1 #+TITLE: org-babel --- facilitating communication between programming languages and people
2 #+SEQ_TODO: PROPOSED TODO STARTED | DONE DEFERRED REJECTED
3 #+OPTIONS: H:3 num:nil toc:t
4 #+STARTUP: oddeven hideblocks
6 Through Org-Babel Org-Mode can communicate with programming languages.
7 Code contained in source-code blocks can be evaluated and data can
8 pass seamlessly between different programming languages, Org-Mode
9 constructs (tables, file links, example text) and interactive comint
13 - The [[* Introduction][Introduction]] :: provides a brief overview of the design and use
14 of Org-Babel including tutorials and examples.
15 - In [[* Getting started][Getting Started]] :: find instructions for installing org-babel
16 into your emacs configuration.
17 - The [[* Tasks][Tasks]] :: section contains current and past tasks roughly ordered
18 by TODO state, then importance or date-completed. This would be
19 a good place to suggest ideas for development.
20 - The [[* Bugs][Bugs]] :: section contains bug reports.
21 - The [[* Tests][Tests]] :: section consists of a large table which can be
22 evaluated to run Org-Babel's functional test suite. This
23 provides a good overview of the current functionality with
24 pointers to example source blocks.
25 - The [[* Sandbox][Sandbox]] :: demonstrates much of the early/basic functionality
26 through commented source-code blocks.
28 Also see the [[file:library-of-babel.org][Library of Babel]], an extensible collection of ready-made
29 and easily-shortcut-callable source-code blocks for handling common
34 Org-Babel enables *communication* between programming languages and
38 - communication between programs :: Data passes seamlessly between
39 different programming languages, Org-Mode constructs (tables,
40 file links, example text) and interactive comint buffers.
41 - communication between people :: Data and calculations are embedded
42 in the same document as notes explanations and reports.
44 ** communication between programs
46 Org-Mode supports embedded blocks of source code (in any language)
47 inside of Org documents. Org-Babel allows these blocks of code to be
48 executed from within Org-Mode with natural handling of their inputs
52 with both scalar, file, and table output
54 *** reading information from tables
56 *** reading information from other source blocks (disk usage in your home directory)
58 This will work for Linux and Mac users, not so sure about shell
59 commands for windows users.
61 To run place the cursor on the =#+begin_src= line of the source block
62 labeled directory-pie and press =\C-c\C-c=.
64 #+srcname: directories
65 #+begin_src bash :results replace
66 cd ~ && du -sc * |grep -v total
69 #+resname: directories
71 | 11882808 | "Documents" |
72 | 8210024 | "Downloads" |
73 | 879800 | "Library" |
76 | 5307664 | "Pictures" |
85 #+srcname: directory-pie
86 #+begin_src R :var dirs = directories :session R-pie-example
87 pie(dirs[,1], labels = dirs[,2])
95 *** operations in/on tables
97 #+tblname: grades-table
98 | student | grade | letter |
99 |---------+-------+--------|
106 #+TBLFM: $2='(sbe random-score-generator)::$3='(sbe assign-grade (score $2))
108 #+srcname: assign-grade
109 #+begin_src ruby :var score=99
120 #+srcname: random-score-generator
125 #+srcname: show-distribution
126 #+begin_src R :var grades=grades-table :session *R*
134 ** communication between people
135 Quick overview of Org-Mode's exportation abilities, with links to the
136 online Org-Mode documentation, a focus on source-code blocks, and the
137 exportation options provided by Org-Babel.
139 *** Interactive tutorial
140 This would demonstrate applicability to Reproducible Research, and
141 Literate Programming.
143 *** Tests embedded in documentation
144 org-babels own functional tests are contained in a large org-mode
145 table, allowing the test suite to be run be evaluation of the table
146 and the results to be collected in the same table.
148 *** Emacs initialization files stored in Org-Mode buffers
149 Using `org-babel-tangle' it is possible to embed your Emacs
150 initialization into org-mode files. This allows for folding,
151 note-taking, todo's etc... embedded with the source-code of your Emacs
152 initialization, and through org-mode's publishing features aids in
153 sharing your customizations with others.
155 It may be worthwhile to create a fork of Phil Hagelberg's
156 [[http://github.com/technomancy/emacs-starter-kit/tree/master][emacs-starter-kit]] which uses literate org-mode files for all of the
157 actual elisp customization. These org-mode files could then be
158 exported to html and used to populate the repositories wiki on [[http://github.com/][github]].
163 *** code evaluation (comint buffer sessions and external processes)
164 There are two main ways to evaluate source blocks with org-babel.
166 - external :: By default (if the =:session= header argument is not
167 present) all source code blocks are evaluated in
168 external processes. In these cases an external process
169 is used to evaluate the source-code blocks.
170 - session :: Session based evaluation uses persistent sessions in
171 comint buffers. Sessions can be used across multiple
172 source blocks setting and accessing variables in the
175 Evaluating source blocks in sessions also allows for
176 interaction with the code. To jump to the session of a
177 source block use the `org-babel-pop-to-session' command
178 or press =M-[down]= while inside of a source code block.
179 When called with a prefix argument
180 `org-babel-pop-to-session' will evaluate all header
181 arguments before jumping to the source-code block.
183 *** results (values and outputs)
184 Either the *value* or the *output* of source code blocks can be
185 collected after evaluation.
187 - value :: The default way to collect results from a source-code block
188 is to return the value of the last statement in the block.
189 This can be thought of as the return value of the block.
190 In this case any printed output of the block is ignored.
191 This can be though of a similar to a "functional" value of
193 - output :: Another way of generating results from a source-code block
194 is to collect the output generated by the execution of the
195 block. In this case all printed output is collected
196 throughout the execution of the block. This can be
197 thought of as similar to a "script" style of evaluation.
201 Add the following lines to your .emacs, replacing the path as
202 appropriate. A good place to check that things are up and running
203 would then be [[#sandbox][the sandbox]].
204 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
205 (add-to-list 'load-path "/path/to/org-babel/lisp")
206 (require 'org-babel-init)
211 ** PROPOSED Default args
212 This would be good thing to address soon. I'm imagining that
213 e.g. here, the 'caller' block would return the answer 30. I believe
214 there's a few issues here: i.e. the naked 'a' without a reference
215 is not understood; the default arg b=6 is not understood.
217 #+srcname: adder(a, b=6)
222 #+srcname: caller(var=adder(a=24))
227 ** PROPOSED allow `anonymous' function block with function call args?
228 My question here is simply whether we're going to allow
229 #+begin_src python(arg=ref)
233 but with preference given to
234 #+srcname blockname(arg=ref)
235 ** PROPOSED allow :result as synonym for :results?
236 ** PROPOSED allow 'output mode to return stdout as value?
237 Maybe we should allow this. In fact, if block x is called
238 with :results output, and it references blocks y and z, then
239 shouldn't the output of x contain a concatenation of the outputs of
240 y and z, together with x's own output? That would raise the
241 question of what happens if y is defined with :results output and z
242 with :results value. I guess z's (possibly vector/tabular) output
243 would be inside a literal example block containing the whole lot.
244 ** PROPOSED optional timestamp for output
245 Add option to place an (inactive) timestamp at the #+resname, to
246 record when that output was generated.
248 *** source code block timestamps (optional addition)
249 [Eric] If we did this would we then want to place a timestamp on the
250 source-code block, so that we would know if the results are
251 current or out of date? This would have the effect of caching the
252 results of calculations and then only re-running if the
253 source-code has changed. For the caching to work we would need to
254 check not only the timestamp on a source-code block, but also the
255 timestamps of any tables or source-code blocks referenced by the
256 original source-code block.
258 [Dan] I do remember getting frustrated by Sweave always having to
259 re-do everything, so this could be desirable, as long as it's easy
260 to over-ride of course. I'm not sure it should be the default
261 behaviour unless we are very confident that it works well.
263 **** maintaining source-code block timestamps
264 It may make sense to add a hook to `org-edit-special' which could
265 update the source-code blocks timestamp. If the user edits the
266 contents of a source-code block directly I can think of no
267 efficient way of maintaining the timestamp.
269 ** TODO make tangle files read-only?
270 With a file-local variable setting, yea that makes sense. Maybe
271 the header should reference the related org-mode file.
272 ** TODO take default values for header args from properties
273 Use file-wide and subtree wide properties to set default values for
275 ** TODO support for working with =*Org Edit Src Example*= buffers [2/4]
276 *** TODO optionally evaluate header references when we switch to =*Org Edit Src*= buffer
277 That seems to imply that the header references need to be evaluated
278 and transformed into the target language object when we hit C-c ' to
279 enter the *Org Edit Src* buffer [DED]
281 Good point, I heartily agree that this should be supported [Eric]
283 (or at least before the first time we attempt to evaluate code in that
284 buffer -- I suppose there might be an argument for lazy evaluation, in
285 case someone hits C-c ' but is "just looking" and not actually
286 evaluating anything.) Of course if evaluating the reference is
287 computationally intensive then the user might have to wait before they
288 get the *Org Edit Src* buffer. [DED]
290 I fear that it may be hard to anticipate when the references will be
291 needed, some major-modes do on-the-fly evaluation while the buffer is
292 being edited. I think that we should either do this before the buffer
293 is opened or not at all, specifically I think we should resolve
294 references if the user calls C-c ' with a prefix argument. Does that
295 sound reasonable? [Eric]
299 [Dan] So now that we have org-src-mode and org-src-mode-hook, I guess
300 org-babel should do this by using the hook to make sure that, when C-c
301 C-' is issued on a source block, any references are resolved and
302 assignments are made in the appropriate session.
303 *** TODO set buffer-local-process variables appropriately [DED]
304 I think something like this would be great. You've probably
305 already thought of this, but just to note it down: it would be really
306 nice if org-babel's notion of a buffer's 'session/process' played
307 nicely with ESS's notion of the buffer's session/process. ESS keeps
308 the current process name for a buffer in a buffer-local variable
309 ess-local-process-name. So one thing we will probably want to do is
310 make sure that the *Org Edit Src Example* buffer sets that variable
313 I had not thought of that, but I agree whole heartedly. [Eric]
315 Once this is done every variable should be able to dump regions into
316 their inferior-process buffer using major-mode functions.
317 *** DEFERRED send code to inferior process
318 Another thought on this topic: I think we will want users to send
319 chunks of code to the interpreter from within the *Org Edit Src*
320 buffer, and I think that's what you have in mind already. In ESS that
321 is done using the ess-eval-* functions. [DED]
323 I think we can leave this up to the major-mode in the source code
324 buffer, as almost every source-code major mode will have functions for
325 doing things like sending regions to the inferior process. If
326 anything we might need to set the value of the buffer local inferior
327 process variable. [Eric]
329 *** DONE some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten [4/4]
330 While I remember, some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten
331 come to mind in that regard:
333 **** DONE Remap C-x C-s to save the source to the org buffer?
334 I've done this personally and I find it essential. I'm using
335 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
336 (defun org-edit-src-save ()
337 "Update the parent org buffer with the edited source code, save
338 the parent org-buffer, and return to the source code edit
347 (define-key org-exit-edit-mode-map "\C-x\C-s" 'org-edit-src-save)
351 I think this is great, but I think it should be implemented in the
354 **** DEFERRED Rename buffer and minor mode?
355 Something shorter than *Org Edit Src Example* for the buffer
356 name. org-babel is bringing org's source code interaction to a
357 level of maturity where the 'example' is no longer
358 appropriate. And if further keybindings are going to be added to
359 the minor mode then maybe org-edit-src-mode is a better name than
362 Maybe we should name the buffer with a combination of the source
363 code and the session. I think that makes sense.
365 [ES] Are you also suggesting a new org-edit-src minor mode?
366 [DED] org-exit-edit-mode is a minor mode that already exists:
368 Minor mode installing a single key binding, "C-c '" to exit special edit.
370 org-edit-src-save now has a binding in that mode, so I guess all
371 I'm saying at this stage is that it's a bit of a misnomer. But
372 perhaps we will also have more functionality to add to that minor
373 mode, making it even more of a misnomer. Perhaps something like
374 org-src-mode would be better.
375 **** DONE Changed minor mode name and added hooks
377 **** DONE a hook called when the src edit buffer is created
378 This should be implemented in the org-mode core
380 ** TODO resolve references to other org buffers/files
381 This would allow source blocks to call upon tables, source-blocks,
382 and results in other org buffers/files.
385 - [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::TODO%20allow%20searching%20for%20names%20in%20other%20buffers][org-babel-ref.el:searching-in-other-buffers]]
386 - [[file:lisp/org-babel.el::defun%20org-babel%20find%20named%20result%20name][org-babel.el#org-babel-find-named-result]]
387 ** TODO resolve references to other non-org files
388 - tabular data in .csv, .tsv etc format
389 - files of interpreted code: anything stopping us giving such files
390 similar status to a source code block?
391 - Would be nice to allow org and non-org files to be remote
392 ** TODO figure out how to handle errors during evaluation
393 I expect it will be hard to do this properly, but ultimately it
394 would be nice to be able to specify somewhere to receive STDERR,
395 and to be warned if it is non-empty.
397 Probably simpler in non-session evaluation than session? At least
398 the mechanism will be different I guess.
400 R has a try function, with error handling, along the lines of
401 python. I bet ruby does too. Maybe more of an issue for functional
402 style; in my proposed scripting style the error just gets dumped to
403 the org buffer and the user is thus alerted.
404 ** TODO figure out how to handle graphic output
405 This is listed under [[* graphical output][graphical output]] in out objectives.
407 This should take advantage of the =:results file= option, and
408 languages which almost always produce graphical output should set
409 =:results file= to true by default (this is currently done for the
410 gnuplot and ditaa languages). That would handle placing these results
411 in the buffer. Then if there is a combination of =silent= and =file=
412 =:results= headers we could drop the results to a temp buffer and pop
415 Display of file results is addressed in the [[* =\C-c \C-o= to open results of source block][open-results-task]].
417 *** TODO R graphics to screen means session evaluation
418 If R graphical output is going to screen then evaluation must be
419 in a session, otherwise the graphics will disappear as soon as the
422 *** Adding to a discussion started in email
423 I'm not deeply wedded to these ideas, just noting them down. I'm
424 probably just thinking of R and haven't really thought about how
425 this fits with the other graphics-generating languages.
427 > I used the approach below to get graphical file output
428 > today, which is one idea at least. Maybe it could be linked up with
429 > your :results file variable. (Or do we need a :results image for R?)
432 I don't think we need a special image results variable, but I may be
433 missing what the code below accomplishes. Would the task I added about
434 adding org-open-at-point functionality to source code blocks take care
437 Dan: I'm not sure. I think the ability for a script to generate both
438 text and graphical output might be a natural expectation, at least for
444 > #+srcname: cohort-scatter-plots-2d(org_babel_graphical_output_file="cohort-scatter-plots-2d.png")
446 > if(exists("org_babel_output_file"))
447 > png(filename=org_babel_graphical_output_file, width=1000, height=1000)
448 > ## plotting code in here
449 > if(exists("org_babel_graphical_output_file")) dev.off()
452 Dan: Yes, the results :file option is nice for dealing with graphical
453 output, and that could well be enough. Something based on the scheme
454 above would have a couple of points in its favour:
455 1. It's easy to switch between output going to on-screen graphics and
456 output going to file: Output will go to screen unless a string variable
457 with a standard name (e.g. ""org_babel_graphical_output_file"")
458 exists in which case it will go to the file indicated by the value
460 2. The block can return a result / script output, as well as produce
463 In interactive use we might want to allow the user to choose between
464 screen and file output. In non-interactive use such as export, it
465 would be file output (subject to the :exports directives).
467 ** TODO =\C-c \C-o= to open results of source block
468 by adding a =defadvice= to =org-open-at-point= we can use the common
469 =\C-c \C-o= keybinding to open the results of a source-code block.
470 This would be especially useful for source-code blocks which generate
471 graphical results and insert a file link as the results in the
472 org-mode buffer. (see [[* figure out how to handle graphic output][TODO figure out how to handle graphic output]]).
473 This could also act reasonably with other results types...
475 - file :: use org-open-at-point to open the file
476 - scalar :: open results unquoted in a new buffer
477 - tabular :: export the table to a new buffer and open that buffer
478 ** TODO Finalise behaviour regarding vector/scalar output
479 *** DONE Stop spaces causing vector output
480 This simple example of multilingual chaining produces vector output if
481 there are spaces in the message and scalar otherwise.
485 #+srcname: msg-from-R(msg=msg-from-python)
487 paste(msg, "und R", sep=" ")
491 : org-babel speaks elisp y python und R
493 #+srcname: msg-from-python(msg=msg-from-elisp)
498 #+srcname: msg-from-elisp(msg="org-babel speaks")
499 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
500 (concat msg " elisp")
502 ** STARTED share org-babel [1/4]
503 how should we share org-babel?
505 *** DONE post to org-mode
506 *** TODO post to ess mailing list
507 *** TODO create a org-babel page on worg
508 *** TODO create a short screencast demonstrating org-babel in action
511 we need to think up some good examples
513 **** interactive tutorials
514 This could be a place to use [[* org-babel assertions][org-babel assertions]].
516 for example the first step of a tutorial could assert that the version
517 of the software-package (or whatever) is equal to some value, then
518 source-code blocks could be used with confidence (and executed
519 directly from) the rest of the tutorial.
521 **** answering a text-book question w/code example
522 org-babel is an ideal environment enabling both the development and
523 demonstrationg of the code snippets required as answers to many
526 **** something using tables
527 maybe something along the lines of calculations from collected grades
530 Maybe something like the following which outputs sizes of directories
531 under the home directory, and then instead of the trivial =emacs-lisp=
532 block we could use an R block to create a nice pie chart of the
536 #+begin_src bash :results replace
540 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var sizes=sizes :results replace
544 ** TODO command line execution
545 Allow source code blocks to be called form the command line. This
546 will be easy using the =sbe= function in [[file:lisp/org-babel-table.el][org-babel-table.el]].
548 This will rely upon [[* resolve references to other buffers][resolve references to other buffers]].
550 ** TODO inline source code blocks [3/5]
551 Like the =\R{ code }= blocks
553 not sure what the format should be, maybe just something simple
554 like =src_lang[]{}= where lang is the name of the source code
555 language to be evaluated, =[]= is optional and contains any header
556 arguments and ={}= contains the code.
558 (see [[* (sandbox) inline source blocks][the-sandbox]])
560 *** DONE evaluation with \C-c\C-c
561 Putting aside the header argument issue for now we can just run these
562 with the following default header arguments
563 - =:results= :: silent
564 - =:exports= :: results
566 *** DONE inline exportation
567 Need to add an interblock hook (or some such) through org-exp-blocks
568 *** DONE header arguments
569 We should make it possible to use header arguments.
571 *** TODO fontification
572 we should color these blocks differently
574 *** TODO refine html exportation
575 should use a span class, and should show original source in tool-tip
577 ** TODO LoB: re-implement plotting and analysis functions from org-R
578 I'll do this soon, now that we things are a bit more settled and we
579 have column names in R.
580 ** PROPOSED conversion between org-babel and noweb (e.g. .Rnw) format
581 I haven't thought about this properly. Just noting it down. What
582 Sweave uses is called "R noweb" (.Rnw).
584 I found a good description of noweb in the following article (see
585 the [[http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/pubs/lpsimp.pdf][pdf]]).
587 I think there are two parts to noweb, the construction of
588 documentation and the extraction of source-code (with notangle).
590 *documentation*: org-mode handles all of our documentation needs in
591 a manner that I believe is superior to noweb.
593 *source extraction* At this point I don't see anyone writing large
594 applications with 100% of the source code contained in org-babel
595 files, rather I see org-babel files containing things like
596 - notes with active code chunks
597 - interactive tutorials
598 - requirements documents with code running test suites
599 - and of course experimental reports with the code to run the
600 experiment, and perform analysis
602 Basically I think the scope of the programs written in org-babel
603 (at least initially) will be small enough that it wont require the
604 addition of a tangle type program to extract all of the source code
605 into a running application.
607 On the other hand, since we already have named blocks of source
608 code which reference other blocks on which they rely, this
609 shouldn't be too hard to implement either on our own, or possibly
610 relying on something like noweb/notangle.
612 ** PROPOSED support for passing paths to files between source blocks
613 Maybe this should be it's own result type (in addition to scalars and
614 vectors). The reason being that some source-code blocks (for example
615 ditaa or anything that results in the creation of a file) may want to
616 pass a file path back to org-mode which could then be inserted into
617 the org-mode buffer as a link to the file...
619 This would allow for display of images upon export providing
620 functionality similar to =org-exp-blocks= only in a more general
622 ** DEFERRED Support rownames and other org babel table features?
624 The full org table features are detailed in the manual [[http://orgmode.org/manual/Advanced-features.html#Advanced-features][here]].
627 Perhaps add a :rownames header arg. This would be an integer
628 (usually 1) which would have the effect of post-processing all the
629 variables created in the R session in the following way: if the
630 integer is j, set the row names to the contents of column j and
631 delete column j. Perhaps it is artificial to allow this integer to
632 take any value other than 1. The default would be nil which would
633 mean no such behaviour.
635 Actually I don't know about that. If multiple variables are passed
636 in, it's not appropriate to alter them all in the same way. The
637 rownames specification would normally refer to just one of the
638 variables. For now maybe just say this has to be done in R. E.g.
640 #+TBLNAME: sample-sizes
641 | collection | size | exclude | include | exclude2 | include2 |
642 |-----------------+------+---------+---------+----------+----------|
643 | 58C | 2936 | 8 | 2928 | 256 | 2680 |
644 | MS | 5852 | 771 | 5081 | 771 | 5081 |
645 | NBS | 2929 | 64 | 2865 | 402 | 2527 |
646 | POBI | 2717 | 1 | 2716 | 1 | 2716 |
647 | 58C+MS+NBS+POBI | | | 13590 | | 13004 |
648 #+TBLFM: @2$4=@2$2 - @2$3::@2$6=@2$2 - @2$5::@3$4=@3$2-@3$3::@3$6=@3$2 - @3$5::@4$4=@4$2 - @4$3::@4$6=@4$2 - @4$5::@5$4=@5$2-@5$3::@5$6=@5$2 - @5$5::@6$4=vsum(@2$4..@5$4)::@6$6=vsum(@2$6..@5$6)
650 #+srcname: make-size-table(size=sample-sizes)
652 rownames(size) <- size[,1]
658 [I don't think it's as problematic as this makes out]
659 This is non-trivial, but may be worth doing, in particular to
660 develop a nice framework for sending data to/from R.
662 In R, indexing vector elements, and rows and columns, using
663 strings rather than integers is an important part of the
665 - elements of a vector may have names
666 - matrices and data.frames may have "column names" and "row names"
667 which can be used for indexing
668 - In a data frame, row names *must* be unique
676 > mat <- matrix(1:4, nrow=2, ncol=2, dimnames=list(c("r1","r2"), c("c1","c2")))
681 > # The names are separate from the data: they do not interfere with operations on the data
688 > df <- data.frame(var1=1:26, var2=26:1, row.names=letters)
690 [1] 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
696 So it's tempting to try to provide support for this in org-babel. For example
697 - allow R to refer to columns of a :var reference by their names
698 - When appropriate, results from R appear in the org buffer with "named
701 However none (?) of the other languages we are currently supporting
702 really have a native matrix type, let alone "column names" or "row
703 names". Names are used in e.g. python and perl to refer to entries
706 It currently seems to me that support for this in org-babel would
707 require setting rules about when org tables are considered to have
708 named columns/fields, and ensuring that (a) languages with a notion
709 of named columns/fields use them appropriately and (b) languages
710 with no such notion do not treat then as data.
712 - Org allows something that *looks* like column names to be separated
714 - Org also allows a row to *function* as column names when special
715 markers are placed in the first column. An hline is unnecessary
716 (indeed hlines are purely cosmetic in org [correct?]
717 - Org does not have a notion of "row names" [correct?]
719 The full org table functionality exeplified [[http://orgmode.org/manual/Advanced-features.html#Advanced-features][here]] has features that
720 we would not support in e.g. R (like names for the row below).
722 **** Initial statement: allow tables with hline to be passed as args into R
723 This doesn't seem to work at the moment (example below). It would
724 also be nice to have a natural way for the column names of the org
725 table to become the column names of the R data frame, and to have
726 the option to specify that the first column is to be used as row
727 names in R (these must be unique). But this might require a bit of
732 | col1 | col2 | col3 |
733 |------+---------+------|
741 #+begin_src R :var tabel=egtable :colnames t
746 | "col1" | "col2" | "col3" |
747 |--------+-----------+--------|
749 | 4 | "schulte" | 6 |
752 Another example is in the [[*operations%20in%20on%20tables][grades example]].
754 ** DEFERRED use textConnection to pass tsv to R?
755 When passing args from the org buffer to R, the following route is
756 used: arg in buffer -> elisp -> tsv on file -> data frame in R. I
757 think it would be possible to avoid having to write to file by
758 constructing an R expression in org-babel-R-assign-elisp, something
761 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
762 (org-babel-R-input-command
763 (format "%s <- read.table(textConnection(\"%s\"), sep=\"\\t\", as.is=TRUE)"
764 name (orgtbl-to-tsv value '(:sep "\t" :fmt org-babel-R-quote-tsv-field))))
767 I haven't tried to implement this yet as it's basically just
768 fiddling with something that works. The only reason for it I can
769 think of would be efficiency and I haven't tested that.
771 This Didn't work after an initial test. I still think this is a
772 good idea (I also think we should try to do something similar when
773 writing out results frmo R to elisp) however as it wouldn't result
774 in any functional changes I'm bumping it down to deferred for
779 #+tblname: quick-test
782 #+srcname: quick-test-src-blk
783 #+begin_src R :var vec=quick-test
793 ** DEFERRED Rework Interaction with Running Processes [2/5]
794 *** DONE robust to errors interrupting execution
796 #+srcname: long-runner-ruby
797 #+begin_src ruby :results silent
802 *** DEFERRED use =C-g= keyboard-quit to push processing into the background
803 This may be possible using the `run-with-timer' command.
805 I have no idea how this could work...
807 #+srcname: long-runner-ruby
808 #+begin_src ruby :results silent
813 *** TODO ability to select which of multiple sessions is being used
814 Increasingly it is looking like we're going to want to run all
815 source code blocks in comint buffer (sessions). Which will have
817 1) allowing background execution
818 2) maintaining state between source-blocks
819 - allowing inline blocks w/o header arguments
822 (like ess-switch-process in .R buffers)
824 Maybe this could be packaged into a header argument, something
825 like =:R_session= which could accept either the name of the
826 session to use, or the string =prompt=, in which case we could use
827 the =ess-switch-process= command to select a new process.
829 *** TODO evaluation of shell code as background process?
830 After C-c C-c on an R code block, the process may appear to
831 block, but C-g can be used to reclaim control of the .org buffer,
832 without interrupting the R evalution. However I believe this is not
833 true of bash/sh evaluation. [Haven't tried other languages] Perhaps
834 a solution is just to background the individual shell commands.
836 The other languages (aside from emacs lisp) are run through the
837 shell, so if we find a shell solution it should work for them as
840 Adding an ampersand seems to be a supported way to run commands in
841 the background (see [[http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ExecuteExternalCommand#toc4][external-commands]]). Although a more extensible
842 solution may involve the use of the [[elisp:(progn (describe-function 'call-process-region) nil)][call-process-region]] function.
844 Going to try this out in a new file [[file:lisp/org-babel-proc.el][org-babel-proc.el]]. This should
845 contain functions for asynchronously running generic shell commands
846 in the background, and then returning their input.
848 **** partial update of org-mode buffer
849 The sleekest solution to this may be using a comint buffer, and
850 then defining a filter function which would incrementally interpret
851 the results as they are returned, including insertion into the
852 org-mode buffer. This may actually cause more problems than it is
853 worth, what with the complexities of identifying the types of
854 incrementally returned results, and the need for maintenance of a
855 process marker in the org buffer.
857 **** 'working' spinner
858 It may be nice and not too difficult to place a spinner on/near the
859 evaluating source code block
861 *** TODO conversion of output from interactive shell, R (and python) sessions to org-babel buffers
862 [DED] This would be a nice feature I think. Although an org-babel
863 purist would say that it's working the wrong way round... After
864 some interactive work in a *R* buffer, you save the buffer, maybe
865 edit out some lines, and then convert it to org-babel format for
866 posterity. Same for a shell session either in a *shell* buffer, or
867 pasted from another terminal emulator. And python of course.
869 ** DEFERRED improve the source-block snippet
870 any real improvement seems somewhat beyond the ability of yasnippet
873 [[file:~/src/emacs-starter-kit/src/snippets/text-mode/rst-mode/chap::name%20Chapter%20title][file:~/src/emacs-starter-kit/src/snippets/text-mode/rst-mode/chap::name Chapter title]]
875 ,#name : Chapter title
878 ${1:$(make-string (string-width text) ?\=)}
883 [[file:snippets/org-mode/sb][sb -- snippet]]
885 waiting for guidance from those more familiar with yasnippets
887 ** REJECTED re-implement R evaluation using ess-command or ess-execute
888 I don't have any complaints with the current R evaluation code or
889 behaviour, but I think it would be good to use the ESS functions
890 from a political point of view. Plus of course it has the normal
891 benefits of an API (insulates us from any underlying changes etc). [DED]
893 I'll look into this. I believe that I looked at and rejected these
894 functions initially but now I can't remember why. I agree with
895 your overall point about using API's where available. I will take
896 a look back at these and either switch to using the ess commands,
897 or at least articulate under this TODO the reasons for using our
898 custom R-interaction commands. [Eric]
902 Lets just replace =org-babel-R-input-command= with =ess-execute=.
904 I tried this, and although it works in some situations, I find that
905 =ess-command= will often just hang indefinitely without returning
906 results. Also =ess-execute= will occasionally hang, and pops up
907 the buffer containing the results of the command's execution, which
908 is undesirable. For now these functions can not be used. Maybe
909 someone more familiar with the ESS code can recommend proper usage
910 of =ess-command= or some other lower-level function which could be
911 used in place of [[file:lisp/org-babel-R.el::defun%20org-babel%20R%20input%20command%20command][org-babel-R-input-command]].
915 #+begin_quote ess-command
916 (ess-command COM &optional BUF SLEEP NO-PROMPT-CHECK)
918 Send the ESS process command COM and delete the output
919 from the ESS process buffer. If an optional second argument BUF exists
920 save the output in that buffer. BUF is erased before use.
921 COM should have a terminating newline.
922 Guarantees that the value of .Last.value will be preserved.
923 When optional third arg SLEEP is non-nil, `(sleep-for (* a SLEEP))'
924 will be used in a few places where `a' is proportional to `ess-cmd-delay'.
927 #+begin_quote ess-execute
928 (ess-execute COMMAND &optional INVERT BUFF MESSAGE)
930 Send a command to the ESS process.
931 A newline is automatically added to COMMAND. Prefix arg (or second arg
932 INVERT) means invert the meaning of
933 `ess-execute-in-process-buffer'. If INVERT is 'buffer, output is
934 forced to go to the process buffer. If the output is going to a
935 buffer, name it *BUFF*. This buffer is erased before use. Optional
936 fourth arg MESSAGE is text to print at the top of the buffer (defaults
937 to the command if BUFF is not given.)
940 *** out current setup
942 1) The body of the R source code block is wrapped in a function
943 2) The function is called inside of a =write.table= function call
944 writing the results to a table
945 3) The table is read using =org-table-import=
947 ** DONE extensible library of callable source blocks
949 This is covered by the [[file:library-of-babel.org][Library of Babel]], which will contain
950 ready-made source blocks designed to carry out useful common tasks.
951 *** Initial statement [Eric]
952 Much of the power of org-R seems to be in it's helper functions for
953 the quick graphing of tables. Should we try to re-implement these
954 functions on top of org-babel?
956 I'm thinking this may be useful both to add features to org-babel-R and
957 also to potentially suggest extensions of the framework. For example
958 one that comes to mind is the ability to treat a source-code block
959 like a function which accepts arguments and returns results. Actually
960 this can be it's own TODO (see [[* source blocks as functions][source blocks as functions]]).
962 - We want to provide convenient off-the-shelf actions
963 (e.g. plotting data) that make use of our new code evaluation
964 environment but do not require any actual coding.
965 *** Initial Design proposal [Dan]
966 - *Input data* will be specified using the same mechanism as :var
967 references, thus the input data may come from a table, or
968 another source block, and it is initially available as an elisp
970 - We introduce a new #+ line, e.g. #+BABELDO. C-c C-c on that
971 line will apply an *action* to the referenced data.
972 - *Actions correspond to source blocks*: our library of available
973 actions will be a library of org-babel source blocks. Thus the
974 code for executing an action, and the code for dealing with the
975 output of the action will be the same code as for executing
976 source blocks in general
977 - Optionally, the user can have the relevant source block inserted
978 into the org buffer after the (say) #+BABELDO line. This will
979 allow the user to fine tune the action by modifying the code
980 (especially useful for plots).
981 - So maybe a #+BABELDO line will have header args
982 - :data (a reference to a table or source code block)
983 - :action (or should that be :srcname?) which will be something
984 like :action pie-chart, referring to a source block which will
985 be executed with the :data referent passed in using a :var arg.
986 - :showcode or something controlling whether to show the code
988 *** Modification to design
989 I'm implementing this, at least initially, as a new interpreter
990 named 'babel', which has an empty body. 'babel' blocks take
991 a :srcname header arg, and look for the source-code block with
992 that name. They then execute the referenced block, after first
993 appending their own header args on to the target block's header
996 If the target block is in the library of babel (a.o.t. e.g. the
997 current buffer), then the code in the block will refer to the
998 input data with a name dictated by convention (e.g. __data__
999 (something which is syntactically legal in all languages...). Thus
1000 the babel block will use a :var __data__ = whatever header arg to
1001 reference the data to be plotted.
1003 ** DONE Column names in R input/output
1004 This has been implemented: Automatic on input to R; optional in
1005 output. Note that this equates column names with the header row in
1006 an org table; whereas org actually has a mechanism whereby a row
1007 with a '!' in the first field defines column names. I have not
1008 attempted to support these org table mechanisms yet. See [[*Support%20rownames%20and%20other%20org%20babel%20table%20features][this
1009 DEFERRED todo item]].
1010 ** DONE use example block for large amounts of stdout output?
1011 We're currently `examplizing' with : at the beginning of the line,
1012 but should larger amounts of output be in a
1013 \#+begin_example...\#+end_example block? What's the cutoff? > 1
1014 line? This would be nice as it would allow folding of lengthy
1015 output. Sometimes one will want to see stdout just to check
1016 everything looks OK, and then fold it away.
1018 I'm addressing this in branch 'examplizing-output'.
1019 Yea, that makes sense. (either that or allow folding of large
1020 blocks escaped with =:=).
1022 Proposed cutoff of 10 lines, we can save this value in a user
1023 customizable variable.
1024 *** DONE add ability to remove such results
1025 ** DONE exclusive =exports= params
1027 #+srcname: implement-export-exclusivity
1034 ** DONE LoB: allow output in buffer
1035 ** DONE allow default header arguments by language
1036 org-babel-default-header-args:lang-name
1038 An example of when this is useful is for languages which always return
1039 files as their results (e.g. [[*** ditaa][ditaa]], and [[*** gnuplot][gnuplot]]).
1040 ** DONE singe-function tangling and loading elisp from literate org-mode file [3/3]
1042 This function should tangle the org-mode file for elisp, and then call
1043 `load-file' on the resulting tangled file.
1045 #+srcname: test-loading-embedded-emacs-lisp
1046 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results replace
1047 (setq test-tangle-advert nil)
1048 (setq test-tangle-loading nil)
1049 (setq results (list :before test-tangle-loading test-tangle-advert))
1050 (org-babel-load-file "test-tangle.org")
1051 (setq results (list (list :after test-tangle-loading test-tangle-advert) results))
1052 (delete-file "test-tangle.el")
1056 #+resname: test-loading-embedded-emacs-lisp
1057 | :before | nil | nil |
1058 | :after | "org-babel tangles" | "use org-babel-tangle for all your emacs initialization files!!" |
1060 *** DONE add optional language limiter to org-babel-tangle
1061 This should check to see if there is any need to re-export
1063 *** DONE ensure that org-babel-tangle returns the path to the tangled file(s)
1065 #+srcname: test-return-value-of-org-babel-tangle
1066 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results replace
1067 (mapcar #'file-name-nondirectory (org-babel-tangle-file "test-tangle.org" "emacs-lisp"))
1071 | "test-tangle.el" |
1073 *** DONE only tangle the file if it's actually necessary
1074 ** DONE add a function to jump to a source-block by name
1075 I've had an initial stab at that in org-babel-find-named-block
1076 (library-of-babel branch).
1078 At the same time I introduced org-babel-named-src-block-regexp, to
1079 match src-blocks with srcname.
1081 This is now working with the command
1082 `org-babel-goto-named-source-block', all we need is a good key
1085 ** DONE add =:none= session argument (for purely functional execution) [4/4]
1086 This would allow source blocks to be run in their own new process
1088 - These blocks could then also be run in the background (since we can
1089 detach and just wait for the process to signal that it has terminated)
1090 - We wouldn't be drowning in session buffers after running the tests
1091 - we can re-use much of the session code to run in a more /functional/
1094 While session provide a lot of cool features, like persistent
1095 environments, [[* DONE function to bring up inferior-process buffer][pop-to-session]], and hints at exportation for
1096 org-babel-tangle, they also have some down sides and I'm thinking that
1097 session-based execution maybe shouldn't be the default behavior.
1099 Down-sides to sessions
1100 - *much* more complicated than functional evaluation
1101 - maintaining the state of the session has weird issues
1102 - waiting for evaluation to finish
1103 - prompt issues like [[* TODO weird escaped characters in shell prompt break shell evaluation][shell-prompt-escapes-bug]]
1104 - can't run in background
1105 - litter emacs with session buffers
1109 #+srcname: ruby-task-no-session
1110 #+begin_src ruby :results replace output
1116 #+resname: ruby-task-no-session
1121 #+srcname: task-python-none-session
1122 #+begin_src python :session none :results replace value
1128 #+resname: task-python-none-session
1133 #+srcname: task-session-none-sh
1134 #+begin_src sh :results replace
1139 #+resname: task-session-none-sh
1145 #+srcname: task-no-session-R
1146 #+begin_src R :results replace output
1153 #+resname: task-no-session-R
1157 ** DONE fully purge org-babel-R of direct comint interaction
1158 try to remove all code under the [[file:lisp/org-babel-R.el::functions%20for%20evaluation%20of%20R%20code][;; functions for evaluation of R code]] line
1160 ** DONE Create objects in top level (global) environment [5/5]
1163 *** initial requirement statement [DED]
1164 At the moment, objects created by computations performed in the
1165 code block are evaluated in the scope of the
1166 code-block-function-body and therefore disappear when the code
1167 block is evaluated {unless you employ some extra trickery like
1168 assign('name', object, env=globalenv()) }. I think it will be
1169 desirable to also allow for a style wherein objects that are
1170 created in one code block persist in the R global environment and
1171 can be re-used in a separate block.
1173 This is what Sweave does, and while I'm not saying we have to be
1174 the same as Sweave, it wouldn't be hard for us to provide the same
1175 behaviour in this case; if we don't, we risk undeservedly being
1176 written off as an oddity by some.
1178 IOW one aspect of org-babel is that of a sort of functional
1179 meta-programming language. This is crazy, in a very good
1180 way. Nevertheless, wrt R I think there's going to be a lot of value
1181 in providing for a working style in which the objects are stored in
1182 the R session, rather than elisp/org buffer. This will be a very
1183 familiar working style to lots of people.
1185 There are no doubt a number of different ways of accomplishing
1186 this, the simplest being a hack like adding
1189 for(objname in ls())
1190 assign(objname, get(objname), envir=globalenv())
1193 to the source code block function body. (Maybe wrap it in an on.exit() call).
1195 However this may deserve to be thought about more carefully, perhaps
1196 with a view to having a uniform approach across languages. E.g. shell
1197 code blocks have the same semantics at the moment (no persistence of
1198 variables across code blocks), because the body is evaluated in a new
1199 bash shell process rather than a running shell. And I guess the same
1200 is true for python. However, in both these cases, you could imagine
1201 implementing the alternative in which the body is evaluated in a
1202 persistent interactive session. It's just that it's particularly
1203 natural for R, seeing as both ESS and org-babel evaluate commands in a
1204 single persistent R session.
1208 Thanks for bringing this up. I think you are absolutely correct that we
1209 should provide support for a persistent environment (maybe called a
1210 *session*) in which to evaluate code blocks. I think the current setup
1211 demonstrates my personal bias for a functional style of programming
1212 which is certainly not ideal in all contexts.
1214 While the R function you mention does look like an elegant solution, I
1215 think we should choose an implementation that would be the same across
1216 all source code types. Specifically I think we should allow the user to
1217 specify an optional *session* as a header variable (when not present we
1218 assume a default session for each language). The session name could be
1219 used to name a comint buffer (like the *R* buffer) in which all
1220 evaluation would take place (within which variables would retain their
1221 values --at least once I remove some of the functional method wrappings
1222 currently in place-- ).
1224 This would allow multiple environments to be used in the same buffer,
1225 and once this setup was implemented we should be able to fairly easily
1226 implement commands for jumping between source code blocks and the
1227 related session buffers, as well as for dumping the last N commands from
1228 a session into a new or existing source code block.
1230 Please let me know if you foresee any problems with this proposed setup,
1231 or if you think any parts might be confusing for people coming from
1232 Sweave. I'll hopefully find some time to work on this later in the
1235 *** can functional and interpreted/interactive models coexist?
1237 Even though both of these use the same =*R*= buffer the value of =a=
1238 is not preserved because it is assigned inside of a functional
1241 #+srcname: task-R-sessions
1248 #+srcname: task-R-same-session
1253 This functional wrapper was implemented in order to efficiently return
1254 the results of the execution of the entire source code block. However
1255 it inhibits the evaluation of source code blocks in the top level,
1256 which would allow for persistence of variable assignment across
1257 evaluations. How can we allow *both* evaluation in the top level, and
1258 efficient capture of the return value of an entire source code block
1259 in a language independent manner?
1261 Possible solutions...
1262 1) we can't so we will have to implement two types of evaluation
1263 depending on which is appropriate (functional or imperative)
1264 2) we remove the functional wrapper and parse the source code block
1265 into it's top level statements (most often but not always on line
1266 breaks) so that we can isolate the final segment which is our
1268 3) we add some sort of "#+return" line to the code block
1269 4) we take advantage of each languages support for meta-programming
1270 through =eval= type functions, and use said to evaluate the entire
1271 blocks in such a way that their environment can be combined with the
1272 global environment, and their results are still captured.
1273 5) I believe that most modern languages which support interactive
1274 sessions have support for a =last_result= type function, which
1275 returns the result of the last input without re-calculation. If
1276 widely enough present this would be the ideal solution to a
1277 combination of functional and imperative styles.
1279 None of these solutions seem very desirable, but for now I don't see
1280 what else would be possible.
1282 Of these options I was leaning towards (1) and (4) but now believe
1283 that if it is possible option (5) will be ideal.
1285 **** (1) both functional and imperative evaluation
1287 - can take advantage of built in functions for sending regions to the
1289 - retains the proven tested and working functional wrappers
1292 - introduces the complication of keeping track of which type of
1293 evaluation is best suited to a particular context
1294 - the current functional wrappers may require some changes in order to
1295 include the existing global context
1297 **** (4) exploit language meta-programming constructs to explicitly evaluate code
1299 - only one type of evaluation
1302 - some languages may not have sufficient meta-programming constructs
1304 **** (5) exploit some =last_value= functionality if present
1306 Need to ensure that most languages have such a function, those without
1307 will simply have to implement their own similar solution...
1309 | language | =last_value= function |
1310 |------------+-----------------------------|
1314 | shell | see [[* last command for shells][last command for shells]] |
1315 | emacs-lisp | see [[* emacs-lisp will be a special case][special-case]] |
1317 #+srcname: task-last-value
1322 ***** last command for shells
1323 Do this using the =tee= shell command, and continually pipe the output
1326 Got this idea from the following [[http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2004-01/0898.html][email-thread]].
1328 suggested from mailing list
1330 #+srcname: bash-save-last-output-to-file
1334 bash -c "$line" | tee /tmp/last.out1
1335 mv /tmp/last.out1 /tmp/last.out
1339 another proposed solution from the above thread
1341 #+srcname: bash-save-in-variable
1344 # so - Save Output. Saves output of command in OUT shell variable.
1354 "^M": " | tee /tmp/h_lastcmd.out ^[k"
1357 export __=/tmp/h_lastcmd.out
1359 If you try it, Alt-k will stand for the old Enter; use "command $__" to
1360 access the last output.
1366 Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
1369 ***** emacs-lisp will be a special case
1370 While it is possible for emacs-lisp to be run in a console type
1371 environment (see the =elim= function) it is *not* possible to run
1372 emacs-lisp in a different *session*. Meaning any variable set top
1373 level of the console environment will be set *everywhere* inside
1374 emacs. For this reason I think that it doesn't make any sense to
1375 worry about session support for emacs-lisp.
1377 *** Further thoughts on 'scripting' vs. functional approaches
1379 These are just thoughts, I don't know how sure I am about this.
1380 And again, perhaps I'm not saying anything very radical, just that
1381 it would be nice to have some options supporting things like
1382 receiving text output in the org buffer.
1384 I can see that you've already gone some way down the road towards
1385 the 'last value' approach, so sorry if my comments come rather
1386 late. I am concerned that we are not giving sufficient attention
1387 to stdout / the text that is returned by the interpreters. In
1388 contrast, many of our potential users will be accustomed to a
1389 'scripting' approach, where they are outputting text at various
1390 points in the code block, not just at the end. I am leaning
1391 towards thinking that we should have 2 modes of evaluation:
1392 'script' mode, and 'functional' mode.
1394 In script mode, evaluation of a code block would result in *all*
1395 text output from that code block appearing as output in the org
1396 buffer, presumably as an #+begin_example...#+end_example. There
1397 could be an :echo option controlling whether the input commands
1398 also appear in the output. [This is like Sweave].
1400 In functional mode, the *result* of the code block is available as
1401 an elisp object, and may appear in the org buffer as an org
1402 table/string, via the mechanisms you have developed already.
1404 One thing I'm wondering about is whether, in script mode, there
1405 simply should not be a return value. Perhaps this is not so
1406 different from what exists: script mode would be new, and what
1407 exists currently would be functional mode.
1409 I think it's likely that, while code evaluation will be exciting
1410 to people, a large majority of our users in a large majority of
1411 their usage will not attempt to actually use the return value from
1412 a source code block in any meaningful way. In that case, it seems
1413 rather restrictive to only allow them to see output from the end
1416 Instead I think the most accessible way to introduce org-babel to
1417 people, at least while they are learning it, is as an immensely
1418 powerful environment in which to embed their 'scripts', which now
1419 also allows them to 'run' their 'scripts'. Especially as such
1420 people are likely to be the least capable of the user-base, a
1421 possible design-rule would be to make the scripting style of usage
1422 easy (default?), perhaps requiring a special option to enable a
1423 functional style. Those who will use the functional style won't
1424 have a problem understanding what's going on, whereas the 'skript
1425 kiddies' might not even know the syntax for defining a function in
1426 their language of choice. And of course we can allow the user to
1427 set a variable in their .emacs controlling the preference, so that
1428 functional users are not inconveniennced by having to provide
1429 header args the whole time.
1431 Please don't get the impression that I am down-valuing the
1432 functional style of org-babel. I am constantly horrified at the
1433 messy 'scripts' that my colleagues produce in perl or R or
1434 whatever! Nevertheless that seems to be how a lot of people work.
1436 I think you were leaning towards the last-value approach because
1437 it offered the possibility of unified code supporting both the
1438 single evaluation environment and the functional style. If you
1439 agree with any of the above then perhaps it will impact upon this
1440 and mean that the code in the two branches has to differ a bit. In
1441 that case, functional mode could perhaps after all evaluate each
1442 code block in its own environment, thus (re)approaching 'true'
1443 functional programming (side-effects are hard to achieve).
1447 echo "There are `wc -l files` files in this directory"
1451 *** even more thoughts on evaluation, results, models and options
1453 Thanks Dan, These comments are invaluable.
1455 What do you think about this as a new list of priorities/requirements
1456 for the execution of source-code blocks.
1459 1) we want the evaluation of the source code block to take place in a
1460 session which can persist state (variables, current directory,
1462 2) source code blocks can specify their session with a header argument
1463 3) each session should correspond to an Emacs comint buffer so that the
1464 user can drop into the session and experiment with live code
1467 1) each source-code block generates some form of results which (as
1468 we have already implemented) is transfered into emacs-lisp
1469 after which it can be inserted into the org-mode buffer, or
1470 used by other source-code blocks
1471 2) when the results are translated into emacs-lisp, forced to be
1472 interpreted as a scalar (dumping their raw values into the
1473 org-mode buffer), as a vector (which is often desirable with R
1474 code blocks), or interpreted on the fly (the default option).
1475 Note that this is very nearly currently implemented through the
1476 [[* DONE results-type header (vector/file)][results-type-header]].
1477 3) there should be *two* means of collecting results from the
1478 execution of a source code block. *Either* the value of the
1479 last statement of the source code block, or the collection of
1480 all that has been passed to STDOUT during the evaluation.
1482 **** header argument or return line (*header argument*)
1484 Rather than using a header argument to specify how the return value
1485 should be passed back, I'm leaning towards the use of a =#+RETURN=
1486 line inside the block. If such a line *is not present* then we
1487 default to using STDOUT to collect results, but if such a line *is
1488 present* then we use it's value as the results of the block. I
1489 think this will allow for the most elegant specification between
1490 functional and script execution. This also cleans up some issues
1491 of implementation and finding which statement is the last
1494 Having given this more thought, I think a header argument is
1495 preferable. The =#+return:= line adds new complicating syntax for
1496 something that does little more than we would accomplish through
1497 the addition of a header argument. The only benefit being that we
1498 know where the final statement starts, which is not an issue in
1499 those languages which contain 'last value' operators.
1501 new header =:results= arguments
1502 - script :: explicitly states that we want to use STDOUT to
1503 initialize our results
1504 - return_last :: stdout is ignored instead the *value* of the final
1505 statement in the block is returned
1506 - echo :: means echo the contents of the source-code block along
1507 with the results (this implies the *script* =:results=
1510 *** DONE rework evaluation lang-by-lang [4/4]
1512 This should include...
1513 - functional results working with the comint buffer
1515 - script :: return the output of STDOUT
1516 - write a macro which runs the first redirection, executes the
1517 body, then runs the second redirection
1518 - last :: return the value of the last statement
1521 - sessions in comint buffers
1523 **** DONE Ruby [4/4]
1524 - [X] functional results working with comint
1525 - [X] script results
1526 - [X] ensure scalar/vector results args are taken into consideration
1527 - [X] ensure callable by other source block
1529 #+srcname: ruby-use-last-output
1530 #+begin_src ruby :results replace
1537 #+resname: ruby-use-last-output
1540 #+srcname: task-call-use-last-output
1541 #+begin_src ruby :var last=ruby-use-last-output :results replace
1542 last.flatten.size + 1
1545 #+resname: task-call-use-last-output
1550 #+srcname: first-ruby-session-task
1551 #+begin_src ruby :session schulte :results silent
1555 #+srcname: second-ruby-session-task
1556 #+begin_src ruby :session schulte :results silent
1560 #+srcname: without-the-right-session
1561 #+begin_src ruby :results silent
1567 - [X] functional results working with comint
1568 - [X] script results
1569 - [X] ensure scalar/vector results args are taken into consideration
1570 - [X] ensure callable by other source block
1572 To redirect output to a file, you can use the =sink()= command.
1575 #+begin_src R :results value vector silent
1582 #+srcname: task-R-use-other-output
1583 #+begin_src R :var twoentyseven=task_R_B() :results replace value
1588 #+resname: task-R-use-other-output
1591 **** DONE Python [4/4]
1592 - [X] functional results working with comint
1593 - [X] script results
1594 - [X] ensure scalar/vector results args are taken into consideration
1595 - [X] ensure callable by other source block
1597 #+srcname: task-new-eval-for-python
1598 #+begin_src python :results silent output scalar
1604 #+srcname: task-use-new-eval
1605 #+begin_src python :var tasking=task-new-eval-for-python() :results replace
1609 #+resname: task-use-new-eval
1612 **** DONE Shells [4/4]
1613 - [X] functional results working with comint
1614 - [X] script results
1615 - [X] ensure scalar/vector results args are taken into consideration
1616 - [X] ensure callable by other source block
1618 #+srcname: task-shell-new-evaluation
1619 #+begin_src sh :results silent value scalar
1624 #+srcname: task-call-other-shell
1625 #+begin_src sh :var other=task-shell-new-evaluation() :results replace scalar
1626 echo $other ' is the old date'
1629 #+resname: task-call-other-shell
1630 : $ Fri Jun 12 13:08:37 PDT 2009 is the old date
1632 *** DONE implement a *session* header argument [4/4]
1633 =:session= header argument to override the default *session* buffer
1637 #+srcname: task-ruby-named-session
1638 #+begin_src ruby :session schulte :results replace
1639 schulte = :in_schulte
1642 #+resname: task-ruby-named-session
1645 #+srcname: another-in-schulte
1646 #+begin_src ruby :session schulte
1650 #+resname: another-in-schulte
1657 #+srcname: python-session-task
1658 #+begin_src python :session what :results silent
1662 #+srcname: python-get-from-session
1663 #+begin_src python :session what :results replace
1667 #+resname: python-get-from-session
1672 #+srcname: task-shell-sessions
1673 #+begin_src sh :session what
1677 #+srcname: task-shell-sessions-what
1678 #+begin_src sh :session what :results replace
1682 #+resname: task-shell-sessions-what
1687 #+srcname: task-R-session
1688 #+begin_src R :session what :results replace
1694 #+resname: task-R-session
1697 #+srcname: another-task-R-session
1698 #+begin_src R :session what :results replace
1702 *** DONE function to bring up inferior-process buffer [4/4]
1704 This should be callable from inside of a source-code block in an
1705 org-mode buffer. It should evaluate the header arguments, then bring
1706 up the inf-proc buffer using =pop-to-buffer=.
1708 For lack of a better place, lets add this to the `org-metadown-hook'
1711 To give this a try, place the cursor on a source block with variables,
1712 (optionally git a prefix argument) then hold meta and press down.
1716 #+srcname: task-ruby-pop-to-session
1717 #+begin_src ruby :var num=9 :var another="something else"
1718 num.times{|n| puts another}
1723 #+srcname: task-python-pop-to-session
1724 #+begin_src python :var num=9 :var another="something else"
1729 #+srcname: task-R-pop-to-session
1730 #+begin_src R :var a=9 :var b=8
1736 #+srcname: task-shell-pop-sessions
1737 #+begin_src sh :var NAME="eric"
1741 *** DEFERRED function to dump last N lines from inf-proc buffer into the current source block
1743 Callable with a prefix argument to specify how many lines should be
1744 dumped into the source-code buffer.
1746 *** REJECTED comint notes
1748 Implementing comint integration in [[file:lisp/org-babel-comint.el][org-babel-comint.el]].
1751 - handling of outputs
1752 - split raw output from process by prompts
1753 - a ring of the outputs, buffer-local, `org-babel-comint-output-ring'
1754 - a switch for dumping all outputs to a buffer
1755 - inputting commands
1757 Lets drop all this language specific stuff, and just use
1758 org-babel-comint to split up our outputs, and return either the last
1759 value of an execution or the combination of values from the
1762 **** comint filter functions
1763 : ;; comint-input-filter-functions hook process-in-a-buffer
1764 : ;; comint-output-filter-functions hook function modes.
1765 : ;; comint-preoutput-filter-functions hook
1766 : ;; comint-input-filter function ...
1768 #+srcname: obc-filter-ruby
1769 #+begin_src ruby :results last
1777 ** DONE Remove protective commas from # comments before evaluating
1778 org inserts protective commas in front of ## comments in language
1779 modes that use them. We need to remove them prior to sending code
1782 #+srcname: testing-removal-of-protective-comas
1784 ,# this one might break it??
1788 ** DONE pass multiple reference arguments into R
1789 Can we do this? I wasn't sure how to supply multiple 'var' header
1790 args. Just delete this if I'm being dense.
1792 This should be working, see the following example...
1794 #+srcname: two-arg-example
1795 #+begin_src R :var n=2 :var m=8
1799 #+resname: two-arg-example
1802 ** DONE ensure that table ranges work
1803 when a table range is passed to org-babel as an argument, it should be
1804 interpreted as a vector.
1807 | 2 | 3 | Fixnum:1 |
1808 | 3 | 4 | Array:123456 |
1812 #+TBLFM: @1$3='(sbe simple-sbe-example (n 4))::@2$3='(sbe task-table-range (n @1$1..@6$1))::@3$3='(sbe task-table-range (n (@1$1..@6$1)))
1814 #+srcname: simple-sbe-example
1815 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
1819 #+srcname: task-table-range
1820 #+begin_src ruby :var n=simple-sbe-example
1824 #+srcname: simple-results
1825 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var n=task-table-range(n=(1 2 3))
1829 #+resname: simple-results
1832 #+srcname: task-arr-referent
1833 #+begin_src ruby :var ar=(1 2 3)
1837 #+resname: task-arr-referent
1840 ** DONE global variable indicating default to vector output
1841 how about an alist... =org-babel-default-header-args= this may already
1842 exist... just execute the following and all source blocks will default
1845 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
1846 (setq org-babel-default-header-args '((:results . "vector")))
1849 ** DONE name named results if source block is named
1850 currently this isn't happening although it should be
1852 #+srcname: test-naming-named-source-blocks
1853 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
1857 #+resname: test-naming-named-source-blocks
1859 ** DONE (simple caching) check for named results before source blocks
1860 see the TODO comment in [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::TODO%20This%20should%20explicitly%20look%20for%20resname%20lines%20before][org-babel-ref.el#org-babel-ref-resolve-reference]]
1861 ** DONE set =:results silent= when eval with prefix argument
1863 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
1866 ** DONE results-type header (vector/file) [3/3]
1867 In response to a point in Dan's email. We should allow the user to
1868 force scalar or vector results. This could be done with a header
1869 argument, and the default behavior could be controlled through a
1870 configuration variable.
1872 #+srcname: task-trivial-vector
1873 #+begin_src ruby :results replace vector
1880 since it doesn't make sense to turn a vector into a scalar, lets
1881 just add a two values...
1883 - vector :: forces the results to be a vector (potentially 1 dimensional)
1884 - file :: this throws an error if the result isn't a string, and
1885 tries to treat it as a path to a file.
1887 I'm just going to cram all of these into the =:results= header
1888 argument. Then if we allow multiple header arguments it should
1889 work out, for example one possible header argument string could be
1890 =:results replace vector file=, which would *replace* any existing
1891 results forcing the results into an org-mode table, and
1892 interpreting any strings as file paths.
1894 *** DONE multiple =:results= headers
1896 #+srcname: multiple-result-headers
1897 #+begin_src ruby :results replace silent
1903 *** DONE file result types
1904 When inserting into an org-mode buffer create a link with the path
1905 being the value, and optionally the display being the
1906 =file-name-nondirectory= if it exists.
1908 #+srcname: task-file-result
1909 #+begin_src python :results replace file
1914 [[something][something]]
1917 This will be useful because blocks like =ditaa= and =dot= can return
1918 the string path of their files, and can add =file= to their results
1921 *** DONE vector result types
1923 #+srcname: task-force-results
1924 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results vector
1931 ** DONE results name
1932 In order to do this we will need to start naming our results.
1933 Since the source blocks are named with =#+srcname:= lines we can
1934 name results with =#+resname:= lines (if the source block has no
1935 name then no name is given to the =#+resname:= line on creation,
1936 otherwise the name of the source block is used).
1938 This will have the additional benefit of allowing results and
1939 source blocks to be located in different places in a buffer (and
1940 eventually in different buffers entirely).
1942 #+srcname: developing-resnames
1943 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
1947 Once source blocks are able to find their own =#+resname:= lines
1950 #+srcname: sbe-w-new-results
1951 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results replace
1952 (sbe "developing-resnames")
1958 *** TODO change the results insertion functions to use these lines
1960 *** TODO teach references to resolve =#+resname= lines.
1962 ** DONE org-babel tests org-babel [1/1]
1963 since we are accumulating this nice collection of source-code blocks
1964 in the sandbox section we should make use of them as unit tests.
1965 What's more, we should be able to actually use org-babel to run these
1968 We would just need to cycle over every source code block under the
1969 sandbox, run it, and assert that the return value is equal to what we
1972 I have the feeling that this should be possible using only org-babel
1973 functions with minimal or no additional elisp. It would be very cool
1974 for org-babel to be able to test itself.
1976 This is now done, see [[* Tests]].
1978 *** DEFERRED org-babel assertions (may not be necessary)
1979 These could be used to make assertions about the results of a
1980 source-code block. If the assertion fails then the point could be
1981 moved to the block, and error messages and highlighting etc... could
1984 ** DONE make C-c C-c work anywhere within source code block?
1985 This seems like it would be nice to me, but perhaps it would be
1986 inefficient or ugly in implementation? I suppose you could search
1987 forward, and if you find #+end_src before you find #+begin_src,
1988 then you're inside one. [DED]
1990 Agreed, I think inside of the =#+srcname: line= would be useful as
1993 #+srcname: testing-out-cc
1994 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
1998 ** DONE integration with org tables
1999 We should make it easy to call org-babel source blocks from org-mode
2000 table formulas. This is practical now that it is possible to pass
2001 arguments to org-babel source blocks.
2003 See the related [[* (sandbox) integration w/org tables][sandbox]] header for tests/examples.
2005 *** digging in org-table.el
2006 In the past [[file:~/src/org/lisp/org-table.el::org%20table%20el%20The%20table%20editor%20for%20Org%20mode][org-table.el]] has proven difficult to work with.
2008 Should be a hook in [[file:~/src/org/lisp/org-table.el::defun%20org%20table%20eval%20formula%20optional%20arg%20equation][org-table-eval-formula]].
2010 Looks like I need to change this [[file:~/src/org/lisp/org-table.el::if%20lispp][if statement]] (line 2239) into a cond
2013 ** DONE source blocks as functions
2015 Allow source code blocks to be called like functions, with arguments
2016 specified. We are already able to call a source-code block and assign
2017 it's return result to a variable. This would just add the ability to
2018 specify the values of the arguments to the source code block assuming
2019 any exist. For an example see
2021 When a variable appears in a header argument, how do we differentiate
2022 between it's value being a reference or a literal value? I guess this
2023 could work just like a programming language. If it's escaped or in
2024 quotes, then we count it as a literal, otherwise we try to look it up
2027 ** DONE folding of code blocks? [2/2]
2028 [DED] In similar way to using outline-minor-mode for folding function
2029 bodies, can we fold code blocks? #+begin whatever statements are
2030 pretty ugly, and in any case when you're thinking about the overall
2031 game plan you don't necessarily want to see the code for each Step.
2033 *** DONE folding of source code block
2034 Sounds good, and wasn't too hard to implement. Code blocks should
2035 now be fold-able in the same manner as headlines (by pressing TAB
2038 *** REJECTED folding of results
2039 So, lets do a three-stage tab cycle... First fold the src block,
2040 then fold the results, then unfold.
2042 There's no way to tell if the results are a table or not w/o
2043 actually executing the block which would be too expensive of an
2046 ** DONE selective export of text, code, figures
2047 [DED] The org-babel buffer contains everything (code, headings and
2048 notes/prose describing what you're up to, textual/numeric/graphical
2049 code output, etc). However on export to html / LaTeX one might want
2050 to include only a subset of that content. For example you might
2051 want to create a presentation of what you've done which omits the
2054 [EMS] So I think this should be implemented as a property which can
2055 be set globally or on the outline header level (I need to review
2056 the mechanics of org-mode properties). And then as a source block
2057 header argument which will apply only to a specific source code
2058 block. A header argument of =:export= with values of
2060 - =code= :: just show the code in the source code block
2061 - =none= :: don't show the code or the results of the evaluation
2062 - =results= :: just show the results of the code evaluation (don't
2063 show the actual code)
2064 - =both= :: show both the source code, and the results
2066 this will be done in [[* (sandbox) selective export][(sandbox) selective export]].
2068 ** DONE a header argument specifying silent evaluation (no output)
2069 This would be useful across all types of source block. Currently
2070 there is a =:replace t= option to control output, this could be
2071 generalized to an =:output= option which could take the following
2072 options (maybe more)
2074 - =t= :: this would be the default, and would simply insert the
2075 results after the source block
2076 - =replace= :: to replace any results which may already be there
2077 - =silent= :: this would inhibit any insertion of the results
2079 This is now implemented see the example in the [[* silent evaluation][sandbox]]
2081 ** DONE assign variables from tables in R
2082 This is now working (see [[* (sandbox table) R][(sandbox-table)-R]]). Although it's not that
2083 impressive until we are able to print table results from R.
2085 ** DONE insert 2-D R results as tables
2086 everything is working but R and shell
2092 This has already been tackled by Dan in [[file:existing_tools/org-R.el::defconst%20org%20R%20write%20org%20table%20def][org-R:check-dimensions]]. The
2093 functions there should be useful in combination with [[http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-data.html#Export-to-text-files][R-export-to-csv]]
2094 as a means of converting multidimensional R objects to emacs lisp.
2096 It may be as simple as first checking if the data is multidimensional,
2097 and then, if so using =write= to write the data out to a temporary
2098 file from which emacs can read the data in using =org-table-import=.
2100 Looking into this further, is seems that there is no such thing as a
2101 scalar in R [[http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/03a/3733.html][R-scalar-vs-vector]] In that light I am not sure how to
2102 deal with trivial vectors (scalars) in R. I'm tempted to just treat
2103 them as vectors, but then that would lead to a proliferation of
2104 trivial 1-cell tables...
2106 ** DONE allow variable initialization from source blocks
2107 Currently it is possible to initialize a variable from an org-mode
2108 table with a block argument like =table=sandbox= (note that the
2109 variable doesn't have to named =table=) as in the following example
2115 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=sandbox :results replace
2116 (message (format "table = %S" table))
2119 : "table = ((1 2 3) (4 \"schulte\" 6))"
2121 It would be good to allow initialization of variables from the results
2122 of other source blocks in the same manner. This would probably
2123 require the addition of =#+SRCNAME: example= lines for the naming of
2124 source blocks, also the =table=sandbox= syntax may have to be expanded
2125 to specify whether the target is a source code block or a table
2126 (alternately we could just match the first one with the given name
2127 whether it's a table or a source code block).
2129 At least initially I'll try to implement this so that there is no need
2130 to specify whether the reference is to a table or a source-code block.
2131 That seems to be simpler both in terms of use and implementation.
2133 This is now working for emacs-lisp, ruby and python (and mixtures of
2134 the three) source blocks. See the examples in the [[* (sandbox) referencing other source blocks][sandbox]].
2136 This is currently working only with emacs lisp as in the following
2137 example in the [[* emacs lisp source reference][emacs lisp source reference]].
2140 ** TODO Add languages [2/6]
2141 I'm sure there are many more that aren't listed here. Please add
2142 them, and bubble any that you particularly care about up to the top.
2144 Any new language should be implemented in a org-babel-lang.el file.
2145 Follow the pattern set by [[file:lisp/org-babel-script.el][org-babel-script.el]], [[file:lisp/org-babel-shell.el][org-babel-shell.el]] and
2146 [[file:lisp/org-babel-R.el][org-babel-R.el]].
2149 This could probably be added to [[file:lisp/org-babel-script.el][org-babel-script.el]]
2154 (see [[* file result types][file result types]])
2156 #+srcname: implementing-ditaa
2157 #+begin_src ditaa :results replace :file blue.png :cmdline -r
2167 #+resname: implementing-ditaa
2168 [[file:blue.png][blue.png]]
2170 *** DONE gnuplot [7/7]
2171 (see [[* file result types][file result types]])
2173 #+PLOT: title:"Citas" ind:1 deps:(3) type:2d with:histograms set:"yrange [0:]"
2174 #+TBLNAME: gnuplot-data
2175 | independent var | first dependent var | second dependent var |
2176 |-----------------+---------------------+----------------------|
2177 | 0.1 | 0.425 | 0.375 |
2178 | 0.2 | 0.3125 | 0.3375 |
2179 | 0.3 | 0.24999993 | 0.28333338 |
2180 | 0.4 | 0.275 | 0.28125 |
2181 | 0.5 | 0.26 | 0.27 |
2182 | 0.6 | 0.25833338 | 0.24999993 |
2183 | 0.7 | 0.24642845 | 0.23928553 |
2184 | 0.8 | 0.23125 | 0.2375 |
2185 | 0.9 | 0.23333323 | 0.2333332 |
2186 | 1 | 0.2225 | 0.22 |
2187 | 1.1 | 0.20909075 | 0.22272708 |
2188 | 1.2 | 0.19999998 | 0.21458333 |
2189 | 1.3 | 0.19615368 | 0.21730748 |
2191 #+srcname: implementing-gnuplot
2192 #+begin_src gnuplot :var data=gnuplot-data :results silent
2193 set title "Implementing Gnuplot"
2194 plot data using 1:2 with lines
2197 **** DONE add variables
2198 gnuplot 4.2 and up support user defined variables. This is how
2199 we will handle variables with org-babel (meaning we will need to
2200 require gnuplot 4.2 and up for variable support, which can be
2201 install using [[http://www.macports.org/install.php][macports]] on Mac OSX).
2203 - scalar variables should be replaced in the body of the gnuplot code
2204 - vector variables should be exported to tab-separated files, and
2205 the variable names should be replaced with the path to the files
2207 **** DONE direct plotting w/o session
2208 **** DEFERRED gnuplot support for column/row names
2209 This should be implemented along the lines of the [[* STARTED Column (and row) names of tables in R input/output][R-colname-support]].
2211 We can do something similar to the :labels param in org-plot, we just
2212 have to be careful to ensure that each label is aligned with the
2215 This may be walking too close to an entirely prebuilt plotting tool
2216 rather than straight gnuplot code evaluation. For now I think this
2219 **** DONE a =file= header argument
2220 to specify a file holding the results
2222 #+srcname: gnuplot-to-file-implementation
2223 #+begin_src gnuplot :file plot.png :var data=gnuplot-data
2224 plot data using 1:2, data using 1:3 with lines
2228 [[file:plot.png][plot.png]]
2230 **** DONE helpers from org-plot.el
2231 There are a variety of helpers in org-plot which can be fit nicely
2232 into custom gnuplot header arguments.
2234 These should all be in place by now.
2236 **** DEFERRED header argument specifying 3D data
2239 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2241 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2242 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2243 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2244 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2245 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2246 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2247 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2248 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2249 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2250 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2251 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2252 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2254 #+srcname: implementing-gnuplot-grid-plots
2255 #+begin_src gnuplot :vars data=org-grid
2259 **** DONE gnuplot sessions
2260 Working on this, we won't support multiple sessions as `gnuplot-mode'
2261 isn't setup for such things.
2263 Also we can't display results with the default :none session, so for
2264 gnuplot we really want the default behavior to be :default, and to
2265 only run a :none session when explicitly specified.
2267 #+srcname: implementing-gnuplot-sessions
2268 #+begin_src gnuplot :var data=gnuplot-data :session none :file session.png
2269 set title "Implementing Gnuplot Sessions"
2270 plot data using 1:2 with lines
2274 [[file:session.png][session.png]]
2277 (see [[* file result types][file result types]])
2280 (see [[* file result types][file result types]])
2284 ** TODO Fix nested evaluation
2285 The current parser / evaluator fails with greater levels of nested
2286 function block calls (example below).
2288 *** Initial statement [ded]
2289 If we want to overcome this I think we'd have to redesign some of
2290 the evaluation mechanism. Seeing as we are also facing issues like
2291 dealing with default argument values, and seeing as we now know
2292 how we want the library of babel to behave in addition to the
2293 source blocks, now might be a good time to think about this. It
2294 would be nice to do the full thing at some point, but otoh we may
2295 not consider it a massive priority.
2297 AIui, there are two stages: (i) construct a parse tree, and (ii)
2298 evaluate it and return the value at the root. In the parse tree
2299 each node represents an unevaluated value (either a literal value
2300 or a reference). Node v may have descendent nodes, which represent
2301 values upon which node v's evaluation depends. Once that tree is
2302 constructed, then we evaluate the nodes from the tips towards the
2303 root (a post-order traversal).
2305 [This would also provide a solution for concatenating the STDOUTs
2306 of called blocks, which is a [[*allow%20output%20mode%20to%20return%20stdout%20as%20value][task below]]; we concatenate them in
2307 whatever order the traversal is done in.]
2309 In addition to the variable references (i.e. daughter nodes), each
2310 node would contain the information needed to evaluate that node
2311 (e.g. lang body). Then we would pass a function postorder over the
2312 tree which would call o-b-execute-src-block at each node, finally
2313 returning the value at the root.
2315 Fwiw I made a very tentative small start at stubbing this out in
2316 org-babel-call.el in the 'evaluation' branch. And I've made a start
2317 at sketching a parsing algorithm below.
2318 **** Parse tree algorithm
2319 Seeing as we're just trying to parse a string like
2320 f(a=1,b=g(c=2,d=3)) it shouldn't be too hard. But of course there
2321 are 'proper' parsers written in elisp out there,
2322 e.g. [[http://cedet.sourceforge.net/semantic.shtml][Semantic]]. Perhaps we can find what we need -- our syntax is
2323 pretty much the same as python and R isn't it?
2325 Or, a complete hack, but maybe it would be we easy to transform it
2326 to XML and then parse that with some existing tool?
2328 But if we're doing it ourselves, something very vaguely like this?
2329 (I'm sure there're lots of problems with this)
2331 #+srcname: org-babel-call-parse(call)
2333 ## we are currently reading a reference name: the name of the root function
2334 whereami = "refname"
2335 node = root = Node()
2336 for c in call_string:
2339 whereami = "varname" # now we're reading a variable name
2342 node.daughters = [node.daughters, new]
2345 whereami = "refname"
2347 whereami = "varname"
2354 if whereami = "varname":
2355 node.varnames[varnum] += c
2356 elif whereami = "refname":
2360 *** discussion / investigation
2361 I believe that this issue should be addressed as a bug rather than as
2362 a point for new development. The code in [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el][org-babel-ref.el]] already
2363 resolves variable references in a recursive manner which *should* work
2364 in the same manner regardless of the depth of the number of nested
2365 function calls. This recursive evaluation has the effect of
2366 implicitly constructing the parse tree that your are thinking of
2367 constructing explicitly.
2369 Through using some of the commented out debugging statements in
2370 [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el][org-babel-ref.el]] I have looked at what may be going wrong in the
2371 current evaluation setup, and it seems that nested variables are being
2372 set using the =:var= header argument, and these variables are being
2373 overridden by the *default* variables which are being entered through
2374 the new functional syntax (see the demonstration header below).
2376 I believe that once this bug is fixed we should be back to fully
2377 resolution of nested arguments. We should capture this functionality
2378 in a test to ensure that we continue to test it as we move forward. I
2379 can take a look at implementing this once I get a chance.
2381 Looks like the problem may be in [[file:lisp/org-babel.el::defun%20org%20babel%20merge%20params%20rest%20plists][org-babel-merge-params]], which seems
2382 to be trampling the provided :vars values.
2384 Nope, now it seems that we are actually looking up the results line,
2385 rather than the actual source-code block, which would make sense given
2386 that the results-line will return the same value regardless of the
2387 arguments supplied. See the output of this [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::message%20type%20S%20type%20debugging][debug-statement]].
2389 We need to be sure that we don't read from a =#+resname:= line when we
2390 have a non-nil set of arguments.
2393 After uncommenting the debugging statements located [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::message%20format%20first%20second%20S%20S%20new%20refere%20new%20referent%20debugging][here]] and more
2394 importantly [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::message%20nested%20args%20S%20args%20debugging][here]], we can see that the current reference code does
2395 evaluate the references correctly, and it uses the =:var= header
2396 argument to set =a=8=, however the default variables specified using
2397 the functional syntax in =adder(a=3, b=2)= is overriding this
2400 ***** doesn't work with functional syntax
2402 #+srcname: adder-func(a=3, b=2)
2407 #+resname: adder-func
2410 #+srcname: after-adder-func(arg=adder-func(a=8))
2415 #+resname: after-adder-func
2418 ***** still does work with =:var= syntax
2420 so it looks like regardless of the syntax used we're not overriding
2421 the default argument values.
2423 #+srcname: adder-header
2424 #+begin_src python :var a=3 :var b=2
2428 #+resname: adder-header
2431 #+srcname: after-adder-header
2432 #+begin_src python :var arg=adder-header(a=8, b=0)
2436 #+resname: after-adder-header
2439 *** Set of test cases
2440 **** Both defaults provided in definition
2441 #+srcname: adder1(a=10,b=20)
2449 ****** DONE Rely on defaults
2457 ******* DONE empty parens () not recognised as lob call
2458 E.g. remove spaces between parens above
2460 updated [[file:lisp/org-babel-lob.el::defvar%20org%20babel%20lob%20one%20liner%20regexp%20lob%20t%20n%20n%20t%20n][org-babel-lob-one-liner-regexp]]
2462 ****** DONE One supplied, one default
2465 #+resname: adder1(a=0)
2471 #+resname: adder1(b=0)
2475 ****** DONE Both supplied
2476 #+lob: adder1(a=1,b=2)
2478 #+resname: adder1(a=1,b=2)
2482 **** One arg lacks default in definition
2483 #+srcname: adder2(a=10,b)
2487 ****** TODO Rely on defaults (one of which is missing)
2492 ## should be error: b has no default
2494 ****** TODO Default over-ridden
2498 ## should be error: b has no default
2500 ****** DONE Missing default supplied
2503 #+resname: adder2(b=1)
2509 ****** DONE One over-ridden, one supplied
2510 #+lob: adder2(a=1,b=2)
2512 #+resname: adder2(a=1,b=2)
2516 *** Example that fails
2518 #+srcname: adder(a=0, b=99)
2528 #+begin_src python :results silent
2533 #+srcname: level-one-nesting
2534 #+begin_src python :var arg=adder(a=one(),b=one())
2541 #+srcname: level-one-nesting
2542 #+begin_src python :var arg=adder(a=adder(a=one(),b=one()),b=adder(a=one(),b=one()))
2549 ** TODO allow srcname to omit function call parentheses
2550 Someone needs to revisit those regexps. Is there an argument for
2551 moving some of the regexps used to match function calls into
2552 defvars? (i.e. in o-b.el and o-b-ref.el)
2554 ** TODO creeping blank lines
2555 There's still inappropriate addition of blank lines in some circumstances.
2557 Hmm, it's a bit confusing. It's to do with o-b-remove-result. LoB
2558 removes the entire (#+resname and result) and starts from scratch,
2559 whereas #+begin_src only removes the result. I haven't worked out
2560 what the correct fix is yet. Maybe the right thing to do is to make
2561 sure that those functions (o-b-remove-result et al.) are neutral
2562 with respect to newlines. Sounds easy, but...
2572 Compare the results of
2573 #+lob: python-add(a=5, b=17)
2575 #+resname: python-add(a=5, b=17)
2577 --------------------------------
2585 ---------------------
2586 ** TODO problem with newlines in output when :results value
2587 #+begin_src python :results value
2588 '\n'.join(map(str, range(4)))
2594 Whereas I was hoping for
2601 This is some sort of non-printing char / quoting issue I think. Note
2604 #+begin_src python :results value
2605 '\\n'.join(map(str, range(4)))
2612 #+begin_src python :results output
2613 print('\n'.join(map(str, range(4))))
2622 *** collapsing consecutive newlines in string output
2624 This is an example of the same bug
2626 #+srcname: multi-line-string-output
2627 #+begin_src ruby :results output
2628 "the first line ends here
2631 and this is the second one
2636 This doesn't produce anything at all now. I believe that's because
2637 I've changed things so that :results output really does *not* get the
2638 value of the block, only the STDOUT. So if we add a print statement
2641 #+srcname: multi-line-string-output
2642 #+begin_src ruby :results output
2643 print "the first line ends here
2646 and this is the second one
2652 : the first line ends here
2655 : and this is the second one
2659 However, the behaviour with :results value is wrong
2661 #+srcname: multi-line-string-value
2663 "the first line ends here
2666 and this is the second one
2674 ** TODO prompt characters appearing in output with R
2675 #+begin_src R :session *R* :results output
2684 ** TODO o-b-execute-subtree overwrites heading when subtree is folded
2686 Try M-x org-babel-execute-subtree with the subtree folded and
2687 point at the beginning of the heading line.
2692 ** TODO Allow source blocks to be recognised when #+ are not first characters on the line
2693 I think Carsten has recently altered the core so that #+ can have
2694 preceding whitespace, at least for literal/code examples. org-babel
2695 should support this.
2697 ** TODO non-orgtbl formatted lists
2700 #+srcname: this-doesn't-match-orgtbl
2701 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results replace
2702 '((:results . "replace"))
2705 #+resname: this-doesn't-match-orgtbl
2707 ** PROPOSED external shell execution can't isolate return values
2708 I have no idea how to do this as of yet. The result is that when
2709 shell functions are run w/o a session there is no difference between
2710 the =output= and =value= result arguments.
2712 Yea, I don't know how to do this either. I searched extensively on
2713 how to isolate the *last* output of a series of shell commands (see
2714 [[* last command for
2715 shells][last command for shells]]). The results of the search were basically
2716 that it was not possible (or at least not accomplish-able with a
2717 reasonable amount of effort).
2719 That fact combined with the tenancy to all ways use standard out in
2720 shell scripts led me to treat these two options (=output= and =value=)
2721 as identical in shell evaluation. Not ideal but maybe good enough for
2724 In the `results' branch I've changed this so that they're not quite
2725 identical: output results in raw stdout contents, whereas value
2726 converts it to elisp, perhaps to a table if it looks tabular. This is
2727 the same for the other languages. [Dan]
2729 ** TODO are the org-babel-trim s necessary?
2730 at the end of e.g. org-babel-R-evaluate, org-babel-python-evaluate, but
2731 not org-babel-ruby-evaluate
2732 ** TODO use new merge function [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::t%20nil%20org%20combine%20plists%20args%20nil][here]]?
2733 And at other occurrences of org-combine-plists?
2734 ** TODO LoB is not populated on startup
2735 org-babel-library-of-babel is nil for me on startup. I have to
2736 evaluate the [[file:lisp/org-babel-lob.el::][org-babel-lob-ingest]] line manually.
2738 ** DONE avoid stripping whitespace from output when :results output
2739 This may be partly solved by using o-b-chomp rather than o-b-trim
2740 in the o-b-LANG-evaluate functions.
2741 ** DEFERRED weird escaped characters in shell prompt break shell evaluation
2742 E.g. this doesn't work. Should the shell sessions set a sane prompt
2743 when they start up? Or is it a question of altering
2744 comint-prompt-regexp? Or altering org-babel regexps?
2747 black=30 ; red=31 ; green=32 ; yellow=33 ; blue=34 ; magenta=35 ; cyan=36 ; white=37
2750 export PS1="\[\033[${prompt_col}m\]\w${prompt_char} \[\033[0m\]"
2753 I just pushed a good amount of changes, could you see if your shell
2754 problems still exist?
2756 The problem's still there. Specifically, aIui, at [[file:lisp/langs/org-babel-sh.el::raw%20org%20babel%20comint%20with%20output%20buffer%20org%20babel%20sh%20eoe%20output%20nil%20insert%20full%20body%20comint%20send%20input%20nil%20t][this line]] of
2757 org-babel-sh.el, raw gets the value
2759 ("" "
\e[0m Sun Jun 14 19:26:24 EDT 2009\n" "
\e[0m org_babel_sh_eoe\n" "
\e[0m ")
2761 and therefore (member org-babel-sh-eoe-output ...) fails
2763 I think that `comint-prompt-regexp' needs to be altered to match
2764 the shell prompt. This shouldn't be too difficult to do by hand,
2765 using the `regexp-builder' command and should probably be part of
2766 the user's regular emacs init. I can't think of a way for us to
2767 set this automatically, and we are SOL without a regexp to match
2769 ** DONE function calls in #+srcname: refs
2771 My srcname references don't seem to be working for function
2772 calls. This needs fixing.
2779 srcname function call doesn't work for calling a source block
2780 #+srcname: caller(var1=called())
2793 They do work for a simple reference
2794 #+srcname: caller2(var1=56)
2803 and they do work for :var header arg
2805 #+begin_src python :var var1=called()
2811 ** DONE LoB: with output to buffer, not working in buffers other than library-of-babel.org
2813 I haven't fixed this yet. org-babel-ref-resolve-reference moves
2814 point around, inside a save-excursion. Somehow when it comes to
2815 inserting the results (after possible further recursive calls to
2816 org-babel-ref-resolve-reference), point hasn't gone back to the
2819 #+tblname: test-data
2824 #+lob: R-plot(data=test-data)
2826 #+lob: python-add(a=2, b=9)
2828 #+resname: python-add(a=2, b=9)
2832 I think this got fixed in the bugfixes before merging results into master.
2834 ** DONE cursor movement when evaluating source blocks
2835 E.g. the pie chart example. Despite the save-window-excursion in
2836 org-babel-execute:R. (I never learned how to do this properly: org-R
2837 jumps all over the place...)
2839 I don't see this now [ded]
2841 ** DONE LoB: calls fail if reference has single character name
2842 commit 21d058869df1ff23f4f8cc26f63045ac9c0190e2
2843 **** This doesn't work
2844 #+lob: R-plot(data=X)
2863 #+lob: R-plot(data=XX)
2865 ** DONE make :results replace the default?
2866 I'm tending to think that appending results to pre-existing results
2867 creates mess, and that the cleaner `replace' option should be the
2868 default. E.g. when a source block creates an image, we would want
2869 that to be updated, rather than have a new one be added.
2873 ** DONE ruby evaluation not working under ubuntu emacs 23
2874 With emacs 23.0.91.1 on ubuntu, for C-h f run-ruby I have the
2875 following, which seems to conflict with [[file:lisp/langs/org-babel-ruby.el::let%20session%20buffer%20save%20window%20excursion%20run%20ruby%20nil%20session%20current%20buffer][this line]] in org-babel-ruby.el.
2878 run-ruby is an interactive compiled Lisp function.
2882 Run an inferior Ruby process, input and output via buffer *ruby*.
2883 If there is a process already running in `*ruby*', switch to that buffer.
2884 With argument, allows you to edit the command line (default is value
2885 of `ruby-program-name'). Runs the hooks `inferior-ruby-mode-hook'
2886 (after the `comint-mode-hook' is run).
2887 (Type C-h m in the process buffer for a list of commands.)
2890 So, I may have a non-standard inf-ruby.el. Here's my version of
2894 run-ruby is an interactive Lisp function in `inf-ruby.el'.
2896 (run-ruby &optional COMMAND NAME)
2898 Run an inferior Ruby process, input and output via buffer *ruby*.
2899 If there is a process already running in `*ruby*', switch to that buffer.
2900 With argument, allows you to edit the command line (default is value
2901 of `ruby-program-name'). Runs the hooks `inferior-ruby-mode-hook'
2902 (after the `comint-mode-hook' is run).
2903 (Type C-h m in the process buffer for a list of commands.)
2906 It seems we could either bundle my version of inf-ruby.el (as it's
2907 the newest). Or we could change the use of `run-ruby' so that it
2908 is robust across multiple distributions. I think I'd prefer the
2909 former, unless the older version of inf-ruby is actually bundled
2910 with emacs, in which case maybe we should go out of our way to
2911 support it. Thoughts?
2913 I think for now I'll just include the latest [[file:util/inf-ruby.el][inf-ruby.el]] in the
2914 newly created utility directory. I doubt anyone would have a
2915 problem using the latest version of this file.
2916 ** DONE test failing forcing vector results with =test-forced-vector-results= ruby code block
2917 Note that this only seems to happen the *second* time the test table
2920 #+srcname: bug-trivial-vector
2921 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results vector silent
2925 #+srcname: bug-forced-vector-results
2926 #+begin_src ruby :var triv=test-trivial-vector :results silent
2930 mysteriously this seems to be fixed...
2931 ** DONE defunct R sessions
2932 Sometimes an old R session will turn defunct, and newly inserted code
2933 will not be evaluated (leading to a hang).
2935 This seems to be fixed by using `inferior-ess-send-input' rather than `comint-send-input'.
2936 ** DONE ruby fails on first call to non-default session
2938 #+srcname: bug-new-session
2939 #+begin_src ruby :session is-new
2943 ** DONE when reading results from =#+resname= line
2945 Errors when trying to read from resname lines.
2947 #+resname: bug-in-resname
2950 #+srcname: bug-in-resname-reader
2951 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var buggy=bug-in-resname() :results silent
2955 ** DONE R-code broke on "org-babel" rename
2957 #+srcname: bug-R-babels
2962 ** DONE error on trivial R results
2964 So I know it's generally not a good idea to squash error without
2965 handling them, but in this case the error almost always means that
2966 there was no file contents to be read by =org-table-import=, so I
2969 #+srcname: bug-trivial-r1
2970 #+begin_src R :results replace
2971 pie(c(1, 2, 3), labels = c(1, 2, 3))
2974 #+srcname: bug-trivial-r2
2975 #+begin_src R :results replace
2979 #+resname: bug-trivial-r2
2982 #+srcname: bug-trivial-r3
2983 #+begin_src R :results replace
2987 #+resname: bug-trivial-r3
2992 ** DONE ruby new variable creation (multi-line ruby blocks)
2993 Actually it looks like we were dropping all but the last line.
2995 #+srcname: multi-line-ruby-test
2996 #+begin_src ruby :var table=bug-numerical-table :results replace
2998 table.each{|n| total += n}
3005 ** DONE R code execution seems to choke on certain inputs
3006 Currently the R code seems to work on vertical (but not landscape)
3009 #+srcname: little-fake
3010 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
3015 #+begin_src R :var num=little-fake
3022 #+srcname: set-debug-on-error
3023 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3024 (setq debug-on-error t)
3027 #+srcname: bug-numerical-table
3028 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3035 #+srcname: bug-R-number-evaluation
3036 #+begin_src R :var table=bug-numerical-table
3045 #+tblname: bug-vert-table
3050 #+srcname: bug-R-vertical-table
3051 #+begin_src R :var table=bug-vert-table :results silent
3055 ** DONE org bug/request: prevent certain org behaviour within code blocks
3056 E.g. [[]] gets recognised as a link (when there's text inside the
3057 brackets). This is bad for R code at least, and more generally
3058 could be argued to be inappropriate. Is it difficult to get org to
3059 ignore text in code blocks? [DED]
3061 I believe Carsten addressed this recently on the mailing list with
3062 the comment that it was indeed a difficult issue. I believe this
3063 may be one area where we could wait for an upstream (org-mode) fix.
3065 [Dan] Carsten has fixed this now in the core.
3067 ** DONE with :results replace, non-table output doesn't replace table output
3068 And vice versa. E.g. Try this first with table and then with len(table) [DED]
3069 #+begin_src python :var table=sandbox :results replace
3074 | 4 | "schulte" | 6 |
3077 Yes, this is certainly a problem. I fear that if we begin replacing
3078 anything immediately following a source block (regardless of whether
3079 it matches the type of our current results) we may accidentally delete
3080 hand written portions of the user's org-mode buffer.
3082 I think that the best solution here would be to actually start
3083 labeling results with a line that looks something like...
3087 This would have a couple of benefits...
3088 1) we wouldn't have to worry about possibly deleting non-results
3089 (which is currently an issue)
3090 2) we could reliably replace results even if there are different types
3091 3) we could reference the results of a source-code block in variable
3092 definitions, which would be useful if for example we don't wish to
3093 re-run a source-block every time because it is long-running.
3095 Thoughts? If no-one objects, I believe I will implement the labeling
3098 ** DONE extra quotes for nested string
3099 Well R appears to be reading the tables without issue...
3101 these *should* be quoted
3103 #+begin_src sh :results replace
3108 | "README.markdown" |
3111 | "existing_tools" |
3115 | "test-export.html" |
3116 | "test-export.org" |
3118 #+srcname: test-quotes
3119 #+begin_src ruby :var tab=ls
3125 #+srcname: test-quotes
3126 #+begin_src R :var tab=ls
3132 ** DONE simple ruby arrays not working
3134 As an example eval the following. Adding a line to test
3136 #+tblname: simple-ruby-array
3139 #+srcname: ruby-array-test
3140 #+begin_src ruby :var ar = simple-ruby-array :results silent
3144 ** DONE space trailing language name
3145 fix regexp so it works when there's a space trailing the language name
3147 #+srcname: test-trailing-space
3152 ** DONE Args out of range error
3154 The following block resulted in the error below [DED]. It ran without
3155 error directly in the shell.
3158 for platf in ill aff ; do
3159 for pop in CEU YRI ASI ; do
3160 rm -f $platf/hapmap-genos-$pop-all $platf/hapmap-rs-all
3161 cat $platf/hapmap-genos-$pop-* > $platf/hapmap-genos-$pop-all
3162 cat $platf/hapmap-rs-* > $platf/hapmap-rs-all
3167 executing source block with sh...
3168 finished executing source block
3169 string-equal: Args out of range: "", -1, 0
3171 the error =string-equal: Args out of range: "", -1, 0= looks like what
3172 used to be output when the block returned an empty results string.
3173 This should be fixed in the current version, you should now see the
3174 following message =no result returned by source block=.
3176 ** DONE ruby arrays not recognized as such
3178 Something is wrong in [[file:lisp/org-babel-script.el]] related to the
3179 recognition of ruby arrays as such.
3181 #+begin_src ruby :results replace
3187 #+begin_src python :results replace
3192 ** REJECTED elisp reference fails for literal number
3193 That's a bug in Dan's elisp, not in org-babel.
3194 #+srcname: elisp-test(a=4)
3195 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
3205 Evaluate all the cells in this table for a comprehensive test of the
3206 org-babel functionality.
3208 *Note*: if you have customized =org-babel-default-header-args= then some
3209 of these tests may fail.
3211 #+TBLNAME: org-babel-tests
3212 | functionality | block | arg | expected | results | pass |
3213 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3214 | basic evaluation | | | | | pass |
3215 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3216 | emacs lisp | basic-elisp | | 5 | 5 | pass |
3217 | shell | basic-shell | | 6 | 6 | pass |
3218 | ruby | basic-ruby | | org-babel | org-babel | pass |
3219 | python | basic-python | | hello world | hello world | pass |
3220 | R | basic-R | | 13 | 13 | pass |
3221 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3222 | tables | | | | | pass |
3223 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3224 | emacs lisp | table-elisp | | 3 | 3 | pass |
3225 | ruby | table-ruby | | 1-2-3 | 1-2-3 | pass |
3226 | python | table-python | | 5 | 5 | pass |
3227 | R | table-R | | 3.5 | 3.5 | pass |
3228 | R: col names in R | table-R-colnames | | -3 | -3 | pass |
3229 | R: col names in org | table-R-colnames-org | | 169 | 169 | pass |
3230 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3231 | source block references | | | | | pass |
3232 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3233 | all languages | chained-ref-last | | Array | Array | pass |
3234 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3235 | source block functions | | | | | pass |
3236 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3237 | emacs lisp | defun-fibb | | fibbd | fibbd | pass |
3238 | run over | Fibonacci | 0 | 1 | 1 | pass |
3239 | a | Fibonacci | 1 | 1 | 1 | pass |
3240 | variety | Fibonacci | 2 | 2 | 2 | pass |
3241 | of | Fibonacci | 3 | 3 | 3 | pass |
3242 | different | Fibonacci | 4 | 5 | 5 | pass |
3243 | arguments | Fibonacci | 5 | 8 | 8 | pass |
3244 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3245 | bugs and tasks | | | | | pass |
3246 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3247 | simple ruby arrays | ruby-array-test | | 3 | 3 | pass |
3248 | R number evaluation | bug-R-number-evaluation | | 2 | 2 | pass |
3249 | multi-line ruby blocks | multi-line-ruby-test | | 2 | 2 | pass |
3250 | forcing vector results | test-forced-vector-results | | Array | Array | pass |
3251 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3252 | sessions | | | | | pass |
3253 |-------------------------+----------------------------+-----+-------------+-------------+------|
3254 | set ruby session | set-ruby-session-var | | :set | :set | pass |
3255 | get from ruby session | get-ruby-session-var | | 3 | 3 | pass |
3256 | set python session | set-python-session-var | | set | set | pass |
3257 | get from python session | get-python-session-var | | 4 | 4 | pass |
3258 | set R session | set-R-session-var | | set | set | pass |
3259 | get from R session | get-R-session-var | | 5 | 5 | pass |
3260 #+TBLFM: $5='(if (= (length $3) 1) (progn (message (format "running %S" '(sbe $2 (n $3)))) (sbe $2 (n $3))) (sbe $2))::$6='(if (string= $4 $5) "pass" (format "expected %S but was %S" $4 $5))
3261 #+TBLFM: $5=""::$6=""
3264 The second TBLFM line (followed by replacing '[]' with '') can be used
3265 to blank out the table results, in the absence of a better method.
3269 #+srcname: basic-elisp
3270 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3275 #+srcname: basic-shell
3276 #+begin_src sh :results silent
3281 #+srcname: date-simple
3282 #+begin_src sh :results silent
3286 #+srcname: basic-ruby
3287 #+begin_src ruby :results silent
3292 #+srcname: basic-python
3293 #+begin_src python :results silent
3299 #+begin_src R :results silent
3307 #+tblname: test-table
3311 #+tblname: test-table-colnames
3312 | var1 | var2 | var3 |
3313 |------+------+------|
3317 #+srcname: table-elisp
3318 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent :var table=test-table
3319 (length (car table))
3323 #+srcname: table-ruby
3324 #+begin_src ruby :results silent :var table=test-table
3325 table.first.join("-")
3329 #+srcname: table-python
3330 #+begin_src python :var table=test-table
3334 #+srcname: table-R(table=test-table)
3339 #+srcname: table-R-colnames(table=test-table-colnames)
3340 #+begin_src R :results silent
3341 sum(table$var2 - table$var3)
3344 #+srcname: R-square(x=default-name-doesnt-exist)
3345 #+begin_src R :colnames t
3349 This should return 169. The fact that R is able to use the column name
3350 to index the data frame (x$var3) proves that a table with column names
3351 (a header row) has been recognised as input for the R-square function
3352 block, and that the R-square block has output an elisp table with
3353 column names, and that the colnames have again been recognised when
3354 creating the R variables in this block.
3355 #+srcname: table-R-colnames-org(x = R-square(x=test-table-colnames))
3365 Lets pass a references through all of our languages...
3367 Lets start by reversing the table from the previous examples
3369 #+srcname: chained-ref-first
3370 #+begin_src python :var table = test-table
3375 #+resname: chained-ref-first
3379 Take the first part of the list
3381 #+srcname: chained-ref-second
3382 #+begin_src R :var table = chained-ref-first
3386 #+resname: chained-ref-second
3390 Turn the numbers into string
3392 #+srcname: chained-ref-third
3393 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table = chained-ref-second
3394 (mapcar (lambda (el) (format "%S" el)) table)
3397 #+resname: chained-ref-third
3400 and Check that it is still a list
3402 #+srcname: chained-ref-last
3403 #+begin_src ruby :var table=chained-ref-third
3408 ** source blocks as functions
3410 #+srcname: defun-fibb
3411 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3412 (defun fibbd (n) (if (< n 2) 1 (+ (fibbd (- n 1)) (fibbd (- n 2)))))
3416 #+srcname: fibonacci
3417 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent :var n=7
3427 ** sbe tests (these don't seem to be working...)
3428 Testing the insertion of results into org-mode tables.
3430 #+srcname: multi-line-output
3431 #+begin_src ruby :results replace
3432 "the first line ends here
3435 and this is the second one
3441 : the first line ends here\n\n\n and this is the second one\n\neven a third
3443 #+srcname: multi-line-error
3444 #+begin_src ruby :results replace
3445 raise "oh nooooooooooo"
3451 | the first line ends here... | -:5: warning: parenthesize argument(s) for future version... |
3452 #+TBLFM: $1='(sbe "multi-line-output")::$2='(sbe "multi-line-error")
3454 ** forcing results types tests
3456 #+srcname: test-trivial-vector
3457 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results vector silent
3461 #+srcname: test-forced-vector-results
3462 #+begin_src ruby :var triv=test-trivial-vector :results silent
3468 #+srcname: set-ruby-session-var
3469 #+begin_src ruby :session :results silent
3474 #+srcname: get-ruby-session-var
3475 #+begin_src ruby :session :results silent
3479 #+srcname: set-python-session-var
3480 #+begin_src python :session
3485 #+srcname: get-python-session-var
3486 #+begin_src python :session
3490 #+srcname: set-R-session-var
3491 #+begin_src R :session
3496 #+srcname: get-R-session-var
3497 #+begin_src R :session
3506 To run these examples evaluate [[file:lisp/org-babel-init.el][org-babel-init.el]]
3508 ** org-babel.el beginning functionality
3510 #+begin_src sh :results replace
3515 : Sun Jul 5 18:54:39 EDT 2009
3522 : Sun Jul 05 18:54:35 -0400 2009
3534 #+begin_src R :results replace
3544 hist(rgamma(20,3,3))
3549 ** org-babel plays with tables
3550 Alright, this should demonstrate both the ability of org-babel to read
3551 tables into a lisp source code block, and to then convert the results
3552 of the source code block into an org table. It's using the classic
3553 "lisp is elegant" demonstration transpose function. To try this
3556 1. evaluate [[file:lisp/org-babel-init.el]] to load org-babel and friends
3557 2. evaluate the transpose definition =\C-c\\C-c= on the beginning of
3559 3. evaluate the next source code block, this should read in the table
3560 because of the =:var table=previous=, then transpose the table, and
3561 finally it should insert the transposed table into the buffer
3562 immediately following the block
3566 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3567 (defun transpose (table)
3568 (apply #'mapcar* #'list table))
3576 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=sandbox :results replace
3581 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
3586 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3590 #+begin_src ruby :var table=sandbox :results replace
3591 table.first.join(" - ")
3597 #+begin_src python :var table=sandbox
3602 #+begin_src ruby :var table=sandbox :results replace
3607 : [[1, 2, 3], [4, "schulte", 6]]
3611 | 4 | "schulte" | 6 |
3613 #+begin_src python :var table=sandbox :results replace
3619 | "__add__" | "__class__" | "__contains__" | "__delattr__" | "__delitem__" | "__delslice__" | "__doc__" | "__eq__" | "__format__" | "__ge__" | "__getattribute__" | "__getitem__" | "__getslice__" | "__gt__" | "__hash__" | "__iadd__" | "__imul__" | "__init__" | "__iter__" | "__le__" | "__len__" | "__lt__" | "__mul__" | "__ne__" | "__new__" | "__reduce__" | "__reduce_ex__" | "__repr__" | "__reversed__" | "__rmul__" | "__setattr__" | "__setitem__" | "__setslice__" | "__sizeof__" | "__str__" | "__subclasshook__" | "append" | "count" | "extend" | "index" | "insert" | "pop" | "remove" | "reverse" | "sort" |
3621 *** (sandbox table) R
3623 #+TBLNAME: sandbox_r
3627 #+begin_src R :results replace
3628 x <- c(rnorm(10, mean=-3, sd=1), rnorm(10, mean=3, sd=1))
3632 | -3.35473133869346 |
3634 | -3.32819924928633 |
3635 | -2.97310212756194 |
3636 | -2.09640758369576 |
3637 | -5.06054014378736 |
3638 | -2.20713700711221 |
3639 | -1.37618039712037 |
3640 | -1.95839385821742 |
3641 | -3.90407396475502 |
3642 | 2.51168071590226 |
3643 | 3.96753011570494 |
3644 | 3.31793212627865 |
3645 | 1.99829753972341 |
3646 | 4.00403686419829 |
3647 | 4.63723764452927 |
3648 | 3.94636744261313 |
3649 | 3.58355906547775 |
3650 | 3.01563442274226 |
3653 #+begin_src R var tabel=sandbox_r :results replace
3658 | 4 | "schulte" | 6 |
3661 Now shell commands are converted to tables using =org-table-import=
3662 and if these tables are non-trivial (i.e. have multiple elements) then
3663 they are imported as org-mode tables...
3665 #+begin_src sh :results replace
3669 | "total" | 208 | "" | "" | "" | "" | "" | "" |
3670 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 57 | 2009 | 15 | "block" |
3671 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 35147 | 2009 | 15 | "COPYING" |
3672 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 722 | 2009 | 18 | "examples.org" |
3673 | "drwxr-xr-x" | 4 | "dan" | "dan" | 4096 | 2009 | 19 | "existing_tools" |
3674 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 2207 | 2009 | 14 | "intro.org" |
3675 | "drwxr-xr-x" | 2 | "dan" | "dan" | 4096 | 2009 | 18 | "org-babel" |
3676 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 277 | 2009 | 20 | "README.markdown" |
3677 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 11837 | 2009 | 18 | "rorg.html" |
3678 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 61829 | 2009 | 19 | "#rorg.org#" |
3679 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 60190 | 2009 | 19 | "rorg.org" |
3680 | "-rw-r--r--" | 1 | "dan" | "dan" | 972 | 2009 | 11 | "test-export.org" |
3683 ** silent evaluation
3691 #+begin_src ruby :results silent
3695 #+begin_src ruby :results replace
3702 ** (sandbox) referencing other source blocks
3703 Doing this in emacs-lisp first because it's trivial to convert
3704 emacs-lisp results to and from emacs-lisp.
3706 *** emacs lisp source reference
3707 This first example performs a calculation in the first source block
3708 named =top=, the results of this calculation are then saved into the
3709 variable =first= by the header argument =:var first=top=, and it is
3710 used in the calculations of the second source block.
3713 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
3717 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var first=top :results replace
3723 This example is the same as the previous only the variable being
3724 passed through is a table rather than a number.
3726 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3727 (defun transpose (table)
3728 (apply #'mapcar* #'list table))
3731 #+TBLNAME: top_table
3735 #+SRCNAME: second_src_example
3736 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=top_table
3740 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=second_src_example :results replace
3745 | 4 | "schulte" | 6 |
3747 Now working for ruby
3754 #+begin_src ruby :var other=start :results replace
3760 #+SRCNAME: start_two
3765 #+begin_src python :var another=start_two :results replace
3770 Since all variables are converted into Emacs Lisp it is no problem to
3771 reference variables specified in another language.
3773 #+SRCNAME: ruby-block
3778 #+SRCNAME: lisp_block
3779 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var ruby-variable=ruby-block
3783 #+begin_src python :var lisp_var=lisp_block
3792 #+begin_src R :results replace
3799 #+begin_src R :var other=first_r :results replace
3806 ** (sandbox) selective export
3808 For exportation tests and examples see (including exportation of
3809 inline source code blocks) [[file:test-export.org]]
3812 ** (sandbox) source blocks as functions
3815 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3820 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var n=default :results replace
3826 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var result=triple(n=3, m=98) :results replace
3832 The following just demonstrates the ability to assign variables to
3833 literal values, which was not implemented until recently.
3835 #+begin_src ruby :var num="eric" :results replace
3842 ** (sandbox) inline source blocks
3844 This is an inline source code block src_ruby{1 + 6}. And another
3845 source block with text output src_emacs-lisp{"eric"}.
3847 This is an inline source code block with header
3848 arguments. src_ruby[:var n=fibbd( n = 0 )]{n}
3851 ** (sandbox) integration w/org tables
3853 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3854 (defun fibbd (n) (if (< n 2) 1 (+ (fibbd (- n 1)) (fibbd (- n 2)))))
3858 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var n=4 :results silent
3862 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3863 (mapcar #'fibbd '(0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8))
3866 Something is not working here. The function `sbe ' works fine when
3867 called from outside of the table (see the source block below), but
3868 produces an error when called from inside the table. I think there
3869 must be some narrowing going on during intra-table emacs-lisp
3872 | original | fibbd |
3873 |----------+-------|
3884 #+TBLFM: $2='(sbe "fibbd" (n $1))
3888 #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
3889 (sbe 'fibbd (n "8"))
3894 LocalWords: DBlocks dblocks org-babel el eric fontification