1 =================================
2 How To Release LLVM To The Public
3 =================================
8 This document contains information about successfully releasing LLVM ---
9 including sub-projects: e.g., ``clang`` and ``compiler-rt`` --- to the public.
10 It is the Release Manager's responsibility to ensure that a high quality build
13 If you're looking for the document on how to test the release candidates and
14 create the binary packages, please refer to the :doc:`ReleaseProcess` instead.
21 LLVM is released on a time based schedule --- with major releases roughly
22 every 6 months. In between major releases there may be dot releases.
23 The release manager will determine if and when to make a dot release based
24 on feedback from the community. Typically, dot releases should be made if
25 there are large number of bug-fixes in the stable branch or a critical bug
26 has been discovered that affects a large number of users.
28 Unless otherwise stated, dot releases will follow the same procedure as
31 Annual Release Schedule
32 -----------------------
34 Here is the annual release schedule for LLVM. This is meant to be a
35 guide, and release managers are not required to follow this exactly.
36 Releases should be tagged on Tuesdays.
38 =============================== =========================
40 =============================== =========================
41 *release branch: even releases* *4th Tue in January*
42 *release branch: odd releases* *4th Tue in July*
43 X.1.0-rc1 3 days after branch.
44 X.1.0-rc2 2 weeks after branch.
45 X.1.0-rc3 4 weeks after branch
46 **X.1.0-final** **6 weeks after branch**
47 **X.1.1** **8 weeks after branch**
48 **X.1.2** **10 weeks after branch**
49 **X.1.3** **12 weeks after branch**
50 **X.1.4** **14 weeks after branch**
51 **X.1.5** **16 weeks after branch**
52 **X.1.6 (if necessary)** **18 weeks after branch**
53 =============================== =========================
55 Release Process Summary
56 -----------------------
58 * Announce release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website. Do
59 this at least 3 weeks before the -rc1 release.
61 * Create release branch and begin release process.
63 * Send out release candidate sources for first round of testing. Testing lasts
64 6 weeks. During the first round of testing, any regressions found should be
65 fixed. Patches are merged from mainline into the release branch. Also, all
66 features need to be completed during this time. Any features not completed at
67 the end of the first round of testing will be removed or disabled for the
70 * Generate and send out the second release candidate sources. Only *critical*
71 bugs found during this testing phase will be fixed. Any bugs introduced by
72 merged patches will be fixed. If so a third round of testing is needed.
74 * The release notes are updated.
78 * Announce bug fix release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website.
80 * Do bug-fix releases every two weeks until X.1.5 or X.1.6 (if necessary).
88 Release Administrative Tasks
89 ----------------------------
91 This section describes a few administrative tasks that need to be done for the
92 release process to begin. Specifically, it involves:
94 * Updating version numbers,
96 * Creating the release branch, and
98 * Tagging release candidates for the release team to begin testing.
100 Create Release Branch
101 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
103 Branch the Git trunk using the following procedure:
105 #. Remind developers that the release branching is imminent and to refrain from
106 committing patches that might break the build. E.g., new features, large
107 patches for works in progress, an overhaul of the type system, an exciting
108 new TableGen feature, etc.
110 #. Verify that the current git trunk is in decent shape by
111 examining nightly tester and buildbot results.
113 #. Bump the version in trunk to N.0.0git and tag the commit with llvmorg-N-init.
114 If ``X`` is the version to be released, then ``N`` is ``X + 1``.
118 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-N-init
120 #. Clear the release notes in trunk.
122 #. Create the release branch from the last known good revision from before the
123 version bump. The branch's name is release/X.x where ``X`` is the major version
124 number and ``x`` is just the letter ``x``.
126 #. On the newly-created release branch, immediately bump the version
127 to X.1.0git (where ``X`` is the major version of the branch.)
129 #. All tags and branches need to be created in both the llvm/llvm-project and
130 llvm/llvm-test-suite repos.
135 After creating the LLVM release branch, update the release branches'
136 version with the script in ``llvm/utils/release/bump-version.py``.
138 Tagging the LLVM Release Candidates
139 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
141 Tag release candidates:
145 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-X.Y.Z-rcN
147 The Release Manager must supply pre-packaged source tarballs for users. This can
148 be done with the export.sh script in utils/release.
150 Tarballs, release binaries, or any other release artifacts must be uploaded to
151 GitHub. This can be done using the github-upload-release.py script in utils/release.
155 $ github-upload-release.py upload --token <github-token> --release X.Y.Z-rcN --files <release_files>
159 $ ./export.sh -release X.Y.Z -rc $RC
161 This will generate source tarballs for each LLVM project being validated, which
162 can be uploaded to github for further testing.
164 Build The Binary Distribution
165 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
167 Creating the binary distribution requires following the instructions
168 :doc:`here <ReleaseProcess>`.
170 That process will perform both Release+Asserts and Release builds but only
171 pack the Release build for upload. You should use the Release+Asserts sysroot,
172 normally under ``final/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.8.1-RCn.install/``,
173 for test-suite and run-time benchmarks, to make sure nothing serious has
174 passed through the net. For compile-time benchmarks, use the Release version.
176 The minimum required version of the tools you'll need are :doc:`here <GettingStarted>`
178 Release Qualification Criteria
179 ------------------------------
181 There are no official release qualification criteria. It is up to the
182 the release manager to determine when a release is ready. The release manager
183 should pay attention to the results of community testing, the number of outstanding
184 bugs, and then number of regressions when determining whether or not to make a
187 The community values time based releases, so releases should not be delayed for
188 too long unless there are critical issues remaining. In most cases, the only
189 kind of bugs that are critical enough to block a release would be a major regression
190 from a previous release.
195 A few developers in the community have dedicated time to validate the release
196 candidates and volunteered to be the official release testers for each
199 These will be the ones testing, generating and uploading the official binaries
200 to the server, and will be the minimum tests *necessary* for the release to
203 This will obviously not cover all OSs and distributions, so additional community
204 validation is important. However, if community input is not reached before the
205 release is out, all bugs reported will have to go on the next stable release.
207 The official release managers are:
209 * Even releases: Tom Stellard (tstellar@redhat.com)
210 * Odd releases: Tobias Hieta (tobias@hieta.se)
212 The official release testers are volunteered from the community and have
213 consistently validated and released binaries for their targets/OSs. To contact
214 them, you should post on the `Discourse forums (Project
215 Infrastructure - Release Testers). <https://discourse.llvm.org/c/infrastructure/release-testers/66>`_
217 The official testers list is in the file ``RELEASE_TESTERS.TXT``, in the ``LLVM``
223 Once all testing has been completed and appropriate bugs filed, the release
224 candidate tarballs are put on the website and the LLVM community is notified.
226 We ask that all LLVM developers test the release in any the following ways:
228 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
229 binary. Build LLVM. Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
230 TEST=nightly report``).
232 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the ``clang`` sources. Compile
233 everything. Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
234 TEST=nightly report``).
236 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
237 binary. Build whole programs with it (ex. Chromium, Firefox, Apache) for
240 #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
241 binary. Build *your* programs with it and check for conformance and
242 performance regressions.
244 #. Run the :doc:`release process <ReleaseProcess>`, if your platform is
245 *different* than that which is officially supported, and report back errors
246 only if they were not reported by the official release tester for that
249 We also ask that the OS distribution release managers test their packages with
250 the first candidate of every release, and report any *new* errors in GitHub.
251 If the bug can be reproduced with an unpatched upstream version of the release
252 candidate (as opposed to the distribution's own build), the priority should be
255 During the first round of testing, all regressions must be fixed before the
256 second release candidate is tagged.
258 In the subsequent stages, the testing is only to ensure that bug
259 fixes previously merged in have not created new major problems. *This is not
260 the time to solve additional and unrelated bugs!* If no patches are merged in,
261 the release is determined to be ready and the release manager may move onto the
264 Reporting Regressions
265 ---------------------
267 Every regression that is found during the tests (as per the criteria above),
268 should be filled in a bug in GitHub and added to the release milestone.
270 If a bug can't be reproduced, or stops being a blocker, it should be removed
271 from the Milestone. Debugging can continue, but on trunk.
276 Instructions for requesting a backport to a stable branch can be found :doc:`here <GitHub>`.
278 Triaging Bug Reports for Releases
279 ---------------------------------
281 This section describes how to triage bug reports:
283 #. Search for bugs with a Release Milestone that have not been added to the
284 "Release Status" github project:
286 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22LLVM+14.0.5+Release%22+no%3Aproject+
288 Replace 14.0.5 in this query with the version from the Release Milestone being
291 Add these bugs to the "Release Status" project.
293 #. Navigate to the `Release Status project <https://github.com/orgs/llvm/projects/3>`_
294 to see the list of bugs that are being considered for the release.
296 #. Review each bug and first check if it has been fixed in main. If it has, update
297 its status to "Needs Pull Request", and create a pull request for the fix
298 using the /cherry-pick or /branch comments if this has not been done already.
300 #. If a bug has been fixed and has a pull request created for backporting it,
301 then update its status to "Needs Review" and notify a knowledgeable reviewer.
302 Usually you will want to notify the person who approved the patch in Phabricator,
303 but you may use your best judgement on who a good reviewer would be. Once
304 you have identified the reviewer(s), assign the issue to them and mention
305 them (i.e @username) in a comment and ask them if the patch is safe to backport.
306 You should also review the bug yourself to ensure that it meets the requirements
307 for committing to the release branch.
309 #. Once a bug has been reviewed, add the release:reviewed label and update the
310 issue's status to "Needs Merge". Check the pull request associated with the
311 issue. If all the tests pass, then the pull request can be merged. If not,
312 then add a comment on the issue asking someone to take a look at the failures.
314 #. Once the pull request has been merged push it to the official release branch
315 with the script ``llvm/utils/git/sync-release-repo.sh``.
317 Then add a comment to the issue stating that the fix has been merged along with
318 the git hashes from the release branch. Add the release:merged label to the issue
325 Below are the rules regarding patching the release branch:
327 #. Patches applied to the release branch may only be applied by the release
328 manager, the official release testers or the code owners with approval from
331 #. Release managers are encouraged, but not required, to get approval from code
332 owners before approving patches. If there is no code owner or the code owner
333 is unreachable then release managers can ask approval from patch reviewers or
334 other developers active in that area.
336 #. *Before RC1* Patches should be limited to bug fixes, important optimization
337 improvements, or completion of features that were started before the branch
338 was created. As with all phases, release managers and code owners can reject
339 patches that are deemed too invasive.
341 #. *Before RC2* Patches should be limited to bug fixes or backend specific
342 improvements that are determined to be very safe.
344 #. *Before RC3/Final Major Release* Patches should be limited to critical
347 #. *Bug fix releases* Patches should be limited to bug fixes or very safe
348 and critical performance improvements. Patches must maintain both API and
349 ABI compatibility with the previous major release.
355 The final stages of the release process involves tagging the "final" release
356 branch, updating documentation that refers to the release, and updating the
362 Review the documentation in the release branch and ensure that it is up
363 to date. The "Release Notes" must be updated to reflect new features, bug
364 fixes, new known issues, and changes in the list of supported platforms.
365 The "Getting Started Guide" should be updated to reflect the new release
366 version number tag available from Subversion and changes in basic system
371 Tag the LLVM Final Release
372 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
374 Tag the final release sources:
378 $ git tag -sa llvmorg-X.Y.Z
379 $ git push https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-X.Y.Z
381 Update the LLVM Website
382 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
384 The website must be updated before the release announcement is sent out. Here
387 #. Check out the ``www-releases`` module from GitHub.
389 #. Create a new sub-directory ``X.Y.Z`` in the releases directory.
391 #. Copy and commit the ``llvm/docs`` and ``LICENSE.txt`` files into this new
394 #. Update the ``releases/download.html`` file with links to the release
397 #. Update the ``releases/index.html`` with the new release and link to release
400 #. After you push the changes to the www-releases repo, someone with admin
401 access must login to prereleases-origin.llvm.org and manually pull the new
402 changes into /data/www-releases/. This is where the website is served from.
404 #. Finally checkout the llvm-www repo and update the main page
405 (``index.html`` and sidebar) to point to the new release and release
411 Create a new post in the `Announce Category <https://discourse.llvm.org/c/announce>`_
412 once all the release tasks are complete. For X.1.0 releases, make sure to include a
413 link to the release notes in the post. For X.1.1+ releases, generate a changelog
414 using this command and add it to the post.
418 $ git log --format="- %aN: [%s (%h)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/%H)" llvmorg-X.1.N-1..llvmorg-X.1.N
420 Once the release has been announced add a link to the announcement on the llvm
421 homepage (from the llvm-www repo) in the "Release Emails" section.