one module may not be visible to another module.
1175 The details of visibility depend on the operating system; some systems
1176 use one global namespace for the Python interpreter and all extension
1177 modules (Windows, for example), whereas others require an explicit
1178 list of imported symbols at module link time (AIX is one example), or
1179 offer a choice of different strategies (most Unices). And even if
1180 symbols are globally visible, the module whose functions one wishes to
1181 call might not have been loaded yet!
1183 Portability therefore requires not to make any assumptions about
1184 symbol visibility. This means that all symbols in extension modules
1185 should be declared
\keyword{static
}, except for the module's
1186 initialization function, in order to avoid name clashes with other
1187 extension modules (as discussed in section~
\ref{methodTable
}). And it
1188 means that symbols that
\emph{should
} be accessible from other
1189 extension modules must be exported in a different way.
1191 Python provides a special mechanism to pass C-level information
1192 (pointers) from one extension module to another one: CObjects.
1193 A CObject is a Python data type which stores a pointer (
\ctype{void
1194 *
}). CObjects can only be created and accessed via their C API, but
1195 they can be passed around like any other Python object. In particular,
1196 they can be assigned to a name in an extension module's namespace.
1197 Other extension modules can then import this module, retrieve the
1198 value of this name, and then retrieve the pointer from the CObject.
1200 There are many ways in which CObjects can be used to export the C API
1201 of an extension module. Each name could get its own CObject, or all C
1202 API pointers could be stored in an array whose address is published in
1203 a CObject. And the various tasks of storing and retrieving the pointers
1204 can be distributed in different ways between the module providing the
1205 code and the client modules.
1207 The following example demonstrates an approach that puts most of the
1208 burden on the writer of the exporting module, which is appropriate
1209 for commonly used library modules. It stores all C API pointers
1210 (just one in the example!) in an array of
\ctype{void
} pointers which
1211 becomes the value of a CObject. The header file corresponding to
1212 the module provides a macro that takes care of importing the module
1213 and retrieving its C API pointers; client modules only have to call
1214 this macro before accessing the C API.
1216 The exporting module is a modification of the
\module{spam
} module from
1217 section~
\ref{simpleExample
}. The function
\function{spam.system()
}
1218 does not call the C library function
\cfunction{system()
} directly,
1219 but a function
\cfunction{PySpam_System()
}, which would of course do
1220 something more complicated in reality (such as adding ``spam'' to
1221 every command). This function
\cfunction{PySpam_System()
} is also
1222 exported to other extension modules.
1224 The function
\cfunction{PySpam_System()
} is a plain C function,
1225 declared
\keyword{static
} like everything else:
1229 PySpam_System(char *command)
1231 return system(command);
1235 The function
\cfunction{spam_system()
} is modified in a trivial way:
1239 spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
1244 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
1246 sts = PySpam_System(command);
1247 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
1251 In the beginning of the module, right after the line
1257 two more lines must be added:
1261 #include "spammodule.h"
1264 The
\code{\#define
} is used to tell the header file that it is being
1265 included in the exporting module, not a client module. Finally,
1266 the module's initialization function must take care of initializing
1267 the C API pointer array:
1274 static void *PySpam_API
[PySpam_API_pointers
];
1275 PyObject *c_api_object;
1277 m = Py_InitModule("spam", SpamMethods);
1279 /* Initialize the C API pointer array */
1280 PySpam_API
[PySpam_System_NUM
] = (void *)PySpam_System;
1282 /* Create a CObject containing the API pointer array's address */
1283 c_api_object = PyCObject_FromVoidPtr((void *)PySpam_API, NULL);
1285 if (c_api_object != NULL)
1286 PyModule_AddObject(m, "_C_API", c_api_object);
1290 Note that
\code{PySpam_API
} is declared
\keyword{static
}; otherwise
1291 the pointer array would disappear when
\function{initspam()
} terminates!
1293 The bulk of the work is in the header file
\file{spammodule.h
},
1294 which looks like this:
1297 #ifndef Py_SPAMMODULE_H
1298 #define Py_SPAMMODULE_H
1303 /* Header file for spammodule */
1305 /* C API functions */
1306 #define PySpam_System_NUM
0
1307 #define PySpam_System_RETURN int
1308 #define PySpam_System_PROTO (char *command)
1310 /* Total number of C API pointers */
1311 #define PySpam_API_pointers
1
1315 /* This section is used when compiling spammodule.c */
1317 static PySpam_System_RETURN PySpam_System PySpam_System_PROTO;
1320 /* This section is used in modules that use spammodule's API */
1322 static void **PySpam_API;
1324 #define PySpam_System \
1325 (*(PySpam_System_RETURN (*)PySpam_System_PROTO) PySpam_API[PySpam_System_NUM])
1327 /* Return -1 and set exception on error, 0 on success. */
1331 PyObject *module = PyImport_ImportModule("spam");
1333 if (module != NULL) {
1334 PyObject *c_api_object = PyObject_GetAttrString(module, "_C_API");
1335 if (c_api_object == NULL)
1337 if (PyCObject_Check(c_api_object))
1338 PySpam_API = (void **)PyCObject_AsVoidPtr(c_api_object);
1339 Py_DECREF(c_api_object);
1350 #endif /* !defined(Py_SPAMMODULE_H) */
1353 All that a client module must do in order to have access to the
1354 function
\cfunction{PySpam_System()
} is to call the function (or
1355 rather macro)
\cfunction{import_spam()
} in its initialization
1364 Py_InitModule("client", ClientMethods);
1365 if (import_spam() <
0)
1367 /* additional initialization can happen here */
1371 The main disadvantage of this approach is that the file
1372 \file{spammodule.h
} is rather complicated. However, the
1373 basic structure is the same for each function that is
1374 exported, so it has to be learned only once.
1376 Finally it should be mentioned that CObjects offer additional
1377 functionality, which is especially useful for memory allocation and
1378 deallocation of the pointer stored in a CObject. The details
1379 are described in the
\citetitle[../api/api.html
]{Python/C API
1380 Reference Manual
} in the section
1381 ``
\ulink{CObjects
}{../api/cObjects.html
}'' and in the implementation
1382 of CObjects (files
\file{Include/cobject.h
} and
1383 \file{Objects/cobject.c
} in the Python source code distribution).